Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation Techniques
Financial Decisions
1. Where to invest? – Investment Decisions
– Long-term investment (Capital Budgeting Decisions)
– Short-term investment (Working capital decisions)
8
Payback Period
• Number of years required to recover a project’s cost “How long
does it take to get our money back?”
• Calculated by adding project’s cash inflows to its cost until the
cumulative cash flow for the project turns positive.
• Acceptance rule:
If Payback period < Cut-off Period: Accept
If Payback period > Cut-off Period: Reject
9
Calculating Payback
Project L’s Payback Calculation
0 1 2 3
CFt -100 10 60 80
Cumulative -100 -90 -30 50
PaybackL = 2 + 30 / 80
= 2.375 years
10
Strengths and Weaknesses of Payback
• Strengths
– Easy to calculate and understand.
– Provides an indication of a project’s risk and liquidity.
• Weaknesses
– Ignores the time value of money.
– Ignores CFs occurring after the payback period.
11
Discounted Payback Period
• Uses discounted cash flows rather than raw cash flows
0 10% 1 2 3
CFt -100 10 60 80
PV of CFt -100 9.09 49.59 60.11
Cumulative -100 -90.91 -41.32 18.79
12
Net Present Value (NPV)
• NPV is the present value of the project’s free cash flows discounted at
the cost of capital.
• Value of project = NPV
N
CFt
NPV
t 0 ( 1 r )
t
14
NPV and Wealth Creation
• NPV = PV of inflows – Cost Net gain in wealth
• NPV Tells us how much the project contributes to the shareholder
wealth
• Higher the NPV More value the project adds Higher the stock
price
15
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
• IRR is the discount rate that forces PV of inflows equal to cost NPV =
0
• IRR is an estimate of project’s rate of return
N
CFt
0
t 0 (1 IRR)
t
16
IRR – Selection Criteria
• Independent project
– If IRR > Discount rate (WACC), Accept the project
– If IRR < Discount rate (WACC), Reject the project
17
IRR and Wealth Creation
• If IRR > WACC the difference will be additional returns for the
stockholders will lead to an increase in the stock price.
• Higher the IRR More returns the project adds Higher the stock
price
18
Comparison of NPV and IRR Formula
N
CFt
NPV r = Discount rate (WACC) (given)
t 0 ( 1 r )
t Calculate NPV
N
CFt
0 NPV = 0 (given)
t 0 (1 IRR)
t Calculate r = IRR
19
NPV and IRR
• Both are logically appealing but NPV and IRR can give conflicting
conclusions when mutually exclusive projects are evaluated.
• A project may have more than one IRR
20
Cash Flow Pattern
• Normal cash flow – A series of out flows followed by a series of inflows
– + + + + + + or – – – – + + + +
21
Find Project P’s NPV and IRR
• Project P has cash flows (in 000s):
CF0 = – $800, CF1 = $5,000, and CF2 = – $5,000
0 1 2
WACC = 10%
22
Multiple IRRs
NPV
IRR2 = 400%
450
0 WACC
100 400
IRR1 = 25%
-800
23
Reasons for Multiple IRRs
• At very low discount rates, the PV of CF2 is large and negative, so NPV
< 0.
• At very high discount rates, the PV of both CF1 and CF2 are low, so CF0
dominates and again NPV < 0.
• In between, the discount rate hits CF2 harder than CF1, so NPV > 0.
• Result: 2 IRRs
• So IRR can be Modified to Modified IRR (MIRR)
24
Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)
• Rearrange the project cash flows so that there is only one IRR
• How?
• By modifying the project cash flows so that there is just one change in
the sign of the cash flows over the life of the project
• Discount all the negative cash flows after the initial cash outflow back to
year 0 and add then to the initial cash flow
• Discount at what rate?
• WACC or IRR?
25
Reinvestment Rate Assumption
• NPV method assumes CFs are reinvested at the WACC
• IRR method assumes CFs are reinvested at IRR
• Assuming CFs are reinvested at the opportunity cost of capital is more
realistic so for MIRR use WACC
26
Calculating MIRR
• MIRR Assumes cash flows are reinvested at the WACC
• Estimate PV of cash outflows at WACC
• Estimate FV of cash inflows (called terminal value) at WACC
• MIRR – Discount rate at which PV of a project’s terminal value (TV) = PV
of costs
𝒏 𝑺𝒖𝒎 𝒐𝒇 𝑭𝑽 𝒐𝒇 𝑪𝒂𝒔𝒉 𝑰𝒏𝒇𝒍𝒐𝒘𝒔
𝑴𝑰𝑹𝑹 = −𝟏
𝑺𝒖𝒎 𝒐𝒇 𝑷𝑽 𝒐𝒇 𝑪𝒂𝒔𝒉 𝑶𝒖𝒕𝒇𝒍𝒐𝒘𝒔
• Selection criterion:
– If MIRR > WACC, Accept the project
– If MIRR < WACC, Reject the project
27
Calculating MIRR
0 1 2 3
10%
-100.0 10.0 60.0 80.0
10%
10% 66.0
12.1
MIRR = 16.5%
-100.0 158.1
PV outflows $158.1 TV inflows
$100 =
(1 + MIRR)3
MIRR = 16.5%
29
Profitability Index (PI)
• Profitability Index (PI) also called Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR)
• Acceptance Rule:
Accept the project if PI > 1
Reject the project if PI < 1
• It is a useful tool for ranking projects as it allows you to quantify the
amount of value created per unit of investment
30
Profitability Index
The initial cash outlay of a project is Rs 100,000 and it can generate cash inflow
of Rs 40,000, Rs 30,000, Rs 50,000 and Rs 20,000 in year 1 through 4. Assume a
10 percent rate of discount. The PV of cash inflows at 10 percent discount rate is:
31
Features of a Sound Method
• NPV is the best method as it is inline with the central goal of financial
management – maximizing shareholder wealth
32
NPV Profiles
• Calculate project’s NPVs at a number of different discount rates/ costs of
capital and Plot them on a graph
NPV Profile
34
Conditions of Conflict between NPV and IRR
Condition 1: Timing difference
• When cash flows in one project come during early years and in case of
the second they come during the later years
35
Conditions of Conflict between NPV and IRR
Condition 2: Project size (or scale) difference
• If the amount invested in one project is larger than the other
36
Conditions of Conflict between NPV and IRR
Condition 3: Project life span difference
• When the life of the projects is different
37
Conflict of NPV and IRR
• If r > crossover rate, no conflict occurs
• If r < crossover rate, a conflict arises
• Crossover rate (breakeven discount rate) – Rate at which NPV of both
projects are same
38
Crossover Rate
The NPV profiles of two projects intersect at 10% discount rate. This is called Crossover
rate or Fisher’s intersection.
Evaluation of NPV, IRR, MIRR
• Independent project: NPV, IRR, MIRR all are equally good
• Mutually exclusive project: When scale of operation differs, NPV is best
as it is in line with maximizing value
• Final conclusion:
– MIRR is superior to the regular IRR as it is an indicator of a project’s
“true” rate of return
– NPV is better than IRR and MIRR when choosing among competing
projects
40
Who is the Winner?
41
Who is the Winner?
42