Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Welcome
Training session will begin shortly.
•Please note that the session will be recorded & shared later.
•Please keep your microphone in mute mode & use below options when required.
TIER 2
RAW MATERIAL –
CLAIM MATERIAL ASSESSMENT
QUALITY ASSURANCE FACTORY ASSESSMENT
(CMA)
(RM-QAFA)
Who: Who:
Designated Tier 2 Fabric Suppliers & Factories Designated Tier 2 Fabric Supplier & Factories
What: What:
To assess quality management system and To assess capability of a Tier 2 factory to
manufacturing risks of a Tier 2 factory servicing handle claimed materials, ensuring risks are
Target Owned Brand’s apparel business identified and effectively mitigated around
guest-facing raw material claims on Target’s
Owned Brand products
.
• QMS alignment
Closure)
• Q&A
Quality Management System
Key Definitions: QMS
Quality Control Quality Assurance Quality Management
System (QMS) QMS
1
(QC) (QA)
Meeting quality by System comprised of quality
Improve quality by being
checking for defects proactive and preventative strategy, planning, resources
Goal = Detection
Quality
and activities to improve the
Focus = Product Goal = Prevention organization as a whole; Assurance
Focus = Product + Process governed by a set of policies
What it is: and procedures.
Quality
Fabric inspection, machine What it is:
inspection, Product Testing, Preventative action, CAPA Audits etc Goal = Strategy beyond QC / QA to Control
Corrective Action an integrated systems approach
What it isn’t:
Inspection, 100% guarantee, QC Focus = Product + Process +
What it isn’t Organization(s) + Data/ Technology
Process, MCP, Preventative
Action, QA What it is:
It is more than just documentation…
it is effective implementation & Continuous Improvement
execution
Continuous Improvement is a central
priority for a QMS – PDCA Continue to Evolve from a QC/QA to a QMS Organization
What it isn’t: Not ISO 9000 Target’s Quality Management System (QMS) principles,
within an established culture of quality.
Quality Management System
1Quality
From one size fits all From lack of visibility in product
development
To differentiated approach
aligned to business needs Quality To planning for end to end
Strategy Planning preventive risk mitigation
throughout product life cycle
Voice of
customer
Enabled by Technology
RM-QAFA
What is Raw Material – Quality Assurance Factory Assessment (RM-
QAFA)?
It’s a factory assessment, managed by Raw Materials Assurance
team (RMA) via nominated 3rd party to review factory’s
manufacturing process & quality management systems that ensure
consistent quality & assess risk in supply chain i.e. fabric suppliers
serving Target's apparel business.
2. Initiate self-assessment
New suppliers/factories - GRMT/Fabric Sourcing to direct to initiate self-assessment.
Existing suppliers/factories –RMA team to inform fabric suppliers/ factories to submit
a self-assessment around 60 days before expiration date.
3. Verification assessment
RMA to review self-assessment, if overall score meets Target’s minimum
requirement, it gets assigned to 3rd party for onsite verification assessment.
• Observations – The assessor will visit all areas of the factory and
observe that defined processes and procedures are being followed as
well as observing general factory conditions. Again, here emphasis is to
ensure that work practices & SOP being executed effectively at factory
floor.
• Factory your – The assessor will tour the factory from the incoming material area to the
finished product warehouse. During the tour assessor will make general observation and
identify the areas of the factory where he/she will return to conduct the detailed portions of
the assessment. The tour helps the auditor visualize the factory layout to optimize
subsequent activities.
• Sectional assessment – The assessor will visit the specific areas of the factory covered
within the scope and utilize the methodologies described above to assess compliance.
• Draft findings – The assessor will then need a private area to review his findings and
prepare the draft for review during the closing meeting.
• Closing meeting – The assessor will present the draft findings to factory management. In
case of any disagreement on assessment observation, factory should reach out to RMA team
within two weeks of assessment,
Assessment score
on making & CAP Follow-up Plan
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
QMS / On- On-
CAPA Desktop Continuous site assessme site assess
Overall Score Overall Color Explanation Decision Review/ improvement nt ment
Rating Evidence (partial (full
review plan
scope) scope)
90 calendar
95.00 to 99.99% Purple Exceed Good to work days - -
expectations from assessm
ent date
90 calendar
80.00 to 94.99% Green Meet Good to work days - -
expectations from assessm
ent date
60 calendar Within 6
60.00 to 79.99% Yellow Needs Continue to work days - months -
(for existing supplier) improvement Act on CAP from assessme from assessm
nt date ent date
60 calendar Within 6
60.00 to 79.99% Yellow Needs Can add to matrix days - months -
(for new supplier) improvement Act on CAP from assessme from assessm
nt date ent date
Claimed Material - Product claims can be of various types, one of them is raw material claims, where mostly sustainable raw materials are
called out in product or packaging. At Target, based on company policy, following material types are in focus for making claims:
• Cotton (Organic, Supima, US Cotton etc.)
• Recycled fibers (rPET, recycled cotton, recycled acrylic etc.)
• Forest based materials
• Down/feather
RMA team manages Claimed Material Assessment (CMA) for above materials, which is valid for one year and a separate CMA is required
for each material.
Examples
Raw Material Controls :
• Receiving inspections of raw materials i.e. Cotton / Yarn / Fabric
• Storage Controls of raw materials i.e. Cotton / Yarn / Fabric
• Receiving & storage controls of dyestuff and accessories
• Receiving & storage controls machine parts etc.
• Identification/ Segregation & Traceability Control
Q -Does the factory conduct finish goods inspections & if there are records
to support final Inspections at packed roll for delivery stage.
Guidance –
• What % of finished goods gets inspected.
• Does factory maintain finished goods inspection records & if it can be traced back in case of issues.
• In case of issues, is there any corrective action taken & if records are maintained for such actions.
• Does factory has defined authorization to know who makes the decision, in case of issues.
• Check if training records are available.
• Check if inspectors are trained how to handle/escalate issues.
• What's the frequency & % of re-inspection.
Examples
Equipment & Maintenance :
• Equipment working condition
• Preventative maintenance
• Maintenance SOP
• Emphasized on safety
• Focus on quality maintaince & improvement
Q -Does the maintenance team get regular visibility for production quality
issues to mitigate them from maintenance perspective.
Guidance –
• Check if maintenance team attend quality meeting on regular basis.
• Check if quality issues are categorized based on reasons like material, maintenance, training etc.
• Ask for examples, if maintenance team have modified their preventive maintenance schedule based on learnings from quality meeting.
Question & Answer Types
question)
2. Based on participation
Ex- Yes –
Parent Q - Is factory's lab certified for No –
Target.
Child question - Does lab follow procedure Ex –
of consolidating test report with third party Is factory's lab certified for Target.
without fail + additional required tests are
conducted at
DOES NOT MEET: The factory does not have a process or records to meet the intent of
the question and criteria in the resource guide.
Examples:
• Factory does not consistently meet the expectations of the question and resource
guide
• Factory does not have sufficient evidence to demonstrate and support the effective
execution of the process
• Required processes for the specific product category are missing, incomplete, and/or
not effective
• Factory has attempted to implement a process but it does not meet the requirements
of the question and resource guide
PARTIALLY MEETS: The factory meets the majority of the criteria in the question and
resource guide and only minor discrepancies are identified.
Examples:
• After review of the process and supporting records, minor inconsistencies are
identified
• Inconsistent execution of a process is observed
• Process is being executed but supporting evidence is inconsistent
RESOURCE GUIDE
Resources will be provided after the
training:
• Recordings
• Survey Link
• Testing platform credentials from
Inspectorio
REMINDER:
CMA process training by RMA team on Mar 11 th @11:00 am – 12:30 pm HKT
(English).