Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
PYROLYSIS
USE OF ETHANOL AS A FUEL
EFFECTS ON ENVIRONMENT AS
A FUEL
INTRODUCTION
IMPORTANCE OF BIOFUELS
Although the weight loss is about 30%, the energy loss is only 10%.
Main product is the solid, torrefied biomass. During the torrefaction
process a combustible gas is released, which is utilised to supply heat to
the method.
ETHANOL AS A FUEL
There are several advantages of using Ethanol as a fuel like-
It is a relatively low-cost alternative fuel that boasts less pollution and more availability
compared to unblended petrol.
Ethanol-fuelled vehicles produce lower carbon dioxide emissions, and the same or lower
levels of hydrocarbon and oxides of nitrogen emissions.
Therefore, ethanol and other biofuels are often promoted as clean, low-cost alternatives to
petrol.
But the production and use of ethanol have not all positive the
positive points.
The major debate about corn and soy-based biofuels is the amount of land it takes away
from food production. It also involves large amounts of synthetic fertilizer and herbicide
which is a frequent source of nutrient and sediment pollution.
The challenge of growing enough crops to meet the demands of ethanol and biodiesel
production is significant and, some say, insurmountable. mean converting most of the
world’s remaining forests and open spaces to farmland — a sacrifice few people would be
willing to make.
But overall it can be used in place of our existing sources of fuel. Also, liquid fuel are used very much because of their
ease of use and azeotropic ethanol (i.e. constant boiling-point mixture with 4.4% water) is a liquid between –114°C and
+78°C, with a flashpoint of 9°C and a self-ignition temperature of 423°C. And so used as a direct substitute or additive
for gasoline.
Production of Ethanol by various Sources
The production method of ethanol depends on the type of feedstock
used. There are basically two sources by which ethanol is produced,
that is starch based crops and cellulose. The process is shorter for
starch- or sugar-based feedstocks than with cellulosic feedstocks.
Starch- and Sugar-Based Ethanol Production
Most ethanol in our country is produced from starch-based crops by
dry- mill or wet-mill processing. In dry mill It is a process that grinds
corn into flour and ferments it into ethanol with co-products of
distillers grains and carbon dioxide whereas in wet-mill plants
primarily produce corn sweeteners, along with ethanol and several
other co-products (such as corn oil and starch).
This is how ethanol is produced from starch and sugar- based sources.
Cellulosic Production
There are two primary pathways to produce cellulosic
ethanol these are biochemical and thermochemical
processes.
The biochemical process involves a pre-treatment to release
hemicellulose sugars which is followed by hydrolysis to break
cellulose into sugars. Sugars are fermented into ethanol, from
where lignin is recovered which is then used to produce energy to
power the process.
The thermochemical conversion process involves adding heat and
chemicals to a biomass feedstock to produce syngas, which is a
mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Syngas is mixed with
a catalyst and reformed into ethanol and other liquid co-products . Distribution of Ethanol
Delivering ethanol by pipeline is the most efficient option, but
there are some hurdles in it.
Due to ethanol's affinity for water and solvent properties, it
require the use of a dedicated pipeline or significant cleanup of
existing pipelines to convert them into dedicated pipelines.
Use of Ethanol as a fuel has many pros and cons therefore, one lesson to learn from these analyses is that
the whole system has to be carefully defined and scrutinized to assess its environmental impact, carbon
footprint and sustainability, etc., to use it as viable replacement for our existing fuels.
Development of a Novel Biofuel Blend Using Ethanol-
Biodiesel-Diesel Microemulsions: EB-Diesel
Oxygenated diesel fuel blends have advantages over regular
diesel. Oxygenation significantly reduces particulate matter
(PM) and reduces toxic gases such as CO, sulphur oxides
(SO x), and, at times, nitrogen oxides (NOx) from tailpipe
emissions. Ethanol, which is the oxygenate in E-diesel.
Recent studies conducted on E-diesel confirm substantial
reductions in PM, sometimes even up to 40. It was also
reported that the CO and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions
were significantly lower when a 20% blend of E-diesel was
used in a constant-speed stationary diesel engine, as
opposed to diesel fuel.
This study also reported that the optimum percentage for
ethanol in E-diesel fuel blends was 15%, which produced
reductions of 43.3%, 34%, and 32% in CO, HC, and PM
emissions, respectively. The addition of ethanol to diesel
may result in a volumetric reduction in sulfur, by as much
as 20%, thus significantly reducing SO2 emissions.
The major drawback in E-diesel is that ethanol is immiscible in diesel over a wide range
of temperatures. various commercial surfactants are used as emulsifiers to form ethanol-
diesel emulsions. Typically, these surfactants are added at a concentration of <5%.
Low-Sulfur (0.5%) Diesel Certification Fuel-Ethanol-Biodiesel System at Room
Temperature (20 °C), on adding biodiesel to this fuel system made ethanol and diesel
miscible in each other at room temperature.
This miscibility was due to the fact that biodiesel acted as an ambiphile and formed
micelles that had nonpolar tails and polar heads. In small amounts, the biodiesel
molecules were in random order; however, in larger numbers, the molecules bound
together in an ordered form. The concentration at which they became ordered is called
the critical micelle concentration.
When diesel fuel was in the continuous phase, the polar head in a biodiesel molecule
oriented itself with the ethanol and the nonpolar tail was oriented with the diesel. This
phenomenon held the micelles in a thermodynamically stable state, depending on the
component concentrations and other physical parameters.
At 20 °C, fuel ethanol, which was denatured with natural gasoline, was completely
miscible in diesel when the diesel concentration in the E-diesel mix was 85%.
The microemulsion fuel blends had the same energy values as their reference
diesel counterparts.
The flash points of both of the a forementioned EB-diesel fuel blends were reduced
only by a few degrees, in comparison to low-sulfur and ultralow-sulfur reference
diesel fuels.