Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
Project sequencing
Projects may be sequenced
Project contains an option to invest in another project.
Projects often have real options associated with them;
Pilot projects can be run
Company can choose to expand or abandon the project based
on pilot project outcome
3
Capital rationing
Companies have many profitable projects
But Capital is a limited resource
Capital rationing is when the amount available for capex
less than total outlay for all the projects
Company’s management must determine the priority order
for selecting projects.
The objective is to maximize owners’ wealth, subject to
the constraint on the capital budget.
Capital rationing could also result in the rejection of profitable
projects.
4
Conventional cash flows
Only one change in sign
Today 1 2 3 4 5
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
5
Nonconventional cash flows
More than one change in sign
Today 1 2 3 4 5
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
6
Investment decision criteria
Payback Period
7
Payback Period
Length of time it takes to recover the initial
investment amount
8
Payback Period
Advantages
Easy to calculate
Easy to understand
Disadvantages
Ignores the time value of money
Ignores the cash flows beyond the payback period
9
Discounted Payback Period
The discounted payback period is the length of time
it takes to recover the initial investment after
accounting for time value of money.
10
Average Accounting Rate of Return (AAR)
The average accounting rate of return is the average
Net income divided by average book value of assets
Return on equity for the project.
Advantages
Easy to calculate
Easy to understand
Disadvantages
Not based on cash flows
Ignores the time value of money
No objective decision criteria
11
Net Present Value (NPV)
Difference between the present values of all inflows
and outflows
Alternatively, we calculate the present value of all the
future cash flows as on today and net out the
investment today
T
Ci
NPV C 0 i
i 1 (1 r )
Decision :
Accept Project if NPV >0
Reject Project if NPV <0
12
Net Present Value (NPV)
Calculate the NPV assuming a discount rate of 8%
13
Net Present Value (NPV)
Advantages
Easy to understand (i.e., value added)
Considers the time value of money
Considers all project cash flows
Disadvantages
Result is a monetary amount, not a return
14
Profitability Index (PI)
PI is the ratio of the present value of future
cashflows to the initial outlay.
15
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
IRR is the rate of discounting that makes the NPV as zero
The internal rate of return is the geometric average return
on a project.
T
Ci
C0 i
0
i 1 (1 IRR )
Decision
Accept the project : IRR > Cost of Capital
Reject the project : IRR < Cost of Capital
16
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Calculate the internal rate of return
17
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Advantages
Easy to understand (i.e., return)
Considers the time value of money
Considers all project cash flows
Disadvantages
Solved iteratively
18
NPV versus IRR Conflict
When projects need to be prioritized, different metrics are
used to organize projects in order
When projects are mutually exclusive, the acceptance
decision by NPV and IRR criteria may produce divergent
views
The source of the problem is different reinvestment rate
assumptions
Net present value: Reinvest cash flows at the required rate of return
Internal rate of return: Reinvest cash flows at the internal rate of
return
The problem is evident when there are different patterns of
cash flows or different scales of cash flows
19
NPV versus IRR Conflict
A B
0 -300 -300
1 0 125
2 0 125
3 395 125
20
NPV versus IRR Conflict
A B
0 -300 -300
1 0 125
2 0 125
3 395 125
IRR 9.6% 12.0%
NPV @4% 51.15 46.89
NPV @7% 22.44 28.04
NPV @10% (3.23) 10.86
NPV @13% (26.25) (4.86)
21
Multiple IRR Problem
When cash flows are non-conventional, there may be
more than one rate that can force the present value of the
cash flows to be equal to zero.
This scenario is called the “multiple IRR problem.”
There is no unique IRR if the cash flows are
nonconventional.
22
Example: The multiple IRR problem
Consider the fluctuating capital project with the following
end of year cash flows, in millions:
Year Cash Flow
0 –550
1 490
2 490
3 490
4 –940
23
Example: The Multiple IRR Problem
24
Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)
MIRR is a variation of the IRR formula where explicit
reinvestment and finance rates are assumed
Any positive cashflow is assumed to be reinvested at
reinvestment rate
Any negative cashflow is assumed to be discounted at finance
rate
MIRR reduces the series of cash flows into
A single initial investment amount at the present time
A total accumulated capital amount at the end of the holding
period.
25
MIRR Solution
Lets solve the previous question using the MIRR metric.
Assume reinvestment rate – 15%, Finance rate – 8%
0 1 2 3 4
Cashflows (550) 490 490 490 (940)
Reinvestment rate15% 745 648 564
Finance Rate8% (691)
Final CF (1241) 0 0 0 1957
MIRR 12.1%
26
Which method to use ?
NPV and IRR are preferred over other methods.
Larger companies tend to prefer NPV and IRR over the
payback period method.
The payback period is still used, despite its failings.
NPV is the estimated added value from investing in the
project; this added value should be reflected in the
company’s stock price.
27
Example: Capital rationing
Consider the following projects, all with a required rate of return of 4%:
Initial
Project NPV PI IRR
Outlay
One –$100 $20 1.20 15%
Two –$300 $30 1.10 10%
Three –$400 $40 1.10 8%
Four –$500 $45 1.09 5%
Five –$200 $15 1.08 5%
28
Example: Unequal lives, Mutually exclusive
Consider two projects, Project X and Project Y, both with a
required rate of return of 10%:
End-of-Year
Cash Flows
Year Project X Project Y
0 –$150 –$125
1 75 75
2 80 200
3 180
Which project should be selected, and why?
29
Mutually exclusive projects with unequal lives
Comparing projects with different useful lives
Comparing NPVs not sufficient
Timing of replacing the projects would be different
30
NPV with a Finite number of replacements
Project X 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-150 75 80 180
-150 75 80 180
CF - X -150 75 80 30 75 80 180
NPV-X 209.3
Project Y 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-125 75 200
-125 75 200
-125 75 200
CF - Y -125 75 75 75 75 75 200
NPV-Y 272.20
31
Annual Equivalent Value
Project X Project Y
PV = 119.53 PV = 108.47
N=3 N=2
I = 10% I = 10%
Solve for PMT Solve for PMT
32
Investment Timing
Projects may not be unprofitable always
Not feasible today
May be feasible if postponed
Time period 0 1 2 3 4
when project
taken
1 -100 85 125
2 -110 150 125
3 -121 100 150
33
Investment Timing
1 -100 85 125
80.58
1. -50,000
2. + -20,000
3. + -5,000
4. = Rs -75,000
Incremental Cash Flows
Asset Expansion
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
–75,000 32,200 31,360 30,688 49,445
Summary of Project Net Cash Flows
Asset Expansion
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
–75,000 32,200 31,360 30,688 49,445
Case Study …cont
During the first year of operations, XYZ expects its total revenues
(from yogurt sales and exercise services) to increase by $50,000
above the level that would have prevailed without the exercise
facility addition. These incremental revenues are expected to grow
to $60,000 in year 2, $75,000 in year 3, decline to $60,000 in year
4, and decline again to $45,000 during the fifth and final year of
the project’s life. The company’s incremental operating costs
associated with the exercise facility, including the rental of the
facility, are expected to total $25,000 during the first year and
increase at a rate of 6 percent per year over the 5-year project life.
Case Study