CALAMANSI (CITROFORTUNELLA MICROCARPA)

AND KAMIAS (AVERRHOA BALIMBI) JUICE AS MAIN

ACTIVE INGREDIENT FOR RUST REMOVER
CENTRO DOS RESULTS/DISCUSSION
PROGRESS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
• This chapter presents the analysis and interpretation of
the study on Calamansi (Citrofortunella microcarpa) and
Kamias (Averrhoa Balimbi) as main active ingredient for
Rust Remover. The content of this chapter are the data
gathered from the experiments conducted on our homes.
The presentations are done according to the specific
objectives and hypothesis. Results were presented using
tables for convenience and for easier comprehension.
TABLE 1: TIME EFFECTIVITY
TABLE 1: TIME EFFECTIVITY
TABLE 1: TIME EFFECTIVITY
• Based from the table above, we have gathered data by
giving a rating of the amount of rust present in the soaked
bolts, we allotted 48 hours for this experiment, with a 3-
hour interval. The table presents that the product shows
its minimum effectivity at the 6-hour mark. We are able to
see that the Commercialized Product is behind by a small
margin on the first 12 hours. But when we left it for
another 9 hours, we have observed that there was a large
drastic change between the amount of rust on our product
compared to the commercialized one. Based from the data
gathered, we are able to determine that the optimum time
for the product to work is around 21-23 hours..
TABLE 1.1: GENERAL
EFFECTIVITY
TABLE 1.1: GENERAL
EFFECTIVITY
TABLE 1.1: GENERAL
EFFECTIVITY
• Based from the table above, we have gathered data by
giving a rating the appearance of metal bolts overtime, we
allotted 50 hours for this experiment, with a 5-hour interval.
The table presents that the during the first 10 hours of the
experiment, most of their appearances were equal but
changes overtime. Unexpectedly, the metal on the
Commercialized Product on the 50-hour mark suddenly
increased its rust by a small amount. Based from the data
gathered, we are able to determine that the Calamansi
(Citrofortunella microcarpa) and Kamias (Averrhoa Balimbi)
Rust Remover, has statistically better results compared to
Brand X.
TABLE 1.2: COST
TABLE 1.2: COST

• Based form this table, the prices of each ingredient were

not the full cost price, but instead the estimated price in
correlation with the amount needed for the product. We
opted not to put any cost in the water as we only needed
a small amount, and water is accessible.
• Our product has a ₱128.00 difference between the
products, considering the results of its effectiveness from
the table above.
TABLE 2: GENERAL
EFFECITIVTY SUMMARY
• Based from this This table
shows that the Calamansi
(Citrofortunella microcarpa)
and Kamias (Averrhoa
Balimbi) Rust Remover has
6 count, 53 sum, 8.8 mean,
and a variance of 0.53.
While Commercialised Rust
Remover has 6 counts, a
sum of 46, a mean of 4.66
and a variance of 0.33.
TABLE 2.1: T-TEST FOR
GENERAL EFFECITIVTY
• Table 2.1 presents the test for
general effectivity between
Calamansi and Kamias Rust
Remover and the Commercialized
Rust Remover. The computed t is
2.84 and the table t is 1. 812. This
indicates that the computed t
value is higher than the table t,
therefore, the null hypothesis is
rejected which means there is a
significant difference between
Calamansi and Kamias Rust
Remover and the Commercialized
Rust Remover in terms of its
general effectivity.
TABLE 2: TIME EFFECTIVITY
SUMMARY
• Based on the Time Effectivity
Summary in Table 3, Calamansi
(Citrofortunella microcarpa) and
Kamias (Averrhoa Balimbi) Rust
Remover has a total of 12 counts, a
total of 80 counts, a mean of 6.7
and a variance of 8.61 counts.
However, Commercialised Rust
Remover also had 12 counts, with a
total of 52 counts, a mean of 4.3,
and a variance of 3.5 for the same
sample period. In comparison
between the two means, they do
have a large amount of mean
difference which is 2.4
TABLE 3.1: T-TEST FOR TIME
EFFECITIVTY
• Table 3.1 presents the test for
time effectivity between Calamansi
and Kamias Rust Remover and the
Commercialized Rust Remover.
The computed t is 2.08 and the
table t is 2.074. This indicates that
the computed t value is higher
than the table t again, therefore,
the null hypothesis is rejected
which means there is a significant
difference between Calamansi and
Kamias Rust Remover and the
Commercialized Rust Remover in
terms of its time effectivity.
THANK YOU!
PRESENTED BY CENTRO DOS GROUP:
ERICKA RAMONES
JOSH FLOR
KRIZELLE LACAR
ERIC ORTIZ