You are on page 1of 18

A Feasibility

report :
Enhancing security and
addressing Employee drug
use
What is a feasibility report

● Answers the question : “Should we


implement plan X?” by stating “yes” ,
“no” , “a maybe” and sometimes “under
certain conditions”
● Provides research and data to proof
feasibility of the plan
● Provides data against the plan and what
can be done to overcome the problems.
The problem faced in our report
01
Does the report
have all the
components?
(make a wild guess)
Report Components

#01 Introduction
Answers some good questions
Who initiated the study?

What is the purpose behind this study?


Report Components

#02 Discussion
• Criteria : Such as economic, structural
and operation feasibility to analyse
solutions

• Analysis : Checks and compares the


proposed solutions against the criteria
Report Components
#03
Conclusion/
Recommendations
02
Is organization up
to the class
discussion?
(yes, but not really)
Well Aligned Headings
Background Criteria and
01. Information 03. analysis
Provides context and Discusses the results and
background for the study. findings of the study.

02. Purpose 04. Conclusion


Evaluates the success of the project
Clearly states the goals and
and any limitations encountered.
objectives of the feasibility study.

05. Recommendation
Indicates plans for future action or
continuation of the project.
BUT..
- Recommendations are given before the conclusion drawn.
- Does not use any particular visuals like tables to organize the
criteria and provide easy access.
03
How does the new
organizational pattern
strengthen the report?
:]
Impact of Organizational Pattern
STRENGTH
● Placing recommendations before the conclusion
can emphasize the urgency and importance of the
proposed solutions.

WEAKNESS
● Placing recommendations before the conclusion
may result in a lack of context for the proposed
solutions. Readers may not fully understand why
these recommendations are being made or how they
relate to the findings presented in the report
04
Which components are
missing from the
selected report?
Missing components :

 Criteria for
Evaluation
 Cost benefit
analysis
 Methodology
05 & 06
Which components
need revision? And
how to enhance
Enhancing Analysis and Structure
● Criteria could be more explicitly stated.
● More prominent budget stated at the
beginning.
● More detailed description of methodology
could enhance credibility and transparency.
● Monitoring and Evaluation plan to check
the feasibility.
Thank you for
bearing with us

You might also like