AQUINAS • Aquinas evaluates human actions on the basis not only of their conformity to the natural law but also of their specific features. • He mentions at least three (3) ASPECTS through which the mortality of an act can be determined -- in terms of its
1. Species 2.Accidents 3. End
1. SPECIES • Species of an action refers to its kind. • also called “the object of the action”. • Human deeds may be divided into kinds,
Some of which are Good (e.g. improving one's own property)
Some Bad (e.g. theft)
Some Indifferent or Neutral (e.g. walking in the park).
• AQUINAS holds that for an action to be Moral, it must be good or atleast
not bad in species. 2. ACCIDENTS • Refer to the circumstances surrounding the action. • In ethically evaluating an action, the context in which the action takes place is also considered because an act might be flawed through its circumstances. For instance, while Christians are bound to profess one's belief in God, there are certain situations in which it is inappropriate or even offensive and distasteful to do so. 3. END • End stands for the AGENT'S INTENTION. • An act might be unjust through its intention. • To intend to direct oneself against a good is clearly immoral. • AQUINAS gives murder, lying and blasphemy as instantiations of this ill will. • Correspondingly, a bad intention can spoil a good act, like giving of alms out of vainglory. Nonetheless, an intention, no matter how good it may be, cannot redeem a bad act. • For Aquinas, theft is intrinsically bad. Hence, stealing to give to the poor, as in the case of Robin Hood, is an unjust act. In this view, converting to a particular religion, say Christianity, merely for material gains is an unjust act. • AQUINAS ETHICAL THEORY states that for an action to be Moral, the kind it belongs to must not be bad, the circumstances must be appropriate, and the intention must be virtuous. 5.3 HAPPINESS, MORAL VIRTUES, AND THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES AQUINAS • He believes that all actions are directed towards ends and that happiness is the final end. • He also thinks that happiness is not equated with pleasure, material possessions, honor, or any sensual good, but consists in activities in accordance with virtue. • A person needs a MORAL CHARACTER cultivated through the habits of choice to realize REAL HAPPINESS. • Aquinas defines VIRTUE as “a good habit bearing on activity” or a good faculty-habit. • HABITS are firm dispositions or “hard to eradicate” qualities that dispose us to act in a particular manner. Notice that not all habits are virtue, but only those that incline us towards our good or end. ACQUIRED AND INFUSED HABITS • Aquinas differentiates between Acquired and Infused habits. • The autonomous will of a person plays a major role in acquired habits as they involve consistent deliberate effort to do an act time and again and despite obstructions. • The Infused virtues, on the other hand, are independent of this process as they are directly instilled by God in our faculties. These virtues are thus divine gifts which elevate the activities of those who received them.