Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Schindler
?
z :60253003T
60255602
3
6015ț0038
• Blueprïnt
• Plan
• Guïde
• Framework
2013/10/28 2
Design in the Research Process
Final check of background records
Co
Client exploratory
interviews interviews
Complete Field Code data w»te
questannaire and
interviewing analyze
Cnmple\e executive
review
ire executives
Milestones:
Proposal approval
Interviews completed Time to Completion:
9 Final report completed 40 working days
• Formal study
• Communication
study
• Experiment
• Ex post facto
design
2013/10/28
@ • Descriø€ł0Østud.y
• Causal-explanatory study
• Causal-predictiv.e study
2013/10/28’ 9
’
• Cross-sectional
studies
• Longitudinal studies
2013/10/28 10
• Statistical studies
• Case studies
2013/10/28 11
• Fïeld conditions
• Laboratory conditions
• Simulations
2013/10/28 1
2
• 1“.Pbśti.cipants perońf esćtations frorn
everyday ”
routines
• .z.Participants perc.eive.devi.ations; but as:
unreIat»!d to the re:se’archer
• 3.Participa!nts perc»ive.’de.vi.ations as
.re:searcher-in.duced
13
• What is being done?
• What has been tried in the past with or
without success?
• How have things changed?
• Who is involved in the decisions?
• What problem areas can be seen?
• Whom can we count on to assist or
participate in the research?
2013/10/28
•Gżaup
discussio:n
•6-10
•Moderator-led
participants
•90 minutes-2
hours
2013/10/28 20
s. are typigafty..’ . ,.lth
hypotheses or’i’nv»SUgative questions, Farm:al
cle arly””
serve a.
studies. variety of res.ea:rc:h objectives: ”
1. Descriptions of”population charactëristics
Est‹mates of frequency of characterist›cs
’Discovery of associations among variables ”
’
22
201.3/10/28’ 2
’ 4
sonwa
. Distant s ” ually nea &
Address
th» ac« s outsid:e the 2-mtIé I
o
the records do-: not.show I:h.is.
- *near,” b'
’”
3, Distant..savers work nea'r the .office.; they are “near” by.vi.rtue of
their work location.
.4. Distant savers are not normally near the office .but .responded
to a promotion that encouraged .savers to bank via computer;
this is .an,othe,r form .of “.nearness” in which this concept is
transformed into one. of “convenience.'”
2013/10/28’’ 25
“ When two or more cases of a given phenomenon have-
one
and only one condition in common, then that condition
may
26
F Exhibit 6-4 Mills Method of Agreement
Descriptive Factors Outcome
No. 1
No. 2
Therefore
e
there isn
.and Z.
201.3/10/28’ 28
’
F Exhibit 6-4 Mills Method of Difference
Therefore
"
of evF
.
2. Time order of events moving in the.hypothesized
directi.on ’”
3. No other.possibI» causes of B
30
.other r
201.3/10/28’ 31
’
C If we: t:órisTder the pzssstb'Ie fe’Iatión»hip:s that cãri
¢i«zar between two variables, we can conclude
there are three possibilities:
• Symmetrical
one in which two variables fluctuate together, but we assume
the changes in neither variable are due to changes in the other.
• Reciprocal
when two variables mutually influence or reinforce each other
• Asymmetrical
we postulate that changes in one variable(IV) are responsible for
changes in another variable(DV)
2013/10/28
32
Relationships
F Exhibit 6- Four Types of Asymmetrical Causal
6 Relationships
Stimulus-response An event or change • A change in work rules leads to a higher
results in a response level of worker output.
from some object. • A change in government economic
policy restricts corporate financial
decisions.
• A price increase results in fewer unit
Propeny-disposition An existing property
causes a disposition. sales.
• Age and attitudes about saving.
• Gender attitudes toward social issues.
Disposition-behavior A disposition causes a
• Social class and opinions about taxation.
specific behavior.
• Opinions about a brand and its purchase.
• Job satisfaction and work output.
Property-behavior An existing property
• Moral values and tax cheating.
causes a specific
behavior. • Stage of the family life cycle and purchases
of furniture.
2013/10/28 3S