MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND

INNOVATION THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN

SAMARKAND STATE INSTITUTE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES

CHAIR OF ENGLISH PHILOLOGY

TURAYEVA OQILA HALIMOVNA

THE BRANCHES OF COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGY

COURSE PAPER
SPECIALITY: 70230101 – Linguistics (The English Language)

“SCIENTIFIC SUPERVISOR”
Aminova N I .

SAMARKAND-2023
AIM
OBJECT
to identify the
different theories branches of
SUBJECT
about the history comparative The field of
and branches of typology. comparative
comparative typology.
typology.
CHAPTER I. THEORY OF COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGY
AS THE MAIN BRANCH OF LINGUISTICS
1.1.The History of Typological Investigation

• Port-Royal
• Latin Grammar
Grammars The second • Arnauld A.,
• Aristotle period is
characterized Lancelot C,
• Plato The first period is (XVII c.
characterized as as a period of
establishing
a spontaneous or the first
evolutionary scientific
comparison of
languages
The third period
is related to The fourth
development of period is related
comparative to establishing of
historical
linguistics, Comparative
genealogical and Typology as a
• (mid- typological separate science • XX
classification of
XIX c.) languages, century.
 1.2. Types of language comparison

• comparison of
substantial
some concrete Panchronically
things or objects,
comparison e.g. sounds, digits,
numbers, etc.

Synchronically

non- • comparison of
substantial
comparison
systems and their
elements
Diachronically
1.3. Theoretical character of comparative typology
with different linguistic subjects

the history of
language

the structure
of native general
language linguistics
COMPARATIVE
TYPOLOGY

practical and practical and

theoretical theoretical
phonetics grammar
CHAPTER II. CLASSIFICATION OF COMPARATIVE
TYPOLOGY BY DR. BURANOV
2.1. Branches of typology as to the object of investigation

Genetic Structural
typology typology
TYPOLOGY
(According to the
object of
investigation )
Comparative
Areal typology typology
2.2. Branches of comparative typology as to the
level of language hierarchy
2.3. Branches of typology as to the two plans of
language
 CONCLUSION
 It is assumed that the great contribution from two German linguists Friedrich von
Schlegel and Wilhelm von Humboldt and their work brought a name for
typological research;
 The comparison may be of two types: substantialand non-substantial .
Comparative Typology may compare language systems panchronically,
synchronicallyand diachronically;
 It closely connected with: 1) the history of language; 2) general linguistics; 3)
practical and theoretical grammar; 4) practical and theoretical phonetics; 5) the
structure of native language;
 According to the object of investigation Comparative Typology may be : Genetic
typology, Areal typology, Comparative typology, Structural typology;
 According to the levels of language hierarchy Comparative Typology may be :
Phonetic and Phonological Typology, Morphological Typology, Syntactic
Typology, Lexical Typology;
 According to two plans of language Comparative Typology may be : Formal and
Semantic typology
 THANK YOU
FOR
YOUR ATTENTION !