Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview of Strategies
Volts-Per-Hertz Control Constant Slip Control Field-Oriented Control
Fall 2005
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
History Advantages Disadvantages
Fall 2005
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Basic Idea
Machine will operate close to synchronous speed, thus speed controlled with frequency We must avoid saturation
On Avoiding Saturation
vas = rsias + pas Vs = e s (14.2-1) (14.2-2)
Fall 2005
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Elementary Volts Per Hertz Control
Fall 2005
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Example System
50 Hp Machine Rated for 1800 rpm, 460 V l-l rms, P=4, 60 Hz rs=72.5 m; rr=41.3 m LM=30.1 mH; Lls=Llr=1.32 mH
2 rm TL = Tb 0.1S (rm ) + 0.9 bm
(14.2-3)
Fall 2005
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Performance Characteristics
Fall 2005
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Comments on Steady-State Performance
Fall 2005
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Problem 1: Resistance At Low Speed Solution: Set Voltage So Slope is Invarient
Te =
2 P X 3 e M 2 b b 2 2
~ 2 rr s Vas
2 e 2 e ( r X + sr X ) 2 rs rr ) + + s ( X M X ss X rr r ss s rr b b
(4.9-19)
(14.2-4)
Fall 2005
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Further Improvement Current Feedback
Lets approximate torque as
Te = Ktv (e r ) T Ktv = e r =
r
(14.2-5) (14.2-6)
(14.2-7)
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Next, consider torque. We have
Te = 3P e e e (dsiqs e qsids ) 22
e e vqs rsiqs
(14.2-8)
e ds =
Thus
e e vds rsids e qs = e
Te =
Where
Is =
3 P 1 e* e 2 (vqsiqs 2rs I s ) 2 2 e
1 e2 e2 iqs + ids 2
EE595S Electric Drive Systems
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Equating (14.2-7) and (14.2-11)
e =
* + *2 + 3P (v e*i e 2r I 2 ) / K r r qs qs s s tv
2
* + max(0, *2 + r r corr )
(14.2-13)
Or
e =
2
(14.2-14)
Where
corr = H ( s) corr LPF e*i e 2r I 2 ) / K = 3 P ( v corr qs qs s s tv
Fall 2005 EE595S Electric Drive Systems
(14.2-15) (14.2-16)
12
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Fall 2005
13
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Performance of Compensated Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Fall 2005
14
Volts-Per-Hertz Control
Start-Up Performance of Compensated Volts Per Hertz Control
Fall 2005
15
Overview of Strategies
Volts-Per-Hertz Control Constant Slip Control Field-Oriented Control
Fall 2005
16
Fall 2005
17
(14.3-2)
(14.3-3)
The Plan
Fall 2005 EE595S Electric Drive Systems 18
Avoiding Saturation
Before Proceeding Consider the Steady-State Equivalent Circuit
+ LM ( I as + I ar ) ar = Llr I ar je LM ~ ~ I I = ar as + rr /s je Lrr ~ ~ ~ ~
Thus 'r = I s LM
Fall 2005
rr
2 L2 + r 2 s rr r
EE595S Electric Drive Systems
Avoiding Saturation
Taking the Magnitude rr ' =I L r s M 2 2 2 Combing (14.3-7) and (14.3-2) Thus 2 P s,set r ,max Te,thresh = 3 2 rr,est So For Large Torque Commands s =
Fall 2005
+ rr s Lrr
(14.3-7)
P s 'r2 Te = 3 2 rr
* 2Te rr ,est
3P2 r ,max
EE595S Electric Drive Systems
20
Fall 2005
21
(14.3-11)
(14.3-12)
Fall 2005
22
Fall 2005
23
~ Pin = 3I s Re(Vas )
(14.3-13) (14.3-14)
Comparison to (14.3-14) to (14.3-2) 2 2 Pin = 3rs I s + P eTe (14.3-15) Now 2 = P out P rTe (14.3-16)
Fall 2005 EE595S Electric Drive Systems 24
(14.3-17)
(14.3-18)
(14.3-19)
Fall 2005
25
Fall 2005
26
Fall 2005
27
Fall 2005
28
Fall 2005
29
Overview of Strategies
Volts-Per-Hertz Control Constant Slip Control Field-Oriented Control
Fall 2005
30
Challenges
Fall 2005
31
Te = 2 BiNLr sin
Fall 2005 EE595S Electric Drive Systems 32
Now
3P idr dr iqr ) Te = (qr 22 3P Te = || iqdr | sin | qdr 22
Fall 2005 EE595S Electric Drive Systems
(14.4-2) (14.4-3)
33
The Plan
Objective Observation
In Steady-State, This is Always True
1 e i = (e r )e qr dr rr 1 e = (e r )e idr qr rr
Thus
Fall 2005 EE595S Electric Drive Systems 34
e = 0 idr
(14.4-7) (14.4-8)
Achieving (14.4-7)
By choice of e
Fall 2005
35
(14.4-9)
The q-axis rotor flux linkage is zero (by choice of reference frame)
idr e + pdr e 0 = rr
(14.4-10)
Fall 2005
(14.4-11)
Some Observations
Since the d-axis rotor current is zero
e e ds = Lssids
e e = LM ids dr
(14.4-12) (14.4-13)
(14.4-14)
Fall 2005
37
Some Observations
Since the q-axis rotor flux linkage is zero
(14.4-15)
Thus
Te = 3 P LM e e iqs dr 2 2 Lrr
(14.4-16)
Fall 2005
38
Fall 2005
40
Methods
Direct Indirect
Modifications
Robust
Fall 2005 EE595S Electric Drive Systems 41
Consider
(14.5-1)
Fall 2005
s s jdr )+ e = angle(qr 2
(14.5-2)
42
e = (qr s ) 2 + (dr s ) 2 dr
(14.5-3)
The problem: We can measure the rotor flux linkages. We can measure the stator flux linkages.
Fall 2005 EE595S Electric Drive Systems 43
Thus
s = iqr
s s LM iqs qm
LM
Recall
s = L is + L (i s + is ) qr lr qr M qs qr
Fall 2005
44
L s s s = rr qm iqs Llr qr LM
(14.5-7) (14.5-8)
L s L i s s = rr dm dr lr ds LM
Fall 2005
45
Fall 2005
46
Fall 2005
47
(14.6-1)
e* = iqs * Te
(14.6-2)
e dr
Fall 2005
48
e* = ids * e dr
LM ,est
(14.6-3)
Fall 2005
49
e dr e* dr =
s +1
LM ,est LM s +1
EE595S Electric Drive Systems
(14.6-5)
50
Fall 2005
Fall 2005
52
(14.6-10) (14.6-12)
Now, assuming the control works e* Te = Kt iqs (14.6-11) This, assumption, coupled with our torque control loop yields T t s +1 = e (14.6-13) * K
Te
t t ,est s + 1
Kt
Fall 2005
53
Fall 2005
54
Fall 2005
55
Fall 2005
56
Fall 2005
57
(14.7-1) (14.7-2)
e = r rr
e iqr e dr
e iqs e ide
(14.7-3)
Fall 2005
58
Fall 2005
59
e (e r )qr e + pdr e 0 = rridr (14.7-6) Now substitute in our expression for electrical frequency e* iqs e rr e e + 0 r i p = + r qr qr (14.7-7) L e* dr
Fall 2005
(14.7-8)
60
rr Lrr
e* iqs e* ids
[L i
e rr dr
e* e + LM ids + pqr
(14.7-9) (14.7-10)
Fall 2005
61
(14.7-11) (14.7-12)
Comments
Fall 2005
62
Fall 2005
63
Disadvantages of Indirect Field Oriented Control over Direct Field Oriented Control
Fall 2005
64
Fall 2005
65
Fall 2005
66