Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E- Further F-
analysis and Management
Evaluation review and
Continual
improvement
A- Documenting NC
• Each of the NC origin (IQC, EQA, QI, etc.)
needs to be linked to the future CA
– Attribution of a number to the CA
• Recommended: YYMMDD-XXX-##
• XXX= origin abbreviation
• ##= number
– Paper version: copy of the origin added
– Electronic management: automated process
• Then the CA itself needs to be documented
A- Documenting the CA (*=mandatory)
• Information to collect:
– Type: corrective/remedial *
– Problem date and time *
– Identification of samples/customers/patients involved
– Creation date and time *
– Name of originator
– Title *
– Origin type (IQC, QI, etc.) *
– CA status (generated, being solved, solved, finalized) *
– Laboratory unit/ward
– Problem summary *
– Responsible person allocated to problem solving
– Action plan *
– Resources provided to responsible person
– Conclusion
– Finalization date and time *
– Validation date and time
B- remedial/corrective action itself
• Rapid
• Precise
• Adapted
• Appropriate
• Verified (if possible)
• Documented (always)
Simple rule for situation documentation,
problem analysis and plan of action
preparation
• 5W2H:
– Who
– Where
– What
– When
– Why
– How
– How much
• Can help you streamline the process
C- Analysis and documentation
• What has exactly happened?
• Which (possible) consequences did the incident/occurrence
have?
• Which possible staff behavior can be postulated?
• How was the incident identified?
• How did the incident happen in detail?
• Why could the incident happen: System? Competence?
Behavior? (Cause analysis)
• Who has documented the initial report? Who is involved?
• Documentation of all relevant data (within 48 hours), immediate
analysis if possible
C- Analysis and documentation
• Process mapping and flowcharting
• Cause and effect-diagram ( for example Ishikawa “fish bone”
diagram)
• Consideration of: Man, Machine, Method, Material, Milieu
Including the consideration of possible active and latent
nonconformities
Root cause analysis example: 5 X why
WHY? WHY? WHY?
Specific presentation available in
LQMS training (English/Russian)
WHY? WHY?
D- Action plan and follow-up
• Following the root cause analysis the corrective
actions are determined including the responsibilities
for the implementation of the actions
• Initial evaluation regarding possible preventive actions
• Follow-up for the verification of the effectiveness of
corrective actions and preventive actions, respectively
• Presentation to Q-manager for data analysis and
preparation of the next management review
Corrective and remedial action
• A corrective action needs to be performed within a
certain (short) amount of time
– No real emergency
– But must be achieved rapidly
• A remedial action needs to be performed immediately
– Out of control IQC
– Major complain
– Major accident
– Etc.
E- Further analysis and evaluation
• Classification
• Trend analysis
• Long-term evaluation of effectiveness of the corrective
and preventive actions
• Statistics
• Evaluation/review of internal audits
F- Management review and continuous
improvement
• Data presentation and trend analysis
• Modifications of the management system for continual
improvement of the management program for handling
of nonconformities
• Commitment to plans for reduction of nonconformities
• Communication
Management review
Input Output
• Legal requirements • Conformity with (new) requirements
• Normative requirements • Update of Q-policy and Q- objectives
• Customer requirements • New Q-plans
• Customer feedback • Preventive actions
• Internal audits • Customer surveys
• Quality objectives • Modified planning of resources
• Complaints • New project suggestions
• Nonconformities/Appeals • Update budget
• Risk analyses • …
• Recommendations for
improvement
• Projects
• (economical) budget
• …
Supporting documents
• CA forms
• PA forms
• Analysis and documentation forms
• Action plan forms
• Analysis/management review preparation forms
Contacts:
tuijn@iqls.net
davtian@iqls.net
zakaryan@iqls.net