0% found this document useful (0 votes)
326 views23 pages

FIR vs IIR Filters Explained

The presentation discusses finite impulse response (FIR) filters and infinite impulse response (IIR) filters. FIR filters have a finite duration impulse response, while IIR filters have an infinite duration impulse response. FIR filters are always stable but require more memory and computation. IIR filters require less memory but can be unstable. Common filter design techniques for FIR filters include the window method and frequency sampling method, while techniques for IIR filters include impulse invariance and bilinear transformation.

Uploaded by

Givenet Makosa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
326 views23 pages

FIR vs IIR Filters Explained

The presentation discusses finite impulse response (FIR) filters and infinite impulse response (IIR) filters. FIR filters have a finite duration impulse response, while IIR filters have an infinite duration impulse response. FIR filters are always stable but require more memory and computation. IIR filters require less memory but can be unstable. Common filter design techniques for FIR filters include the window method and frequency sampling method, while techniques for IIR filters include impulse invariance and bilinear transformation.

Uploaded by

Givenet Makosa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

GROUP1 PRESENTATION

• 1. FINITE IMPULSE RESPONSE


FILTERS
• 2. INFINITE IMPULSE RESPONSE
FILTERS
GROUP MEMBERS
CHIPARAUSHE PRAISE A R188816F
MUTAWO CHANTELLE F R1810774
HOVE RYAN R188192A
CHIFAMBA COURAGE A R1810988
HOVE TERERAI R1813810
TADYANEMHANDU DOROTHY R197966R
MAGUME NICOLE R196724U
MAKOSA GIVENET R197126H
TAHWASHA ROBERT R197137Z
KANDAWASVIKA TREVOR R184132R
WHAT IS A FILTER?

• AN AC CIRCUIT DESIGNED TO PERFORM FREQUENCY SELECTION OUT OF A MIX OF


DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES IN A CIRCUIT

• MOST COMMONLY USED FILTERS ARE LOW-PASS, HIGH-PASS, BAND-PASS AND BAND-
STOP FILTERS

• THE MAIN REASON TO FILTER A SIGNAL IS TO SMOOTH OUT HIGH FREQUENCY NOISE
ASSOCIATED WITH A MEASUREMENT

• IN THE DIGITAL REALM, THE ARE TWO TYPES OF FILTERS –FIR(FINITE IMPULSE
RESPONSE) AND IIR(INFINITE IMPULSE RESPONSE)
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
HIGH-PERFORMANCE STEREO SYSTEMS

IN THE “CONDITIONING” OF NON-SINUSOIDAL VOLTAGE WAVEFORMS IN POWER

CIRCUITS.

FILTER CIRCUITS ARE USED TO ELIMINATE BACKGROUND NOISE

THEY ARE USED IN RADIO TUNING TO A SPECIFIC FREQUENCY


PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

USED IN PRE-AMPLIFICATION, EQUALIZATION, TONE CONTROL IN AUDIO SYSTEMS

THEY ARE ALSO USED IN SIGNAL PROCESSING CIRCUITS AND DATA CONVERSION

FILTER CIRCUITS ARE EXTENSIVELY USED IN MEDICAL ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS


SYNTHESIS OF FILTERS
• SYNTHESIS OF THE DIGITAL FILTERS BEGINS WITH THE DEFINITION OF THE FILTER
CHARACTERISTICS
• TO SYNTHESIZE THE DIGITAL FILTER, A KNOWN ANALOG FILTER TEMPLATE IS
USED TO FIND A DIGITAL SYSTEM CHARACTERIZED BY THE TRANSFER FUNCTION
H(Z)
• TRANSFER FUNCTION IS THE REPRESENTS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE
INPUT AND THE OUTPUT SIGNAL OF A CONTROL SYSTEM AND THE INPUT VALUES,
FOR ALL INPUT VALUES
SYNTHESIS OF FILTERS

• DETERMINATION OF THE TRANSFER FUNCTION BY A DIRECT METHOD IS NOT


SIMPLE, ON THE OTHER HAND
• TRANSFORMING AN ANALOG FILTER TO A DIGITAL FILTER IS RELATIVELY SIMPLE
• MANY METHODS ARE BASED ON DESIGNING A DIGITAL FILTER FROM THE
EQUIVALENT ANALOG FILTER
• THE OBJECTIVE OF FILTER DESIGN IS TO FIND A STABLE FUNCTION THAT IS
REALIZABLE USING A SUITABLE FILTER STRUCTURE TOP ESTIMATE A SPECIFIED
FREQUENCY RESPONSE OR IMPULSE RESPONSE
DIFFERENCE EQUATION

• THE DIFFERENCE EQUATION IS A FORMULA FOR COMPUTING AN OUTPUT SAMPLE


AT TIME  BASED ON PAST AND PRESENT INPUT SAMPLES AND PAST OUTPUT
SAMPLES IN THE TIME DOMAIN.
• WE MAY WRITE THE GENERAL, CASUAL, LTI DIFFERENCE EQUATION AS
FOLLOWS:
SYSTEM DESCRIBED BY A DIFFERENCE
EQUATION

• IF THE COEFFICIENTS a ≠ 0 , THE SYSTEM IS SAID TO BE RECURSIVE THUS IIR


0
SYSTEM DESCRIBED BY A DIFFERENCE
EQUATION

• IF THE COEFFICIENTS ai = 0, THEN THE SYSTEM IS DEPENDENT ONLY ON AND IT IS


SAID TO BE NON RECURSIVE THUS FIR
FIR AND IIR FILTERS

• TWO CLASSES OF FILTERS ARE DEFINED BASED ON THE LENGTH OF THEIR


LINEAR IMPULSE RESPONSE
• FIR, FINITE IMPULSE RESPONSE FILTERS ARE ALWAYS STABLE AND CAN BE
DESIGNED TO HAVE EXACTLY LINEAR PHASE
• IIR, INFINITE IMPULSE RESPONSE FILTERS ARE UNSTABLE AND CAN’T BE
DESIGNED TO HAVE LINEAR PHASE
FIR & IIR FILTERS
• CLASSES OF FILTERS ARE DEFINED BASED ON THE LENGTH OF
THEIR LINEAR IMPULSE RESPONSE
• THERE ARE TWO METHODS FOR THE APPROXIMATION OF FIR
FILTERS WHICH ARE THE WINDOW METHOD AND THE
FREQUENCY SAMPLING METHOD
CONTINUE
• THE WINDOW METHOD CONSIST OF 7 STEPS WHICH ARE
1. NORMALIZE
2. CHOOSE H(N)
3. CHOOSE WINDOW FUNCTION USING ATTENUATION
4. CALCULATE N
5. CALCULATE H(N)
6. FIND HN(N)
7. TRANSLATE
WINDOW METHOD EXAMPLE
• FIND THE COEFFICIENT OF FIR LOW PASS FILTER USING THE WINDOW METHOD
FROM THE FOLLOWING
• CUTOFF FREQ = FS/10, TRANSITION BAND FREQ = FS/5 AND ATTENUATION IS
GREATER THAN 50DB
FREQUENCY SAMPLING METHOD

• THE FREQUENCY SAMPLING METHOD ALLOWS US TO DESIGN RECURSIVE AND


NON-RECURSIVE FIR FILTERS FOR BOTH STANDARD FREQUENCY SELECTIVE AND
FILTERS WITH ARBITRARY FREQUENCY RESPONSE
• THE FREQUENCY SAMPLING METHOD CAN BE USED TO DESIGN A FILTER WITH
AN ARBITRARY FREQUENCY RESPONSE SUCH AS H(Ω) .
STEPS FOR FREQUENCY SAMPLING METHOD

• 1 CHOOSE THE DESIRED FREQUENCY RESPONSE H(Ω)


• 2 SAMPLE H(Ω) AT N -POINTS BY TAKING Ω=ΩK=2ΠKN WHERE K=0,1,2,3,…...
• 3 THE N-POINT INVERSE DFT OF THE SEQUENCE H(K) GIVES THE IMPULSE
RESPONSE OF THE FILTER H( N).
IIR MAPPING TECHNIQUES
• THE MAPPING TECHNIQUES ARE THE IMPULSE INVARIANCE METHOD AND THE
BILINEAR TRANSFORMATION METHOD
• THE IDEA IS TO MAP AN ANALOG SIGNAL INTO A DIGITAL SIGNAL
IMPULSE INVARIANCE METHOD
• THE STEP INVOLVED ARE AS FOLLOWS:
• INVERSE LAPLACE TRANSFORM
• SAMPLING METHOD
• APPLY Z TRANSFORM
IMPULSE INVARIANCE METHOD EXAMPLE
TRANSFORM THE FOLLOWING TO H(Z)
ADVANTAGES OF FIR FILTERS

• IS ALWAYS STABLE(THIS IS BECAUSE ITS POLES ARE AT THE ORIGIN)


• HAS A FINITE DURATION
• SIMPLE(BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO FEEDBACK MEANING THEY DO NOT USE THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES TO
COMPUTE THEIR PRESENT)
• DESIGN COMPLEXITY GENERALLY LINEAR(BECAUSE THEY HAVE A PHASE RESPONSE THAT GRACES OUT A
STRAIGHT LINE)
• NON CAUSAL
• NOISE ERROR IS MINIMUM
• ROBUST
• GOOD PERFOMANCE
DISADVANTAGES OF FIR FILTERS

• LARGE STORAGE REQUIREMENTS


• CANNOT SIMULATE PROTOTYPE ANALOG FILTER(BECAUSE OF LARGE STORAGE
REQUIREMENTS)
• DIFFICULT TO IMPLEMENT(REQUIRES COMPLEX COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUES)
• EXPENSIVE DUE TO LARGE ORDER
• REQUIRES MORE MEMORY
• TIME CONSUMING PROCESS
ADVANTAGES OF IIR FILTERS

• HAS A STABLE DESIGN


• IMPLEMENTATION REQUIRES FEWER PARAMETERS
• LESS MEMORY REQUIREMENT
• LOWER COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY
• EASY TO IMPLEMENT AND DESIGN
DISADVANTAGES OF IIR

• UNSTABLE
• USUALLY HAS A NON-LINEAR RESPONSE
• HAS A FEEDBACK LOOP HENCE INCREASE NOISE ERROR
• USEFUL ONLY WHEN THE ANALOG FILTER IS BANDLIMITED
• HARDER TO IMPLEMENT USING FIXEDPOINT ARITHMETIC SUCH AS NOISE
• SUSCEPTIBLE TO THE PROBLEM OF FINITE LENGTH ARITHMETIC
• DOES NOT OFFER COMPUTATIONAL AVANTAGES OF FIR FILTER

You might also like