Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GE Leadership
GE Leadership
• Necessary for organizations and societies, no singular account (Day and Antonakis, 2012; Hunt and
Fedynich, 2018)
• ‘leaders intentionally seek to influence the behavior of other people’ (Owens, 2001: 234)
• Evolution of Leadership Theory:
• Trait Theory: specific traits (Johns and Moser, 1989)
• Behavioral Approach: behavior of leaders, treatment of others
• Contingency Theory: context and suitable leadership styles (Day and Antonakis, 2012)
• Jeffrey Immelt
• 11 business units (Ocasio and Joseph, 2008)
• 300,000 employees
• Organic growth, efficiency (Immelt, 2017)
• Industrial Internet - 2011
- $1 billion investment
- 2013: $800 million revenue
- 2014: over $1 billion revenue
- Total GE revenue in 2013 $146 million – What went wrong? (Krauskopf, 2014)
Issue 1: Decision
Visionary Leadership Immelt’s Leadership
• New path when lack of growth, • Difficult to maintain growth in current
stagnation; aim to achieve higher goals external environment (Immelt, 2017)
• Bring followers in line, shared vision • Trainings for executives and managers,
(Dambe and Moorad, 2008) promote corporate culture to instill vision
• Top-down implementation
• Take risks for future, invest in innovation • $1 billion investment, change corporate
culture, structure, goals, norms (Denning,
2019)
• Strong belief decision will impact
organization (Rowe, 2001)
• Life or death, no plan B (Immelt, 2017)
Visionary Leadership Challenges: Decisions
• Invest more in initiatives than warranted • Industrial Internet initiative not constrained by
profits and losses
• $1 billion investment
• Result: minimal profits (Lakhani et al., 2015)
• Non-linear decision-making • Rollout across almost entire organization
simultaneously (Moazed, 2018)
• Risks bring wealth or loss (Rowe, 2001) • Minimal profits, pressure from stockholders
(Blank, 2017)
Issue 2: Implementation
4 Dimensions of Immelt’s Leadership
Transformational Leadership
1. Charisma-idealized influence • Sincere concern for GE
• High regard, identify with leader, role model, admired, • Approachable (Abell et al., 2018)
respected, trusted • Changed culture to encourage employees to take
• Care about others’ needs, consistent, share risks, ethical (Oke risks (Adebowale, 2013)
et al., 2009)
• Inspirational motivation can conflict with • Lack of new technology knowledge necessary for
followers’ interests, impacting performance (Chen industrial internet, difficult to motivate (Lakhani
et al., 2018) et al., 2015)
Recommendations
Strategic leadership: concern with future viability and current financial
stability
• Predicated on shared vision within organization, but maintains status quo
• Avoids investments in innovations that change organization (Rowe, 2001)