DOMINANT ACTORS IN THE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS. THE INTERSTATE SYSTEM HA BEEN ORGANIZED AROUND THE PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGNTY, TERRITORIALITY, AND NON- INTERFERENCE. STATE A COMMUNITY OF PERSONS, MORE OR LESS UNITED, OCCUPYING A DEFINITE PORTION OF TERRITORY, HAVING A GOVERNMENT OF ITS OWN IN WHICH A GREAT NUMBER OF INHABITANTS RENDER OBEDIENCE AND INDEPENDENT OF EXTERNAL CONTROL. ELEMENTS OF STATE
1.TERRITORY- DEFINITE PORTION OF THE
EARTH WHERE THE PEOPLE LIVE 2.PEOPLE- MASS OF INHABITANTS WHO LIVE WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF STATE 3. GOVERNMENT- AGENCIES/OFFICES WHICH CARRIES OUT THE WILL OF STATE STATE, THAT IS TO MAINTAIN ORDER AND SECURITY IN THE STATE 4. SOVEREIGNTY- SUPREME POWER OF THE STATE TO COMMAND OBEDIENCE FROM ITS PEOPLE AND TO BE FREE FROM OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE (INDEPENDENCE) AS A RULE, EVERY STATE MUST RESPECT EACH OTHER’S SOVEREIGNTY AND NOT INTERVENE IN THE EACH DOMESTIC AFFAIRS. .THE TREATY OF WESTPHALIA (1648) RECOGNIZES THE PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN STATEHOOD. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES 1.REALISM- ASSUME THAT JUST LIKE HUMAN INDIVIDUALS, STATES ARE RATIONAL ACTORS AND THEIE PRIMARY CONCERN IS THE PROMOTION OF THEIR SELF-INTERESTS. REALISM IN AN ANARCHIC INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM, WHEREIN THERE’S AN ABSENCE OF CENTRAL AUTHORITY, STATES MUST FEND FOR THEMSELVES AND MUST AMASS POWER TO PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM THE DEPRADATIONS OF OTHER STATES THE STATE’S POWER MAY BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS: 1.MILITARY STRENGTH 2.STRONG ECONOMY 3. INTERNAL STABILITY 4. FOREIGN ALLIANCES 2. LIBERALISM . LIBERALS ASSUME STATES BEHAVE WITH RATIONALITY AND MUST BEHAVE PROPERLY IN RELATION WITH EACH OTHER .THEY ARE OPTIMISTIC FOR LONG-TERM PEACE LIBERALISM .LIBERALS EMPHASIZE THE PACIFYING ROLES OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, ECONOMIC INTERDEPENDENCE, AND DEMOCRACY LIBERALISM .LIBERALS MAINTAIN THAT ECONOMIC INTERDEPENDENCE MINIMIZES CONFLICTS. AS RATIONAL ACTORS, IT IS NOT IN STATE’S BEST INERESTS TO SACRIFICE THE GAINS OF ECONOMIC TIES BY ENGAGING IN COSTLY CONFLICTS LIBERALISM .CONFLICTS AND WARS CAN ONLY RESULT IN MUTUALLY ASSURED ECONOMIC DESTRUCTION .LIBERALS BELIEVE THAT DEMOCRATIC STATES DO NOT FIGHT OTHER DEMOCRACIES. THEY RESEPCT EACH OTHER 3. CONSTRUCTIVISM . IS CONCERNED WITH THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AGENTS AND STRUCTURES .CONSTRUCTIVISTS IDENTIFY THE PRINCIPAL ACTORS, THEIR INTERETS AND INDENTITIES, AND THE NATURE AND STRUCTURE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM 4. MARXISM . 4. MARXISM .ARGUE THAT THE WORLD IS DIVIDED ALONG ECONOMIC LINES, BETWEEN DEVELOPED AND UNVELOPING STATES. RICH/DEVELOPED STATES EXPLOIT POOR/DEVELOPING STATES RESULTING TO MASS POVERTY AND GIVING RISE TO ANTI-IMPERALIST MOVEMENTS. MARXISM .IMPERIALISM MAKES THE CONFLICT BETWEEN RICH AND POOR STATES UNAVOIDABLE AND CONTINUOUS. .IT IS THE AIM OF POOR STATES FROM FREE THEMSELVES FROM IMPERIALISM AND PURSUE DEVELOPMENT ON THEIR OWN PATH. THE ROLE OF NON-STATE ACTORS 1.INTERNATIONALORGANIZATIONS .PROMOTE PEACE, SECURITY AND COOPERATION (UN, EU, ASEAN, NATO) 2. NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS .ENGAGE IN VARIOUS ADVOCACIES LIKE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ,HUMAN RIGHTS (AMNESTY INT’L, GREENPEACE) NON-STATE ACTORS 3. MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS .MONOPLY FIRMS THAT OPERATE IN MANY COUNTRIES .PROMOTE INTERDEPENDENCE BY EXPANDING TRADE AND FOREIGN INVESTMENT MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS (MNC’S) .OWING TO THEIR ENORMOUS CAPITAL, THEY HAVE THE TENDENCY TO INTERFERERE AND INFLUENCE THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF HOST COUNTRIES OUTSIDE –IN-VIEW
.regards globalization as an exogenous
process (outside) that is making a profound impact on state affairs. States have become powerless to the forces of the market. In other words, globalization is undermining the contemporary interstate system INSIDE-OUT-VIEW
GLOBALIZATION RECOGNIZES THAT STATES ARE
THE INFUENCING THE LEVEL OF GLOBAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS TODAY. IT EMPHASIZES THAT GLOBALIZATION IS NOT AN INDEPENDENT PHENOMENON THAT TAKES PLACE IN A VACUUM.WHILE IT AFFECT STATES, STATES ALSO AFFECT GLOBALIZATION. IT ALSO MEANS THAT STATES DO NOT REJECT BUT INSTEAD ADJUST THEMSELVES TO IT.