This document discusses the connections between state failure, insurgency, and terrorism. It argues that failed states are more susceptible to terrorist and insurgent threats because they lack control over their territories and populations. Within failed states, terrorist groups can organize, recruit, fundraise, and operate with little interference from incompetent governments. Insurgencies also find conditions in failed states favorable for growing and thriving.
Original Description:
Original Title
The Connections between State Failure, Insurgency, and Terrorism
This document discusses the connections between state failure, insurgency, and terrorism. It argues that failed states are more susceptible to terrorist and insurgent threats because they lack control over their territories and populations. Within failed states, terrorist groups can organize, recruit, fundraise, and operate with little interference from incompetent governments. Insurgencies also find conditions in failed states favorable for growing and thriving.
This document discusses the connections between state failure, insurgency, and terrorism. It argues that failed states are more susceptible to terrorist and insurgent threats because they lack control over their territories and populations. Within failed states, terrorist groups can organize, recruit, fundraise, and operate with little interference from incompetent governments. Insurgencies also find conditions in failed states favorable for growing and thriving.
The Connections between State Failure, Insurgency, and Terrorism • International security experts are coming to the consensus that threats to international security may arise from areas within states or at boundaries between states that, for various reasons, are not controlled by state authority. • These states provide favourable demographic and social conditions, which are key factors in their conduciveness to terrorism or to the development of an insurgency. • According to this view, the front lines of the war on terrorism and the increasingly difficult fight against insurgency lie within these failed states. The Connections between State Failure, Insurgency, and Terrorism • The main argument as to the relevance and relationship between failed states, insurgency, and terrorism revolves around the fact that failed states are easier for terrorist organisations to penetrate and operate from and that they are easier for insurgencies to develop and thrive within. • This logic emerges from the fact that failed states lack the ability to project power internally and have incompetent and corrupt law enforcement capacities. The Connections between State Failure, Insurgency, and Terrorism • It has been long understood that they provide opportunities for terrorist groups to organise, train, generate revenue, and set up logistics and communications centres. • In this regard, terrorist groups can essentially develop their own capabilities with little governmental interference. • Building on this is the argument that failed states offer terrorist groups larger pools of recruits or potential recruits as they contain larger numbers of disaffected and alienated citizens, for whom political violence is, in the majority of cases, an accepted avenue of behaviour. The Connections between State Failure, Insurgency, and Terrorism • Failed states, through their inherent incompetence, create political vacuums into which these terrorist groups step. • In doing so terrorist groups provide personal security, economic assistance, and other special services to the citizens in return for protection and the time to widen their base of operations.
Understanding The Mindanao Conflict The Origins of The Mindanao Conflict Can Be Traced Back To The 16th Century When The Native Moro Population of The Island Resisted Invading Spanish Forces