Professional Documents
Culture Documents
200
150
100
50
0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
All other things being equal, sales in Aug-03 would decrease 4.8%
because of one less selling day. In order to compare the two
months Aug-03 sales will have to be adjusted up +4.8%.
80
• A month which was 60
Seasonally Adjusted
1800
Data Description … tells us
Annualized Sales in M bbls
1200
Irregular variations … shows us the
1000
impact of market place actions
800
600
Trend Line … tells us the direction of sales
based on past & present performance
400
Annualized Sales … tells us how
200
big the market is.
0
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
16 16
14 14
12 12
10 10
8 0% 8 +21%
6 6
4 4
Positive Trend: Trend Flat; Positive
2 Flat % Change 2 % Change
0 0
1998 1999 1998 1999
16 25
14
20
12
10 15
8
-21% 10
+15%
6
4
Trend Flat; Negative 5 Trend Negative;
2 % Change Positive % Change
0 0
1998 1999 1998 1999
200
Thousand Barrels
150
100
0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
2,000
1,500
1,000
0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
{
2,000
1,500
0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
{
Annualized Sales in US bbls (in 1000's)
2,000
1,000
J
F
M
120
118
138
120
118
138
{ Actual Sales
A 166 166
M 195 195
J 211 211
J 221 221
500 A 196 196
S 160 160
O
N
2,106
2,110
0.959
1.110
0.932
0.914
÷ 12
÷ 12
171
145
171
145
{ Predicted
D 2,113 1.004 1.239 ÷ 12 217 217
2,059
0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
2,000
1,500
Given our YTD Sep-2003 performance what
would be an appropriate budget for next year
1,000 and how should that volume be spread by
month?
500
%Change vs. Year Ago
Sep-03: +4.1% ; SDA -0.9%
YTD Sep-03: +1.2% ; SDA +1.2%
0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
2,123
Annualized Sales in US bbls (in 1000's)
2,000
57.6 Price = P1
Volume = V1
51.2
Annualized STR's in M
Price = P2
44.8
Volume = V2
38.4
BBLS
32.0
Elasticity Calculation
25.6 P1: 18.99; P2: 20.45 i.e. +7%
V1: 44.5; V2: 38.5 i.e. -14%
19.2 Price Increase
Elasticity = -2.0
12.8
6.4
0.0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
2022年12月11日 -25- O:/Network/Path/Filename.ppt
Conclusions
• Time Series technique is a very useful sales analysis tool…
it is the standard for reporting and analyzing sales at A-B
• It is a powerful decision making tool for assessing sales
performance, making accurate forecasts, and establishing
appropriate budgets and spreads.
3,000
2,500
2,000
Trend +8.2%
1,500
1,000
500
3,000
2,500
2,000
Trend +6.7%
1,500
1,000
500
900
772.5
Annualized Sales Metric Tons in Thousands
800
700
600
500
Trend +3.9%
400 % Change vs. Year Ago
Oct-03: -15.7% ; SDA -15.7%
300 YTD Oct-03: +2.5% ; SDA +2.5%
2003 PYE: 713.5M Met. Tons; +2.0% vs. '02
200
2004 Forecast: 772.5M Met. Tons; +8.3% vs. '03
100
500
300
200
100
600
500
400
200
100
400
322.2
300
200
100
200
150
100
Trend -4.1%
50
350
2003 PYE: 250.7M Met. Tons; -7.5% vs. '02
2004 Forecast: 227.7M Met. Tons; -9.2% vs. '03
300
250 227.7
200
150
100
Trend -9.2%
50
200
150
100
Trend +35.2%
50
% Change: +56.6%
0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
2022年12月11日 -35- O:/Network/Path/Filename.ppt
Northeast Region
Shipments
160
2003 PYE: 136.3M Met. Tons; +15.6% vs. '02
120
100
80
60 Trend +17.3%
40
20
80
70.4
60
40
Trend +12.4%
20
% Change: +41.1%
0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
2022年12月11日 -37- O:/Network/Path/Filename.ppt