Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IMBA NCCU
Managerial Economics
Lecturer: Jack Wu
RISING GASOLINE PRICES
Between September 2004 and September 2005, the
monthly average retail price of gasoline jumped from
$1.85 per gallon to $3.08 per gallon. Sales of full-size
SUVs dropped 16.8% over the same time period (with a
particularly sharp 42.5% drop for full-size GM SUVs).
GM VICE CHAIRMAN: BOB LUTZ
May 31, 2004: “It sounds cavalier, but in any household
budget, gasoline isn't a factor”, Business Week.
July 1, 2005: “The demise of the full-size truck is a
figment of the imagination of the popular press.
Everybody assumes it is true but the market is still
buying”, Reuters.
“The effect will decrease over time as people adjust to
the thought of $3 a gallon, just as they did when it was
$2 a gallon and just as they did when it was $1 a gallon”,
New York Times.
MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS QUESTIONS
How important are gasoline prices to the sales of SUVs
and other types of automobiles?
How should the auto manufacturers respond to the
increasing price of gasoline?
Are manufacturer incentives (i.e. price reductions) an
effective response?
What are the combined effects of incentives and
increasing gas prices?
MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS TOOL:
DEMAND
We apply demand to show how the rising price of
gasoline has caused decreases in large SUV sales, and
how manufacturer incentives can offset these reductions.
INDIVIDUAL DEMAND CURVE
Definition: graph of quantity that buyer will purchase at
every possible price
Construction -- “Other things equal, how many would
you buy at a price of ….?’’
vertical axis -- price
7.50
2.50
0 1 2 4 7
Quantity (Movies a month)
INDIVIDUAL DEMAND SCHEDULE II
Price Quantity
($ per movie) (movies per month)
20.00 0
19.00 1
18.00 2
…. …
0.00 20
ANOTHER TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL
DEMAND CURVE
TWO VIEWS
for every possible price, it shows the quantity demanded
for each unit of item, it shows the maximum price that
the buyer is willing to pay
DEMAND CURVE: SLOPE
diminishing marginal benefit -- each additional unit of
consumption/usage provides less benefit than the
preceeding unit
demand curve slopes downward
CONSUMER DIFFERENCES
individual preferences different demand curves
changes in consumer's preferences, eg, age
different consumers
HOOVER, 1992
Changes in income
normal product – demand increases
with income
inferior product – demand falls with
income
DEMAND AND INCOME
DEMAND AND OTHER FACTORS
prices of related products
substitutes
complements
advertising
OTHER DEMAND FACTORS:
COMPLEMENTS
RECORDED MUSIC
Argentina Canada
Demographic
Population
Age structure
Urban-rural
Cultural-social
MARKET DEMAND: MICRO FACTORS
Price
Tax
Advertising
R&D
variable Demand Curve Shift
7.50 d a
individual demand
5 c b e (marginal benefit) curve
f
2.50 g h
j
0 1 2 4 7
fixed payment
usage charge
fixed
payment
usage
charge
BUYER SURPLUS: TWO-PART PRICING
Business Provider Fixed Fee Usage Fee