Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• If your task is to design a digital filter for a hearing aid (with the
information in the frequency domain), the frequency response is all
important, while the step response doesn't matter
What makes a filter optimal for the time domain or frequency
domain applications.
• Figures (c) and (d) shows the next parameter that is important:
Overshoot in the step response. Overshoot must generally be
eliminated because it changes the amplitude of samples in the signal;
this is a basic distortion of the information contained in the time
domain.
• Finally, it is often desired that the upper half of the step response be
symmetrical with the lower half, as illustrated in (e) and (f).
Frequency Domain Parameters
• Figure 14-3 shows the four basic frequency responses. The purpose of these
filters is to allow some frequencies to pass unaltered, while completely
blocking other frequencies.
• The passband refers to those frequencies that are passed, while the stopband
contains those frequencies that are blocked.
• The transition band is between. A fast roll-off means that the transition band
is very narrow.
• The division between the passband and transition band is called the cutoff
frequency
• Figure 14-4 shows three parameters that measure how well a filter
performs in the frequency domain.
• To separate closely spaced frequencies, the filter must have a fast roll-
off, as illustrated in (a) and (b).
• For the passband frequencies to move through the filter unaltered,
there must be no passband ripple, as shown in (c) and (d).
• Lastly, to adequately block the stopband frequencies, it is necessary
to have good stopband attenuation, displayed in (e) and (f)
• A digital filter is a discrete-time system that operates some
transformation on a digital input signal x(n) generating an output
sequence y(n), as schematically shown by the block diagram. The
characteristics of transformation T[·] identify the filter.
• For a time-invariant system, the output and input should be delayed
by some time unit. Any delay provided in the input must be reflected
in the output for a time invariant system.
• The idea is you are going to get a signal out of a very noisy measurement
and every measurement of a signal contains an amount of noise.
• Def: Signal averaging can be defined as a technique applied in the time
domain, intended to increase the strength of a signal relative to the
noise obscuring it.
Measurement
Noise
Signal
• Conditions for Signal Averaging:
1. Signal ,and Noise are uncorrelated
2. The timing of the signal is known i.e. the knowing where the signal
is because you evoked it.
3. The signal is consistent across trials.
4. The noise is random and has a zero mean.
• Random signal: the signal is not precisely predictable i.e. given the
past history of the signal and amplitude values it has taken on, its not
possible to precisely predict what particular value it will take on at
certain instants in the future e.g. speech, audio, bio-signals
• Zero mean value: Evenly distributed between points
Cont..
• Our measurements are inevitably affected by the noise that can come
from different sources. Sometimes the signal that we measure is
orders of magnitude smaller than the noise component. In these
cases, we need noise reduction techniques to somehow suppress the
noise.
How Does Signal Averaging Work?
Figure 1
• Suppose that our measurement setup uses an ADC to digitize this
signal. We ideally expect to have the samples of the curve in Figure 1;
however, in reality, a noise voltage appears at the ADC input and
corrupts our samples.
• Assume that the noise component has a normal distribution with a
mean value of 0 and a variance of 1. An example of such a noise
component is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 showing
the Noise
component
Figure 2
Figure 3
• X1 = S1 + n1 = -0.707 v
• X2 = S2 + n2 = 1.712 v
• X3 = S3 + n3 = 2.557 v
• In the above equations, Si for i = 1, 2, 3 denotes the desired signal
value which is 0.7769 v in this particular example (from Figure 1).
However, ni which is the noise component, varies from one
experiment to the other. Since the noise samples are not correlated
with each other and have a zero mean, averaging the above three
values should give a better estimate of the desired value. We obtain:
• Xaverage = 1.187 v
• NB: The desired value, which is the same in all of our experiments, is
not suppressed by the averaging process; however, the noise
component that is random and has a zero mean becomes smaller.
Figure 5