This document describes an activity where students are divided into roles of speaker, recorder, and artist to test visual description and interpretation skills. The speaker describes an image to the recorder without naming it, while the artist draws what is described and can ask for clarification. Comparing the original image to the description and drawing highlights how key identifying characteristics are needed rather than vague attributes. The conclusion notes this parallels distinguishing chemical substances by investigating properties rather than appearance alone.
This document describes an activity where students are divided into roles of speaker, recorder, and artist to test visual description and interpretation skills. The speaker describes an image to the recorder without naming it, while the artist draws what is described and can ask for clarification. Comparing the original image to the description and drawing highlights how key identifying characteristics are needed rather than vague attributes. The conclusion notes this parallels distinguishing chemical substances by investigating properties rather than appearance alone.
This document describes an activity where students are divided into roles of speaker, recorder, and artist to test visual description and interpretation skills. The speaker describes an image to the recorder without naming it, while the artist draws what is described and can ask for clarification. Comparing the original image to the description and drawing highlights how key identifying characteristics are needed rather than vague attributes. The conclusion notes this parallels distinguishing chemical substances by investigating properties rather than appearance alone.
rsc.li/2RF6rss Roles Sit with your back to each other – do not look at anyone else's work! • Student 1: Describe the image – no naming or hints • Student 2: Record exactly what student 1 says – no talking! • Student 3: Draw what student 1 describes – can ask clarification question Draws Only writes Can ask for clarification No talking! 3 2 2 mins – STOP! Write down what you think was described. Anyone correct? Has the picture and carefully describes it 1 Now compare what was said and what was drawn with the image Conclusion • Using descriptions such as long ears, round head or long tail is unlikely to have helped you identify the picture nor be able to distinguishing between cats and dogs. • The presence or absence of key characteristics such as those in the table are required.
Dog-like families Cat-like families
(Caniformia) (Feliformia) claws non-retractable retractable coats plain patterned diet omnivorous carnivorous • In chemistry we can distinguish between substances that look the same by investigating their chemical properties.