Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. Introduction
A. What is the title of the literary work?
B. What is it about? (in 1-2 sentences only)
C. Who is the author?
D. What is your main thesis statement or the main idea of your
analysis?
Hashtag: _________________________________
Explanation:
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
Task 2
Getting to Know Africa!
Directions: Write T if the statement is True and F if it’s False. Write the answers on
your answer sheet. (5 points)
1. Nadine Gordimer helped Nelson Mandela edit his famous speech “I Am Prepared
to Die” during Mandela’s trial for treason in 1962.
2. J.M. Cooetzee has not won a Nobel Prize for Literature.
3. Feminism works towards equality, not female superiority.
4. The goal of structuralism is to challenge the systemic inequalities women face on a
daily basis.
5. Out of Africa is a well-known book on Africa that was written by an African author.
What’s New
DAY 2
In Lesson One, you were introduced to the ways or
approaches in analyzing literary texts. These various
approaches offer a range of perspective which can be
utilized to engage in critical analysis of numerous texts.
Aside from the Sociological Approach, Feminist criticism
or feminism, can also be used to analyze a text.
I. FEMINISM
APPROACH IN
READING
Feminist criticism or feminism, examines the role of women in literature. It
looks into how the female character may be empowered or discriminated against.
Feminist criticism has, in many ways, followed what some theorists call the waves
of feminism: 1. The first comprised women's suffrage movements of the 19th and
early-20th centuries, promoting women's right to vote. Notable women in this
period include writer Mary Wollstonecraft (A Vindication of the Rights of Women,
1792), activists like Susan B. Anthony and Victoria Woodhull. 2. The second
wave, the women's liberation movement, began in the 1960s and campaigned for
legal and social equality for women. Writers like Simone de Beauvoir (Le
Deuxième Sexe, 1949) and Elaine Showalter established the groundwork for the
dissemination of feminist theories dove-tailed with the American Civil Rights
movement. 3. In or around 1992, a third wave was identified, characterized by a
focus on individuality and diversity. The term third wave is credited to Rebecca
Walker. 4. The fourth wave, from around 2012, used social media to combat
sexual harassment, violence against women and rape culture; it is best known for
the Me Too Movement.
Feminism literary criticism
may use any of the following
methods:
• interpreting the way that women characters are described in novels,
stories, plays, biographies, and histories, especially if the author is
male
• decoding how the readers own gender influences the reading and
interpretation of a text.
• unravelling how women autobiographers and biographers of women
treat their subjects, and how women are treated as secondary to the
main subject
• describing relationships between the literary text and ideas about
power, sexuality, and gender
• critiquing of patriarchal or woman-marginalizing language, such as
a "universal" use of the masculine pronouns "he" and "him“
• noticing and unpacking differences in how men and women write: a
style, for instance, where women use more reflexive language and men
use more direct language (example: "she let herself in" versus "he
opened the door")
• reclaiming women writers who are little known or have been marginalized or
undervalued, sometimes referred to as expanding or criticizing the canon—the usual
list of "important" authors and works (e.g. include raising up the contributions of
early playwright AphraBehn and showing how she was treated differently than male
writers from her own time forward, and the retrieval of Zora Neale Hurston's writing
by Alice Walker.)
• reclaiming the "female voice" as a valuable contribution to literature, even if
formerly marginalized or ignored
• analyzing multiple works in a genre as an overview of a feminist approach to that
genre: for example, science fiction or detective fiction
• analyzing multiple works by a single author (often female)
• examining how relationships between men and women and those assuming male
and female roles are depicted in the text, including power relations
• examining the text to find ways in which patriarchy is resisted or could have been
resisted
II. TIPS IN
USING
FEMINISM
CRITICISM
IN READING
Here are some tips in analyzing some of the
feminism issues which are represented in a
given literary sample, with attention on the
female characters and the roles they played.
The following aspects should be given
attention when examining and analyzing the
work. They are as follows:
• Get to know the characters. The characters background, work, sexuality,
childhood, and outlook on life should be taken into consideration in order
for you to draw conclusion.
• Get to know their roles in the literary text. Determine the specific role the
main female character in the text.
• Time to write. Organize all the information you gathered and use them as
the basis in writing your analysis.
EXAMPLE OF
FEMINISM
APPROACH IN
LITERATURE
Below is a sample format in writing an analysis using the feminism approach.
I. Introduction
A. What is the title of the literary work?
B. What is it about? (1-2 sentences only)
C. Who is the author?
D. What is your main thesis statement or the main idea of your analysis?
II. Body
A. Who is the lead female character? Describe her background, childhood, sexuality, work, and outlook on the
world?
B. What is the setting of the sample literary piece? How is the relationship between men and women portrayed?
Is it typical for that time or not? Why or Why not?
C. How do the men interact with women? Women with men?
D. What roles/work/responsibilities do characters of either gender have?
E. What is considered socially acceptable behavior for each gender?
F. Is there evidence of characters being fundamentally shaped by gender expectations?
G. Do the men and women use language differently?
III. Conclusion
A. How do you restate your main thesis statement?
B. What is the possible solution to the women issue/s presented?
C. What is your challenge to the readers in relation to the issue/s?
As you can see from the format
above, feminism critics are focused
on the efforts to change that
include fighting against gender
stereotypes and establishing
educational, professional, and
interpersonal opportunities and
outcomes for women that are equal
to those for men
Study the given analysis of
The Story of an Hour by Kate
Chopin which uses the
feminism approach, and then
reflect on the questions that
follow.
In "The Story of an Hour" we are told that the protagonist suffers
from a heart condition and she was carefully informed of her husband
Brently's death. In the course of an hour we see the protagonist named
Louise as a weak person become into a stronger woman. She
contemplates her newly found independence and is delighted over
thought of being free. This surprising reaction reflects the feeling
women had in the late 19th century had towards marriage. Through
this, Chopin voices that marriage meant men had total control over
women. The women were not allowed to have their own identity,
thoughts or purpose. In Louise's case, her husband’s death frees her
from the restraint of marriage. Her once forbidden pleasure of
independence will no longer hold her back. For just an hour, Louise
experiences and praises her freedom that is no longer chained to her
husband's control. As she looks out the window we realize how
marriage made her into someone who did not have an identity.
She has lived a life that has given her limitations that she was only her
husband's wife and nothing more. She believed for a brief moment that she no
longer have a man that will "[bend her] in that blind persistence with which
men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a
fellow-creature." This demonstrates that patriarchal ideology that was the
norm in the late 19th century. Louise was an example of an average
housewife who was not allowed her own identity and freedom. I believe Kate
had connection with the story and the main character. When Louise felt a
brief moment of sadness of her husband’s death and then have it replaced
with happiness, this reveals how truly Kate felt when she heard the news of
her husband’s death. Kate felt restrained in her marriage, even though she
truly loved her husband, she was not happy. Even though, "The Story of an
Hour" is a fiction story, it speaks loud about the life of women in the late 19th
century.
Reflect on these questions in writing an analysis using the feminism
approach (No need to answer these questions on paper).
REFLECTIVE QUESTIONS: 1. How did the introduction begin?
2. How did the body develop?
3. How was the setting introduced in the body?
4. How were the characters presented in the body?
5. What content/s comprised the body?
6. How did the analysis end?
Part I. Directions: Answer the following items based on
what you learned about Feminism Criticism. Write the
answers on your answer sheet. (10 points)
1. Explain the feminism criticism as a reading approach.
2. Give three methods/ways in using this reading approach.
3. Present the significance of using feminism criticism in
analyzing a sample 21st Century literary work.
DAY 3
Part II. Directions: Read the
autobiography Desert Flower: The
Extraordinary Journey of a Desert Nomad
by Waris Dirie and Cathleen Miller from
Somalia. Read the notes in the boxes as
well.
Desert Flower: The Extraordinary Journey of a Desert Nomad
By Waris Dirie and Cathleen Miller
How will you describe the character How will you describe the character
based on her actions? based on the perceptions of other
people?
LESSON 3
Reader-Response
Approach vis-à-vis
European Literature
DAY 1
In Lesson Two, we learned about the Feminist Approach vis-à-vis African Literature.
This lesson will help us understand another reading approach, the Reader-Response
Approach vis-à-vis European Literature.
Directions: Suppose you were to update your Facebook status and share what you
learned about the Feminist Approach and what you know about the Reader-Response
Approach, what would you share? Write one sentence for Feminist Approach and one
sentence for Reader-Response Approach on your answer sheet (5 points each=10
points).
READER-RESPONSE
APPROACH
The reader-response approach believes that literature does
not exist as an artifact upon a printed page but as a
transaction between the physical text and the mind of a
reader. It attempts to describe what happens in the reader's
mind while interpreting a text and reflects that reading, like
writing, is a creative process. Reader-response approach
suggests that the role of the reader is essential to the meaning
of a text, for only in the reading experience does the literary
work come alive. According to reader-response critics,
literary texts do not contain a meaning; meanings derive only
from the act of individual readings. Hence, two different
readers may derive completely different interpretations of the
same literary text; likewise, a reader who re-reads a work
years later may find the work different. There is no single
"correct" interpretation for a literary work.
HOW DO YOU DO THE
READER-RESPONSE
APPROACH?
The purpose of a reader-response approach is examining,
explaining, and defending your personal reaction to a text. Your
critical reading of a text asks you to explore:
• why you like or dislike the text;
• explain whether you agree or disagree with the author;
• identify the text’s purpose; and
• critique the text. There is no right or wrong answer to a
reading response. Nevertheless, it is important that you
demonstrate an understanding of the reading and clearly explain
and support your reactions. Do not use the standard approach of
just writing: “I liked this text because it is so cool and the ending
made me feel happy,” or “I hated it because it was stupid, and
had nothing at all to do with my life, and was too negative and
boring.”
In writing a response, you
may assume the reader has
already read the text. Thus,
do not summarize the
contents of the text at
length. Instead, take a
systematic, analytical
approach to the text and
give examples.
If you did not like a text, that is fine, but criticize it either from:
• principle, for example:
o Is the text racist?
o Does the text unreasonably puts down things, such as religion, or groups of people,
such as women or adolescents, conservatives or democrats, etc?
o Does the text include factual errors or outright lies? It is too dark and despairing? Is
it falsely positive?
• form, for example:
o Is the text poorly written?
o Does it contain too much verbal “fat”?
o Is it too emotional or too childish?
o Does it have too many facts and figures?
o Are there typos or other errors in the text?
o Do the ideas wander around without making a point?
EXAMPLE OF
READER-
RESPONSE
APPROACH IN
LITERATURE
Below is a sample format for writing an
analysis using the reader-response
approach.
I. Introduction
A. What is the title of the literary work
you are responding?
B. What is it about? (in 1-2 sentences
only)
C. Who is the author?
II. Body
A. What does the text have to do with you, personally, and with your life (past, present or future)?
B. How much does the text agree or clash with your view of the world, and what you consider right and
wrong? Use several quotes as examples of how it agrees with and supports what you think about the
world, about right and wrong, and about what you think it is to be human.
C. What did you learn, and how much were your views and opinions challenged or changed by this
text, if at all? Did the text communicate with you? Why or why not? Give examples of how your views
might have changed or been strengthened (or perhaps, of why the text failed to convince you, the way
it is).
D. How well does the text address things that you personally care about and consider important to the
world? How does it address things that are important to your family, your community, to people of your
economic or social class or background, or your faith tradition? Use quotes from the text to illustrate.
E. What can you praise about the text? What problems did you have with it? Include positive things
about the text as well as pointing out problems, disagreements, and shortcomings.
F. How well did you enjoy the text (or not) as entertainment or as a work of art? Use quotes or
examples to illustrate the quality of the text as art or entertainment.
III. Conclusion
A. What is your overall reaction to the text?
B. Would you read something else like this in the
future?
C. Would you read something else by this author?
D. Would you recommend this text to someone
else and why?
Study the given analysis of
Balaki Ko ‘Day Samtang Gasakay
Ta’g Habal-Habal by Adonis
Durado which uses the reader-
response approach, then reflect on
the questions that follow.
Written by Adonis Durado, Balaki Ko ‘Day Samtang Gasakay Ta’g Habal-
Habal describes a very common situation in the provincial areas – a habal-habal ride
– but the unique thing about this habal-habal ride is that it has a romantic and
somehow sensual feel to it as the driver tells his passenger, a woman who is most
probably his lover, to hold on to him tighter for him to feel her heartbeat more
clearly against his back.
As a young woman who rides habal-habal for transportation, it seems weird for
me how the woman in the poem is portrayed as someone who is sensual with the
driver. Unless she is his lover, the poem would totally be uncomfortable. The
driver’s want for the woman to cling to him tight can be interpreted as an expression
of love. This craving of physical intimacy between the characters suggests of young
love, as young couples usually act as if they cannot get enough of each other and
has to have their hands on each other constantly. I have nothing against young love;
however, I would rather call it infatuation than young love because love is more
than physical intimacy.
Love is a commitment whether or not couples are together or
not, love does not change. Despite the conflict of the poem’s
meaning to my preference, I do like its lighthearted emotion as
seen in the lines “Dayon samtang nagakatulin kining atong
dagan,mamiyong tag maghangad ngadto sa kawanangan aron
sugaton ang taligsik sa uwan, dahon, ug bulak.” It was somewhat
refreshing while reading the poem. Somehow, I enjoyed it.
The poem was a good read because it was not the usual poem. I
am interested to read other works of Adonis Durado to explore
more creative ways of writing literary pieces. My friends would
probably like this poem because most of them have very creative
sides as well. They will definitely enjoy this poem.
REFLECTIVE QUESTIONS:
1. How did the introduction begin?
2. How did the body develop?
3. How was the reader’s personal experience introduced in the
body?
4. How were the reader’s personal views and opinions presented
in the body?
5. What content/s comprised the body?
6. How did the analysis end?
Truth or Change?
Part 1. Directions: Write TRUE if the statement is true; if NOT, change the
underlined word/phrase to make the statement true. Write the most appropriate answer
on your answer sheet (5 points).
1. In reader-response approach, two readers may have different interpretations.
2. According to reader-response critics, meanings come from group sharing.
3. If you do not like a text, you may criticize the text using reader-response approach
through principle and biography. 4. Reader-response approach suggests that the role of
the writer is essential to the meaning of a text. 5. The reading experience makes the
literary work come alive.
DAY 2
Part 2. Directions: Read
the summary of Me
Before You by Jojo
Moyes from United
Kingdom. Read the notes
in the boxes as well.
Me Before You
(A Summary)
A novel by Jojo Moyes (United Kingdom)
Directions: Create your own collage. Cut out photos that you can personally
relate to the story Me Before You from unused magazines, newspapers, or
other resources available that you can recycle. Use these cut outs to form a
shape that would best represent the life of Will Traynor. Then write a one-
sentence explanation of your collage. Refer to the sample collages and
rubric for scoring below (30 points).
Will’s life is like a crescent moon – the light
may seem dim, but it is bright enough to light
up a dark sky.
I. Poetry: Author, title of the poem, persona, addressee, tone, attitude, motifs, conditions,
imagery, symbolisms, genre, structure, theme, and appeal.
II. Fiction: setting, characters (protagonist, antagonist, static/flat, dynamic, round,
antihero, and foil), plot (en medias res, flashback, prolepsis or flash-forward, foreshadowing, and
frame story), point-of-view (participant narrator/first person, second person, and non-participant
narrator/third person), conflict (man vs. himself, man vs. man, man vs. society, man vs. culture,
and man vs. nature), symbols, theme
III. Drama: Setting, characters, plot, dialogue, movements, music, and theme
EXAMPLE OF THE
FORMALISM
APPROACH IN
LITERATURE
Below is a sample format for writing an analysis using the formalism approach.
I. Introduction
A. What is the title of the literary work?
B. What is it about? (1-2 sentences only)
C. Who is the author?
D. What is your main thesis statement or the main idea of your analysis?
II. Body
B. How does the author's choice of point of view affect the reader's understanding and
feelings about the story?
C. What influence does the setting have on the characters or their actions? D. How do the
rhythms and/or rhyme schemes of a poem contribute to the meaning or effect of the
piece?
D. How do the rhythms and/or rhyme schemes of a poem contribute to the
meaning or effect of the piece?
E. Is there a central or focal passage that can be said to sum up the entirety of
the work?
F. How are the various parts of the work interconnected?
III. Conclusion
Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveller, long I stood And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth; Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim, Because it was grassy and wanted
wear; Though as for that the passing there Had worn them really about
the same, And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.
I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less travelled by,
And that has made all the difference.
About the Poem
"The Road Not Taken" is a narrative poem by Robert Frost, published in
1916 as the first poem in the collection Mountain Interval. Its central
theme is the divergence of paths, both literally and figuratively,
although its interpretation is noted for being complex and potentially
divergent. Frost spent the years 1912 to 1915 in England, where among
his acquaintances was the writer Edward Thomas.[2] Thomas and Frost
became close friends and took many walks together. After Frost
returned to New Hampshire in 1915, he sent Thomas an advance copy
of "The Road Not Taken". Thomas took the poem seriously and
personally, and it may have been significant in Thomas' decision to
enlist in World War I. Thomas was killed two years later in the Battle of
Arras.
About the Author Robert Lee Frost (March 26, 1874 –
January 29, 1963) was an American poet. His work was initially
published in England before it was published in the United
States. Known for his realistic depictions of rural life and his
command of American colloquial speech,[2] Frost frequently
wrote about settings from rural life in New England in the early
twentieth century, using them to examine complex social and
philosophical themes. Frost was honored frequently during his
lifetime and is the only poet to receive four Pulitzer Prizes for
Poetry. He became one of America's rare "public literary
figures, almost an artistic institution."[3] He was awarded the
Congressional Gold Medal in 1960 for his poetic works. On
July 22, 1961, Frost was named poet laureate of Vermont.
Task 3 Walk the Talk!
Directions: Answer the following questions based on the poem
read. Write your answers in one to two sentences. Support your
answer with instances from the text. Write the answers on your
answer sheet. (25 points) 1. Where is the poem set? 2. Describe
the two paths that the persona encountered. Which path did
he/she take? Was he/she happy about his/her choice? How can
you tell? 3. Compare the first line in stanza 1 and the third line
in stanza 3. Why is this line repeated? What does it mean? 4.
What do you think the speaker means in the last line of the
poem? 5. What are some of the major decisions that a person
makes in his/her life?
DAY 3
Directions: Fill in the boxes with your learning/insights about the topic. Write the answers
on your answer sheet. (9 points)
PMI MATRIX
What’s best about the What is quite difficult? What struck you most?
topic?
Write It Up!
Directions: Using another sheet of paper, choose one literary text from the samples
given in Lessons 1- 4 and write a critical analysis of it using an appropriate reading
approach. Follow the suggested structure/format indicated for that specific reading
approach and be guided by the scoring rubric indicated below (35 points).
Note: The template or format for the reading approaches is given in the discussion
part of each lesson (What’s New). You may review this part as your reference
before writing your analysis.
DAY 4
Directions: Using your answer sheet, write
the letter of your chosen answer (15 points).
1. A reading approach we can use to distinguish the roles of marginalized women in the society.
A. Feminism B. Formalist C. Sociological D. Reader-Response
2. The sociological approach to reading is done by analyzing the work in relation to its _________.
A. female characters B. reader C. society D. Structure
3. The following 21st century writers originate from Latin America. Which does not belong to the Latin American Canon
of writers?
A. Isabel Allende C. Mario Vargas Llosa
B. Jorge Volpi D. Albert Camus
4. What is the reader-response approach to reading?
I. It describes the transaction between the text and the reader.
II. It supports one correct analysis from a reader.
III. It provides meaning from individual readings.
A. I only B. I and II only C. I and III only D. I, II, and III
5. What reading approach is used in the text below?
As an only female child with a strong bond to my father, I empathize with the taximanin disciplining Lay Choo in his
desire to give her a brighter future. Fathers may be hard on the outside, but they indeed have a soft spot inside.
A. sociological approach C. feminist approach
B. reader-response approach D. formalist approach
6. In the reader-response approach, responding to the text is
very important because this approach focuses on how the
reader’s ____________
A. response match with other readers C. mind interacts with the
author
B. reaction connects with the audience D. experience affects the
text
7. Which is an example of a sociological approach to reading?
A. If I were Will in Me Before You, I would rather keep my life
and allow God to take it
at His perfect time.
B. If I had a son like Will, I would give him all the love he
needs to live life more
comfortably.
C. Me Before You encourages me to value life and appreciate
the little things in life
because life is a gift.
D. Me Before You shows us the more liberated Western culture
as they support the
granting of a death wish through assisted suicide.
8. What Asian ideology is evident in The Taximan’s Story?
A. nationalism C. family
B. spirituality D. social structure
9. In analyzing Art Spiegelman’s “Prisoner on the Hell Planet,”
you take a more traditional approach and discuss the setting,
conflict, characters, tone, theme, and other elements of the
story. You assert that “Prisoner on the Hell Planet” is not a
legitimate form of literature because it fails to meet our
expectations of what a story should be. What kind of critical
approach are you using?
A. Feminist B. Formalist C. Sociological D.. Reader-Response
10. How is contemporary European literature portrayed in Me
Before You?
A. The ending is unexpected. C. The plot is confusing.
B. The structure is fragmented. D. The characters are
questionable.
11. The following writers originate from North America. Which
does not belong to the North American Canon of writers?
A. Emily Dickinson C. T.S. Eliot
B. Samuel Johnson D. William Faulkner
12. In criticizing Pam Houston’s “How to Talk to a Hunter,” you
discuss the stereotypical views on women, men, and
relationships expressed by the characters, focusing on the
advice of both female and male friends in particular. You assert
that the author is highly critical of these stereotypes. What kind
of critical approach are you using?
A. Feminism B. Formalist C. Sociological D. Reader-Response
13. In discussing T.B. Wood’s “A Loaf of Bread,” you focus on
you focus on symbols, characters, and theme and how these
various elements help to create a unity in the work. You do not
discuss the author, the reader, or any considerations outside the
text itself. What kind of critical approach are you using?
A. Feminist B. Formalist C. Sociological D. Reader-Response
14. Gabriel Garcia Marquez was one of the best- known
contemporary writers of Latin America. Which of the
following works did he author?
A. Wasted in Love C. The Stone Thrower
B. The Beautiful Indifference D. A Very Old Man with
Enormous Wings
15. In the poem “The Road Not Taken” by Robert Frost,
which of the following road signs tells the motorists to expect
the road to “diverge?
A. B. C. D.