Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Have you ever collected data so far?
2
Data Collection – Quantitative and
Qualitative
After
developing the instruments
Pilot and Main (actual)
determine the data sources
In case of experimental , analytical or predictive
Setting the objectives of the design artifacts and later
after the construction of the artifact.
Requires sufficient preparation - has to be reported
3
Developing Data Collection Instruments
Two general approaches (in case of people respondent)
Adopting from similar previous researches
Mention how and what part is adopted
Crafting yourself based / inline with specific objectives
No orphan question or objectives should be observed
And pilot study to validate
4
Actual Data Collection
• One should carefully plan the data collection as this
is the departure for execution of the research
• Pre-data collection
– Training of Data Collectors might be crucial
– Supporting letters might be necessary
• Post-data collection
– Editing of returned questionnaires
• The data you have collected may be presented using
–5 Tabular methods
Cont…
Followed by analysis
In strict sense in case of quantitative but not in qualitative
In qualitative you collect- analyze- collect…
Until “saturation “
6
Exploring and Organizing a Data Set
Before employing any statistical procedure, develop
habit of looking closely at your data and exploring
various ways of organising them – detect patterns
Example : reading test scores of 11 children.
Ruth, 96; Robert, 60; Chuck, 68; Margaret, 88; Tom,
56;
Mary, 92; Ralph, 64; Bill, 72; Alice, 80; Adam, 76;
Kathy, 84
What do you see? Arrange and look for patterns
Careful researchers discover everything possible
about their data, whether the information is
immediately useful or not
Arranging The Data
Alphabetical arrangement – look for meaning or
pattern, no matter how trivial
Observable fact – highest score was earned by a girl
and that the lowest score was earned by a boy –
although silly and meaningless, it’s an observable
fact, and it may come in handy at a future time
Symmetrical pattern – same sex arrangement -
Separate girls from boys
The graph shows dramatic trends – the girls’ scores increase
as we proceed through the alphabet, and the boys’ scores
decrease
Dramatic Trends
Not only is there a divergence of trends, the scores are
equidistant from one another. Each score is 4 points either
above or below the preceding one
May have no relevance to research but it represents dynamics
within the data
The researcher should be aware of the dynamics, the
phenomena, that are active within the data, whether those
phenomena are important to the purpose of the research or not
The astute (clever at seeing quickly how to gain an advantage)
researcher overlooks nothing
Another arrangement of the data would have probably made a
different meaning more apparent.
Fundamental Guideline for Looking
at the Data
Whatever the researcher does with the data to prepare it for
inspection or interpretation will affect the meaning that those
data reveal
Therefore, every researcher should be able to provide a clear,
logical rationale for the procedure used to arrange and
organise the data
There is no rationale whatever for arranging the test scores
according to the children’s first names
Had their last names being used, which would have been
equally illogical, we would still have seen that the girls had
higher scores than the boys, but we would not necessarily have
seen the diverging trends.
Drawing Conclusions from the Data
Questions from the example
Why were all the scores of the girls higher than those
of the boys?
Why is this algorithm working better?
Why were the intervals between each of the scores
equidistant for both boys and girls?
Knowledge springs from questions like these
But must be careful not to make snap judgments
Drawing Conclusions from the Data
Even the most thorough research can go
astray(wrong) at the point of drawing conclusions
The example – might conclude that girls read better
than boys – not thinking carefully
Reading is a complex and multifaceted skill
Organising Data to Make Them
Easier to Think About and Interpret
Another example: Joe’s daily grade at high school in the order
they were earned – a simple linear sequence
92, 69, 91, 70, 90, 89, 72, 87, 73, 86, 85, 75, 84, 76, 83, 83, 77,
81, 78, 79
Arrange the grades in a two-dimensional table
Read vertically the grades on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
– they are considerably higher than those on Tuesday and
Thursday
Look at successive scores in each column – they get
progressively worse on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays,
but progressively better on Tuesdays and Thursdays
The researcher should explore the data further – it may have a
cause for behaving that way
Tabular methods of data presentation
• Tabulated data can be more easily understood than
facts
• They help facilitate statistical treatment of data
• When data are tabulated, all unnecessary details and
repetitions are avoided.
• Type of tables
– Simple (one way) table: shows one characteristic
– Two-way table: shows two characteristics
– Higher order table: shows three or more
characteristics
14
Tabular
Tabularmethods
methodsofofdata
datapresentation
presentation
(Frequency
(Frequencydistributions)
distributions)
•• Steps
Steps
–– Begin
Beginby byarranging
arrangingthe thedata
datafrom
fromsmallest
smallestto tolargest
largest
–– Count
Countvalues
valuesthat
thatrepeat
repeatbybymaking
makingtallies
tallies
–– Group
Groupobservations
observationswith withcomparable
comparablemagnitude
magnitude
–– Stop
Stopthe theclassification
classificationwhen
whenyou
youare
aresure
surethat
thatthe
thefirst
firstand
and
the
thelast
lastclasses
classesrespectively
respectivelyconsist
consistthe
thesmallest
smallestand
andlarges
larges
values
values
–– Indicate how many many values
values and
are included in a class
Note:
Note:
IfIfthe
thenumber
numberof ofclasses
classeskkhas
hasbeen
beenfixed,
fixed,then
thenclass
classwidth
width
may
maybe befixed
fixedasasww==range/k
range/k
15
Graphical methods of data presentation
• Data in a frequency distribution can be presented
graphically or diagrammatically
• Graphs are the natural choice to represent
continuous data
• For discrete or qualitative data, we have
– Pie chart (multiply relative frequency by 3600
– Pictogram (use of pictures)
– Bar graph (class limit and Abs. frequency)
16
Graphical methods … cont’d
• For continuous data, we have
– Histogram (class boundary and abs. freq.)
– Frequency polygon (Class mark and abs freq.)
– Cumulative frequency graph (class mark and
cumulative frequency)
17
Analysis
Statistical descriptive and inferential or experiments for
quantitative
Understanding numbers is very much important
Parameter /Variable settings (assumptions..)
Understanding meanings through pattern matching,
content analysis, time series analysis … using coding
Providing “Thick” description is important including rival
explanations.
Design and Construction of an artifact
Following standards and principles is important
May need input from qualitative type of analysis
18
Interpretation and Discussion
Explain the results in light of previous literatures and
theories.
No clear distinction in case of qualitative
Involves demonstration and evaluation in case of design
research
May be required to collect data and analysis with the same
procedures as we have seen before
19
Example (In design science )
22
24
25
26
THE TOOLS OF RESEARCH- with
respect to data collection and analysis
Example : students work 24, 22, 12, and 16 hours per week.
The average is 18.5 but NO student work exactly 18.5
hours/week.
5. The Human Mind – Tool of Research
1. Deductive logic
2. Inductive reasoning
3. Scientific method
4. Critical thinking
5. Collaboration with others
Critical Thinking
During LR don’t just accept research findings and
theories at face value.
Scrutinize for faulty assumptions, questionable
logic, weaknesses in methodology, inappropriate
statistical analyses, and unwarranted conclusions.
Good researchers engage in critical thinking.
Involves evaluating information or arguments in
terms of their accuracy and worth.
Critical Thinking
Take a variety of forms, depending on the context.
1. Verbal reasoning – Understanding and evaluating the
persuasive techniques found in oral and written language.
2. Argument analysis – Discriminating between reasons that
do and do not support a particular conclusion.
3. Decision making – Identifying and judging several
alternatives and selecting the best alternative.
4. Critical analysis of prior research.
Critical Analysis of Prior Research
Evaluating the value of data and research results in terms of the
methods used to obtain them and their potential relevance to
particular conclusion.
Consider these questions
1. Was an appropriate method used to measure a particular
outcome?
2. Are the data and results derived from a relatively large number
of people, objects, or events?
3. Have other possible explanations or conclusions been
eliminated?
4. Can the results obtained in one situation be reasonably
generalized to other situations?
Collaboration with Others
More heads are better than one.
A researcher has certain perspectives, assumptions, and
theoretical biases – not to mention holes in knowledge
about subject matter – that limit research approaches of a
project.
Need to bring colleagues who have perspectives,
backgrounds, and areas of expertise somewhat different –
more cognitive resources to tackle research problem and
how to find meaning.
Collaboration with Others
Can be equal partners or
Simply offer suggestions and advice.
Graduate students themselves are the key players.
Typically they are assigned an advisor or advisory
committee.
Prudent (careful) student selects committee that will
make genuine contribution.
Make sure that your data collection
and analysis is logical!!!
62