Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Unbalanced growth theorists argue that the government may not have suf-
ficient resources to promote widespread and coordinated investments in all
sectors and regions.
• Those with the greatest number of backward and forward links are priori-
tized. Resources should concentrate on strategic industries with signifi-
cant forward linkages - creating essential inputs for other key firms in the
economy; and backward linkages - firms buy industrial inputs from a large
number of domestic firms
• Developing domestic industries replaces imports, import substitution, and
so improves the balance of payments.
Dependency Theory
• Paul Baran developed dependency theory from Marxian analysis
• Dependency theory underscores that development is a result of underde-
velopment, and underdevelopment is a result of development.
• For underdeveloped nations (peripheries) to develop, they must break their
ties with developed nations (center) and pursue internal growth.
• Resources are extracted from the periphery and flow towards the states at
the center in order to sustain their economic growth and wealth.
• It posits that the cause of the low levels of development in less econo
mically developed countries is caused by their reliance and dependen
ce on more economically developed countries; surplus drawn off by
MNCs, no profit left for reinvestment
• The premises of dependency theory are: poor nations provide a desti
nation for obsolete technology, and markets to the wealthy nations
• First World nations actively perpetuate a state of dependence through
economics
, media control, politics, banking and finance, education, culture,
sport,
• Attempts by the dependent nations to resist the influences of depen-
dency often result in economic sanctions and/or military invasion
and control.
• The dependency theory traces the problem back to colonialism,
• Central to the theory is the core-periphery relationship to explain the
perpetual lack of development in the periphery
• The core-periphery model is a spatial framework, which
says that pre-industrial order is characterized by small in-
equalities in wealth and development as regions function
in relative isolation from each other.
• The beginnings of industrialization bring the concentra-
tion of investment in a single strong center (core or growth
pole) at the expense of more traditional periphery domi-
nated by primary economic activities.
• The periphery supplies raw materials at cheap prices to
the urban industrial core and the core supplies expensive
manufactured goods back to the periphery. Inequalities
are great.
• Later, the simple core-periphery structure is transformed
into a multinuclear structure with strong sub centers
emerging in the periphery.
• Ultimately there arises a mature and functionally intercon-
nected space economy where regional inequalities are
small.
• The growth/decline of inequalities between rich and poor regions are
driven by a process of concentration (polarization effects) and decon-
centration (tricking down effects).
• Polarization effects reinforce growth in the core at the expense of the pe-
riphery through circular and cumulative causation create a self –sustain-
ing “snowballing” or ‘multiplier’ effect.
• Mechanisms:
1) capital investment (new industries and services) is attracted to the core.
2)young , dynamic and skilled and semi skilled workers migrate to the core .
3) More innovation in the core leads to the creation of new or enlarged in-
dustries, which, in turn, bread more innovation.
4) faster growth in the core is multiplied into a more service-rich support en-
vironment with more schools, hospitals, shopping centers, good housing,
modern transport system making it more attractive for future economic
activity and further immigration..
• Eventually, growth in the core stimulates demand for goods and ser-
vices from the periphery and regional sub centers emerge.
• Convergence will occur as trickle-down effects work to diffuse bene-
fits outward from the center
1.higher prices paid for needed materials
2. dispersion of technology to branch plants
3. contract suppliers in lower-cost regions of production
4. High density, congestion, higher labour costs, environmental decay
and diffusion of innovation encourage the outward dispersion of
growth.
• The core periphery model has been used to explain both national and
international differences in economic development.
Growth Pole Theory
• Originated from British Economist, Sir William Petty
(1623-1687), who was fascinated by the high growth
in London during the 17th century and conjectured
that strong urban economies are the backbone and
motor of the wealth of nations.
• However, the French Economist, Francois Perroux
(1903-1987), is credited with formalizing and elabo-
rating on the concept.
• Growth pole theory, assumes that growth does not
appear everywhere at the same time, but it manifests
itself in “points” or “poles” of growth; and latter
spreads by different channels and eventually affects
the economy as a whole.
• A growth pole is a point of economic growth. Growth
poles are usually urban locations, benefiting from ag-
glomeration economies, and should interact with sur-
rounding areas, spreading prosperity from the core to
the periphery.
• Growth poles in geographic space may be of two
types.
1. Natural pole which results from little or no gov-
ernment planning and is more the result of a spatial
concentration arising from a high marginal productivity
of capital and agglomerative economics.
2. planned pole - results due to government inter-
vention and investment controls. These poles are
usually created to develop new resource frontiers, to
stimulate growth in older agricultural regions, to redi-
rect rural- urban migration away from a few major ur-
ban areas by creating alternative employment oppor-
tunities, and to promote a more balanced regional de-
velopment
Growth poles are constituted by expanding industries in a
given region, inducing development at other points in
space, or by a geographic agglomeration of propulsive ac-
tivities. The process of geographical diffusion has a criti-
cal role in the growth pole theory.
Industrial Linkages and the Multiplier Effect
• Industries made financial savings by locating close to and linking with
other industries. Industrial linkages may be divided into backward link-
ages and forward linkages. A factory, for example, can have a backward
linkage with firms providing raw materials or component parts and for-
ward linkages with firms further processing the product or using it as a
component part.
• Industrial linkages result in reduced transport costs; use of waste product
from one industry as a raw material for another; use of energy given off by
one process to be used elsewhere; economies of scale where several firms
buy in bulk or share distribution costs; improved communication, service
and financial investment; high levels of skill and further research.
• A large specialized type of industry in an area generates a multiplier effect
as its success attracts other forms of economic development creating jobs,
services and wealth and spending power of the local population.
• With the emergence of growth poles, there will be an influx of migrants,
entrepreneurs and capital along with new ideas and technology.
Agglomeration Economies
• Agglomeration economies are, savings that result from concentrat-
ing economic activities in one place or adjacent to one another as
it creates cost reduction s by minimizing transport costs and max-
imizing access to suppliers.
1. Transfer Economies
• inter-industry linkages or transportation savings that a plant enjoys
by locating close to other plants. Manufacturing tends to locate in
nodes on a transportation network or plants locate near one another
to benefit from successive stages of production.
2. Localization Economies
• cost reductions arise from a spatial concentration of plants in the
same industry. Localization economies occur when an area devel-
ops a specialization in certain type of product. Local financial in-
stitutions and utilities, suppliers of specialized items and business
services, utilities and the labour force that develop the special ex-
pertise for this product, up to date information are all available
and accessible.
Comparative advantage in production
• The costs of production differ among regions because
resources at their disposal are not distributed equally.
• Efficiency requires that areas with lower opportunity
costs of producing a given good export that good to ar-
eas where production costs of that good are higher.
• A region is said to have comparative advantage in pro-
ducing a good, say electronics, if its opportunity cost of
producing it is lower than that of the other region with
which it trades.
• Comparative advantage suggests that if regions special-
ize in producing goods for which they have lower costs
and exchange those goods for products for which they
higher costs, regional output and income will increase.
3. Urbanization Economies
• cost savings derived from an increase in the size of the place where
plants are located.. Bigger cities provide bigger markets for a firm’s
products and provide many goods and services. The economies of
scale are external to the plants in many industries as the industries
share the burden of certain costs to all. A large urban area has a large
flexible labour pool; developed commercial and financial services;
public services like water, health, airport, fire and police protection.
4. Internal Economies of Scale
• savings a plant enjoys from increasing its scale of operation or size
where average production cost of items manufactured normally de-
creases because of large quantity purchase, efficient use of labour
and machines and bulk distribution.
• large plants serving a wide market and drawing on distant resources
like automobile industry benefit more.
• As the size of the plant increases, at some point, the average cost of
production per unit may begin to rise as inefficiencies and disec-
onomies are encountered.
Locational Theories
Von Thunen's Location Theory
• agricultural land use patterns change with dis-
tance from the centrally located market.
• a farm product that achieves the highest profit/
high rent- paying ability outbids other products
in the competition for location which should be
relegated to an outer zone.
• book entitled ‘The Isolated State’ in 1826
• first to propose the idea of opportunity cost.
Eg. Opportunity cost for a commercial land
owner farmers
Assumptions and Principles
A. isolated state- a single urban market (central
city) whose needs are supplied by the surround-
ing agricultural hinterland.
B. Isotropic plain,- cultivable land of homogenous
physical character
C. A uniform transportation surface- movement
costs increase with distance, market served by
one mode of transport (horse and cart).
D. The farmers acted as 'economic men' –profit
maximizers, having equal knowledge of the
needs of the market.
•
Principles
• with increasing distance from the market the type of land
use varied and the intensity of production decreased.
• emphasized on the relationship with three variables: dis-
tance of farms from the market, price received by farmers
for their product and economic (location) rent.
• Locational rent is the difference between revenue received
by a farmer for a crop grown on a particular piece of land
and the total cost of producing and transporting that crop.
• the nearer the farmer to the market the greater his return
from the sale of his produce.
• highest returns from land near the market and the greater
competition for such land escalates its price &encourages
farmers for intensive cultivation.
LR= Y(m-c-td)
LR=M-(C+T)
where R= locational (economic) rent
Y= Yield per unit of land
m= market price per unit of commodity
d= distance from the market
c= production cost per unit of land
t= transport cost per unit of commodity
• Relationship between locational rent and dis-
tance from the market
R
Profit is absorbed at X
M X
(Market) Distance from market (Margin of cultivation)
• Economic rent falls with increasing distance from the market until a
point beyond which it is not worth using the land for the crop (mar-
gin of cultivation) - zero profit.
• The point at which one type of land use is replaced by another is
called the margin of transference.
• Locational rent will be at its maximum at the market where there are
no transport costs.
• If market price rises, transport costs or cost of production decrease,
profits will rise and the margin of farming will expand.
• Von Thunen suggested that bulky crops like potatoes and perishable
goods such as vegetables and dairy products should be produced
closer to the market in order to minimize transport costs and loses.
• Patterns of Land Use around the Market
A. Intensive market gardening and dairying – perishability and bulki-
ness necessitate production close to the market.
B. Wood - major source of fuel and building material; high cost of
transporting such a bulky good .
C. Intensive cultivation of crops with crop rotation (rye, potatoes,
clover, barley) with no fallow period.
D. Cereal farming with less intensive means, rotation system .
E. Extensive farming -cultivation of less bulky and less perishable ce-
reals that could bear the high transport cost.
F. Extensive livestock farming (ranching) at the outer most edge of the
cultivated land . Animals are self-transporting; and longer keeping
dairy products (butter, cheese) are less bulky and cheap to transport.
Criticisms of Von Thunen's Model
Oversimplification
Out-datedness
Failure to recognize the role of government
Failure to include behavioral factors
I
J
B H
G C
A
F D
K M
E
L
I
H
J
C B
K
D
E A G
F
M
L
All villagers go to A
Limitation of Central Place Theory
• Large areas of flat land are rare and relief barriers and river valleys
channel transport in certain directions. There is more than one
form of transport and costs are not proportional to distance
• People and wealth are not evenly distributed. Provision of services
may be concentrated in fewer and larger units to obtain benefits of
economies of scale
• Government intervention through planning measures has interfered
in the operation of the market forces, which shape the central place
system.
The Rank-Size Hierarchy
• The rank-size rule developed by George Zipf in 1949
devised explained the size of cities in a country.
• It enables us predict the population size of any given ur-
ban center given the center’s rank and the population
size of the largest urban center
• The model outlined that the second largest city is half the
population of the largest city; the third largest city is one-
third of the largest city…..
The law of primate city
•Developed by the geographer M. Jefferson to explain the
phenomena of huge cities in terms of population and eco-
nomic activity
•could be an exception to the rank size rule in that a coun-
try's leading city is always disproportionately large and ex-
ceptionally expressive of national capacity and feeling.
•A huge city that accommodates a large proportion of a
country's population as well as its economic activity, educa-
tional and cultural dominance, and political control
•Often the capital city and political center
•Tend to be national focal point, culture
Assignments
1. Housing supply and demand in city_____
2. Informal and squatter settlements in…….
3. Challenges of urban growth and regional inequality,
4. Industrial parks development in Ethiopia: challenges and Opportuni-
ties;
5. Rural-urban linkages and regional development
6. Causes and consequences of urban expansion;
7. The urban informal sector: contributions and challenges
8. Urban land rent, housing prices, and neighborhood choice.
9. Urban Agriculture: Practices, Challenges and Opportunities
10. Urban unemployment in…..
11. Challenges of Urban Infrastructure and Service Delivery: case
12. Micro and Small Enterprises: Roles and Challenges
13. Satellite town development & integration with metropolitan areas
14. Trade activities in urban areas
15. The urban development policy of Ethiopia
16. Growth pole Theory and regional Development
17. Urban Regeneration
18. Urban agglomeration
19. Urban recreational parks development
End