analysis, derived mainly from work begun in the 1960s by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida, that questions the fundamental conceptual distinctions, or “oppositions”. Definition • a critical dismantling of tradition and traditional modes of thought. • The point of the deconstructive analysis is to restructure, or “displace,” the opposition, not simply to reverse it. Textual signs Speech vs Spoken words as language. linguistic signs.
For Derrida, the signs
are “spoken words function as linguistic it is to displace the signs only to the extent opposition so as to that they can be show that neither term repeated in different is primary. contexts, in the absence of the speaker who originally utters them.” Logocentrism • Derrida contends that the opposition between speech and writing is a manifestation of the “logocentrism” of Western culture—i.e., the general assumption that there is a realm of “truth” existing prior to and independent of its representation by linguistic signs.
• Logocentrism encourages us to treat
linguistic signs as distinct from and inessential to the phenomena they represent, rather than as inextricably bound up with them. Contrapuntal In practical terms, ‘contrapuntal reading’ as I Reading have called it means reading a text with an understanding of what is involved when an author shows, for instance, that a colonial sugar plantation is seen as important to the process of maintaining a particular style of life in England . . . the point is that contrapuntal reading must take account of both processes, that of imperialism and that of resistance to it, which can be done by extending our reading of the texts to include what was once forcibly excluded.” Edward said Contrapuntal According to Said, ‘in the Reading counterpoint of western classical music, various themes play off one another, with only a provisional privilege being given to any particular one, yet in the resulting polyphony there is concert and order, an organized interplay that derives from the themes, not from a rigorous melodic or formal principle outside the work. Contrapuntal The goal of a contrapuntal reading is Reading thus to not privilege any particular narrative but reveal the ‘wholeness’ of the text, the intermeshed, overlapping, and mutually embedded histories of metropolitan and colonised societies and of the elite and subaltern. A contrapuntal reading is like a fugue which can contain ‘two, three, four or five voices; they are all part of the same composition, but they are each distinct’. Contrapuntal Through a contrapuntal reading, Said Reading engaged in a ‘reading back’ to uncover the ‘submerged but crucial presence of empire in canonical texts’ and to demonstrate ‘the complementarity and interdependence instead of isolated, venerated, or formalized experience that excludes and forbids the hybridizing intrusions of human history’. This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Next Assignment
(Literature and Culture Handbooks) Gary Day, Bridget Keegan - The Eighteenth-Century Literature Handbook-Continuum International Publishing Group (2009)