Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback. Let's have a constructive discussion on how to design effective assessments. The goal is to evaluate student learning in a way that also supports growth.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback. Let's have a constructive discussion on how to design effective assessments. The goal is to evaluate student learning in a way that also supports growth.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback. Let's have a constructive discussion on how to design effective assessments. The goal is to evaluate student learning in a way that also supports growth.
Stays within appropriate time constraints Is relatively easy to administer Has a scoring/evaluation procedure that is specific and time-efficient Reliability: Student-related reliability (illness, fatigue, anxiety, etc.) Rater reliability (inexperience, inattention, bias, etc.) Test-administration reliability (noises, disturbing views, weather, etc.) Test-reliability (too long time, poorly written test, etc.) Validity: Content validity (validity related to the content/subject matter) Criterion validity (Validity related to criterion that has been achieved) Construct validity (Validity related to existing theory) Face validity (Validity related to whether the assessment/test looks right, measures the ability it claims) Authenticity:
The language in the test is as natural as
possible Items are contextualized rather than isolated Topics are meaningful for learners Tasks represent real-world tasks Washback
The positive impact of the test on the
students’ learning. 2. PRINCIPLES OF TESTING
Are the test procedures practical?
(Can students complete the test reasonably within the set time frame?; Is the scoring system feasible in the teachers’ time frame?) Is the test reliable? (Do objective scoring procedures leave little debate about correctness of an answer?) Does the procedure demonstrate content validity? (Are classroom objective identified?; Are lesson objectives represented in the form of test specifications?) Does the procedure show face validity? (Are the test directions clear?; Is the structure of the test organized logically?) Are the test tasks authentic? (Is the language in test natural?; Are items contextualized rather than isolated?) Does the test provide beneficial washback to the learner? Thank you! Let’s have discussion. Study the sample test carefully. Then, answer the following questions. Are the test procedures practical? (Can students complete the test reasonably within the set time frame?; Is the scoring system feasible in the teachers’ time frame?) Is the assessment reliable? (Do objective scoring procedures leave little debate about correctness of an answer?) Does the procedure demonstrate content validity? (Are classroom objective identified?; Are lesson objectives represented in the form of test specifications?) Study the sample test carefully. Then, answer Does the following the procedure questions. show face validity? (Are the test directions clear?; Is the structure of th test organized logically?) Are the test tasks authentic? (Is the language in test natural?; Are items contextualized rather than isolated?) Does the test provide beneficial washback to the learner? Study the sample assessment carefully. Then, answer the following questions.
What are the strengths of the assessment?
What are the weaknesses of the assessment?
What are your suggestions to improve the quality of the