You are on page 1of 17

SESSION 10 – RECOGNIZING SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICES

IN WINS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


ORIENTATION AND PLANNING FOR THE
WINS POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
Department of Education
Conducted by National Capital Region
May 24-26,2017
CRITERIA FOR RECOGNITION

Criteria Weight
Improvement of schools in the WinS 30%
implementation level.
Schools’ achievement of national standards 20%
(3 Stars)
Organizational Enablers 50%

2
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
SUB-CRITERIA FOR ORGANIZATIONAL
ENABLERS
A. STEERING STRUCTURE AND RELATIONS
Structures and relationships needed to steer WinS implementation
B. SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Supportive mechanisms that provide the processes and tools to move the
WinS program
C. PLANNING, PROGRAMMING AND RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
Articulation of directions, programs and resource commitment to achieve
national WinS standards in strategic and operational plans
D. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, RESEARCH AND INNOVATIONS
Refers to the intent to innovate and learn from experience to
continuously improve WinS management and implementation
E. HUMAN CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
Refers to capacitating human resource to ensure that the organization
has the appropriate and relevant competencies for WinS
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
3
SUB-CRITERIA FOR ORGANIZATIONAL
ENABLERS
A. STEERING STRUCTURE AND RELATIONS
Criteria Means of Verification
1. Functional SD WinS TWG which • Any form of issuance to constitute the WinS
comprise a range of internal and TWG
external stakeholders that are • At least 2 WinS TWG meeting in one year with
working together and providing minutes as supporting document
directions on WinS management • Attendance sheet shows internal and external
and implementation stakeholders attending the meeting/s
• TWG program of work should address
important issues and enhance program
implementation of WinS

4
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
SUB-CRITERIA FOR ORGANIZATIONAL
ENABLERS
B. SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Criteria Means of Verification
2. M&E of WinS as part of the • At least 95% of schools encoded
SDO M&E system (e.g. Schools • At least 25% of schools have been validated by
validated by the SDO; Monitoring the SDO
reports) • Policy document or manual indicating system of
monitoring and evaluating WinS containing the
following: tools, process, persons involved and
schedule
• Division Monitoring Reports include WinS

5
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
SUB-CRITERIA FOR ORGANIZATIONAL
ENABLERS
B. SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Criteria Means of Verification
3. TA System Integrates WinS (e.g. • WinS is part of the SDO’s TA agenda to schools
WinS is part of the SDO’s TA • Policy document or manual indicating system
agenda to schools; SDO personnel of technical assistance for WinS containing the
capable of providing TA to schools following: tools, process, persons involved and
re: WinS schedule
• TA plan uses data coming from the WinS M&E
system

6
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
SUB-CRITERIA FOR ORGANIZATIONAL
ENABLERS
B. SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Criteria Means of Verification
4. SDO Learning Resource • Copy of new WinS materials developed,
Development and Management distributed or approved
System is developing, distributing
and assuring the quality of WinS
materials to support health
education

7
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
SUB-CRITERIA FOR ORGANIZATIONAL
ENABLERS
C. PLANNING, PROGRAMMING AND RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
Criteria Means of Verification
5. WinS is reflected as agenda in • WinS is one of the improvement areas of the
the Division Education DEDP
Development Plan (DEDP - SDO’s
strategic plan) on areas such as
research, KM, T&D.
6. Resource allocation for WinS • WinS activities/services can be found in the
activities and services (reflected in AIP/APP
the SDO’s Annual Improvement
Plan and/or Annual Procurement
Plan)

8
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
SUB-CRITERIA FOR ORGANIZATIONAL
ENABLERS
C. PLANNING, PROGRAMMING AND RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
Criteria Means of Verification
7. Active involvement of partners • Documentation of involvement of at least 2
(e.g. NGOs, LGUs, CSO and INGOs) partners (eg. MOA, MOU, etc.)
in implementing the WinS agenda • List of support obtained resulting from
as a result of actively establishing resource mobilization
and maintaining linkages with
these partners (at least 2 types of
partners)

9
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
SUB-CRITERIA FOR ORGANIZATIONAL
ENABLERS
D. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, RESEARCH AND INNOVATIONS
Criteria Means of Verification
8. The SDO conducts at least one • At least one Research paper on WinS per year
study a year on WinS or a topic
related to it
9. SDO-led WinS project or • Project design on WinS (eg. Initiatives to
innovations innovate, sustain, or improve)
• Documentation of WinS project
implementation or innovation
10. Utilize WinS M&E data to • Plan adjustments are made based on WinS
design and make improvements M&E data
on programs (knowledge
management)

10
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
SUB-CRITERIA FOR ORGANIZATIONAL
ENABLERS
E. HUMAN CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
Criteria Means of Verification
11. WinS as a learning topic is • Training design indicating WinS as one of the
included in the SDO Professional learning topics
Development Program (for SDO • Training report with WinS as one of the
staff and supervisors) learning topics
12. SDO staff and supervisors • Certificate of participation in WinS trainings for
developed their capacity by at least half of the personnel assigned to
participating in learning monitor and provide TA for WinS
opportunities – e.g. direct
training; LAC sessions; advance
learning on WinS

11
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
TOOLS FOR RECOGNIZING
WINS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Click on the Generate


Reports feature found
in the Modules Menu

Click on the three Reports to


generate data on Schools
Needing Improvement,
Three Star Schools and
Encoded Schools 12
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
TOOLS FOR RECOGNIZING
WINS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Criteria 1: Schools with


Improved Rating

Criteria 2: Schools with 13


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 3-Stars
Enter data in
white cells

All MOV
criteria
should be
present
before an
enabler is
given a score

14
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
TOOLS FOR RECOGNIZING
WINS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

15
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
WORKSHOP

• Assess a division in your region in terms of the


organizational enablers and the means of verification
• Fill up the WinS Recognition Tool for Program
Management

16
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
THANK YOU!

17
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

You might also like