 18.

Yes, the application did not reach the date of completion, in according to the contractor
work programme has approved by the S.O previously.
 S.O advised contractor to submit all relevant approved document by the related consultants
for S.O assement and recommendation.

 19. No. In reference to the defective work catogary, under clause 48 defect after
completion, the S.O should not to hold an issuance of the CPC.
 20. S.O will issue the official instruction to contractor.The contractor to submit new work
programme and V.O amount as well E.O.T application to S.O fot the approval. The said
additional work will commence upon obtain S.O approval.
21. No, because during the DLP period, as instructed by the S.O, the dirty footprint on wall is
under vandalism catogary. (Refer to Clause 49)
22. No, the loss and expenses should include in the preliminary contract.
23. Yes, because S.O has made final decision and minuted during the meetings.
GROUP 3

 17. No, the drawing has compile in the tender document for contractor reference but,
during site commencement if contractor found any discripency the contractor to issue an
RFI for S.O approval as well the revise construction drawing.