Section 20, Article 3 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution expressly provides that no person shall be imprisoned for debt. A fraudulent debt may result in the imprisonment of the debtor if: 1. The fraudulent debt constitutes a crime such as estafa and 2. The accused has been duly convicted.
Section 20, Article 3 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution expressly provides that no person shall be imprisoned for debt. A fraudulent debt may result in the imprisonment of the debtor if: 1. The fraudulent debt constitutes a crime such as estafa and 2. The accused has been duly convicted.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Section 20, Article 3 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution expressly provides that no person shall be imprisoned for debt. A fraudulent debt may result in the imprisonment of the debtor if: 1. The fraudulent debt constitutes a crime such as estafa and 2. The accused has been duly convicted.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Section 20, Article 3 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution expressly provides that no person shall be imprisoned for debt. Debt, as used in the Constitution, refers to civil debt or one not arising from a criminal offense. It means any liability to pay arising out of a contract, express or implied.
Non-Imprisonment for Debt
What the law prohibits is imprisonment for non-payment of a contractual obligation.
Non-Imprisonment for Debt
What the law prohibits is imprisonment for non-payment of a contractual obligation.
Non-Imprisonment for Debt
A FRAUDULENT debt may result in the imprisonment of the debtor if: 1. The fraudulent debt constitutes a crime such as estafa and 2. The accused has been duly convicted.
When one is convicted of estafa and sent to prison, the imprisonment is not for the non- payment of debt but for the deceit or abuse of confidence employed by the convict.