Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessing Listening Group4
Assessing Listening Group4
GROUP 4
MEMBER OF GROUP
• Assessment is more authentic and provides more wash-back when skills are
integrated. When you propose to assess someone’s ability in once or a combination
of the four skills, you assess that person’s competence, but you observe the person’s
performance. Sometimes the performance doesn’t indicate true competence, because
any distraction that could be in the classroom, or an emotional distraction. So, one
important principle for assessing a learner’s competence is to consider the fallibility
of the results of a single performance, such as that produced in a test. As a teacher,
the obligation is to triangulate the measurements: Consider at least two or more
performances and/or contexts before drawing a conclusion. The importance of
listening is paramount because as Brown put it, “one’s oral production ability
is only as good as one’s listening comprehension ability.”
THE PROCESS OF LISTENING
Microskills:
1. Discriminate among the different sounds of English.
2. Retain chunk of language in short-term memory.
3. Recognize English stress patterns (intonation, rhythm)
4. Recognize reduced forms of words.
5. Distinguish word boundaries and core of words, recognizing their significance, etc.
Macroskills:
6. Recognize the communicative functions of utterances.
7. Infer situations, participants and goals using real-world knowledge.
8. Predict, infer, deduce causes and effects, detect relations, new given information from different events
and situations, etc.
LISTENING TAXONOMY: LIST OF WHAT
MAKES LISTENING DIFFICULT.
• The assessment of listening or speaking, reading and writing of a student involves the assessment of their
competence, but what we observe is the performance. Performance is not always a true indication of a
person’s competence, and observing listening and reading can be as Brown would say, seeing the wind
blowing. The importance of listening is paramount because as Brown put it, “one’s oral production ability is
only as good as one’s listening comprehension ability.” Brown goes on to discuss the stages of listening
which we can then derive the types of listening, which are Intensive, Responsive, Selective and Extensive.
Richard synthesizes the stages and types of listening into 17 different micro and macro-skills which provide
objectives for test makers to assess listening. With objective in hand test makers can now begin the work of
designing assessment tasks for the different types of listening. Phonological and morphological elements of
language are a typical form of intensive listening, followed by paraphrasing recognition which both deals
with the micro-skill objectives. To assess the responsive listening a question-and-answer format provides the
interactivity required. The third type of listening performance is selective listening which can be assessed
through a listening cloze task or an information transfer task. The forth type of listening performance,
extensive listening which the division between selective and extensive tasks are less clear as we move along
the micro macro continuum can be assess through dictations, communicative stimulus-response tasks and
authentic listening tasks.
THANK YOU