Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WORD COMPOSITION.
SHORTENING
AND MINOR WAYS OF WORD-FORMATION.
Lecture 7
Plan
1. Conversion.
2. Compounds and free word-groups.
3. Classification of compounds.
4. Shortening. Types of shortening.
1. Conversion
Conversion – a highly productive way of replenishing the English word-stock that refers to the numerous cases of
phonetic identity of two words belonging to different parts of speech.
work – to work, love – to love, paper – to paper, brief – to brief, wireless – to wireless
The paradigm plays significant role in the process of word-formation in general and not only in the case of conversion.
the noun cooker (cf. gas-cooker) is formed from the verb to cook not only by the addition of the suffix -er, but also by
the change in its paradigm
Full substantivation is when the adjective becomes the noun and possesses all its
categories.
relative a – relative n, criminal a – criminal n.
Partial substantivation is when the adjective has only some features of the noun.
It may be used with the article the without any endings in the plural: old – the old, young
– the young.
2. Compounds and free word-groups.
The result of this process is compounds, i.e. words consisting of at least two
stems which occur in the language as free forms.
week-end, time-table, blackboard
Synchronically we concentrate our attention on such problems as
1) the principal features of compounds in Modern English which help to
distinguish, them from other structural types of words and from free
phrases;
2) the structure of compounds in Modern English, in particular, their
semantic structure;
3) different principles underlying different classifications of compounds.
Like all other structural types of words compound words are characterized by
nonseparability, i.e. structural and semantic nonseparability (the term of Smirnitsky),
which finds expression in the graphic, phonetic, morphological and semantic integrity.
When viewed from the semantic structure compound words fall into:
a) semantically transparent (fully or partially motivated) and
b) semantically non-transparent (lack motivation altogether, idiomatic).
There are compounds that lack motivation, it is impossible to deduce the meaning of a
compound from the lexical meaning of the bases and one meaning of the pattern.
eye-wash – smth said or done to deceive a person
fiddlesticks – nonsense, rubbish
a night-cap – a drink taken before going to bed at night
3. Classification of compounds
Classification from the point of view of general relationship and degree of semantic independence of components, the
compound words fall into two classes:
a) coordinative (often termed copulative or additive),
b) subordinative (often termed determinative).
In c o o r d i n a t i v e compounds the two components are semantically equally important. Here we distinguish
a) reduplicative compounds which are made up by the repetition of the same base, e.g., bye-bye, fifty-fifty;
b) the compounds made by joining the phonically variated rhythmic twin forms, e.g., zig-zag, chit-chat, sing-song,
helter-skelter, a walkie-talkie;
c) additive compounds which are built on stems of the independently functioning words of the same part of speech,
e.g., a queen-bee, an actor-manager, a secretary-stenographer.
In s u b o r d i n a t i v e compounds the components are neither structurally nor semantically equal in importance
but are based on the domination of the head-member which is the second component. This second component
influence the part-of-speech meaning of the whole compound, e.g., stone-deaf, age-long (adj), a baby-sitter, a wrist-
watch (nouns).
According to the part of speech to which the compound belongs there are:
Compounds proper are formed by joining together bases built on the stems or on
the word-forms of independently functioning words with or without the help of
special linking element.
door-step, age-long, babysitter, looking-glass, handiwork, sportsman
Derivational compounds differ from compounds proper in the nature of bases and
their second component.
long-legged, three-cornered
The two components of the compounds are the suffix "-ed" meaning "having" and the
base built on a free word-group "long legs".
According to the correlation between compounds and free word-groups it is possible to classify compounds into
four major classes:
1. Adjectival – nominal compounds have one following patterns: compound adjectives of n + a pattern (snow-
white, age-long, care-free); compound adjectives of num + n pattern (two-day beard, a seven-day week);
derivational compound adjectives of (a/n + n) + ed pattern (long-legged, bell-shaped, doll-faced).
2. Verbal – nominal compounds have one derivational structure n + nV, i.e. a combination of a noun-base with a
deverbal suffixal noun-base (bottle-opener, stage-manager, peace-fighter, rocket-flying, office-management,
price-reduction).
3. Nominal compounds are nouns of highly productive derivational pattern n + n; both bases are simple stems
(horse-race, pencil-case, windmill).
4. Verba1 - adverbial compounds are derivational nouns built with the help of conversion according to the
pattern (v + adv) + conversion (a breakdown, a castaway, a runaway).
4. Shortening. Types of shortening
Unlike conversion, shortening produces new words in the same part of speech.
The bulk of shortened words are nouns.
Verbs are rarely shortened, e.g., rev (revolve), tab (tabulate)
Clipped adjectives are also very few, e.g., comfy (comfortable), awk (awkward), impos
(impossible), mizzy (miserable).
Blending is a type of compounding by means of merging parts of words into new one word. The process of formation
is also called telescoping , because the words seem to slide into one another like sections of a telescope.
brunch (breakfast + lunch), smog (smoke + fog), smaze (smoke + haze), slimnastics (slim + gymnastics)
It seems practical to distinguish the following groups of blends:
1) coining a new word from the initial elements of one word and the final elements of another, e.g., drunch (drink +
lunch), skort (skirt + short);
2) coining a new word by combining one notional word arid the final element of another word, e.g., manglish (man +
English), radiotrician (radio + electrician);
3) combining the initial elements of one word with a notional word, e.g., mobus (motors + bus), legislady (legislative
lady).
Such coinages are often formed with a playful or humorous intent and have a stylistic status.
They can convey various shades of emotive colouring (irony or mockery), which makes them most active in
different types of slang: dopelomat (dope + diplomat), Yanigan (Yankee + hooligan), nixonomics (Nixon +
economics).
Abbreviation is a type of shortening when words are formed from the initial letters of each part of a
phrasal term.
Abbreviations are pronounced as a series of letters, i.e. the alphabetical reading of the letters is
retained.
B.B.C. (The British Broadcasting Corporation), M.P. (Member of Parliament), P.M. (Prime Minister),
T.V. (Television), Y.C.L. (The Young Communist League)
A specific type of abbreviations having no parallel in Ukrainian is represented by Latin
abbreviations, which are not read as Latin words but substituted by their English equivalents
a.m. (ante meridium) – in the morning; p.m. (post meridiem) – in the afternoon; i.e. (id est) – that is;
cp. (comparare) – compare; e.g., (exempli gratia) – for example
Acronyms (from Greek "acros" end + "onym" name) are abbreviated words formed from the initial
letters of word-combination; the abbreviated written form lends itself to be read as though, it were an
ordinary English word and sounds like an English word.
NATO /neitou/ - The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, UNO /ju:nou/ - United Nations Organization,
SALT /solt/ - Strategic Arms Limitation Talks, radar – radio detecting and ranging; laser – light
amplification stimulated emission radio; maser – microwave amplification stimulated emission radio.