The quality of information is determined by its ability to contribute to effective decision making and create managerial impact through attention, decisions, and actions. Information quality can be measured based on four dimensions: utility, satisfaction, error, and bias. Utility depends on the information being in the required form, available on time, easily accessible, and possessed by the manager who needs it. Satisfaction is measured by the decision maker's level of satisfaction. Errors can arise from incorrect data measurement, collection methods, processing procedures, incomplete data, or deliberate falsification. The location and extent of errors should be prevented to ensure high quality information.
The quality of information is determined by its ability to contribute to effective decision making and create managerial impact through attention, decisions, and actions. Information quality can be measured based on four dimensions: utility, satisfaction, error, and bias. Utility depends on the information being in the required form, available on time, easily accessible, and possessed by the manager who needs it. Satisfaction is measured by the decision maker's level of satisfaction. Errors can arise from incorrect data measurement, collection methods, processing procedures, incomplete data, or deliberate falsification. The location and extent of errors should be prevented to ensure high quality information.
The quality of information is determined by its ability to contribute to effective decision making and create managerial impact through attention, decisions, and actions. Information quality can be measured based on four dimensions: utility, satisfaction, error, and bias. Utility depends on the information being in the required form, available on time, easily accessible, and possessed by the manager who needs it. Satisfaction is measured by the decision maker's level of satisfaction. Errors can arise from incorrect data measurement, collection methods, processing procedures, incomplete data, or deliberate falsification. The location and extent of errors should be prevented to ensure high quality information.
The manager will determine the quality of the information
based on the contribution it provides for effective decision
making. The quality of information is high, if it creates managerial impact leading to attention, decision and action. The quality of information can be measured on the four dimensions viz., utility, satisfaction, error and bias. 1. Utility: The utility dimensions have four facets – the form, the time, the access and the possession. The Form-If the information is presented in the form the manager requires, then its utility increases. The time-If it is available when needed, the utility is optimized. The access-If the information is easily and quickly accessible through the On-line Access system, its utility gets an added boost. Possession- Lastly, if the information is possessed by the manager who needs it, then its utility is the highest. Satisfaction: Since in the organization there are many users of the same information, the subjectiveness would vary. Therefore, the one common key for measuring the quality could be the satisfaction of the decision maker. Error: An error is the third dimension of the quality of the information. The error creep in on account of various reasons, namely; An incorrect data measurement An incorrect collection method Failure to follow the prescribed data processing procedure Loss of data or incomplete data Poor application of data validation and control systems A deliberate falsification Erroneous information is a serious problem because the decision maker cannot make the adjustments as he is not aware of it in terms of the location and the quantum of error. To control errors, it is necessary to follow the methods of systems analysis and design. The approach should be that the errors should be prevented.