Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transboundary Externalities:
One countrys actions can affect another countrys environment.
2
I. Some International Environmental Problems
A. pollution
- litter, trash, sewage, oil spills, emissions, radiation,
4
ex: A power plant burns coal to produce electricity and as a result,
sulfur dioxide (SO2) is emitted into the air.
The power plant does not compensate the people who develop
health problems or face the effects of acid rain.
5
The market outcome
Social Costs occurs where PC =
Price PB.
Private Costs (S)
But the SC of
production are
psocial
greater than the PC.
pmarket
In this case, the PB
and SB are equal.
Private
Benefits (D) The socially optimal
= Social Benefitslevel of production
Qsocial Qmarket Q of megawatt hours
is lower and the
price is higher.
6
How could we get
Social Costs the firm to produce
Price the socially optimal
Private Costs (S)
amount?
tax
Make the firm bear
psocial
the true cost of their
pmarket actions.
- tax the firm
When the market is corrected so the firm bears the full cost of its
7
actions, we have internalized the externality.
Many economists advocate a carbon tax as a way to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions.
- price rises!!! ---- unpopular politically
8
Although the economic approach is to get polluters to pay for the
waste that they generate, governments often take a different
approach.
9
cap-and-trade approach: the government selects a particular
pollution target then issues just enough permits to meet the
target and allows firms to buy and sell the permits among
themselves
- firms can select the method that they use for abatement
- firms with relatively lower costs associated with abatement can
reduce pollution more and sell their additional permits
- firms with relatively higher costs associated with abatement
can purchase permits from firms with lower costs
- the level of the pollution can be lower than the target
11
What if an environmental
group purchases some
Price S2 S permits and instead of
releasing CO2, pulls the
permit out of the market?
P2
P*
12
Suppose two firms both produce CO2 as a by-product of their
production process. Each firm faces a different marginal
abatement cost (MAC). [ex: cheaper for Firm 1 to reduce
emissions] Firm 1 Firm 2
MAC MAC
($/unit) ($/unit)
MAC
MAC
reduction of reduction
13 of
emissions emissions
The emissions trading market determines the price of a permit P*.
If the price of buying a permit is less than the cost of abatement, the
firm will choose to buy a permit instead of reducing pollution.
14
R* is the optimal reduction for each firm.
Firm 1 Firm 2
MAC MAC
($/unit) ($/unit)
MAC
MAC
P*
P*
reduction of reduction
15 of
R* R*
emissions emissions
The government sets a pollution target and each firm has to reduce
emissions to at least Rreq.
Firm 1 Firm 2
MAC MAC
($/unit) ($/unit)
MAC
MAC
P*
P*
reduction of reduction
16 of
Rreq R* R* Rreq
emissions emissions
For Firm 1, the Rreq < R*. Also, at Rreq the MAC < P.
This firm could make some money by reducing emissions and
selling permits.
Firm 1 Firm 2
MAC MAC
($/unit) ($/unit)
MAC
gains from
selling permits
MAC
P*
P*
reduction of reduction
17 of
Rreq R* R* Rreq
emissions emissions
For Firm 2, the Rreq > R*. Also, at Rreq the MAC > P.
This firm is better off reducing emissions to R* and then buying
permits.
Firm 1 Firm 2
MAC MAC
($/unit) ($/unit)
MAC
savings from
gains from buying permits
selling permits instead of reducing
MAC emissions
P*
P*
spending on
permits
reduction of reduction
18 of
Rreq R* R* Rreq
emissions emissions
The US has a SO2 trading system (1990 clean air act).
19
B. Ozone Depletion
20
There has been a net decrease in the level of global ozone. The main
cause is emissions from man-made sources of halocarbons.
21
C. Wildlife Issues
22
The Tragedy of the Commons
International strategy:
1973 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species
- trade is not allowed for products from endangered species
24
The case of the sea turtle:
25
Solution: In the 1970s, a ban was placed on global trade in sea
turtle products.
A possible solution:
- lift the ban on trade but regulate the industry
- deal with habitat destruction issues
In the 1960s, in the Cayman Islands, a sea turtle farm was started.
- harvested mature turtles for profit
- raised babies and released them into the wild
- after a time, proved to be viable, profitable, and sustainable
26
2. Spread of invasive species
27
28
D. Destruction of Ecosystems
1. Oceans
- Used for economic activity, recreation, and sustenance by
many people in many nations
- tragedy of the commons issues
- pollution
- unsustainable consumption of living marine
resources
29
2. Desertification
- Caused by climate variations and human activities
- untouched lands that suffer from drought generally
recover on their own
- when stressed by human economic activity, areas often
do not recover
- over-cultivation
- over-grazing
- deforestation
Results:
- loss of primary resources (topsoil, vegetation, crops)
- land cant support people
- famine starves people and animals
- displacement of people and economic disruption
30
The UN reports that drought and desertification threaten the
livelihood of 1 billion people in 110 countries.
E. Climate Change
31
Kyoto Protocol (address greenhouse gasses)
32
II. Trade and the Environment
Trade vs Environment:
Round 1: The Tuna-Dolphin Case
Round 2: The Shrimp-Turtle Case
33
Round 1: Tuna Dolphin case
In 1990, Congress created the highly popular dolphin-safe tuna
consumer labeling program.
34
In 1995, to avoid WTO sanctions, the US met with representatives
from the embargoed countries.
- called the Panama Declaration
- lifted embargo on tuna imports
- established dolphin kill levels
- re-examined the term dolphin-safe
35
In 1998, the WTO ruled that the US had the right to ban imports.
But,
- the US failed to undertake serious negotiations with its
trade partners prior to placing the ban
- different phase-in periods for the turtle excluder devices
were set (4 months to 3 years)
36
There is no end in sight to the trade-environment cases.
37
2. Trade, Economic Growth, and Environmental Risks
economic development
(low GDP per capita),
environmental conditions
tend to worsen as the
economy grows.
Conditions start to
improve once nations hit
middle income levels.
GDP per capita
38
Analysis suggests that the Kuznets curve relationship holds true
for air and water pollution, as well as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen
oxide.
2. composition effects
- as wealth increases, peoples preferences shift toward
greener goods
3. scale effects
- more wealth makes greater consumption possible, which
increases economic activity and therefore increases
pollution
41
B. Arguments for separating trade and environmental policy
42
C. Psychological Spillovers and Ethical Preferences
43
When is policy in another country a choice, worthy of respect
and acceptance in a diverse world? When does it become a
violation of a moral minimum standard?
44