Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter Five: Exploratory Research Design: Qualitative Research
Chapter Five: Exploratory Research Design: Qualitative Research
5-1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter Outline
1) Overview
2) Primary Data: Qualitative Versus Quantitative Research
3) Rationale for Using Qualitative Research Procedures
4) A Classification of Qualitative Research Procedures
5-2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter Outline
7) Projective Techniques
i. Association Techniques
ii. Completion Techniques
a. Sentence Completion
b. Story Completion
iii. Construction Techniques
a. Picture Response
b. Cartoon Tests
iv. Expressive Techniques
a. Role Playing
b. Third-Person Technique
v. Advantages and Disadvantages
of Projective Techniques
vi. Applications of Projective
Techniques
5-4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter Outline
5-5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
A Classification of Marketing Research Data
Fig. 5.1
Marketing Research Data
Descriptive Causal
Projective
Depth Interviews Techniques
Focus Groups
5-8
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Characteristics of Focus Groups
Table 5.2
5-10
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
One-way mirror
Source: www.campos.com/focusgs.htm
5-12
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Key Qualifications of Focus Group Moderators
5-14
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Procedure for Planning and Conducting
Focus Groups
Fig. 5.3
5-16
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Variations in Focus Groups
5-17
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Advantages of Focus Groups
1. Synergism
2. Snowballing
3. Stimulation
4. Security
5. Spontaneity
6. Serendipity
7. Specialization
8. Scientific scrutiny
9. Structure
10. Speed
5-18
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Disadvantages of Focus Groups
1. Misuse
2. Misjudge
3. Moderation
4. Messy
5. Misrepresentation
5-19
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Online Versus Traditional Focus Groups
Table 5.3
Group composition Anywhere in the world Drawn from the local area
Physical setting Researcher has little control Under the control of the researcher
Respondent attentiveness Respondents can engage in other tasks Attentiveness can be monitored
5-20
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Online Versus Traditional Focus Groups
Respondent recruiting Easier. Can be recruited online, e-mail, Recruited by traditional means
panel, or by traditional means (telephone, mail, mail panel)
Openness of respondents Respondents are more candid Respondents are candid, except for
due to lack of face-to-face contact sensitive topics
Nonverbal communication Body language cannot be observed. Body language and emotions
Emotions expressed by using symbols observed
Use of physical stimuli Limited to those that can be displayed A variety of stimuli (products,
on the Internet advertising demonstrations, etc.)
can be used
5-21
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Online Versus Traditional Focus Groups
Table 5.3, cont.
Transcripts Available immediately Time consuming and expensive to
obtain
Observers’ communication Observers can communicate with the Observers can manually send notes
with moderator the moderator on a split-screen to the focus group room
Turnaround time Can be set up and completed Takes many days for setup and
in a few days completion
Basic focus group costs Much less expensive More expensive: facility rental,
food, taping, transcript preparation
5-22
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Advantages of Online Focus Groups
5-23
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Disadvantages of Online Focus Groups
5-24
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Depth Interview Techniques: Laddering
5-25
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Depth Interview : Hidden Issue Questioning
5-26
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Depth Interview Techniques: Symbolic Analysis
5-27
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Focus Groups Versus Depth Interviews
Table 5.4
5-30
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Word Association
EXAMPLE
STIMULUS MRS. M MRS. C
washday everyday ironing
fresh and sweet clean
pure air soiled
scrub don't; husband does clean
filth this neighborhood dirt
bubbles bath soap and water
family squabbles children
towels dirty wash
5-32
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Completion Techniques
5-33
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Completion Techniques
5-34
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Construction Techniques
5-35
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
A Cartoon Test
Figure 5.4
Sears
Let’s see if we
can pick up some
house wares at
Sears.
5-36
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Expressive Techniques
5-37
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Advantages of Projective Techniques
5-38
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Disadvantages of Projective Techniques
5-39
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Guidelines for Using Projective Techniques
5-40
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Comparison of Focus Groups, Depth
Interviews, and Projective Techniques
Table 5.5
5-42
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-43
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
International Marketing Research
5-44
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
International Marketing Research
5-45
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Ethical Issues
5-46
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Ethical Issues
5-47
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-48
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior
written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United
States of America.
5-49
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.