Insert

Official Seal
of the
Municipality

MUNICIPAL TALAKAYAN
Municipality, Province
Date:
Venue:
 Insert
Official Seal
of the
Municipality

Insert Insert
Insert Insert
Picture Picture
Picture Picture
here here
Here here

SESSION 1
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT STATUS
MUNICIPAL BACKGROUND
STATUS OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE
STATUS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STATUS OF PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT
Insert
Insert
Picture
Picture
here
here

Insert
Picture
here MUNICIPAL
BACKGROUND
Insert
Picture here
 Municipal Background

• Top Three Economic Activities of the

Municipality
• Brand and tag of municipality (e.g. fruit
basket of the North)
 20,345
POPULATION

10,345 10,000
females males

Source: Community Based Monitoring System, 2020

 Population Per Age

18 and above 5003 4672

13 to 17 2467 2345

12 & Below 2875 2983

6000 4000 2000 0 2000 4000 6000

Female Male

Source: Community Based Monitoring System, 2020

 5,467
HOUSEHOLD

1,367 2,451
POOR INDIGENOUS
HOUSEHOLD HOUSEHOLD

Source: Community Based Monitoring System, 2020

 4,567 3,213
Senior
Farmers
Citizen

POPULATION PER
SECTOR

765 542
PWDs Fisherfolks

Source: Community Based Monitoring System, 2020

Population Density

Source: Municipal Planning and Development Office

 Insert
Picture Insert
here Picture
here

STATE OF LOCAL Insert

Picture

GOVERNANCE here
 Municipal Income
(In Million Pesos)
50 47.74 47.56
44.04 45.77
9.17 4.84
12.6 6.72
40 2.34
34.43 2.28
2.37
1.38 1.72
1.51
30

20 38.59
36.11 34.95
31.54 33.42

10

0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
IRA Share Locally-sourced revenues Other Revenues
Source: DOF - Bureau of Local Government Finance
Municipal Expenditure, 2015

Social welfare services

Health Eco- 3%
Ser- nomic
vices ser-
10% vices
Edu- 9%
cation
/
Man-
power
Ser- General public services
vices 78%
1%

Source: DOF - Bureau of Local Government Finance

 Result of Perception Survey on
Local Governance
Trust and Confidence on Officials Rating
3.45
a. Barangay residents believe that our local officials are
Strongly
working for the benefit of our barangay.
Agree

3.00
b. Local officials are not fair in dealing with the people
Agree

2.95
c. Barangay officials regularly meet with the community
Agree

1.00
d. Municipal officials regularly meet with the community Strongly
Disagree
3.10
e. I don't believe that the local officials are working for the
Strongly
benefit of our barangay
Agree
STATE OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
 SOCIAL
SERVICES 8 Health
Facilities
FACILITIES
25 School
Buildings

10 Day Care
Centers

Source: Community Based Monitoring System, 2020

Social Protection Programs
Beneficiaries
55
Supplementary
2,376 235
Feeding

Pantawid
Social
Pamilya
Pension
HH 123
SLP HH
3,458 23
KC-NCDDP
876 CSAP HH
HH
Cash/ 546
Food for Philhealth
Work

Source: Community Based Monitoring System, 2020

 Poverty Incidence
100
90 85.5
Municipality
80
70
60
49.5
Percent

50
40 35.07
Province 27.6
30
29.3
20 26
22
18.5
10
0
2003 2006 2009 2012

Source: Philippine Statistical Authority

 Social Welfare Indicator

Level Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3

Survival 793 380 4
Subsistence 3,453 3,858 4,268
Self Sufficient 0 0 18

Wave 1 date conducted: September 2011

Wave 2 date conducted: May 2012
Wave 3 date conducted: September 2014

Source: Municipal Action Team

Core Local Poverty Indicator

Housing
Education

Water and
Health and Sanitation
Nutrition

Source: CBMS, 2020

INCOME AND LIVELIHOOD

303 of 1,548 (19.57%)

HOUSEHOLDS HAVE INCOME BELOW
FOOD THRESHOLD
INCOME AND LIVELIHOOD

3 of 1,548 (0.19%)
HOUSEHOLDS EXPERIENCED FOOD
SHORTAGE
INCOME AND LIVELIHOOD

92 of 1,399 (6.58%)
MEMBERS OF THE LABOR FORCE
ARE UNEMPLOYED
 PEACE AND ORDER

86 of 6,683 (0.02%)
POPULATION WERE VICTIMIZED BY
CRIMES
 HEALTH AND NUTRITION

3 of 627 (0.48%)
CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS OLD
WHO DIED
HEALTH AND NUTRITION

40 of 786 (5.09%)
CHILDREN UNDER 0-5 YEARS OLD
ARE MALNOURISHED
 HOUSING

1 of 1,548 (0.06%)
HOUSEHOLD LIVING IN
MAKESHIFT HOUSING
 HOUSING

7 of 1,548 (0.45%)
HOUSEHOLDS ARE INFORMAL
SETTLERS
 WATER AND SANITATION

5 of 1,548 (0.32%)
HOUSEHOLDS HAVE NO ACCESS TO
POTABLE WATER
 WATER AND SANITATION

42 of 1,548 (2.71%)
HOUSEHOLDS HAVE NO ACCESS TO
SANITARY TOILET FACILITY
 BASIC EDUCATION

121 of 1,105 (18.25%)

CHILDREN 6-12 YEARS OLD NOT
ATTENDING ELEMENTARY
 BASIC EDUCATION

157 of 619 (33.26%)

CHILDREN 13-16 YEARS OLD NOT
ATTENDING HIGH SCHOOL
 Result of Perception Survey on
Poverty Reduction
Access to Services and Governance Rating
3.45
a. There is an adequate number of health facilities in our
Strongly
barangay.
Agree

b. The number of educational facilities in our barangay is 3.00

not enough. Agree

c. Our barangay has adequate an number of roads

2.95
accessed by public vehicles (e.g. transportation of public
Agree
goods)
1.00
d. Potable water is not available to the community Strongly
Disagree
3.10
e. There is peace and order in the community Strongly
Agree
 Result of Perception Survey on
Poverty Reduction
Access to Services and Governance Rating

f. School-aged children in our household are able to go to 1.55

school Disagree

g. Our household is able to purchase basic necessities in 3.00

the market/nearby store Agree

2.95
h. I don’t feel secure from crimes in the community
Agree

1.00
i . Our household has access to potable water Strongly
Disagree
3.10
j. If I or any of my household is sick, we can easily go to a
Strongly
health center
Agree
STATE OF PEOPLE
EMPOWERMENT
 Barangay Assemblies
6 Conducted

Community Based
15 Organization

Household Involved
20 in Participatory Planning

Civil Society Organizations Involved

10 in Participatory Planning
Source: Community Based Monitoring System, 2020
 Result of Perception Survey on
People Empowerment
Participation and Empowerment of the Poor and
Rating
Marginalized
3.45
a. Women are excluded from the implementation of
Strongly
programs/ projects in the community
Agree

b. (FOR IP MEMBERS ONLY) IPs are engaged in the 3.00

implementation of programs/ projects in the community Agree

2.95
c. The poorest are represented in the barangay assembly
Agree

1.00
d. Members of the community are not given various skills
Strongly
training (e.g. livelihood, financial literacy, etc.)
Disagree
 Result of Perception Survey on
People Empowerment
Participation and Empowerment of the Poor and
Rating
Marginalized
3.45
e. I am able to participate in the implementation of
Strongly
programs/ projects in the community
Agree

f. I am shy when participating in community development 3.00

activities Agree

g. I attend trainings/ activities (e.g. livelihood, financial 2.95

literacy, etc.) provided to the community Agree

1.00
h. (If answer to item G is 3 or 4 only) My skills have
Strongly
improved because of these trainings
Disagree
 Result of Perception Survey on
Local Governance
Disaster-Risk Related Activities and Preparedness Rating
3.45
a. People in the community are aware of the dangers
Strongly
brought by disasters
Agree

b. People in the community are not aware of the different 3.00

measures to reduce dangers brought by disasters Agree

2.95
c. I am aware of the dangers brought by disasters
Agree

1.00
d. I am aware of the different measures to reduce dangers
Strongly
brought by disasters
Disagree
3.10
e. I think my barangay is not ready for any possible
Strongly
disaster
Agree