You are on page 1of 40

Company Performance Rating

Assessment Program In Environmental


Management (PROPER) 2021
PROPER 2021 Assessment Criteria
Glossary

 
PROPER : Company Performance Rating Assessment Program In Environmental Management

 
AMDAL : Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

 
RKL – RPL: Environmental Management & Monitoring Plan

 
UKL – UPL : Environmental Management & Monitoring Efforts

 
UKL – UPL report: Environmental Management & Monitoring Report

 
SIMPEL : Electronic Environmental Reporting System

 
SIRAJA LIMBAH B3: Hazardous & toxic waste information system

 
Festronik : Electronic Waste Manifest

 
B3 : Hazardous & toxic

 
CEMS: Continuous Emission Monitoring System

 
SPARING : Real-Time automatic water quality monitoring reporting system
What is PROPER?

PROPER or Company Performance Rating Assessment


 

Program in Environmental Management is


evaluation/assessment of company performance in
environmental management, so that, environmental quality
enhancement efforts could be implemented more efficient &
effective.

1 Not substitution instrument of existing conventional compliance

2 Is a complementary and synergize to another compliance instrument

3 Is a Public Disclosure Program for Environmental Compliance.


Background of PROPER was made

At 1980 – 1990,
 
PROPER was designed and
 

environmental set to improve


pollution in environmental control, and
Indonesia is not on June 1995, Indonesia
became first developing
under control. country who implemented
PROPER
World Bank confirmed that
 

PROPER as the most successful


collaboration program in
developing country
PROPER Benefit

1 Increase company compliance in mandatory environmental


management requirements

2 Increasing transparency & public involvement in


environmental management

3 Creating better environment quality by encourage


companies to innovate in environmental
management

4 Endorse Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) achievement


PROPER Rank Description

Gold Green Blue Red Black


Performed
beyond
compliance in Witted or
Consistently mandatory imprudent
performed required Have Haven’t which led to
environmental environmental performed performed environmental
excellence in management environmental environmental harm, found
production & through management management guilty of
service, and environmental efforts as efforts as environmental
implement management required to required to law violation to
good business system and applied applied applied
ethics and utilize environmental environmental obligations or
socially resources obligation obligation not practice
responsible efficiently and administration
performed penalty
good social
responsibility
PROPER 2021 Mechanism
ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE
GOLD
SOCIAL INNOVATION
ECO-INNOVATION
S Passing grade
U

empowerment
PRODUCT

EMERGENCY
reduction
efficiency

Biodiversity
management
Emission
GREEN

management
conservation

RESPONSE
Community
& efficiency

Haz & toxic


Energy

B S
ECO-

Waste
Water

waste
C
S O
C R
O E Passing grade
R
E Life Cycle Assessment
Environmental Management System Implementation

Air pollution control


Water pollution control
Comply BLUE
Hazardous & toxic waste management
Peat lands ecosystem management Not comply RED
Potential of land damage in mining area
Waste management
Hazardous & toxic material management No effort BLACK

Legal compliance
PROPER 2021 Blue Rank Assessment Criteria List – BSF Currently

Air pollution control

Hazardous & toxic waste management

Water pollution control

Non-hazardous & toxic waste management


PROPER 2021 Green Rank Performance Criteria*
Eco-innovation

Eco-product

Life cycle assessment

Energy efficiency

Emission reduction

Hazardous & toxic waste reduction & utilization

Non-hazardous & toxic waste reduction & utilization

Water conservation & efficiency

Biodiversity *Gold & green rank assessment


For gold & green candidate selection is based on
regional environmental agency recommendation
Community empowerment

Emergency response
PROPER 2021 Gold Rank Performance Criteria
Social innovation

Environmental excellence

Eco-innovation

Eco-product

Life cycle assessment

Energy efficiency

Emission reduction

Hazardous & toxic waste reduction & utilization

Non-hazardous & toxic waste reduction & utilization

Water conservation & efficiency


*Gold rank assessment
Biodiversity For gold rank assessment criteria is kindly similar to
green rank, but emphasize social innovation &
Community empowerment environmental excellence criteria

Emergency response
Assessment Criteria – Environmental Document Aspect
No Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

1 Availability of environmental Available environmental approval/environmental document Available environmental Not available
approval/environmental document approval/environmental document environmental
approval/environ
mental
document
2 Implementation of environmental • Area boundary & production capacity still in conform • Area boundary & production
obligation which stated on environmental to environmental approval/document capacity not conform to
approval/document: • Environmental management & monitoring referred to environmental
• Area boundary & production capacity AMDAL/UKL-UPL/RKL-RPL/UKL-UPL report approval/document
• Environmental management, most • Environmental management &
importantly hazardous management, monitoring not referred to
water & air pollution control aspect AMDAL/UKL-UPL/RKL-RPL/UKL-
UPL report

3 Routine reporting of environmental Performed reporting regularly through SIMPEL Not report regularly through SIMPEL
obligation implementation (hazardous
waste management, water & air pollution
control aspect)
Air Pollution Control Aspect
• Compliance to emission source
• Compliance to emission TLV parameter
• Compliance in amount data per reported parameter
• Compliance to technical requirements
Assessment Criteria – Air Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank
Personnel competency Manager & operator Employ certified air pollution Not employ certified air
personnel control manager & operator pollution control manager &
operator
Emission source Manual monitoring All emission source 100% Not all emission source
compliance point monitored monitored
Continuous Emission All CEMS mandatory emission Not all CEMS mandatory
Monitoring System source 100% monitored emission source monitored
(CEMS)
Meet the emission Manual monitoring All emission parameter 100% Not all emission parameter
parameter threshold value monitored monitored
Continuous Emission All mandatory emission Not all mandatory emission
Monitoring System parameter 100% monitored parameter monitored
(CEMS) Mandatory CEMS in mining
industry: SO2, NOx, Opacity, O2,
and Flow in all electric
generator/power plant > 25 MW
All parameter CEMS mandatory Not all parameter CEMS
Assessment Criteria – Air Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Compliance in data Reporting Report monitoring data Reported data is not Report fake data
amount per parameter – regularly at least once in 100% monitored in
Manual monitoring semester basis assessment period
Compliance in data Genset For genset with: Reported data is not Report fake data
amount per parameter – • Capacity ≤ 570 KW at 100% monitored in
Manual monitoring least once in 3 years assessment period
• Capacity 570 KW < n ≤
3 MW at least once in
annual basis
• Capacity > 3 MW at
least once in semester
basis
Compliance in data Steam boiler For steam boiler which Reported data is not Report fake data
amount per parameter – operated < 6 months at 100% monitored in
Manual monitoring least once in annual basis assessment period
(if any)
Compliance in data Mass balance Mass balance calculation Not performed mass Report fake data
amount per parameter – calculation for nickel mate processing balance calculation
Assessment Criteria – Air Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Compliance in data Air emission load Reported regularly Reported regularly Report fake data
amount per parameter – calculation
Manual monitoring
Compliance in data SIMPEL emission Reported in SIMPEL Reported in SIMPEL regularly Report fake data
amount per parameter – monitoring regularly
Manual monitoring reporting
Compliance in data Data validity Available average data of Not available average data of Report fake data
amount per parameter – daily emission monitoring daily emission monitoring at
CEMS data at least 90-92 days in least 90-92 days in quarterly
quarterly basis for normal basis for normal operation
operation
Compliance in data Data validity Available average daily Report fake data
amount per parameter – emission monitoring data
CEMS data at least 18 hours of
monitoring
Compliance in data Conformity with Reported all mandatory Not reported all mandatory
amount per parameter – utilization/proce parameter which outlined parameter
Assessment Criteria – Air Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Compliance in data Air emission Reported air emission load Report fake data
amount per parameter load calculation calculation
– CEMS data

Compliance in data Emission Report emission Not report emission Report fake data
amount per parameter monitoring data monitoring data through monitoring data through
– CEMS data reporting SIMPEL SIMPEL

Compliance in emission Parameter 100% comply to Emission <100% comply to emission Report fake data
parameter threshold Concentration TLV TLV
limit value (TLV) –
Manual monitoring
Compliance in emission Monitoring data ≥ 95% comply to daily < 95% comply to daily Report fake data
parameter threshold average reported data in average reported data in
limit value (TLV) – CEMS quarterly basis quarterly basis
data
Assessment Criteria – Air Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Compliance in Stack technical Available emission stack Not comply on stack
technical requirements requirements technical requirements
– Manual monitoring
Compliance in Stack technical Equipped with sampling Not comply on stack
technical requirements requirements hole technical requirements
– Manual monitoring
Compliance in Stack technical Equipped with stairs & Not comply on stack
technical requirements requirements hand-rail technical requirements
– Manual monitoring
Compliance in Stack technical Equipped with work Not comply on stack
technical requirements requirements platform technical requirements
– Manual monitoring
Compliance in Stack technical Equipped with code & Not comply on stack
technical requirements requirements coordinate technical requirements
– Manual monitoring
Compliance in Stack technical Equipped with electricity Not comply on stack
technical requirements requirements source technical requirements
Assessment Criteria – Air Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Compliance in technical Accredited & Employ accredited & Not employ accredited & Report fake data
requirements – Manual registered registered laboratory for registered laboratory for
monitoring laboratory for monitoring purposes monitoring purposes
monitoring
Compliance in technical SNI monitoring Conducted in SNI method
requirements – Manual method or another international
monitoring standard method
Compliance in technical Oxygen Oxygen correction on No oxygen correction on
requirements – Manual correction for monitoring result is monitoring result
monitoring certain emission mandatory
parameter
Compliance in technical Total monthly Conducted total monthly No recorded data of
requirements – Manual hours of genset hours record of genset monthly total hours genset
monitoring utilization as utilization utilization
back up data
Compliance in technical Administrative Comply to administrative
requirements – Manual penalty penalty until the due
Assessment Criteria – Air Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Compliance in technical Energy audit Conduct energy audit Not conduct energy audit
requirements – Manual regularly
monitoring
Compliance in technical Competency Available certified Not available certified
requirements – Manual certification personnel on air pollution personnel on air pollution
monitoring control (manager & control
operator)
Compliance in technical GHG calculation Performed GHG Not performed GHG
requirements – Manual calculation refer to latest calculation
monitoring regulation
Compliance in technical Stack technical 100% comply to stack Not 100% comply to stack
requirements – CEMS requirements technical requirements technical requirements
data
Compliance in technical CEMS For industry which CEMS Not installed CEMS Non-fugitive
requirements – CEMS mandatory mandatory, CEMS equipment for CEMS emission not
data equipment should be mandatory industry & CEMS released through
installed and normally equipment not normally stack
Assessment Criteria – Air Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Compliance in technical CEMS equipment If CEMS equipment is broken Not repair the broken down
requirements – CEMS data down, emission monitoring CEMS equipment in a year
should be conducted
manually at least once in
quarterly basis for annual
assessment period
Compliance in technical CEMS equipment Availability of calibration Not available calibration
requirements – CEMS data calibration certificate by competent certificate of CEMS equipment in
personnel at least once a year annual basis
Compliance in technical QA & QC Availability of QA & QC Not available QA & QC system
requirements – CEMS data system on CEMS equipment

Compliance in technical Administrative Comply to administrative


requirements – CEMS data penalty penalty until the due

Compliance in technical Isokinetic method Performed monitoring in Not performed monitoring in


requirements – CEMS data isokinetic method isokinetic method
Assessment Criteria – Air Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Air ambient compliance Location All locations which outlined in All locations which outlined in
environmental document are environmental document are
100% monitored not 100% monitored
Air ambient compliance Parameter refer to All parameter which outlined All parameter which outlined in
PP 41/2019 in environmental document environmental document are
are 100% monitored not 100% monitored
Noise compliance Location All locations which outlined in All locations which outlined in
environmental document are environmental document are
100% monitored not 100% monitored

Odor compliance Location All locations which outlined in All locations which outlined in
environmental document are environmental document are
100% monitored not 100% monitored

Odor compliance Parameter All parameter which outlined All parameter which outlined in
in environmental document environmental document are
are 100% monitored not 100% monitored
Water Pollution Control Aspect
• Compliance to wastewater discharge permit
• Compliance to wastewater discharge compliance point
• Compliance in amount of mandatory TLV of wastewater quality
parameter
• Compliance to amount reported data per parameter
• Compliance to TLV standard
• Compliance to technical requirements
Assessment Criteria – Water Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Personnel competency Manager personnel Employ certified water pollution Not employ certified water pollution
control manager control manager
Operator personnel Employ certified water pollution Not employ certified water pollution
control operator control operator
Compliance to wastewater Discharge Wastewater discharge permit is Wastewater discharge permit is not
discharge permit permit/technical available available
approval availability

Discharge Evidence of permit No evidence of permit


permit/technical renewal/proposal (if expired or field renewal/proposal (if expired)
approval availability condition is inappropriate with
permit/tech. approval)
Domestic All domestic wastewater source is Not all domestic wastewater source is
wastewater flown to established discharge flown to established discharge permit
discharge permit
permit/technical
approval
Wastewater Available wastewater utilization Unavailable wastewater utilization
utilization permit permit for soil/land needs purposes permit for soil/land needs purposes
(if any) (if any)
Assessment Criteria – Water Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

Compliance to wastewater Compliance point – All wastewater discharge outlet are All wastewater discharge outlet are not
discharge compliance point Manual monitoring 100% monitored (include the one 100% monitored (include the one who
who not established in permit) not established in permit)
Compliance point – All wastewater discharge outlet are All wastewater discharge outlet are not
automatic 100% continuously monitored 100% continuously monitored
monitoring automatically through SPARING for automatically through SPARING for
mandatory SPARING mandatory SPARING industry/activity
industry/activity (for mining
industry is mandatory)
Compliance in amount of Mandatory All monthly & daily mandatory All monthly & daily mandatory
mandatory TLV of wastewater parameter are 100% monitored parameter are not 100% monitored
wastewater quality parameter – Manual which included in: which included in:
parameter monitoring • Wastewater discharge permit • Wastewater discharge permit
• National/regional TLV of • National/regional TLV of wastewater
wastewater parameter (if parameter (if permit is unavailable)
permit is unavailable)
Mandatory All mandatory parameter are 100% All mandatory parameter are not 100%
wastewater continuously monitored continuously monitored automatically
parameter – automatically through SPARING for through SPARING for mandatory
Automatic mandatory SPARING SPARING industry/activity
monitoring industry/activity (for mining
industry is mandatory)
Assessment Criteria – Water Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Compliance to amount Mandatory All parameter in every All parameter in every Report fake
reported data per reported data compliance point are 100% compliance point are not 100% data/found
parameter amount reported regularly as required reported regularly as required guilty for
within permit/tech. approval within permit/tech. approval commited
environment
al pollution
Wastewater load Wastewater load calculation Wastewater load calculation are Report fake
calculation are 100% reported regularly as not 100% reported regularly as data
required within permit/tech. required within permit/tech.
approval approval
Monitored data All parameter in each All parameter in each Report fake
reporting compliance point are 100% compliance point are not 100% data
reported through SPARING for reported through SPARING for
SPARING mandatory SPARING mandatory
industry/activities industry/activities
Assessment Criteria – Water Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Compliance in Meet TLV All monthly & daily reported All monthly & daily reported Exceeded TLV
wastewater TLV standard standard parameter in every compliance parameter in every parameter >
point are 100% comply to TLV compliance point are not 500% (> 5
standard within assessment 100% comply to TLV parameter
period as required in standard within assessment exceeded from
permit/regulation period as required in TLV)
permit/regulation
Monitoring by All monitoring data which All monitoring data which
PROPER Team taken by PROPER team are taken by PROPER team are
100% comply to TLV standard not 100% comply to TLV
standard
Daily All monitoring data which All monitoring data which
compliance rate taken continuously & taken continuously &
automatically are ≥ 95% automatically are < 95%
comply to daily average comply to daily average
compliance rate compliance rate
Assessment Criteria – Water Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Compliance to technical Water pollution Equip name & coordinate point Not comply one of Release untreated
requirements control technical in compliance point water pollution wastewater to
requirements control technical environment
requirements

Separate wastewater channel Release wastewater


from runoff discharge in unlicensed
area
Construct waterproof
wastewater channel
Installed flowmeter/discharge
measurement apparatus
Employ accredited & registered
laboratory for external
monitoring purposes
Not dilute wastewater
Not release wastewater
discharge outside compliance
Assessment Criteria – Water Pollution Control
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank
Compliance to technical Wastewater All discharged wastewater Not identify all discharged
requirements identification 100% identified wastewater
All wastewater source & Not identify all wastewater
treatment process are 100% source & treatment process
identified
Available record of raw
material & production process
which involved on wastewater
generation
All mandatory technical All mandatory technical
requirements are 100% requirements are not 100%
comply for industry/activity comply for industry/activity
which classified as SPARING which classified as SPARING
mandatory mandatory
Administrative Meet all mandatory Not fulfill administrative penalty
penalty requirement in administrative until the due date
penalty
Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect

• Data collection and codification of each type hazardous and toxic waste
• Hazardous & toxic waste management reporting
• Hazardous & toxic waste management approval status
• Permit requirement implementation
• Organizational structure
• Open dump, open burn, & spillage handling & management of contaminated waste
• Percentage amount of managed hazardous & toxic waste
• Hazardous & toxic waste management by third parties
• Emergency response of hazardous and toxic waste management
• Competency certification of hazardous & toxic waste personnel
Assessment Criteria – Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

Data collection & codification Identification Generated hazardous & toxic waste Not identify, codified, and record
of each type of hazardous & are 100% identified, codified, and all generated hazardous and toxic
toxic waste its utilization is recorded regularly waste regularly
Hazardous & toxic waste Reporting Report hazardous & toxic waste Not/haven’t report hazardous &
management reporting management regularly in quarterly toxic waste management activity
basis through SIMPEL & SIRAJA through SIMPEL & SIRAJA LIMBAH
LIMBAH B3 B3
Electronic Printed quarterly electronic receipt Unavailable printed quarterly
receipt are available electronic receipt
Hazardous & toxic waste Storage permit Available hazardous & toxic waste Unavailable hazardous & toxic
management permit status storage permit or permit status in waste storage permit or expired
on renewal process
Utilization, Available valid mandatory permit or Manage
hoarding already proposed permit renewal at hazardous &
treatment, least 60 days before expire due toxic waste
dumping, or without
another permit/permit is
management not renewed
permit
Assessment Criteria – Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

Hazardous & toxic waste Export permit Available export permit Unavailable export permit
management permit status
Collaboration Available collaboration contract Unavailable collaboration contract
contract between exporter & hazardous & between exporter & hazardous &
toxic waste recipient toxic waste recipient
Transboundary Available transboundary movement Unavailable transboundary
movement manifest movement manifest
document
Permit requirement Permit 100% comply to permit Not 100% comply to permit Harm activities
implementation requirement requirement (temporary requirement (temporary on environment
compliance storage/collecting/utilize/processin storage/collecting/utilize/processin either human
g/hoarding/dumping) and not g/hoarding/dumping) and not health which
found harm activities on found harm activities on impacted by
environment neither human health environment neither human health hazardous &
toxic waste is
found
Dispose
hazardous &
toxic waste on
unlicensed
parties
Assessment Criteria – Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

Personnel competency Manager & Employ certified hazardous & toxic Not employ certified
operator waste manager and operator hazardous & toxic waste
competency manager and operator
Open dumping, open burning, Open No open dumping/open burning Found guilty for
spillage management and dumping, open activities is found doing open
contaminated waste handling burning, dumping/open
burning activities
Spillage Available contaminated soil & Available contaminated soil & Unavailable
management spillage handling & management spillage handling & contaminated soil &
& plan and in accordance with management plan and not in spillage handling &
contaminated government regulation accordance with government management plan
waste handling regulation
Contaminated Contaminated soil clean up & Contaminated land clean up &
soil clean up & recovery activity is in accordance recovery activity is not in
recovery with recovery plan accordance with recovery plan

Contaminated Accomplished all mandatory Not accomplished all Not accomplished


Land obligation in SSPLT mandatory obligation in SSPLT any mandatory
Settlement obligation in SSPLT
Status Letter
(SSPLT)
Assessment Criteria – Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

Percentage amount of Percentage All type of hazardous & toxic waste All type of hazardous & toxic
managed hazardous & toxic amount are 100% managed as required waste are not 100%
waste managed as required

Mass balance Hazardous & toxic waste mass Hazardous & toxic waste
balance is in conform to mass balance is not in
assessment period conform to assessment
period
Hazardous & toxic waste Waste disposal Handed over hazardous & toxic Handed over hazardous &
management by third parties to third-party waste to licensed toxic waste to inappropriate
criteria (waste collector/processor/beneficiary/hoa licensed
generator to rder/transporter collector/processor/benefici
collector) ary/hoarder
Handed over hazardous & toxic Unavailable collaboration
waste to appropriate licensed contract between waste
collector/processor/beneficiary/hoa generator with
rder/transporter collector/processor/benefici
ary/hoarder
Available collaboration contract Collaborate with
between waste generator with collector/processor/benefici
collector, collector with ary/hoarder who suspected
Assessment Criteria – Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

Hazardous & toxic waste Waste disposal Handed over hazardous & toxic Waste generator not have Handed over
management by third parties to third-party waste to licensed collaboration contract with licensed hazardous &
criteria (waste collector/processor/beneficiary/hoa collector/processor/beneficiary/hoa toxic waste to
generator to rder/transporter whose license is rder/transporter unlicensed
processor/benef on renewal process processor/benefi
iciary/hoarder) ciary/hoarder
Handed over hazardous & toxic Unavailable collaboration contract
waste to appropriate licensed between waste generator with
processor/beneficiary/hoarder/tran processor/beneficiary/hoarder
sporter
Available collaboration contract Collaborate with
between waste generator with processor/beneficiary/hoarder who
processor/beneficiary/hoarder/final suspected in legal enforcement
processor before contract published
Assessment Criteria – Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

Hazardous & toxic waste Waste disposal Available transportation permit Waste generator hand over Unavailable
management by third parties to third-party & supervisory card from hazardous & toxic waste to recommendation letter
criteria Ministry of Transportation and transporter whose from Environment &
(transporter) recommendation letter from transportation permit & Forestry Ministry and
Environment & Forestry supervisory card are expired transportation permit &
Ministry supervisory card from
Ministry of Transportation
Transported waste type is in Unavailable waste
conform to permit & transporter
recommendation letter recommendation letter from
Environment & Forestry
Ministry
Transportation equipment is in Inappropriate transported
conform to permit & waste to permit &
recommendation letter recommendation letter

Every transportation Utilized transportation


equipment are registered in equipment is not in conform
Festronik to recommendation letter &
permit
Every transportation Every transportation
equipment are equipped with equipment are not
GPS tracking equipped with GPS tracking
Assessment Criteria – Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect

Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

Hazardous & toxic waste Waste disposal to Have access to hazardous Not have access to
management by third parties third-party criteria waste electronic manifest hazardous waste electronic
(transporter) (Festronik) manifest (Festronik)

Available valid environmental Unavailable valid


pollution insurance environmental pollution
insurance
Transportation route is in Transportation route is not in
conform with supervisory card conform with supervisory
card
Available collaboration Unavailable collaboration
contract between waste contract between waste
generator and beneficiary generator and beneficiary
with transporter or licensed with transporter or licensed
third party third party
Festronik Applies hazardous waste Have access to hazardous Final waste dispose is
electronic manifest (Festronik) waste electronic manifest couldn’t be accounted for
when transport activity (Festronik), but not applied it
occurred when transport activity
occurred
Assessment Criteria – Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect
Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

Hazardous & toxic waste Compliance 100% comply to technical Not 100% comply to Unavailable hazardous
emergency response system requirements of hazardous & technical requirements of & toxic waste
toxic waste emergency hazardous & toxic waste emergency response
response system emergency response system system
Non-Hazardous & toxic waste Implementation Performed non-hazardous & Not performed non-
management toxic waste management as hazardous & toxic waste
required on Minister decree management as required on
Minister decree

For non-hazardous & toxic waste management criteria only for selected PROPER
candidate which has Decision Letter for Determination of Non B3 Waste
Non-Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect

• Waste reduction
• Waste segregation
• Temporary waste storage
• Waste transportation
• Waste processing
Assessment Criteria – Non-Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect

Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

Waste reduction Waste yield Available waste yield record No effort on


record waste reduction

Procedure Available waste reduction Unavailable waste reduction


procedure procedure

Program Implemented waste reduction Not implemented waste reduction


program regularly program regularly
Waste segregation Segregation Available 5 segregated waste bin Less than 5 segregated waste bin No segregated
waste bin

Amount of waste bin in each area is Amount of waste bin in each area is
in conform to waste yield amount not in conform to waste yield
amount
Temporary waste storage Available permanent closed Available segregated temporary Unavailable
segregated temporary waste waste storage but not permanent temporary waste
storage storage
Assessment Criteria – Non-Hazardous & Toxic Waste Management Aspect

Criteria Sub Criteria Blue Rank Red Rank Black Rank

Waste transport Transport Waste transported with closed Waste transported with open No effort on
vehicle vehicle waste transport

Waste processing Processing At least 30-50% waste yield is At least 1-29% waste yield is Open burning
processed processed practice and
dispose waste
into the sea

You might also like