SE4

Monitoring and
Evaluation
Harnessing Data and Insights for Program Effectiveness
and Continuous Improvement
The Ritz Hotel, Davao City

NATIONAL ORIENTATION OF KEY OFFICIALS

ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
NATIONAL LEARNING CAMP
MONITORING VS EVALUATION

Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are

processes that both refer to the measurement
of the performance of an organization, a
program, a project, or an individual.

Monitoring is a systematic and objective

assessment of an on-going implementation of
plans, programs, projects, and major activities.
Evaluation provide valuable lessons and insights
that can be used by managers in crafting
strategic decisions for the future such as in
designing organizational changes or future
programs and/or projects.
MONITORING VS EVALUATION

The purpose of monitoring is to assess whether

the program is being implemented as planned,
identify any challenges or deviations, and
provide real-time feedback for timely decision-
making and corrective action.
The purpose of evaluation is to determine the
overall effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, and
sustainability of the program. It focuses on
understanding the program's impacts,
identifying lessons learned, and informing
future program planning and decision-making.
THE THEORY OF CHANGE
Blueprint of Evaluation

It is a conceptual framework that

outlines how a program or
intervention is expected to bring
about desired outcomes or
impacts. It maps out the logical
pathway of change, connecting
the activities, outputs, outcomes,
and impacts of a program.
THE THEORY OF CHANGE
Goal Intermediate Outcome
Improved learners' Improved learners' learning
performance competencies.
Improved learners' motivation,
interest, and engagement, socio-
emotional skills
---
Teachers improved their
pedagogical skills on,
intervention, consolidation and
enhancement.
Teachers improved their
collaborative expertise
Immediate Outcome Outputs
Learners completed the Provided print and non-print learning
3 weeks/5 weeks materials.
learning camp
Schools developed learning camp
Learners participated design/plan according to the guidelines
the 3 weeks/5 weeks
learning camp.
Teachers conducted intervention,
consolidation and enhancement camps
Teachers participated using the targeted instruction
in the LAC sessions for
collaborative expertise Conducted professional development /
sharing. LAC sessions on collaborative expertise
Schools provided with TAs
THE M & E PLAN

A Monitoring and Evaluation

(M&E) Plan is a document that
outlines the systematic
processes, methodologies, and
activities to be undertaken to
monitor and evaluate a program
or intervention.
THE M & E PLAN FOR NLC

Highlighted under
Data Source are
the M&E tools
developed.
THE M & E TOOLS
TOOL PURPOSE SCHEDULE
Teachers’ Self-Assessment This survey tool will help teachers assess as to what level they Pre and Post
Tool demonstrate needed pedagogical skills and collaborative NLC
practices.
NLC Monitoring Tool This tool provide data on learners and teachers participating in During the
the NLC, and information on various aspects of program NLC
implementation including challenges and and best practices.

Learning Survey on This survey tool provide data on motivation, interest, and Post NLC
Motivation, Engagement, engagement, socio-emotional skills of learners improved from
Interest and Socio-emotional the perspective of learners, teachers and parents.
aspects of Learning

Interview Guide for Focus It provide data on the experiences, valuable insights and Post NLC
Group Discussion perspectives before, during, and after the conduct of the
learning camp form the of learners, teachers and
parents/stakeholders.

The M&E tools shall be finalized and will be issued in

a separate DepEd memo.
M&E TOOL: Teacher’s Self Assessment Tool
M&E TOOL: NLC Monitoring Tool
M&E TOOL: Post NLC Self-Assessment Survey on Motivation, Engagement
and Socio-Emotional Aspect of Learning
M&E TOOL: Interview Guide for Focus Group Discussion
RESPONSIBLITIES OF IMPLEMENTING UNITS

School heads supervise the

ROs and SDOs monitor
implementation and
school’s compliance with CO utilizes M&E results
ensures that the Policy is
the Policy and consolidate for policy evaluation
communicated to
M&E reports
stakeholders

MONITORING AND EVALUATION

RESPONSIBLITIES OF IMPLEMENTING UNITS
School Heads Supervise the implementation of these guidelines in their
schools, ensuring that the provisions are communicated
to all concerned stakeholders in the school community.
prepare a report at the end of the annual Learning Camp
SDO Jointly monitor schools' compliance with these guidelines
School Governance Operations and policy.
Division (SGOD) and Consolidate reports and analyze data from schools.
Curriculum Implementation
Division (CID)

RO Jointly monitor schools' compliance with these guidelines

Quality Assurance Division (QAD) and policy.
and Consolidate reports and analyze data from SDOs.
Curriculum and Learning
Management Division (CLMD)

CO Monitor schools' compliance with these guidelines and

Curriculum and Teaching (CT) policy.
Strand, through the Bureau of Evaluate the program for continuous improvement of its
Learning Delivery design and implementation.
Monitoring and Evaluation of the
National Learning Camp
Harnessing Data and Insights for Program Effectiveness
and Continuous Improvement