Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transitions to Democracy
What is Autocracy?
• Definition:
• Greek terms auto (self) + kratia (rule)
• despotism, tyranny
• rule by one
• without regard to law
Defining Features of Autocracy
Defining Features:
2) Majority Rule
3) Political Participation
4) Political Freedom
Limitations of Liberal Democracy
• Elite Rule
• elected officials are drawn primarily from upper and upper middle classes
• Tyranny of the Majority
• fundamental principle: majority rules
• Private vs. Public Interests
Starting Transitions
• Different types of transitions can occur
• Pacted Transition
• Top-down
• Pacts or agreements are signed among the elites in formerly undemocratic
states that establish democratic government
• Bottom-up Transition
• The people can demand the transition to democracy
• The people form a movement and demand democracy
Transitional Elections
• Once elites agree to meet the people’s demands then a transitional election can
occur
• Election that marks the official beginning of democracy
• Concerns
• Need some way to assure they are fair
• Need a quick and honest vote count
• All candidates need a certain amount of media time
• After the election the transition to democracy has occurred but it is far from consolidated
Constrained Democracy
• Features free and competitive elections and often a thin example of
democracy
• Country meets the procedural definition of democracy
• Can be looked at in terms of steps
1) An opening when an authoritarian regime shows weakness
2) A breakthrough when the authoritarian regime collapses
3) The transitional election, which is the first experience with democratic
politics
Partial or Imperfect Democracy
• Thin democracy
• Countries where the democratic transition stalled before taking full effect
• Argentina in the 1990s
• Sometimes also called “low-intensity democracies”
• In some cases this term applies to democracies that depend on the support of
the military to rule
Delegative democracy
• Have competitive elections, wide-ranging political opposition, free
media, and legislatures and courts that function
• What they lack is any sort of serious control over their presidents and
prime ministers between elections
• Text: “They are governed by a boss who has as free a hand as the boss dares
to use”
• They can become even more powerful in a crisis, can assume great
powers in crisis
*Consolidation
• the situation when a country’s commitment to democracy is strong
and sure
• democracy is likely to persist
• unlikely to turn back to authoritarian or totalitarian rule
• very difficult to measure
• it is easy to tell when a country takes the first step towards democracy
but hard to tell when it truly takes hold
Why does consolidation fail?
• In some cases the governments themselves seek to prevent the
extension of democracy
• Sometimes they may be trying to keep more power to themselves
• In other cases there may be powerful interests in the government
acting against the spread of democracy
How Can We Promote and Strengthen
Democracy?
• Many current stable and consolidated democracies have made an
effort to encourage other countries to consolidate and become more
stable
• Among the countries that are significant sources of aid to poor countries only
Japan does NOT have a democracy component to its aid
• There are also some NGOs working to encourage the strengthening of
democracy
Are all these efforts well spent?
• Carothers (2002)
• Not well spent
• Advocate a one-size-fits-all philosophy
• What works to strengthen democracy in one country might not work in others
Democracy in Canada
• even in Canada we cannot take our democracy for granted
• although we never suffered under a dictatorship democracy has grown
significantly over time
• until early in the 20th century Canada had a property franchise
• until the 1940s some provinces restricted the right of non-European ethnic backgrounds
from voting
• women were denied the right to vote federally until 1918
• aboriginals could not vote until 1960
What does the future hold?
• Will democracy spread throughout the world?
• Are there parts of the world where democracy is not appropriate?
• Some analysts think that eventually all countries will at least have
elections
• Francis Fukuyama
• Worked for the US department of State
• Argued that in 1989 liberal democracy had already proven its superiority and
would soon become universally accepted