Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Individual Behavior
Chapter Content
What is perception?
• Perception is a process by which individuals organize and interpret their
sensory impressions in order to give meaning to their environment.
• However, what we perceive can be substantially different from
objective reality.
• For example, all employees in a firm may view it as a great place to
work—favorable working conditions, interesting job assignments, good
pay, excellent benefits, understanding and responsible management—
but, as most of us know, it’s very unusual to find such agreement.
Cont’d…
• Why is perception important in the study of OB? Simply because
people’s behavior is based on their perception of what reality is, not
on reality itself.
• The world as it is perceived is the world that is behaviorally important.
Factors That Influence Perception
• How do we explain the fact that individuals may look at the same thing yet
perceive it differently?
• A number of factors operate to shape and sometimes distort perception.
• These factors can reside in the perceiver; in the object, or target, being
perceived; or in the context of the situation in which the perception is made.
• When you look at a target and attempt to interpret what you see, your
interpretation is heavily influenced by your personal characteristics—your
attitudes, personality, motives, interests, past experiences, and
expectations.
• For instance, if you expect police officers to be authoritative or young
people to be lazy, you may perceive them as such, regardless of their actual
traits.
Cont’d…
• Characteristics of the target also affect what we perceive. Loud
people are more likely to be noticed in a group than quiet ones. So,
too, are extremely attractive or unattractive individuals.
• Because we don’t look at targets in isolation, the relationship of a
target to its background also influences perception, as does our
tendency to group close things and similar things together.
• We often perceive women, men, Whites, African Americans, Asians,
or members of any other group that has clearly distinguishable
characteristics as alike in other, unrelated ways as well.
Cont’d…
• Context matters too. The time at which we see an object or event can
influence our attention, as can location, light, heat, or any number of
situational factors.
• For example, at a nightclub on Saturday night, you may not notice a
young guest “dressed to the nines or “dressed to the highest
degree”).
• Yet that same person so attired (dressed) for your Monday morning
management class would certainly catch your attention (and that of
the rest of the class).
• Neither the perceiver nor the target has changed between Saturday
night and Monday morning, but the situation is different.
Factors that Influence Perception
Factors in the perceiver
Attitudes
• Motives
• Interests
• Experience
• Expectations
Factors in the situation
• Time Perception
• Work setting
• Social setting
Factors in the target
• Novelty
• Motion
• Sounds
• Size
• Background
• Proximity
• Similarity
Person perception: Making judgements about others
• Now we turn to the application of perception concepts most relevant
to OB— person perception, or the perceptions people form about
each other.
Attribution theory and the three determinants of attribution
• Nonliving objects such as desks, machines, and buildings are subject to
the laws of nature, but they have no beliefs, motives, or intentions.
People do.
• That’s why when we observe people, we attempt to explain why they
behave in certain ways.
• Our perception and judgment of a person’s actions, therefore, will be
significantly influenced by the assumptions we make about that
person’s internal state.
Cont’d…
• Attribution theory tries to explain the ways in which we judge people
differently, depending on the meaning we attribute to a given
behavior.
• It suggests that when we observe an individual’s behavior, we attempt
to determine whether it was internally or externally caused.
• That determination, however, depends largely on three factors:
(1) distinctiveness, (2) consensus, and (3) consistency.
• First, let’s clarify the differences between internal and external
causation, and then we’ll elaborate on each of the three determining
factors.
Cont’d…
• Internally caused behaviors are those we believe to be under the
personal control of the individual.
• Externally caused behavior is what we imagine the situation forced
the individual to do.
• For example, if one of your employees is late for work, you might
attribute that to his partying into the small hours and then
oversleeping. This is an internal attribution.
• But if you attribute lateness to an automobile accident that tied up
traffic, you are making an external attribution.
Cont’d…
• Distinctiveness refers to whether an individual displays different behaviors in
different situations.
- Is the employee who arrives late today also one who regularly “blows off”
commitments? What we want to know is whether this behavior is unusual.
- If it is, we are likely to give it an external attribution. If it’s not, we will probably
judge the behavior to be internal.
• If everyone who faces a similar situation responds in the same way, we can say the
behavior shows consensus.
- The behavior of our tardy/late employee meets this criterion if all employees who
took the same route were also late.
- From an attribution perspective, if consensus is high, you would probably give an
external attribution to the employee’s tardiness, whereas if other employees who
took the same route made it to work on time, you would attribute his lateness to
an internal cause.
Cont’d…
• Finally, an observer looks for consistency in a person’s actions.
- Does the person respond the same way over time? Coming in 10
minutes late for work is not perceived in the same way for an
employee who hasn’t been late for several months as it is for an
employee who is late two or three times a week.
- The more consistent the behavior, the more we are inclined to
attribute it to internal causes.
Cont’d…
• One of the most interesting findings from attribution theory research is
that errors or biases distort attributions.
• When we make judgments about the behavior of other people, we tend
to underestimate the influence of external factors and overestimate the
influence of internal or personal factors.
• This fundamental attribution error can explain why a sales manager is
prone to attribute the poor performance of her sales agents to laziness
rather than to the innovative product line introduced by a competitor.
• Individuals and organizations also tend to attribute their own successes
to internal factors such as ability or effort, while blaming failure on
external factors such as bad luck or unproductive co-workers.
Cont’d…
• People also tend to attribute ambiguous information as relatively
flattering and accept positive feedback while rejecting negative
feedback. This is the self-serving bias.
- For example, Researchers asked one group of people “If someone
sues you and you win the case, should he pay your legal costs?” 85
percent responded “yes.”
- Another group was asked “If you sue someone and lose the case,
should you pay his costs?” Only 44 percent answered “yes.”
Cont’d…
• The evidence on cultural differences in perception is mixed, but most
suggest there are differences across cultures in the attributions
people make.
- One study found Korean managers less likely to use the self-serving
bias—they tended to accept responsibility for group failure “because I
was not a capable leader” instead of attributing failure to group
members.
- On the other hand, Asian managers are more likely to blame
institutions or whole organizations, whereas Western observers
believe individual managers should get blame or praise.
Cont’d…
• Differences in attribution tendencies don’t mean the basic concepts
of attribution and blame completely differ across cultures, though.
• Self-serving biases may be less common in East Asian cultures, but
evidence suggests they still operate across cultures.
• Recent studies indicate Chinese managers assess blame for mistakes
using the same distinctiveness, consensus, and consistency cues
Western managers use. They also become angry and punish those
deemed responsible for failure, a reaction shown in many studies of
Western managers.
• This means the basic process of attribution applies across cultures,
but that it takes more evidence for Asian managers to conclude
someone else should be blamed.
Cont’d…
Common Shortcuts in Judging Others
• The shortcuts we use in judging others are frequently valuable: they allow us
to make accurate perceptions rapidly and provide valid data for making
predictions.
• However, they are not foolproof (guaranteed). They can and do get us into
trouble when they result in significant distortions.
• Selective Perception: Any characteristic that makes a person, an object, or an
event stand out will increase the probability we will perceive it. Why? Because
it is impossible for us to assimilate everything we see; we can take in only
certain stimuli.
• This explains why you’re more likely to notice cars like your own, or why a
boss may reprimand some people and not others doing the same thing.
Because we can’t observe everything going on about us, we engage in
selective perception.
Cont’d…
• Halo Effect: When we draw a general impression about an individual
on the basis of a single characteristic, such as intelligence, sociability,
or appearance, a halo effect is operating.
• If you’re a critic of President Obama, try listing 10 things you admire
about him. If you’re an admirer, try listing 10 things you dislike about
him. No matter which group describes you, odds are you won’t find
this an easy exercise!
• That’s the halo effect: our general views contaminate our specific
ones.
Cont’d…
• Contrast Effects:
• Evaluation of a person’s characteristics that is affected by comparisons
with other people recently encountered who rank higher or lower on the
same characteristics.
• An old saying among entertainers is “Never follow an act that has kids or
animals in it.” Why?
- Audiences love children and animals so much that you’ll look bad in
comparison.
- This example demonstrates how a contrast effect can distort perceptions.
We don’t evaluate a person in isolation. Our reaction is influenced by
other persons we have recently encountered.
Cont’d…
• In a series of job interviews, for instance, interviewers can make
distortions in any given candidate’s evaluation as a result of his or her
place in the interview schedule.
• A candidate is likely to receive a more favorable evaluation if
preceded by mediocre applicants and a less favorable evaluation if
preceded by strong applicants.
• Stereotyping: When we judge someone on the basis of our
perception of the group to which he or she belongs, we are using the
shortcut called stereotyping.
Cont’d…
Specific Applications of Shortcuts in Organizations
• People in organizations are always judging each other. Managers must
appraise their employees’ performances.
• We evaluate how much effort our co-workers are putting into their jobs.
Team members immediately “size up” a new person.
• In many cases, our judgments have important consequences for the
organization.
• Let’s look at the most obvious applications.
Employment Interview:
• Few people are hired without an interview. But interviewers make
perceptual judgments that are often inaccurate and draw early impressions
that quickly become entrenched.
Cont’d…
• Research shows we form impressions of others within a tenth of a
second, based on our first glance.
• If these first impressions are negative, they tend to be more heavily
weighted in the interview than if that same information came out
later.
• Most interviewers’ decisions change very little after the first 4 or 5
minutes of an interview.
• As a result, information elicited early in the interview carries greater
weight than does information elicited later, and a “good applicant” is
probably characterized more by the absence of unfavorable
characteristics than by the presence of favorable ones.
Cont’d…
Performance Expectations:
• People attempt to validate their perceptions of reality even when these
are faulty.
• The terms self-fulfilling prophecy and Pygmalion effect describe how an
individual’s behavior is determined by others’ expectations.
• If a manager expects big things from her people, they’re not likely to let
her down.
• Similarly, if she expects only minimal performance, they’ll likely meet
those low expectations.
• Expectations become reality. The self-fulfilling prophecy has been found
to affect the performance of students, soldiers, and even accountants.
Cont’d…
Performance Evaluation:
• Performance evaluations very much depend on the perceptual process.
• An employee’s future is closely tied to the appraisal—promotion, pay
raises, and continuation of employment are among the most obvious
outcomes.
• Although the appraisal can be objective (for example, a sales-person is
appraised on how many dollars of sales he generates in his territory),
many jobs are evaluated in subjective terms.
• Subjective evaluations, though often necessary, are problematic
because all the errors we’ve discussed thus far— selective perception,
contrast effects, halo effects, and so on—affect them.
The link between perception and individual decision
making
• Individuals in organizations make decisions, choices from among two or more
alternatives.
• Top managers determine their organization’s goals, what products or services to offer,
how best to finance operations, or where to locate a new manufacturing plant.
• Middle- and lower-level managers set production schedules, select new employees,
and decide how to allocate pay raises.
• Nonmanagerial employees decide how much effort to put forth at work and whether
to comply with a boss’s request.
• Organizations have begun empowering their nonmanagerial employees with decision-
making authority historically reserved for managers alone.
• Individual decision making is thus an important part of organizational behavior. But
the way individuals make decisions and the quality of their choices are largely
influenced by their perceptions.
Cont’d…
• Decision making occurs as a reaction to a problem. That is, a discrepancy exists
between the current state of affairs and some desired state, requiring us to consider
alternative courses of action.
• If your car breaks down and you rely on it to get to work, you have a problem that
requires a decision on your part.
• Unfortunately, most problems don’t come neatly labeled “problem.” One person’s
problem is another person’s satisfactory state of affairs.
• So awareness that a problem exists and that a decision might or might not be
needed is a perceptual issue.
• Every decision requires us to interpret and evaluate information. We typically receive
data from multiple sources and need to screen, process, and interpret them.
• Which data are relevant to the decision, and which are not? Our perceptions will
answer that question.
Cont’d…
• We also need to develop alternatives and evaluate their strengths and
weaknesses. Again, our process will affect the final outcome.
• Finally, throughout the entire decision making process, perceptual
distortions often surface that can bias analysis and conclusions.
2.2 Personality, Values, Attitudes and Job Satisfaction
2.2.1 Personality
• The word personality itself stems from the Latin word persona, which
refers to a theatrical mask worn by performers in order to either
project different roles or disguise their identities.
• At its most basic, personality is the characteristic patterns of thoughts,
feelings, and behaviors that make a person unique.
• It is believed that personality arises from within the individual and
remains fairly consistent throughout life.
• Example of person’s personality: Happy, sad, impatient, shy, fearful,
curious, helpful.
Cont’d…
5-63
Classifying Values – Rokeach Value Survey
An intention to behave in a
certain way toward
someone or something
Attitude
3-67
3-68
Cont’d…
• As we’ve noted, although we often think cognition causes affect,
which then causes behavior, in reality these components are difficult
to separate.
Does Behavior Always Follow from Attitudes?
• Leon Festinger – No, the reverse is sometimes true!
• Cognitive Dissonance: Any incompatibility between two or more
attitudes or between behavior and attitudes.
• Individuals seek to reduce this uncomfortable gap, or dissonance, to
reach stability and consistency
• Consistency is achieved by changing the attitudes, modifying the
behaviors, or through rationalization
• Desire to reduce dissonance depends on:
Importance of elements
Degree of individual influence
Rewards involved in dissonance
3-70
Moderating Variables
• The most powerful moderators of the attitude-behavior relationship are:
• Importance of the attitude
• Correspondence to behavior
• Accessibility
• Existence of social pressures
• Personal and direct experience of the attitude
Moderating Variables
3-71
Cont’d…
Predicting Behavior from Attitudes
• Important attitudes have a strong relationship to behavior.
• The closer the match between attitude and behavior, the stronger the
relationship:
Specific attitudes predict specific behavior
General attitudes predict general behavior
• The more frequently expressed an attitude, the better predictor it is.
• High social pressures reduce the relationship and may cause
dissonance.
• Attitudes based on personal experience are stronger predictors.
3-72
2.2.4 Job Satisfaction
• At work, two particular job attitudes have the greatest
potential to influence how we behave.
• These are job satisfaction and organizational
commitment.
• Job satisfaction refers to the feelings people have toward
their job.
• If the number of studies conducted on job satisfaction is
an indicator, job satisfaction is probably the most
important job attitude.
• Age.
• Promotion.
• Pay influences job satisfaction only to a point.
After about $40,000 per year (in the U.S.), there is no relationship
between amount of pay and job satisfaction.
Money may bring happiness, but not necessarily job satisfaction.
• Personality can influence job satisfaction.
Negative people are usually not satisfied with their jobs.
Those with positive core self-evaluation are more satisfied with
their jobs.
Employee Responses to Dissatisfaction
Active
Exit Voice
• Behavior • Active and
directed constructive
toward attempts to
leaving the improve
organization conditions
Destructive Constructive
Neglect Loyalty
• Allowing • Passively
conditions waiting for
to worsen conditions
to improve
Passive 3-78
Cont’d…
• Exit. The exit response directs behavior toward leaving the
organization, including looking for a new position as well as
resigning.
• Voice. The voice response includes actively and constructively
attempting to improve conditions, including suggesting
improvements, discussing problems with superiors, and undertaking
some forms of union activity.
3-79
Cont’d…
• Loyalty. The loyalty response means passively but optimistically waiting
for conditions to improve, including speaking up for the organization in
the face of external criticism and trusting the organization and its
management to “do the right thing.”
• Neglect. The neglect response passively allows conditions to worsen
and includes chronic absenteeism or lateness, reduced effort, and
increased error rate.
3-80
Outcomes of Job Satisfaction
a) Job Performance
Satisfied workers are more productive AND more productive workers are more
satisfied!
The causality may run both ways.
b) Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCB)
Work attitudes are even more strongly related to organizational citizenship
behaviors.
OCBs: are behaviors that are not part of our job but are valuable to the
organization, such as helping new employees or working voluntary overtime).
OCB is a person's voluntary commitment within an organization or company that is
not part of his or her contractual tasks.
c) Customer Satisfaction
• Satisfied frontline employees increase customer satisfaction and
loyalty.
d) Absenteeism
• Absenteeism refers to unscheduled absences from work.
• Satisfied employees are moderately less likely to miss work.
• Satisfied and committed people are absent less frequently and for
shorter duration, are likely to stay with a company longer, and
demonstrate less aggression at work.
Cont’d…
e) Turnover
Turnover refers to an employee leaving an organization.
Employee turnover has potentially harmful consequences, such as
poor customer service and poor
Satisfied employees are less likely to quit.
Many moderating variables in this relationship.
o Economic environment and tenure
o Organizational actions taken to retain high performers and to
weed out lower performers
Cont’d…
f) Workplace Deviance
Dissatisfied workers are more likely to unionize, abuse substances,
steal, be tardy/delayed, and withdraw.
Despite the overwhelming evidence of the impact of job
satisfaction on the bottom line, most managers are either
unconcerned about or overestimate worker satisfaction.
Summary and Managerial Implications
Defining motivation
Characteristics of motivation
Types of motivation
Theories of motivation
Reflection:
What is motivation?
Do you motivate your employees? why?
What mechanisms do you use to motivate employees?
What improvements did you observe as a result?
88
Defining Motivation
5/25/2011
91
Types of motivation
92
Theories of motivation
The Content/Need Theories of Motivation
1. Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
2. Alderfer’s ERG Theory
3. Frederic Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory
4. Douglas McGregor- Theory X and Theory Y
5. Acquired – Needs Theory (David McClelland)
The Process Theory of Motivation
• Equity theory
93
1. The Content/Need Theories of Motivation
•Define motivation in terms of need satisfaction.
•Focus on the assumption that individuals are motivated by the
desire to fulfill inner needs.
•Needs reflect either physiological or psychological deficiencies.
•According to content theories, motivation can be treated as a
need-satisfying process.
•Leaders should try to:
◦determine what needs a worker is trying to satisfy on the job
◦ ensure that a worker can satisfy his or her needs by engaging in
behaviors that contribute to organizational effectiveness.
•It suggest the manager’s job is to create a work environment that
responds positively to individual needs.
94
Maslow’s Theory of Motivation
• In 1943, Maslow wrote five fundamental human needs and their
hierarchical nature.
• Maslow stated that individuals have five needs which he arranged
in a hierarchy from the most basic level to the highest:
physiological, safety, belongingness and love, esteem, and self-
actualization.
• The lower the needs in the hierarchy, the more fundamental they
are and the more a person will tend to abandon the higher needs in
order to pay attention to sufficiently meet the lower needs.
95
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
96
How do these needs affect human behavior?
• Two principles:
• The deficit principle holds that a satisfied need is not a motivator
of behavior
• The progression principle holds that a need at one level does not
become activated until the next lower level need is already
satisfied
97
98
Cont’d…
Reflection
• Do you think that hierarchy of needs theory conform to the actual
needs structure?
• Discuss the practical implications of Maslow’s need hierarchy of
motivation for contemporary leaders.
99
2. ERG Theory
• Proposed by Clayton Alderfer
• Builds on Maslow’s work
• Collapses Maslow’s five needs categories into three: Existence needs,
Relatedness needs, and Growth needs.
• ERG identified only three orders of human needs
• People sometimes activate their higher level needs before they have
completely satisfied all their lower level needs.
• Frustration-Regression principle
o Satisfaction-progression principle is not always true.
100
12 CHAPTER 6 The Nature of Work Motivation
102
cont’d…
• The two factor theory remains a useful reminder that there are two
important aspects of all jobs:
• Job content (intrinsic)-what people do in terms of job tasks, and
• Job context (extrinsic)- the work setting in which they do it.
• Herzberg’s advice to leaders are:
• Always correct poor context to eliminate actual or potential sources
of job dissatisfaction, and
• Be sure to build satisfier factors into job content to maximize
opportunities for job satisfaction.
103
4. Theory X and Y of McGregor
Theory X and theory Y each represent different ways in which
leaders view employees.
Theory X:
◦ Theory X believes that employees are lazy, and uncooperative
◦ The average human being has an inherent dislike for work,
wishes to avoid responsibility
◦ Most people must be controlled, directed, and threatened with
punishment
104
Cont’d …
Theory Y:
◦ Theory Y believes that subordinates work hard, are cooperative, and
have positive attitudes.
◦ Control and the threat of punishment are not the only means for
bringing out effort toward organizational objectives.
◦ Commitment is a function of rewards associated with achievement
◦ The average human being learns, under proper conditions, not only to
accept but also to seek responsibility
105
Process Theories of motivation
107