Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Scales development
• In Class activity for instrument development
• Questionnaire Design
• In Class Activity
Hypothesis/es
• Formal statement of an unproven proposition that is empirically testable.
• Example: Giving employees one Friday off each month will result in lower employee
turnover.
• There is a positive correlation between the number of hours students study and their test
scores.
Variables
• Independent Variable: a variable that is manipulated by the marketer
to observe its effect on the dependent variable. For example, a
marketer may change the price of a product to see how it affects sales.
2. Causality
3. Generalization
4. Replication
1. Measurement
• Variation in a variable
2. Causality
• Explanation
• why things are the way they are
• Confidence
• in the researcher's causal inferences
Impact or Category…?
3. Generalization
• Attitude towards a brand: This scale measures the respondent's attitude towards a
brand by asking them to rate it on a set of bipolar adjectives such as "sophisticated"
versus "unsophisticated", "exciting" versus "boring", "innovative" versus
"conventional".
• Assessment of a product: This scale measures the respondent's assessment of a
product by asking them to rate it on a set of bipolar adjectives such as "high quality"
versus "low quality", "useful" versus "useless", "attractive" versus "unattractive".
Brand personality or concept
Non-comparative scales: Stapel scale
• The Stapel scale, named after its developer, Jan Stapel, is a unipolar
rating scale with 10 categories numbered from -5 to +5, without a
neutral point
Non-comparative scales: Semantic differential
• A measure of attitudes that consist of series of 3-, 5-, or 7-point rating scale that use bipolar
adjectives o anchor the begging and the end of each scale.
• Attitude towards a brand: This scale measures the respondent's attitude towards a brand by
asking them to rate it on a set of bipolar adjectives such as "sophisticated" versus
"unsophisticated", "exciting" versus "boring", "innovative" versus "conventional".
• Assessment of a product: This scale measures the respondent's assessment of a product by asking
them to rate it on a set of bipolar adjectives such as "high quality" versus "low quality", "useful"
versus "useless", "attractive" versus "unattractive".
Attitudes
• Attitudes are hypothetical or latent or simple called constructs.
• They are called latent or hypothetical because they can not be
observed/measured directly. Examples of common latent constructs are job
satisfaction, personal values, feeling and perceived value.
• Thus, we measure attitudes by inferring it from individual response
(agree/disagree) to a set of statements about an object(person /product/brand
or place etc.).
• Measuring attitude of a company stakeholder should be a permeant process.
Attitude rating scales
1. Simple attitude scales:
Usually asked through a single statement, with a binominal option to respond, such as yes or no,
agree or disagree, present or absent. Thus, the data produced through such measure allow for
very limited option of statistical analysis.
2. Category scales:
Most scientist believe that attitudes exist on a continuum. The simple scale does not offer to
measure response on a continuum. Thus, category scales solve this problem by offering categories
of responses on a continuum. Such as, never, rarely, sometimes, often and very often.
They provide a more sensitive level of measurement as compared to simple scales. However, they
can not be used to measure attitudes that are more likely to be bipolar.
Measuring behavioral intentions
• Behavioral intentions is the subset of an attitude. Intentions are measured as a proxy of actual
behavior.
• Therefore, like other component of attitudes (cognition and affect) behavioral intentions can
be measured using same techniques we have discussed earlier. Such as Likert scale, Semantic
differential scale ( we call it behavioral differential now), paired comparison or sorting (air
line example).
• The most used methods are Likert or semantic differential scales.
The impact of service quality of nursing staff on the consumer
behaviour: An investigation of emergency services at hospital
Revisit
Intention
SERVQUA Attitude
L Towards
hospital
Satisfaction