You are on page 1of 52

PENGGUNAAN SNI SEBAGAI ACUAN DALAM DESAIN STRUKTUR TAHAN GEMPA (LESSON LEARNED)

Dr. Ir. Made Suarjana, MSCE


Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environment Institut Teknologi Bandung

Data Iranata, ST., MT., PhD


Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

Kerusakan akibat Gempa Padang (2009)

www.themegallery.com

Kerusakan akibat Gempa Padang (2009)

www.themegallery.com

Kerusakan akibat Gempa Padang (2009)

www.themegallery.com

EARTHQUAKES DONT KILL PEOPLE, BUT BUILDINGS DO.

www.themegallery.com

D Gaya Gempa V

Perpindahan Lateral

RESPON STRUKTUR ELASTIK LINIER


Pengetahuan kurang tentang beban gempa rencana dan kapasitas struktur gedung

??
Gaya Gempa V

??

??

??

Desain V

Pendekatan Awal: Beban gempa proposional dengan berat struktur Desain V = 5 10 % Berat Struktur Analisis statik linier dengan faktor keamanan untuk mengatasi ketidak tahuan tentang beban gempa dan kapasitas struktur PBI 1955, PBI 1971, PMI 1970

RESPON STRUKTUR DAKTAIL


Ve,max Gempa Kuat, 500 tahun

V=Ve,max/R

Struktur Daktail: V= Ve.max/R R= Faktor Reduksi Gaya Struktur Daktail Faktor Daktilitas m = Dmax/Dleleh SNI 1726-2002, SNI 2847-2002, SNI 1729-2002

Kapasitas Struktur Daktail

Desain V

Respon inelastis (daktail)

Dleleh

Dmax

DESAIN STRUKTUR SECARA INELASTIK

www.themegallery.com

STRUCTURAL RESPONSE & PERFORMANCE

www.themegallery.com FEMA 451B

STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE LEVEL

FEMA 451B
www.themegallery.com

PERFORMANCE BASED ENGINEERING DESIGN

5% demand spectrum (elastic) iteration Capacity spectrum

api
>5% demand spectrum (inelastic)

Performance Point

dpi= D desain

PERFORMANCE BASED ENGINEERING DESIGN


Gempa Kuat 2500 tahun Gempa inelastik (Demand earthquake) Struktur Daktail (Capacity) Resolusi berdasarkan Demand vs Capacity yang menghasilkan Performance Point (Titik Kinerja) Performance (Kinerja) Struktur berdasarkan deformasi in-elastik SNI XXXX-2010

COLLAPSE PREVENTION (CP)

COLLAPSE PREVENTION (CP) LIFE SAFETY (LS)

IMMEDIATE OCCUPANCY (IO)

INELASTIC STRUCTURE
= Plastic Hinge = Last Plastic Hinge Roof Displacement Ratio = Roof Displ./H

Roof Displacement

Lateral Shear Force= Fi

Base Shear = Vb= Fi

Roof Height, H

IMMEDIATE OCCUPANCY (IO)

LIFE SAFETY (LS)

COLLAPSE PREVENTION (CP)

DRAFT SNI-2010 SNI 1726-2002

Peak Ground Acceleration (Base Rock) - Major E/Q SNI 03-1726-2002 (Rn=10%, t=50 years, T=500 years)

Site Class B (Rock) untuk Ss (T=0,2 detik) , x=5% (Zoning untuk Short Period, T=0,2 detik), Perioda Ulang Gempa 2500 Tahun

Site Class B (Rock) untuk S1 (T=1,0 detik) , x=5% (Zoning untuk Long Period, Constant Velocity) Perioda Ulang Gempa 2500 Tahun

Desain berdasarkan SNI


SNI 2847
Perencanaan Struktur Beton

SNI 1726
Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa

SNI 1729
Perencanaan Struktur Baja

Desain Bangunan Tahan Gempa berdasarkan SNI


www.themegallery.com

Zona Gempa: UBC vs SNI

www.themegallery.com

Sistem Struktur berdasarkan SNI


Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen

Sistem Rangka Gedung Sistem Ganda

Sistem Dinding Penumpu


www.themegallery.com

Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen


Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Biasa (SRPMB)

Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen

Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Menengah (SRPMM)

Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Khusus (SRPMK)

www.themegallery.com

SRPMB
No special detailing required Advantages: Disadvantages:
Higher base shear Highly restricted use
Normalized Shear
1.2 1.0 Elastic

Low detailing cost

Expected
0.8 Design

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

Normalized Displacement

www.themegallery.com

SRPMM
Detailing requirements:
Continuous top and bottom reinforcement Special requirements for shear strength Special detailing in critical regions
Normalized Shear
1.2 1.0 Elastic

Expected
0.8 Design

0.6

0.4

0.2

Advantages:
Low base shear Less congested reinforcement

0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Normalized Displacement

Disadvantages:
Restricted use
www.themegallery.com

SRPMK
Detailing requirements:
Restrictions on steel grades Continuous top and bottom reinforcement Joint shear strength requirements Strong column weak beam Use of maximum probable strength Closely spaced ties in critical regions
1.2 1.0 Elastic

Expected

Normalized Shear

0.8

Design

0.6

0.4

0.2

Advantages:
Low base shear

0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Disadvantages:
Drift control Congested reinforcement

Normalized Displacement

www.themegallery.com

Column
Lap splice in the middle of columns

Transverse Reinforcement Requirements - Rectangular Hoop Reinforcement

150 mm

500 mm

6db 75 mm 100 mm

x 350 mm on center 100 mm sx = 100 + [(350-hx)/3] 150 mm

Columns at least 120% stronger than beams

Transverse Reinforcement Requirements

Hoop and Ties Confinement Reinforcement


6db (75 mm)

Transverse Reinforcement Requirements

Beam-column joints (connections)

TYPICAL JOINT REINFORCEMENT

Larger Seismic Forces Resisted by Shear Walls compared to Columns

Shear Wall and Frame Behavior

Shear Wall Behavior

Frame Behavior
75%

25%

Shear and Frame Interaction

Couple Shear Wall Rebar

Terima Kasih

You might also like