Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ensuring Implementation
Defining performance
Performance
Performance at
Ispat will be
defined in terms of
Task Factors ,
measured in
quantitative terms
Key terms
• Task factors are the key performance parameters for a
role. These are defined as “Critical outcomes towards
which effort is directed to support achievement of
desired business results.”
• Measurement Criteria is the expected performance on
each Task Factor in quantifiable terms
The Performance Management System: Key players
01 Appraisee
Every employee whose • It’s about your
performance will be Performance
assessed. All employees in • You are the key driver
levels E-08 and above of the process
Reporting
02 Officer (RO)
Every individual who
• Will help you manage
assesses the performance
your performance &
of one or more people that
provide continuous
report to him/her. He is feedback and coaching
your boss.
Business Planning
[Corporate & Division]
Periodic & Mid March – End March
Ongoing
development
Performance Planning
activities
[Individual]
2nd Week of April
Key terms
• Competencies are skills and abilities described in
behavioral terms that are coachable, observable,
measurable, and critical to successful individual or
organization performance
The Performance Management System: getting
started-Page 1
Form
• You need to enter your Employee Number only, the other information will be
populated automatically
The Performance Management System: Performance
planning-Page 2
The Performance Management System: Quarter
Appraisal-Page 3
The new Performance Management
System: feedback-Page 4
Form Flow diagram
RO forwards his
feedback to
reviewer
Reviewer
validates
Appraisee
accesses
feedback
Annual performance rating
Details
RO & appraisee
jointly identify
appraisee
development
needs: Existing
role & Career
growth
Decide on the
training inputs
necessary
Freeze
timeframe
Reviewer
validates
The new Performance Management System:
Appraiser and Reviewer rating
Flow diagram
Self rating
by
appraisee
RO’s enters
rating post
discussion
with the
Performance Category
appraisee
Exceptional Contributor
Why feedback
Informal and formal opportunities for Reporting Officers to
connect or “touch base” with you to:
•Provide support and direction
•Keep performance on track
Wrong feedback
• Personal insults
• Conflicting information or too much, all at once
• Unclear messages causing the other person to guess
Contd --
The Performance Management System:
feedback-tips for Reporting Officers
Giving negative • Describe the observed behavior and provide specific examples
feedback • Focus on behavior that can be changed, not the person
• Define the impact on you and other members
• Get a reaction from the employee
• Share your expectations for future behavior
• Together explore options for solving the problem
• Describe consequences of improved/not improved performance
• Agree on a time table to review progress
• Offer support to help or remove obstacles
• Express confidence in the employee’s ability to improve
Thank You