Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A B
D
C
Critiquing a literary selection based on
Formalist / Structuralist and Moralist Approach
Objectives: 1. Identify structuralist/formalist and moralist
approaches as ways in critiquing a literary
selection
At the ball, Madame Loisel is a hit: elegant, joyful, and desired for
waltzes. She and M. Loisel return home at nearly 4 o’clock in the morning,
and only when they arrive home does Mme. Loisel realize she lost the necklace.
After a week with no news, M. Loisel proclaims that they must replace it, and
the couple finds a replacement for 36,000 francs. Loisel has 18,000 francs from
his father’s will and borrows the remaining sum, bit-by-bit and making “ru-
inous promises” along the way. After all this, Madame Loisel is able to return
the
newly bought necklace in the original case, apparently rousing no suspicion.
The Necklace
by Guy De Maupassant
To pay off the debt, both Monsieur and Madame Loisel must work tirelessly.
After ten years, they are finally able to pay off all of their debts. One day, while
taking a walk, Madame Loisel runs into madame Forestier. She approaches her
old friend, but Mme. Forestier almost doesn’t recognize her. In sudden emo-
tion, Madame Loisel reveals her entire story of losing the necklace, replacing it,
and working off the cost of the replacement ever since. In response, Madame
Forestier replies that the original necklace contained not actual diamonds but
rather fake diamonds, meaning the original necklace cost no more than
500 francs.
Characters:
Madame Loisel, the wife
Monsieur Loisel, the husband who is the clerk of the
Ministry of Public Instruction
Madame Forestier, the friend who lent Mathilde a
diamond necklace
Setting:
a) Place --- in Paris
b) Social conditions --- Mathilde Loisel and her husband were poor
c) Mood --- Mathilde is not contented of her poor life. When she loses the bor-
rowed necklace, she and her husband become anxious. Then they buy a new
one to replace it, and they live a stressful life in order to pay their debts incur-
red to buy such necklace
Plot:
A) Introduction
Mathilde, the main woman character in this short story, is being described as unhappy
because of her and her husband’s being poor
B) Rising action
The complication starts when she and her husband are invited to a rich people’s ball. She
buys a new gown, and to go with it, she borrows an elegant diamond necklace from her
friend, Madame Forestier.
C) Climax
The peak of this short story is when Mathilde
discovers that she lost the diamond necklace
Plot:
D) Falling Action
To replace the lost diamond necklace, Mathilde buys another one exactly the
same.
E) Denouement (the final outcome of the main dramatic complication in a literary work)
The problem resolves itself, though in a negative manner, when Mathilde and
Madame Forestier meet again after ten years, and the latter tells the former that
the necklace she borrowed was fake.
Conflict:
The author tells the story in third person (using pronouns they,
she, he, it, etc.). We know only what the character knows
and what the author allows him/her to tell us. We can see the
thoughts and feelings of characters if the author chooses to
reveal them to us.
Literary Devices:
“Things are not always as they appear to be” and “Be con-
tented on what you have” are applicable to this story.
We ought to be grateful for what we have rather than con-
stantly wishing for more.
Moralist Approach
Moralist Approach
- Moralist approach is viewed to discuss man and its nature. It presents man as
essentially rational; that is, endowed with intellect and freewill; or that the piece
does not misinterpret the true nature of man. This approach is close to “moral-
ity” of literature, to questions of ethical goodness or badness. It analyzes the
values/lessons and ethics present in the text, examines the effect of the text to
the readers as moral beings, determine whether the text helps the readers im-
prove their lives and their understanding of the world.
Moralist Approach
Ask these questions:
Is the character good or bad?
Is the action taken by the character good or bad?
Is the event in the story good or evil?
What standards of morality are your judgments based on?
What are the behavior/s that the characters display which the author wants us to
think are right?
What behavior is “wrong”? What religious or ethical beliefs does the text deal with
directly? Are there any religions or philosophies mentioned specifically in the text?
What religious or ethical beliefs or philosophies does the author seem to favor?
Moralist Approach
Look for:
Moral (good)
Immoral (bad)
Amoral (neutral)
Having or showing no concern about whether behavior is morally right or wrong
Being neither moral or immoral
Moralist Approach
More Issues:
We think that the good things in life are high social status,
expensive things, and giving fake impressions to other
people about ourselves. These wrong perceptions make us
so vain just like what happened in the story. Like Mathilde,
we also like to be the “star” to everyone’s eyes. We like to
appear too good in everyone’s eyes.
What values / lessons and ethics are present in the story?
Being satisfied and grateful for the things you have rather
than striving for the things that may appear better but often
are not.
“Its better to tell the truth.” Had Mathilde told the truth to
Mdme. Forestier, she would have not suffered for ten years.
What is the effect of the given literary text to you as a reader and as a moral
being? Does it help you improve your life and understand the world?
At first, I was angry at Mathilde for having so much illusions about luxurious things and life. She is neither
rich nor poor but does not appreciate what she has. Though it is evident that she is not contended and al-
ways complain to her husband, her husband still does everything for her. I am angry at her that she can’t
see that at first. Unlike Mathilde, we should give value to little things that people around us do and give to us.
It is not al ways the case with Mathilde that there would be someone to help us and be with us during hard
and mise rable times. Mathilde is still fortunate to have a husband like Monsieur Loisel that would still
choose to be with her knowing that she is the reason for their misery.
The story helped me understand the value of contentment and ap-
preciation. It also made me realize that we are not like Cinderella
and other princesses who would wait for our prince charming to
take us to the castle and live happily ever after. If we want our lives
to be better, and we know that we can still do better than what we
have and who we are now, work for it! It doesn’t matter if you are a
woman, we are capable of doing things, man or woman. Don’t just
dream like Mathilde. Don’t be too pretentious like Mathilde. Do what
you can! Be
who you are!
Now, it’s your turn!
Sonnet 18: “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?”
by William Shakespeare
Student talk
An opening statement or
activity as a warm-up/ mo-
tivation
Thank you