Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anti-surge Technology
ABSTRACT
Centrifugal compressors are the key drivers of many industrial processes, and as a result, damage to them can often result in costly maintenance expenditures, increased downtime and an overall drop-off in system efficiency. Surging is one of the most common causes of compressor damage and because it is highly dependent on a number of different variables, its occurrence is difficult to accurately predict. Even with anti-surge measures in place, many compressors have to be used rather conservatively in order to prevent damage to equipment. This results in wasted energy, decreased productivity and makes process optimization virtually impossible to achieve. The remainder of this paper will focus largely on Dresser-Rands anti-surge technology and how its proprietary Universal Performance Curve is used to accurately predict the surge point over a wide range of changing conditions, especially in process applications where variations in both fluid composition and temperature are common. It will also include a detailed overview of Dresser-Rands proprietary Load Sharing Algorithm along with a comparison of how its technology performs with respect to some of the most common anti-surge methodologies in use today.
forward flow but when it resumes, the resulting pressure differential again reaches a point where the compressor becomes unstable, flow is reversed and this cycle is repeated. This continues until a change is made in the process and/or compressor conditions. Surging can cause serious physical damage to pumps, fittings, valves, pipes, and other ancillary pieces of equipment. Rotor shifting caused by the surge cycle can also destroy thrust bearings, and in many cases, operating temperatures can exceed allowable limits and cause compressors to overheat. Because of this, it is always important to have effective anti-surge measures in place. Surge can be prevented either by blow-off or recirculation of flow in order to keep the pressure differential across the compressor at a level in which reversal cannot occur. The moment at which either of these actions needs to take place is determined by a controller, which is designed to predict the point at which surging is imminent (i.e., the surge line) by measuring a function of pressure rise vs. flow. The challenge, however, is being able to accurately define the surge line over a wide range of operating conditions. Because this is so difficult to do, engineers generally have to err on the side of caution and use compressors in a very conservative manner, resulting in decreased throughput and low operating efficiencies. The key to maximizing compressor efficiency is to determine the surge line with a high degree of accuracy. In doing so, the workable limits of the compressor can be clearly defined and unnecessary recirculation of flow can be kept to an absolute minimum.
INTRODUCTION
Surging occurs when insufficient flow into the compressor and/or an increasing pressure rise across the compressor causes a condition in which forward flow is unable to be sustained. This results in a temporary reversal of flow within the impeller, causing a decrease in the discharge pressure and/or an increase in the suction pressure. This rise in suction pressure allows the compressor to reestablish
2014 Dresser-Rand. All rights reserved.
Anti-surge Technology
many multi-stage compressors deviate from this theory. This methodology also produces surge control maps with coordinate systems that are only partially invariant to inlet gas molecular weight, temperature and compressibility. Due to the volume ratio effect, which affects the polytropic head suction flow relationship, the temperature and molecular weight of incoming gas can significantly change the point at which surge occurs in a multi-stage compressor. As a result, anti-surge algorithms that fail to produce surge control maps with coordinate systems that are completely invariant to changes in the properties of an incoming fluid are subject to a wide margin of error. Figure 1 displays the compressor performance maps for two gases with different molecular weights. The maps have been super-imposed onto one image to illustrate how molecular weight can dramatically change the surge point of a compressor. If an anti-surge controller that was unable to compensate for this difference was used on this particular compressor, it would either not be able to prevent surge under all conditions, or it would produce a control line located so far to the right that the compressor would be highly inefficient when dealing with heavier gases.
Anti-surge Technology
conditions, surge control action is initiated at the control line by opening the surge valve. This prevents a further shift of the operating point to the left towards the surge line.
Anti-surge Technology The third control is a variable proportional gain action that takes effect when normal PI control response is unable to prevent flow from dropping below the control line during rapid system upsets. To prevent surge under these circumstances, Dresser-Rands Floating Proportional Control Algorithm is initiated and surge valves are opened before the operating point reaches the control line. When the upset has been stabilized, normal PI control is resumed. way of determining surge and is recommended by the ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) PTC-10 Performance Test code for compressors.
Anti-surge Technology
the surge limit line and the control line seen in Figure 2), Dresser-Rands controllers provide a useful combination of open and closed loop responses in the event that compressor flow falls below the control line. This allows for fast step openings of the recycle valve to prevent surge and is particularly effective at eliminating overcompensations that frequently cause process destabilization.
Anti-surge Technology recycled flow (Qrrec). To eliminate this problem, Dresser-Rands algorithm uses a Coefficient of Export Flow (CEF), which is the distance from the operating point to the surge control line. This value takes into account any flow being recycled and allows for effective load sharing over the entire operating range of the compressor. To ensure consistency across an entire system, each compressors load sharing controller receives the same CEF set point from a master controller.
CONCLUSION
The Compressed Air and Gas Institute (CAGI) estimates that industrial facilities in the U.S. waste up to $3.2 billion every year on energy costs due to poorly designed and maintained compression systems1. Compressors are the key drivers of many of these systems and with energy prices on the rise, the need for new and innovative controlling technologies that can help cut operating expenditures and boost process efficiency will become increasingly prominent.
Dresser-Rand Control Systems 1202 W. Sam Houston Pkwy. N Houston, Texas 77043 USA Tel: (Intl +1) 713-467-2221 Fax: (Intl +1) 713-346-2100
This document comprises a general overview of the products described herein. It is solely for informational purposes, does not represent a warranty or guarantee of the information contained herein, and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy. Contact Dresser-Rand for detailed design and engineering information suitable to your specific applications. Dresser-Rand reserves the right to modify its products and related product information at any time without prior notice.