Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
Characteristics of Goals And Objectives
Definitions
• Educational or instructional objectives: Identify the intended
outcomes of the educational process, whether in reference to
an aspect of a programme or a total programme of study
• Behavioural or learning objectives: These make use of the
modifier behavioural or learning to denote that they are action
oriented rather than content-oriented and learner-centred rather
than teacher-centred. Behavioral objectives describe what the
learner will be able to do after a learning situation
3
• A goal is the final outcome of what is achieved at the end of a
teaching-learning process. Goals are global and broad; they
serve as long-term targets for the learner and the teacher.
• An objective is a specific, single, unidimensional behaviour.
Objectives are short-term in nature and should be achievable
at the conclusion of one teaching session or within a few days
following teaching sessions.
• An objective describes a performance that learners should be
able to exhibit before becoming competent.
• A behavioural objective is the intended result of instruction,
not the process or means of instruction.
4
• Objectives must be observable, measurable and achieved
before the goal can be reached.
• For example, learning self-management of diabetes is a goal.
Specific objectives must be outlined to address changes in
behaviour such as the need to learn diet therapy, insulin
administration, exercise regimen, stress management, and
glucose monitoring.
• Successful achievement of predetermined objectives is, in
part, the result of appropriate instruction.
• Successful learning-teaching process is dependent on mutual
setting of goals and objectives.
5
The Debate About Using Behavioural Objectives
• Educators have made strong arguments for and against the use
of behavioural objectives for teaching and learning.
• There is a need to realise that behavioural objectives are not a
panacea for all problems encountered in the educational
process.
• Some of the arguments against using behavioural objectives
are that they:
– Are superfluous.
– Are reductionist – a format that reduces behavioural processes
into equivalents that do not reflect the sum total of the parts.
– Take a lot of time to write.
– Force the teacher and student to attend only to specific areas,
which stifles [ ]ي==عيقcreativity and interfere with the freedom to
learn and teach.
6
• However, the rationale for using behavioural objectives
outweighs the arguments for not using them. Those who
support their use believe that they:
– Help to keep educators’ thinking on target and learner-centred.
– Communicate what is planned for teaching and learning.
– Help students understand what is expected of them so that they
can keep track of their progress
– Tailor teaching to the learner’s particular circumstances and
needs.
– Focus attention on what the learner will, eventually, come up
with.
7
Writing Behavioural Objectives
8
• An example of well-written objective is:
– Following a teaching session of behavioural objectives
(condition), students will be able to list (performance) the
arguments for and against using them (criterion)
• An example of poorly-written objective is:
– To demonstrate crutch walking postoperatively to the
patient (teacher-centred)
9
Taxonomy of Objectives According to Learning
Domains
• A taxonomy ]ت===صنيف
[ is a mechanism used to categorise things
according to their relationships to one another.
• In education, a taxonomy refers to a system for defining and
ordering levels of behaviour according to their type and
complexity.
• Of relevance, Bloom et al (1956) developed the Taxonomy of
Educational Objectives as a tool for systematically classifying
behavioural objectives.
• The taxonomy is composed of three broad domains: cognitive,
affective, and psychomotor.
• These domains are interdependent and can be experienced
simultaneously.
10
• The objectives in each domain are ordered in a taxonomic
form of hierarchy, and are classified into low, medium, and
high levels.
• Simple behaviours are listed first (designated by numbers 1.0
or 2.0) and the more complex behaviours listed last
(designated by numbers 5.0 or 6.0).
11
The Cognitive Domain
12
– Analysis: ability of the student to recognise and structure
information by breaking it into its constituent parts and
specifying the relationship between parts. An example is: “After
attending a lecture on medication calculation, the student will be
able to calculate the correct number of milligrams of a drug to be
taken by a patient over a week”.
– Synthesis: ability of the student to put together parts and
elements into a unified whole by creating a unique product that
is written, oral, and pictorial. An example is: “Given a sample
list of foods, the patient will prepare a menu to include foods
from the four food groups (dairy, meat, vegetables & fruits, and
grains) in the recommended amounts for daily intake.
13
Teaching in the Cognitive Domain
14
The Affective Domain
15
Levels of the Affective Behaviour
16
• Valuing: ability of the student to regard or accept the worth of
a theory, idea, or event.
• Organisation: ability of the student to organise, classify, and
prioritise values by integrating a new value into a general set
of values. An example is: “Care, help, support, cause no
harm”.
• Characterisation: ability of the student to integrate values into
a total philosophy or world views, showing firm commitment
and consistency of responses to the values by generalising
certain experiences into a value system. An example is:
“Following a series of training sessions on blood transfusion
practice, nurses will show consistent interest in carrying out
the patient identification procedure precisely to prevent
incorrect transfusions.
17
Teaching in the Affective Domain
• A variety of reliable teaching methods are available to support
learners acquire elements of the affective domain. These
include:
– Questioning.
– Case study.
– Role-playing.
– Simulation gaming.
– Group discussion.
18
The Psychomotor Domain
19
Levels of Psychomotor Behaviour
20
• Mechanism: ability of the student to repeatedly perform steps
of a desired skill with certain degree of confidence, indicating
mastery to the extent that some or all aspects of the process
become habitual (CPR).
• Complex overt response: ability of the student to automatically
perform a complex motor act with independence and a high
degree of skill, without hesitation and with minimum
expenditure of time and energy.
• Adaptation: ability of the student to modify or adapt a motor
process to suit the individual or various situations, indicating
mastery of highly developed movements that can be suited to a
variety of conditions. (CPR for infant versus adult).
21
• Origination: ability of the student to create new motor acts ,
such as novel ways of manipulating objects or materials, as a
result of understanding of a skill and developed ability to
perform skills.
22
Teaching in the Psychomotor Domain
24