HYDRAULIC DESIGN CRITERIA

._

SHEET 122-1/2 OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS DISCHARGE COEFFICIENTS DESIGN HEAD

can be used for se1. Purpose. Hydraulic Design Chart 1..22-l/2 lecting the spillway design head for upstream spillway face slope and approach depth conditions not covered by other Hydraulic Design Criteria charts. The chart, used in conjunction with the USBR1 extensive tables of lower and upper nappe surface coordinate data for weirs sloping downstream and for vertical weirs, should permit optimization of spillway crest shape design for free overfall spillways having upstream face slope ratios from 3V on 12H to vertical and approach depths from 0.15 to 10 times the design head (Hal). 2. Background. The USBR tests were made in a 2-ft-wide, 9-ftdeep rectangular flume. Approach depths varied from less than 0.1 ft to 5 ft. Heads on the sharp-crested weirs ranged from about 0.1 to 1.0 ft. Discharge coefficients have been converted into values applicable to heads on the rounded crest. USBR coordinates of the upper and lower nappes of the weir overflow are in terms of the head on the sharpcrested weir. Comparable presentations of Bazins2 data for weirs sloping downstream (3V on 6H and 3V on 12H) are also included on the chart and in the USBR tabulation. A plot of the WES experimental data (Chart 122-1) for H/Hal= 1 and p/Hal= 0.3 to 1 is included for comparison. The WES discharge coefficients for rounded crests have consistently been about 3 percent higher than comparable USBR coefficients for sharpcrested weirs (HDC 122-4). The use of the USBR coefficients for the design of unmodeled spillways should result in conservative design. Application. The spillway design flow ~ is computed using 3. an appropriate coefficient from Chart 122-1/2 and pier and abutment contraction coefficients from other applicable charts (see Charts 111-3/1, ill-3/2, 111-5, 116-6, and 122-2). The spillway design head Hd and the computed design discharge ~ are then used with Chart 111-3/3 to develop a spillway rating curve for uncontrolled flow as described in paragraph j~of Sheet 111-3/3. 4. (1) References.

U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Studies of Crests for Overfall Dams; Hydraulic Investigations. Bulletin 3, Part VI, Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports, Denver, Colo., 1948 Bazin, M., Recent experiments on the flow of water over weirs. Annales des Ponts et Chaussees.October 1888.

(2)

122-1/2

4.1

4.0

3.Q

3.8

cd

3.7

3.6

3.5

3.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 I .0 P T, 2.0 4.0 6.0 !0.0

0,1

1 NOTE: CURVES BASED ON FIGURES CANYON 15 AND 21, BULLETIN PROJECT, FINAL 3, REPORT,

OVERFLOW

SPILLWAYS
DISCHARGE COEFFICIENTS DESIGN HEAD
HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHART 122-1/2 WES 2-72

PART 221, BOULDER USBR 1948.

hh

HYDRAULIC DESIGN CRITERIA SHEETS 122-3 to 122-3/5 LOW OGEE CRESTS CREST SHAPE 45-DEGREE UPSTREAM SLOPE

1. General. An alternate method to that presented in Chart 111-20 for ogee spillway crests with a 45-deg upstream face slope is presented here. Coordinates of the lower nappe-profile for sharpcrested weirs sloping 45 deg downstream and various approach depths have been determined and published by the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) (reference 1). The published coordinates are in terms of the head on the sharp-crested weir. 2. For low ogee crests, the head is defined as the total energy head upstream from the spillway crest, and the approach depth as the height of the spillway crest above the approach channel bottom. For convenience of design, the shape downstream from the apex of the crest is considered separately from the shape upstream. The USBR (referenced 2) has published curves for determining the location of the apex of the crest, and for selecting coefficients and powers applicable to the general downstream quadrant crest shape equation. These curves are in a somewhat different form from that used by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers.

. -.

-()
Y

n USBR form d

=K~

Xn=~Hd where Y=

()

(n-l)y

Corps of Engineers form

vertical coordinate positive downward

design head d = K= variable dependent on approach depth

x= horizontal coordinate positive to the right

n= variable, however usually set equal to 1.85

The published curves have been confirmed by an independent U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (wES) study of the USBR data for weirs sloping 45 deg downstream.

122-3 to 122-3/5 Revised 11-87

3. Preferred Shapes. Chart 122-3 shows the relation between the approach depth P and the approach velocity head ha in terms of the based on the USBR data (reference 1). The increments d of h /Hd used in the original study were fairly close together, altho~gh the actual shape change is not great until the velocity of the approach flow becomes substantial. Three preferred shapes which would be considered reasonable for a range of ha/Hal and their corresponding values of P/Hd are indicated in Chart 122-3. These three selected design head

crest shapes are suggested for projects subject to model testing to provide information systematically and economically on pressure characteristics and discharge coefficients for spillways designed using the USBR method. For cases in which model studies are not contemplated, use of model study results presented in Sheets 111-20 to 111-20/1 is recommended. 4. Downstream Quadrant Shape. Chart 122-3/1 presents the published USBR curves for the coefficient K and exponent n of the downstream quadrant shape equation. The curves are applicable to approach velocity head-design ratio ha/Hal of 0.00 to 0.20. The USBR curves of Xe/Hd and Ye/Hal for locating the apex of the crest are also given in the chart. Downstream quadrant equations for spillways having approach velocity head-design ratios of 0.08 and 0.12 are given in Charts 122-3/2 and 122-3/3, respectively. The condition of h /Hd = 0.00 is presented in Chart 111-9. The coefficients in the equati~ns given in these charts as noted in paragraph 2 are reciprocals of those given in Chart 122-3/1. Tables of the functions required in the evaluation of the equations are not available elsewhere; consequently, they are included in the charts to assist the designer in computing the required coordinates. Tabulations of the slope of the downstream quadrant shape are also included in the charts to facilitate location of the beginning of the toe curve or the tangent section.
5. Upstream Quadrant Shape. Upstream quadrant shapes have frequently been defined by circular arcs fitted to the experimental data. This procedure usually results in a surface of discontinuity where the curved crest meets the sloping upstream face. The possible effects of this surface of discontinuity are discussed in paragraph 4 of Sheets 111-1 to 111-2/1. WES has derived upstream quadrant equations based on the USBR basic data (reference 1) for 45-deg downstream sloping weirs. Chart 122-3/4 gives the general form of the equation in terms of the sharp-crested weir. Curves of the coefficients and the exponents required for evaluation of the equation are given in this chart and in Chart 122-3/1. The curves are applicable to approach velocity headdesign head ratios h /Hd of 0.00 to 0.20. Upstream quadrant shapes based on these curvesashould satisfy the crest location criteria given in Chart 122-3/1, result in zero slope at the spillway crest, minimize

122-3

to

122-3/5

Revised 11-87

the discontinuity at the 45-deg upstream face, and result in good agreement with the experimental data.
6. The solution of the equation in Chart 122-3/4 gives coordinates in terms of the sharp-crested weir. Transfer of the coordinate origin to the spillway crest and the reference head to the design head results in the cumbersome general equation shown in Chart 122-3/5. Upstream quadrant coordinates referenced to the crest apex and design head are tabulated in this chart for h_/H, values of 0.08 and 0.12 to a a simplify the design procedure. 7. The crest shapes defined in Charts 122-3 to 122-3/5 have not been tested in the laboratory for determination of pressures and discharge coefficients. 8. References.

(1) U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, U. S. Department of the Interior, Boulder Canyon Project, Hydraulic Investigations; Studies of Crests for Overfall Dams, Part VI, Bulletin 3, Denver, Colo., 1948. (2) 9 Design of Small Dams, Washington D. C., 1960.

122-3 to 122-3/5 Revised 11-87

0.20

0.18

0.16

0.14

\,

0.12

~ Hd

0.10

0.06

\
L

0.06

0.04
. . .

0.02

USE

T 0.00 0.0 0.4

I
Oa
1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2

P
Hd NOTE: ha 1 i F CREST AXIS DATA FROM TABLE 8, BOULDER CANYON RE PORT BULLETIN 3, USBR, 1946.

t Hd )t
P

! ! 1 I

){
45

,1/
DEFINITION
ARM EN G#NEER WATERWAYS ExPERIMENT

1
SKETCH
STATION VICKSBURG MISS15SIPPS

LOW OGEE CRESTS

45DEGREE APPROACH
HYDRAULIC REV I-84

UPSTREAM

SLOPE

HYDRAULICS
DESIGN CHART 122-3
WES

PREPARED

KY

10-61

0.54

82

0.50

0.46. 0.00

?
0.04

CONSTANTS
0.20

OF

DOWNSTREAM

QUADRANT

EQUATIONS
0.06

0.18 Ye ~ ------

0.

6 0

)0

0.04

0.06 ha ~

0.12

0.16

0.02 0.20

B. WEIR

NAPPE

GEOMETRY

NOTE:

CURVES REPRODUCED FROM FIGURE 187, DESIGN OF SMALL ~AMs, USBR, 1960.

-r

---1ha

DEFINITION

SKETCH

LOW 45-DEGREE
CREST
HYDRAULIC REV 1-64

OGEE
SHAPE
DESIGN

CRESTS
FACTORS
CHART 122-3/1
WES 10-61

UPSTREAM SLOPE

pREPARELI

av

4F4U%

ENGW4EER

WATERWAYS

EXPERIMENT

ST ATWJN

VICKSmLIRG

iImsfissIPPI

-.

I
I
/fd

ha = 0.08Hd

ORIGIN UPSTREAM (SEE HDC QUADRANT 122-3/5)

OF

COORDINATES

DOWNSTREAM

QUADRANT

SHARP-CRESTED WEIR P=o. ?5Hd

I 0.75

NOTE:

EQUATION BASED ON CURVES, HDC 122-3/1.

USBR

DOWNSTREAM QUADRANT

DATA I 869 x Ho ?5
d

xl 75

xl 75

~ d

1869. Ho 75 d I 869 3144 4261 5.287 6,250 7.166 8044 8891 9712 10511 II 290 12.051 }2.797 13528 14247 14953 15,649 16334 17010 17677 18336 18987 19631 20.268 20.898

Hd

010 0.15 0.20 0.25 030 035 040 045 0.50 0.60 070 080 0.90 I 00 I 20 140 160 180 2.00 250 300 350 400 450 500

0.0177 0.0361 0.0598 0.0883 0.1216 01592 02011 0.2472 02973 04090 05356 06767 O 8316 1000 1376 1802 2276 2797 3.364 4.970 6.839 8956 11.314 13.903 16.719

6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 la 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 90 100

23002 30.125 38.055 46765 56234 77369 101327 128000 157299 189148 279508 384.558 503.639 636217 781.847 940151 1110797 1293495 1487984 1694032 1911,425 2139969 2629810 3162278

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

21522 22139 22752 23358 23960 24557 25148 25735 26.318 26.897 27471 2804 I 28608 29171 29.730 30285 30838 31387 31933 32475 33.015 33552 34.086 34.617 35146

r
SLOPE DATA dY dX x Hd 050 060 070 0433 0553 0679 0811 0949 0.80 0.90 100 1092 1,05 1 165 1.10 1240 1 15 I 25 I 30 I 35 I 40 145 I 50 160 1.70 1.80 1315 1392 I 470 1549 1629 1710 1,792 1,875 2043 2.215 2391 120

lJOGEE CRESTS
UPSTREAM SLOPE QUADRANT-ha= 0.08Hd
DESIGN CHART 122-3/2
wES 1-64

LOW
45-DEGREE DOWNSTREAM
HYDRAULIC
pREpARED

Ky

ARMY

ENGINEER

WATERWAYS

EXPERIMENT

STATION,

VICKSBURG

Mlssls51ppt

-----

&zd
A t ORIGIN Hd UPSTREAM QUADRANT (SEE HDC 122-3/5) \ i P=0.45Hd ! a u DOWNSTREAM QUADRANT OF COORDINATES SHARP-CRESTED WEIR

NOTE:

EQUATION CURVES,

BASED ON HDC 122-3/1.

USBR

DOWNSTREAM QUADRANT

DATA 1.905 x H0.747 d 21.718 22.339 22.954 23.564 24.169 24,768 25.362 25.952 26.537 27.118 27,695 28.267 28.836 29.401 29.963 30,520 31.075 31.626 32174 32.718 33.260 33.799 34.334 34.867 35.397

SLOPE DATA E dX 0.50 060 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 140 1.45 1,50 1,60 1.70 1,80 + d 0.444 0.567 0.696 0.833 0.975 1.123 1.198 1.275 1.35d 1,433 1.514 1.595 1,678 1.762 1,846 1.932 2.106 2.284 2466

xl 747

X1747

Hd

1.905 x 0747 Hd 1.905 3.197 4.328 5.365 6.338 7.263 8.149 9.004 9,832 10.638 11.422 12190 12.941 13.677 14.401 15.112 15.812 16.5J32 17.182 17.853 18,516 19170 19.818 20458 21.091

Hd

010 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.60 0,70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1,20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2,00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4,50 500

0.0179 0.0363 0.0601 0,0887 0,1220 0.1597 0.2017 0.2478 0.2979 0.4096 0.5362 0.6771 0.8318 1.000 1.375 1.800 2.273 2.792 3.357 4.957 6.816 8.923 11.267 13.841 16.638

6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 90 100

22.879 29949 37.818 46.458 55.847 76.794 100,528 126,940 155.941 187456 276,822 380654 498295 629.215 772.969 929182 1097.523 1277.704 1469.466 1672.578 1886.828 2112.021 2594.548 3118889

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

LOW
45-DEGREE DOWNSTREAM
HYDRAULIC

OGEE

CRESTS

UPSTREAM SLOPE QUADRANT-ha=0.12Hd

DESIGN CHART 122-3/3
wES 1-64

PREPARED

BY

ARMY

ENG,

NE ER

WATERWAYS

EXPERIMENT

sTATION,

VICKSBURG

M,ss,

s$,

PP,

.._
n,

0.52

0.48

KI

0.44

0.40

0.36 0.00 1.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20

~ .

0.96

0.92

~ \

0.88

. 0.00

0.04

0.08

0.12

0.16

0.20

NOTES:

I
Hd

I. CURVES BASED ON USBR DATA IN BOULDER CANYON REPORT, BULLETIN 3, PART lZI,1946, AND ON USBR CURVES ON HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHART 122-3/1. 2. n IS THE SAME IN BoTp UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM QUADRANT EQUATIONS.

HW

,ORIGIN OF COORDINATES \

ly\ t[ I-CREST xs
SHARP-CRESTED WEIR

LOW
UPSTREAM
HYDRAULIC

OGEE

CRESTS

45- DEGREE
DEFINITION SKETCH

UPSTREAM SLOPE QUADRANT FACTORS

DESIGN CHART 122 -3/4 WE5 I-54

--

pREPAREO

BY

ARMY

ENGINEER

WATERWAYS

EXPERIMENT

ST AT80N

VICKSBURG

MISSISSIPPI

..-..

Ik

ha

Hw

Hd

k=%+ (ii+ a-(i+an

Ye ORIGIN OF COORDINATES

! !
Ir

11

DOWNSTREAM (SEE P 1r SHARP-CRESTED WEIR HDC 122-3/2

QUADRANT & 122-3/3)

I
.\_
-0.000 -0.020 -0.040 -0.060 -0.080 -0.100 -0.110 0.0000 0.0004 0.IM16 0.0035 0.0064 0.0101 0.0122 0.0147 0.0174 0.0203 0.0219

Y/Hd
0.12

II
-0.150 -0.155 -0.160 -0.165 -0.170 -0.175 -0.180 -0.185 -0.190 -0.195

I
0.0235 0.0252 0.0270 0.0288 0.0308 0.0328 0.0349 0.0372 0.0395 0.0420

Ymd

0.000o 0.W04 0.0015 0.0035 0.0062 O.oow o.olm 0.0144 0.0170 O.olw 0.0215

0.0231 0.0248 0.0265 0.0284 0,0303 0.0323 0.0344 0.0366 0.0390

-o.lm
-0.130 -0.140 -0.145

NOTE:

COORDINATES HDC 122-3/1

BASEDON AND 122-3/4.

LOW

OGEE

CRESTS

45-DEGREE UPSTREAM SLOPE UPSTREAM QUADRANT COORDINATES

HYDRAULIC
PREPARED

DESIGN

CHART

122-3/5
WfSS 1-64

KY

ARMY

ENGINEER

WATERWAYS

ExPER4kIENT

sTATION

VICKSBURG,

MISSISSIPPI

HYDRAULIC DESIGN CRITERIA SHEETS 122-3/9 TO 122-3/10

-

LOW OGEE CRESTS WATER-SURFACE PROFILES 45-DEGREE UFSTREAM SLOPE

1. The shapes of the upper nappe profiles for low, ogee crests are required for the design of spillway abutment and pier heights and for the selection of trunnion elevations for tainter gates. Coordinates for the upper nappe profile for sharp-crested weirs sloping 45 degrees downstream have been determined and-published by the USBR.* The published coordinates apply, in a strict sense, only to the unsupported free-falling jet. When the jet is supported, the development of the turbulent boundary lay~r will influence the thickness of the jet. The jet thickness will also be affected if the beginning of the toe curve or the tangent chute is close to the crest. However, the published data can be used for estimating the watersurface profile in the vicinity of the spillway crest for the design. 2. For low, ogee crests, head upstream from the spillway of the spillway crest above the the relation betweenthe design

the head is defined as.the total energy crest, and the approach depth as the height approach channel invert. HDC 122-3/9 shows head-approach channel depth ratio ha used by the USBR. This

(,:+ J
d e

and the approach velocity parameter

()q

chart can be used in conjunction with HDC 12E!-3and 122-3/l for selection of the r,ostappropriate upper nappe profile coordinates from the published data.

3* The published data are in the terms of the head on the sharpcrested weir with the origin of the data at the weir crest. For design purposes, coordinates are expressed in terms of the head on the crest with their origin at the crest apex. The necessary conversion can be accomplished using the relation between the weir head and the design head
Hw = Hd + ye

HDC122-3/10 and the values of Xe/Hd and Ye/Halgiven in HDC 122-3/1. illustrates the computations required for this conversion.
* U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Studies of Crests for Overfall Dams, Boulder Canyon Project. Final Reports, Part VI-Hydraulic Investigations, Bulletin 3, Denver, c!o1o.,1748.

122-s/9

to

122-3/10

Revised I-64

0.20

0.16

0.12

-----

z
I

2.0 Hd Pw + Ye NOTE:

3.0

DATA FROM TABLE 8, BOULDER REPORT, BULLETIN 3, USBR,1948.

CANYON

LOW
Pw

OGEE

CRESTS

45DEFINITION
PREp ARED BY u S ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS

DEGREE UPSTREAM SLOPE APPROACH VELOCITY

HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHART 122-3/9
WES 1-64

SKETCH
EXPERIMENT ~TAT; ON~lCKSBURG, MISS ISSIPPl-

U. S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYSEXPERIMENT STATION COMPUTATION SHEET JOB: ES 804 : RGC PROJECT: John Doe Dam SUBJECT : SDillway

COMPUTATION COMPUTED
GIVEN: Spil!way Crest Hd =20 P/Hd=o.74
ho/Hd=&08

Upper Water Surface Profile DATE : 1/6/64 CHECKED BY: MBB DATE: 1/10/64

BY:

~ ho ft /\ d

HDC

122-3

Hw d Ir

REQUIRED: Coordinates forupper nappeprofi lefor design head (Hd),

I

origin at crest apex.

COMPUTE: 1. Required relationships (HDC (HDC (HDC 122-3/1) 122-3/1) 122-3/9) sketch)

Ye~d=&042 Xe/Hd h#lW= =0.195 0.076

x
~

=1.042~
Hw

~=
Hd

1.042 #w

(Origin

at sharp crest)

HW=Hd+Ye H ~=1+~=1 Hd Y

(Definition +0.042=1.042
d

= 1.042# Hd

x
-N; ~Hdw ~ . 1.042$

Y + Q WH

(origin
d apex)

at crest

2.

Coordinates

-UpPer Origin

water-surface

profile Origin (4) Y/Hd (1.042

X

at Weir Crest (3) X/Hd (1.042

X (l))

at Crest Apex (6) (7) x (ft) -87.26 -66.42 -45.58 -24.74 -3.90 6.52 16.94 27.36 37.78 (8) Y (ft) -18.12 -18.04 -17.90 -17.52 -15.00 -11.24 -4.52 5.98 2CI.24

(1) )(/H:

(2) Y/H~

(5) X/Hd (2)) ( (3) - 0.195)) -4.363 -3.321 -2.279 -1.237 -0.195 0.326 0.847 1.368 1.889 3, USBR, 1948 ( (4)+

Y/Hd 0.042))

-4.00 -3.00 -2.00 -1.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 *From **From

-0.910 -0.906 -0.899 -0.881 -0.760 -0.580 -0.257 0.247 0.931 Table Table

-4.168 -3.126 -2.084 -1.042 0.000 0.521 1.042 1.563 2.084

-0.948 -0.944 -0.937 -0.918 -0.792 -0.604 -0.268 0.257 0.970 Canyon report, interpolated for Bulletin

-0.906 -0.902 -0.895 -0.876 -0.750 -0.562 -0.226 0.299 1.012

21, p. 80, Boulder 21, cited above,

hO!Hw = 0.076

LOW

OGEE

CRESTS

45- DEGREE UPSTREAM SLOPE UPPER WATER-SURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE COMPUTATION

HYDRAULIC
PREPARED BY U s ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS ExPERIMENT STATION, VICKSEZURG, MISSISSIPPI

DESIGN

CHART

122-3/10 WES l-s4

HYDRAULIC DESIGN CRITERIA S~ET 122-5

LOW OGEE CRESTS TOE CURVE PRESSURES

1. Purpose. Experimental laboratory data indicate that toe curve pressures for low ogee crests are approximately a maximum from the third point to the end of the toe curve. Analytical and flow net studies further indicate that the toe curve affects the boundary pressure immediately upstream and downstream from the curve. The relatively high pressure at the end of the curve may be transmitted to the underside of the chute slabs immediately downstream. Also, for low ogee crests the toe curve may have a submergence effect upon the flow over the crest. Therefore, estimates of boundary pressure relating to toe curves may be useful in studies of the structural design of the curve, the stability of the slabs immediately downstream, and the capacity of the spillway. HDC 122-5 can be used as a guide in estimating the pressure distribution on toe curves for low ogee spillways. Design Criteria. The results of a Waterways Experiment Station (WES)12~emiempirical study on flip bucket and toe curve pressures for high overflow spillways have been published and are summarized in HDC 112-7. The study included analysis of data from five hydraulic model investigations of low ogee spillways (Gavins Point,2 Dickinson,3 Fresno,4 Bonny,5 Dams). and KeyhOle6 The parameters defined in HDC 112-7 were used in the analysis. Reasonable correlation of the data for ratios of toe curve radius-total head R~ < 1.0 was obtained as shown in HDC 122-5. The curves in the chart are ~ased on HDC 112-7. For R~ ratios > 1.0, the dimensionless pressure term can be expressed as hp/HT + ~(hp/HT) where hp~ is.the value of the pressure parameter from HDC 122-5 and 11(~~) 1s an additive value from the insert graph in the chart. Revision of the curves in this chart may be desirable as additional data become available. 3. Application. The values of the parameters q/R~2~ ~ ~/~ ~ and R~ are computed for the design or maximum flow as the case may be. The notation is defined in HDC 112-7 and in the definition sketch in HDC fOr @~T 122-5. The values of hp% of 0.0 and 0.25 to 1.00 are read from the directly from the chart if R~ <1.0 . Values of A(hp~) chart insert should be added to the values read from the chart proper if R~ >1.0 . The pressure upstream and downstream from the toe curve reduces rapidly to the normal hydrostatic pressure and can be evaluated by a flow net or model study. However, an estimate of these pressures can be obtained by graphical extrapolation of the pressure pattern of the toe curve. 4. References.

(1) U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, CE, An Investigation

122-5

of Spillway Bucket and Toe Curve Pressures. Miscellaneous Paper No. 2-625, Vicksburg, Miss., February 1964.
(2)

U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, CE, Spillway for Gavins Point Dam, Missouri River, Nebraska; Hydraulic Model Investigation. Technical Memorandum No. 2-4o4, Vicksbuxg, Miss., May 1955. Beichley, G. L., Hydraulic Model Studies of Dickinson Dam Spillway. Hydraulic Laboratory Report No. HYD-267, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, 30 December 1949. Ball, J. W., and Besel, R. C., Hydraulic Model Studies of the Spillway and Outlets for the Fresno Dam, Milk River Project. Hydraulic Laboratory Report No. HYD-177, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, 6 July 1945. Rusho, E. J., Hydraulic Model Studies of the Overflow Spillway and the Hale Ditch Irrigation Outlet, Bonny Dam, Missouri River Basin Project. Hydraulic Laboratory Report No. HYD-331, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, 31 January 1952. Beichley, G. L., Hydraulic Model Studies of Keyhole Dam Spillway, Missouri River Project. Hydraulic Laboratory Report No. HYD-271, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, 8 January 1952.

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

122-5

0.6
0.4 0.2 x x ~ 0.0 o 0 tA A
-0.2 a -0.4 0.6 I .0 R mT -

0.6

/ -H~ox

0.5

1.4

1.8

0.4 , 33 A 67 IAW A / ( II 0.3 50

BASED ON I DC lf2-7 0.2

0. i NOTE :

T T
WMBERS 2F (a/a~)
I

ARE VALL x Io2

0.0 0.0

,
0.2

0.6

LEGEND

x
A

GAVINS FRESNO

POINT DAM DAM

DAM

DICKINSON

0 BONNY DAM + KEY HOLE DAM

LOW
DEFINITION SKETCH

OGEE
DESIGN

CRESTS
CHART 122-5
WES 1-66

TOE
vICKSBURG, MISSISSIPPI

CURVE PRESSURES

HYDRAULIC
PREPARED BY IJ s ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EX.OERIMENT STATION,

HYDRAULIC DESIGN CRITERIA SHEET

123-2TO 123-6

SPILLWAY CHUTES ENERGY - DEPTH CURVES

The design procedure tiodetermine the water-surface 1. General. profile in a spillway chute often employs the step method of computation. The curve can be SOIV d by use of the varied flow function. The method devised by Bakhmeteff ? 1) is preferred by some engineers and the type of profile is classified as the S1 curve. However, when the step method is employed, a trial-and-error procedure is normally used to resolve the total energy into depth and velocity head from the equation: 2 2g where E is the energy in feet and is the difference between the energy gradient and the bottom of the chute, d is the depth of flow andVz/2g is the velocity head.
2. Energy -depth Curves. A graph with energy and depth as ordinates and a family of curves representing various rates of flow per unit width (q) greatly facilitates the step method. This type of graph is not new.
is The sample computation chart (123-6) 3. Sample Computation. included only to demonstrate the application of the energy-depth curves. Many different arrangements of the computation form have been used. The sample computation is carried to one-hundredths of a foot to indicate that the last significant figure can be estimated from the energy-depth curve. The starting station of the water-surface profile is commonly taken to be the tangent point of the chute to the ogee. If one assumes no energy loss between the reservoir pool and the starting station, the initial energy is the difference in elevation between the reservoir and the chute floor at the starting station. Entering the energy-depth graph with the initial energy and the proper discharge per unit width, the depth can be determined. Subtracting the depth from the energy} the velocity head is found. The energy-depth curves are then used at each successive phase of the computation after a new energy value is determined. Reproductions of the energy-depth curves on double size sheets are available upon request.

E=

d+~

(1)

Boris A. Bakhmeteff}

Hydraulics of Open Channels (McGraw-Hint

19s2).

123-2 to 123-6

L
z

Id

n
Ii

E = ENERGY

IN FEET

D = DEPTH IN FEET. DC= CRITICAL DEPTH IN FEET. q = DISCHARGE PER FOOT OF WIDTH E= ENERGY IN FEET (E= D+ 229

IN CFS. ~.

V = VELOCITY

IN FT PER SEC.

ENERGY-DEPTH SUPERCRITICAL
ENERGY20 TO 44
HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHART

CURVES
FLOW
FEET
123-2
WES 4-1-S2

16

-.
15

14

13

12

II

10

1I&l L

z
1

1-

a. w n
II Q

0 44

46

48

50

52

54 E=

56 ENERGY

58 IN FEET

60

62

64

66

68

D = DEPTH IN FEET. 0== CRITICAL DEPTH IN FEET. q-= DISCHARGE PER FOOT OF WIDTH E = ENERGY V = VELOCITY IN FEET IN FT ~E-D+ PER SEC. %9).

IN CFS,

ENERGY-DEPTH SUPERCRITICAL
ENERGY-44
HYDRAULIC

CURVES FLOW
68 FEET
123-3
WES 4-1-52

TO
DESIGN

CHART

--

G
w Id u.

z
x

1a. IA n II a

68

70

72

74

76

78 E=

80 ENERGY

82 IN FEET

64

66

88

90

92

D = DEPTH

IN FEET. IN CFS.

~= CRITICAL DEPTH IN FEET. q = DISCHARGE PER FOOT OF WIDTH E = ENERGY V = VELOCITY IN FEET (E= D + ~g),

ENERGY-DEPTH
SUPERCRITICAL
ENERGY-68
HYDRAULIC

CURVES
FLOW
92
CHART

IN FT PER SEC.

TO
DESIGN

FEET
123-4
WE S4I-52

E=

ENERGY

IN FEET

D = DEPTH

IN FEET. IN FEET. FOOT OF WIDTH V2 (E=D+ 29 /) PER SEC. IN CFS. .

Dc= CRITICAL DEPTH q = DISCHARGE PER E= v= EN ERGY VELOCITY IN FEET IN FT

ENERGY-DEPTH
SUPERCRITICAL
ENERGY-92
HYDRAULIC

CURVES
FLOW
116
CHART

TO
DESIGN

FEET
123-5
WES 4-I-52

WATERWAYS

EXPERIMENT SHEET

STATION

COMPUTATION

Job:

C W-804

Project:

Computations:

DAM WATER SURFACE P#?OF/..E

JOHN DOE
d-i-sz
S.bjecf:

CHU

~~

SP/LLWAY
d-/-

Computed

By:

AA.

MC.

Date:

Checked

By:

~.G.

Date:

52

G/VE/V. cfs Q =/20,000 w= 400 ff n= 0.0 /3 AL= /00ff

Chufe Inifial Slope = 0.10 Energy= 280
ENERGY GRAD ELEV

FORMULAS. Ahf Ab2

22,~4/3

V2

()

ALn2 = 0.0169
ff q = Q/w= 300 cfs

STATION

FLOOR

ELEV

V2 ~

2 2iR4/3

V2

Ahf

-.

59925 627z25280 845 8./ / /9,55 355 62666({ //+50589.25626.34(3 37.4/ 6.786.56 30.6344,5 625. // 12+5057925 62477 4586 592 575 3994 507 622.86 /3+5056925 62~50 536/ 535 52/ 4826 558/ 6/9.86 /4+50559.256/953 606/ 500 4gg 556/ 5982 6/6.22 /5+5054925 6/588 6697 472 46/ 6225 6344
/0+50

34.920.5906 0.9086 72.57 /,226 /.568 //30/ /9/0 2273 /5595 2636 2.972 /957/ 3308 3.647 23585 3,986 &Ahf = //.368

Gradienf Elev 62725 615.88 + 11,368 62 Z248 Check %irsf es fimafe of energy gradienf based on Ahf from sfafion 10 + 50(2) h~usfed energy -qrouienf bused on average of Ahf bef ween 10+ 501? II +50@)

Check Energy --

NOTA T/O/V.
d= Depih of Fjow in Chu +e - ff Energy = d+ v~@ -f+ Loss-f+ L.eng+h -f+

E-=
Ahf= AL n=
K

Incremen+ Incremenf Manningk Discharge

of Fricfion of Chufe

Fric} ion Coefficient per cfs Abdius - ff ft/sec e - f} foo i of widthcfs

b R=

Discharge Hydraulic VelocityWidth

CHUTE

SPILLWAYS

v= w=

of Chui

ENERGY- DEPTH CURVES SAMPLE COMPUTATION

HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHART 123-6
WE S4-I-S2 REVISED 6-57

HYDRAULIC DESIGN CRITERIA SHEETS 123-T

----

TO 123-9

CHUTE SPILLWAY

COMPUTATION AIDS

1. The curves on Hydraulic Design Chart 12s-7 to 123-9 were prepared as design aids for problems similar to the one given in the sample

computation on Chart 123-6 previously issued. The first two charts facilitate the determination of the hydraulic radius for a given rectangular chute width when the depth becomes known. Chart 123-T is for widths from 10 to 120 ft and Chart 123-8 is for widths from 100 to 1200 ft The last chart nables the designer to find the velocity and the. function Vp/2.21 R4 7 s after the velocity head has been computed.
G

10

20

30

40

50 WIDTH

60 IN FEET

70

80

90

I00

110

I 2(

BASIC

EQUATION

R=m
WHERE:

CHUTE
OF OF CHUTE WATER RADIUS

SPILLWAYS

W+2d

W WIDTH d = DEPTH

HYDRAULIC WIDTH-DEPTH
WIDTH
HYDRAULIC

RADIUS CURVES
TO 120 FT
WES 4-1-!53

R = HYDRAULIC

10

DESIGN CHART 123-7

-----

1LI
Id u.

I 00

200

300

400

500 WIDTH

600 IN FEET

700

600

900

I000

1100

I 20

BASIC ~WHERE:

EQUATION Wd
W+2d OF OF CHUTE WATER RADIUS

CHUTE

SPILLWAYS

W = WIDTH d = DEPTH

HYDRAULIC RADIUS WIDTH - DEPTH CURVES WIDTH

HYDRAULIC

R = HYDRAULIC

lOOTO
DESIGN

1200 FT
CHART 123-8
WES 4-1-S3

\)

1W

w
(L

>
1-

G 0
w >
-J

10

20

30

40

50 VELOCITY

60 IN F PS

70

80

90

I 00

110

126

CHUTE

SPILLWAYS

VELOCITY-

HEAD
HYDRAULIC

AND
DESIGN

V2
2.21
CHART 123-9

CURVES

-----

WES 4-1-53

HYDRAULIC DESIGN CRITERIA

-----

SHEETS 124-1 TO 124-1/1 CHUTE SPILLWAYS STILLING RASINS LENGTH OF HYDRAULIC JUMP

1. Purpose. The hydraulic jump is commonly used for energy dissipation at the end of spillway chutes. The jump may occur on the sloping chute, on both the sloping chute and the horizontal apron, or on the horizontal apron, depending upon tailwater conditions. In each case it is necessary to determine the length of the stilling basin walls required to confine the jump. HDC 124-1 can be used to estimate jump lengths when excess tailwater forces the jump to occur entirely on the chute slope. HDC 124-1/1 is applicable when the length of the jump spans the intersection of the sloping chute and the horizontal apron.
2. Laboratory Investigation. Laboratory experiments on the hydraulic jump on sloping aprons have b~en conducted by Bakhmetef and Mat zke,1 Kindsvater, 2 Lin and Priest, and Bradley and Peterka. 6 ,5 Difficulty has been found in correlating the results of various investigations of length of a jump on a sloping floor. The apparent reason for this is differences in the definition of the jump length used by the investigators. Bradley and Peterka 4 define the end of the jump as The point where the high velocity jet begins to lift from the floor, or a point on the tailwater surface immediately downstream of the surface roller, whichever occurs farthest downstream. Bradley and Peterkas jump-length curves have been reproduced as HDC 124-1 and 124-1/1 and are recommended for design purposes because of the extensiveness of the tests compared with those of other investigators. The experimental data points have been omitted existing basins from the charts to simplify their use. Data points for with sloping aprons are plotted in HDC 124-1/1 and show good agreement with the curves. These p ints, selected from project tabulations published by Bradley and Peterka, G are limited to those cases where the locations of the jumps are dimensionally defined.

3* The length L of the jump in terms of the theoretical depth 2 for zero slope is plotted as a function of the entering Froude number 1 in HDC 124-1. Jump-length curves for continuous slopes of 0.0 to 0.33 are given. The tailwater depth d~ required for the jump to occur completely on the sloping apron is shown by the insert graph.
4. For noncontinuous slopes, the length Lt of that porti~n of the jump occurring on the slope is given as a function of the tailwater depth ~ in HDC 124-1/I_. The theoretical depths d2 for the horizontal apron jump have been used to develop the dimensionless curves for apron slopes of 0.05 to 0.33.

5=
marine r:

Application.

HDC 124-1 and 124-1/1 can be used in the following

a.

Continuous Slope. Compute the Froude number of the entering flow and the theoretical depth d2 for the jump on a horizontal floor. The latter can be estimated from HDC 112-3 or 112-4 and 112-5. From the insert graph in HDC 124-1, determine the tailwater depth d) for the slope of interest. This depth locates the end of the jump. From the chart proper determine the jump length for the entering Froude number and the chute slope. Locate the toe of the jump using the computed tailwater depth d; and jump length L . Check the Froude number at the toe of the jump against the Froude nwber computed for the entering flow and repeat the computations if necessary. Noncontinuous Slope. For a noncontinuous slope, the procedure is similar to that for continuous slopes. If the existing tailwater depth TW is less than the d; obtained from the insert graph in HDC 124-1 but greater than the theoretical depth ~ , the hydraulic jump will occw partly on the slope and partly on the horizontal apron. The length of the portion of the jump on the slope is readily determined from HDC 124-1/1. The computed length Lt locates the toe of the jump. If the Froude number used in the computation does not approximate that existing at the toe of the jump, the computations should be repeated using the new Froude number at the toe of the jump. Bradley and Peterka suggest that the jump length curves given in HIXl 124-1 for continuous slopes are also applicable, with negligible error, to noncontinuous slopes.

b.

6.

References.

(1)

Bakhmeteff, B. A., and Matzke, A. E., The hydraulic jump in terms of dynamic similarity. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers, VO1 101 (1936), -PP 630-680. Kindsvater, C. E., The hydraulic jump in sloping channels. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol 109 (1944), pp 11o71120.

(2)

(3)

Lin, Kuang-ming, and Priest, M. S., The Hydraulic Jump Over a Plane Inclined Bottom. Alabama Polytechnic Institute, Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin 30, April 1958. Bradley, J. N., and Peterka, A. J., Hydraulic design of stilling basins: stilling basin with sloping apron (basin V). ASCE Hydraulics Division Journal, vol 83, IN 5 (October 1957), pp 1-32. U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Hydraulic Design of Stilling Basins and Bucket Energy Dissipators, revised July 1963, by A. J. Peterka. Engineering Monograph No. 25.
.-

(4)

(5)

124-1 to 124-1/1

7.6

~.3> Y 55/
7.2

/ / /

6.8

/ r /,
6.4

//

I i
6.0

/
5.6

I
0.35

0.30

0.25 In ~o.20 L o ~ 0.15

5.2

0.10 4.8

0.05

0.00

1.0

1.4

[.8

2.2 dlz z I

2.6

3.0

3,4

4.4 2 4 6

I 0

I 10

I 12

1 14

NOTE:

CURVES AND DATA. CURVE

DEVELOPED FROM POINTS S=0.33

BY BRADLEY EXPERIMENTAL OMITTED TO

PETERKA DATA FOR

SIMPLIFY

CHART. EXTRAPOLATED

CHUTE SPILLWAYS STILLING BASINS CONTINUOUS SLOPE LENGTH OF HYDRAULIC JUMP

HYDRAULIC
PREPARED BY U S ARMY EN G, NEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT sTATION, VICKSBURG
M,

DESIGN

CHART

124-1
WFS

SS!SS,

PF,

----- -1-66

1.8..

1.7 O G

LEGEND NORRIS BHAKRA S= 0.25 S=o. io

II 1.6 A

FRIANT DICKINSON

S= O.143 S= O.125

1.5

1.4

I I I

1.3 ~

1.2

1.1
L

1.0

0.9 0 I 2 3 4 Lt q 5 6 7

~=$(m-1)
NOTE: F1. ~ ~ CURVES DEVELOPED BY BRADLEY AND PETERKA FROM EXPERIMENTAL DATA. DATA POINTS OMITTED TO SIMPLIFY CHART. CURVE FOR S= 0.33 EXTRAPOLATED

\~;-

/
TW

1-
PREPARED BY u s ARMY ENGINEER

I I
SKETCH
EXPERIMENT 5r AT!oN, VICKSBURG, MISSISSIPPI

CHUTE SPILLWAYS STILLING BASINS

NONCONTINUOUS JUMP LENGTH
DESIGN

SLOPE ON
CHART

++

SLOPE
124-1/l
WES 1-66

DEFINITION
WATERWAYS

HYDRAULIC

HYDRAULIC DESIGN CRITERIA SHEETS 140-1 TO 140-1/8 MORNING GLORY SPILLWAYS

1. Background. Morning glory or shaft spillways utilize a crest circular in plan. The outflow is carried by a vertical or sloping shaft to a horizontal tunnel at approximately streambed level. The capacity of the morning glory spillway is limited by the size of the circular crest that can be fitted to the topography and by the head on the crest. Under various hydraulic conditions} the flow may be controlled by the crest, the throat, or the friction of the entire system flowing under pressure. A recent design of the USBR includes an inclined shaft wit vertical bend 2 at the bottom that has a radius five times the diameter. ?7 The USBR recommends that the horizontal tunnel of morning glory s i lways be designed to flow only 75 percent full to eliminate instability. ?$
2. LaboratoryInve stigation. Laboratory investigations by Camp,(s~4J Wagner,(9) Lazzari, (5) and others on flow over circular sharpcrested weirs have been used as the basis for design of morning glory spillways. The most complete study was that made by Wagner on a 20-in.diameter weir. The results of this slmdy have been used for the development of HDCS 1.40-1to 140-1/8.

3. Design Discharge. Morning glory spillways are generally designed for crest control or free-flow conditions. Laboratory tests indicate that submergence begins to affect the discharge when the ratio of the head to weir radius is greater than 0.15. The discharge may be determined by a modified weir equation:
Q=C (2fiR)H;J2

where Q c R Hd = = = = discharge, cfs discharge coefficient radius of sharp crest, ft design head on spillway crest, ft

HDC 140-1 permits a preliminary estimate of the discharge-head-radius relation for deep approach and free-flow crest conditions. The discharge curves on this chart are for head-radius ratios of 0.20, 0.30, and 0.40.
1. circular} The experimental discharge weir. coefficients are for the head on the

Discharge coefficient ves for design head on the spillway crest have been published by the USBR ?~? and are reproduced in HDC 140-1/1 for use with the equation given in paragraph 3. Curves for
sharp-crested

140-1to

140-1/8

three approach depth conditions are shown. Crest Shape. HDCS 140-I_/2 to 140-1/5 present dimensionless crest profiles and coordinates in terms of the head on the sharp crest. Tabulations are included for ratios of head to weir radius of 0.2 to 2.0 and ratios of approach depth to radius of 2, 0.30, and O.1~. The ratio of head (Hs) to weir radius (R) is required for use of these charts. This relation can be determined from a USBR design aid(8) reproduced as HDC 140-I/6.
5* 6. Crest Shape Equations. Equations of the lower surface of the nappe have been determined for a limited number of conditions. The converging flow over the crest results in complex equations for morning glory spillway crest shapes. Upstream and downstream quadrant shape equations for three approach depth conditions and for three ratios of head to radius for each depth are given in HDC 140-1/7. The equations are considered adequate for defining crest shapes within the limits indicated on the chart.

79 Transition Shape. The crest shape is generally connected to the vertical shaft by a transition section. A procedure whc can be used for transition shape design has been published by the USBR.&)
8. Application Procedure. HDC 140-1/8 is a sample computation illustrating the use of HDCS 140-1/1 to 140-1/7 in morning glory spillway design. In this computation the horizontal tunnel was considered as flowing 75 percent full.

Design Factors. A number of problems encountered in the design 9* and operation of morning glory spillways have been reported.(1~2~6}7) In the design of these structures the engineer is sometimes concerned with flow regulation by crest gates. Information may also be required on discharge coefficients and crest pressures for less than design flow and possible effects of adjacent topography on radial flow to the crest. Therefore, in some cases a model study may be required before selection of the final design.

10. (1)

References.

Abecasis, F. N., The behavior of morning glory shaft spillways. IAHR, Proceedings of the Sixth General Meeting, The Hague, 19j5j Vol 3, pp C8-1-C8-1O. Bradley, J. N., Prototype behavior, in Morning glory shaft spillways: A Symposium. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engipp 312-344. neers, vol 121 (1956), Camp, C. S., Determination of Shape of Nappe and Coefficient of Discharge of a,Vertical Sharp-crested Weirj Circular in Plan with Radially Inward Flow. State University of Iowa thesis, 1937. Camp, C. S., and Howe, J. W., Tests of circular weirs. Civil

(2)

(3)

(4)

140-1to 140-I/8

Engineering, vol.g, No. k (April lgsg), pp 247-248.

(5)
(6)

Lazzari, E., Ricerca sperimentale SU11O sfioratore a pianta circolare. LEnergia Elettrica (November 1954), pp 8s8-840. Peterka, A. J., Performance tests on prototype and model) in Morning glory shaft spillways: A symposium. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol 121 (1956), pp 385-40g. U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Tests on preliminary designs of spillways) in Model Studies of Spillways. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports, Part VI, Hydraulic Investigations, Bulletin 1 (Denver, Colo., 1938)} Chapter II.
,

(7)

(8)

Design of Small Dams, 1st ed.

1960.

(9)

Wagner, W. E., Shaft spillways: determination of pressure-controlled profiles. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol 121 (1956).

.-

140-lto 140-1/8
-

-,03

8 DIsCHARGE

,.4 (Q) - CFS

,.5

EQUATION

Q = C (2?TR) Hd32
WHERE: Q =DISCHARGE, CFS C = DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT R =RADIUS OF SHARP CREST, FT Hd =DESIGN HEAD ON SPILLWAY CREST,

FT

DEFINITION

SKETCH

NG GLORY

SPI .LWAYS

DEEP APPROACH - CREST CONTROL DESIGN DISCHARGE

HYDRAULIC
PREPARED BY

DESIGN

CHART

140-

I
WES 10-61

u s

ARMY

EN GfNEER

WATERWAYS

EXPERIMENT

STATION,

VICKSBURG,

MISSISSIPPI

2.0

T \

\\ \
r

1.8

1.6

\ \ Y
\\ \\

I .4

--1---

.2

.0

> \\ \
0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0 I
)

~
DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT -e

NOTE:

EQUATION Q = C(2TTR)
WHERE: Q C R Hd =DISCHARGE, CFS. -DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT. RADIUS OF SHARP CREST, FT. = DESIGN HEAD ON SPILLWAY CREST, FT.

CURVES ARE TAKEN FROM USBR DESIGN OF SMALL DAMS AND ARE BASED ON WAGNERS DATA FOR FULLY AERATED FLOW OVER A SHARP-CRESTED WEIR. DASHED VALUES CURVES OF Hal/R ARE BASED ON EXTRAPOLATED (CHART 140- 1/6). TO SHARP CREST, FT.

Hd32

P= APPROACH

DEPTH

MORNING

GLORY

SPILLWAYS

DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT DESIGN HEAD

HYDRAULIC
pREPARED BY u s ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXperiment sTATlON vtc KsBu RG MISSISSIPPI

DESIGN

CHART

140-1/l
WES 10-61

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.0

-1.5

~ H~

-2.0

-2.5

-3.0

-3.5

-4.0

I 0.0

0.5

1.0

1,

NOTE:

~ 2, NEGLIGIBLE OF APPROACH.

VELOCITY AERATED.

~a

NAPPE

MORNING

GLORY

SPILLWAYS

LOWER NAPPE PROFILES

DEFINITION
-A RED BY u S ARMY ENGINEER wATERWAYS

SKETCH
EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG,

HYDRAULIC
MISSISSIPPI

DESIGN

CHART

140-

1/2
WES 10-61

~
R x ~ 0000 .010 .020 030 .040 050 .060 070 .080 090 .100 120 .140 160 .180 .200 .25a .300 .350 .400 .450 .500 550 .600 .650 Y < 0.000 -.020 -.040 -.060 -.080 -.100 -.150 -.20fJ -250 -.300 -400 -.500 -.600 -.800 -1 .Wo -1.200 -1.400 -1.600 -1.800 -2.000 -2.500 -3.GQO -3.5430 -4.000 -4.500 -5.000 -5.500 -6.000

020

0.30

0.40

0.50

060

1 00

1,50

2.00

-+
s

FOR PORTION OF PROFILE

ABOVE WEIR CREST

0.0000 .0133 0250 0350 0435 0506 .0570 0627 .0677 0722 .0762 0826 0872 0905 0927 0938 0926 0850 .0750 .0620 0450 .0250 0020

0.0000 .0128 .0236 0327 0403 .0471 0531 .0584 0630 0670 .0705 0758 0792 .0812 0820 0819 .0773 .0668 .0540 .0365 .0170

00000 0122 0225 0308 0377 0436 .0489 .0537 0578 .0613 .0642 .0683 0705 .0710 .0705 0688 0596 .0446 .0280 0060

0 Ooco 0116 0213 0289 0351 0402 0448 .0487 0521 .0549 0570 0596 .0599 0s85 .0559 0521 0380 .0174

00000 0112 0202 0270 0324 0368 0404 .0432 0455 0471 .0482 .0483 0460 .0418 0361 0292 .0068

00000 .0095 0159 .0198 0220 0226 0220 0201 0172 .0135 0089

0.0000 0077 0115 0126 .01!7 0092 0053 0001

0 (XMO .0070 0090 .0085 .0050

\ \\ r

+
s

FOR PORTION

OF PROFILE

BELOW WEIR CREST

0.554 592 .627 .660 .692 .722 .793 .860 919 .976 1.079 1 172 1.260 1.422 1.564 1.691 1.808 1.918 2.024 2,126 2.354 2.559 2,749 2.914 3.053 3,170 3.294 3.405

0.487 526 563 .536 .628 657 725 .790 847 900 1 000 1.087 1 167 1 312 1.440 1.553 1.653 1.742 1.821 1.891 2.027 2.119 2.171 2.201 2.220 2.227 2229 2.232

0.413 452 .487 .519 549 577 .641 .698 750 797 880 .951 1.012 1.112 1.189 1.248 1.293 t ,330 1.358 1.381 1.430 1,468 1.489 1,500 1.509

0334 369 .400 428 .454 478 .531 .575 613 648 .706 .753 793 854 899 .933 .963 .388 1.CQ8 1.025 1,059 1.086 1.102

0262 .293 .320 342 .363 381 423 459 490 518 .562 .598 627 .673 .710 .739 .760 .780 .797 .810 .830 853

0.116 .145 .165 .1B2 197 .210 238 .260 280 296 .322 .342 359 384 .402 .417 .423 .430 .433

0070 .096 .115 129 .140 .150 .170 .184 .196 206 .220 232 .240 .253 .260 266

0048 074 .088 .100 .110 .118 .132 .144 .153 160 .1643 .173 .179 .184 .188

t \

NOTE:

NEGLIGIBLE VELOCITY OF APPROACH. NAPPE AERATED. TABLE BY WAGNER, TRANSACTIONS, ASCE, 1956.

MORNING
LOWER NAPPE

GLORY SPILLWAYS
SURFACE P/R>2 COORDINATES

HYDRAULIC

DESIGN

CHART

140-1/3 WES 10-61

pREPARED

BY

ARMY

ENGINEER

WA TERWAyS

EXperiment

STATION

VICKSBURG,

MISSISSIPPI

~
R x ~ O.coo 010 020 .030 040 .050 .060 .070 .080 .090 .100 .120 .140 .160 .180 .200 ,250 .300 .350 .4(XI .450 .500 .550

0.20

0.30 +FOR s

0.40 PORTION OF PROFILE

0.50

0.60

080

ABOVE WEIR CREST

00000 .0130 0245 0340 .0415 .0495 0560 0610 .0660 0705 .0740 .080i) .0840 .0870 .0885 .0885 .0855 .0780 0660 .0495 Om 0090

00000 0130 0240 .0330 .0390 0455 0505 0550 .0530 .(%25 .0660 0705 .0735 .0750 .0755 .0745 .0685 .0580 .0425 .0240 .0025

00000 .0120 0225 .0300 .0365 .0420 0460 .05W ,0530 0550 .0575 .C600 .C615 .C610 .0600 .0575 .0480 .0340 .0150

O.ooca 0115 .0195 0270 0320 0370 0405 0440 0460 .0480 .0500 .0510 .0515 .0500 0475 0435 .0270 .0050

0.0000 0110 .0180 .0240 .0285 .0325 .0350 .0370 03a5 0390 .0335 .030 .0355 .0310 .0250 .0180

00000 .0100 .0170 0210 0240 0245 0250 .0245 .0235 .0215 .0190 .0120 0020

\ \ \ \ r \

Y ~ O.000 -.020 -.040 -.%0 -.080 -.100 -.150 -.200 -.250 -.mo -.400 -590 -.6GU -.8(XI -1 .O(m -1.200 -1 .4C0 -1.600 -1.800 -2.WO -2.500 -3.WO -3.500 -4.000 -4.500 -5.000 -5. SOD -6.000 0.519 .%0 .5% .632 .664 .693 .760 .831 .893 .953 1.060 1,156 1.242 1.403 1.549 1.680 1.800 1.912 2.018 2.120 2.351 2.557 2.748 2.911 3.052 3.173 3.290 3.400

-#-FOR s 0.455 .495 .532 .567 .600 ,631 .701 .763 .826 .880 ,981 1.072 1.153 1.3)1 1.430 1.543 1.647 1.740 1.821 1.892 2.027 2.113 2.167 2.200 2.217 2.223 2228

PORTION OF PROFILE

BELOW wEIR cREsT

0.384 .423 .458 .491 .s22 .552 .618 .677 .729 .779 .867 .938 1.000 1.101 1.180 1.240 1.287 1.323 1.3s3 1.*O I .428 1.464 1.489 1.499 1.507

0.310 .345 .376 .406 .432 .456 510 .558 .599 .634 .692 .74s .7m .845 .892 .93 .9s3 .983 1.00s 1.022 1.0s9 1.081 1.099

0,238 .272 .300 324 .348 .368 412 .451 .483 .510 .556 .595 .627 .672 .707 .733 7s7 .778 .797 .810 .837 .852

0.144 .174 .198 220 .2?a .254 .290 .317 .341 .362 .396 .424 .446 .478 .504 .524 .540 .s51 .560 .569

R-x

NOTE:

APPRECIABLE VELOCITY OF APPROACH NAPPEAERATED. TABLE BY WAGNER, TRANSACT10N3, ~~, 1956.

MORNING
LOWER NAPPE

GLORY

SPILLWAYS

SURFACE COORDINATES P/R = 0.30

DESIGN CHART 140-1/4 WES 10-61

HYDRAULIC

pREPARED

BY

ARMY

ENGINEER

WATERWAYS

EXPERIMENT

STATION,

VICKSBURG,

MISSISSIPPI

H~ R 0.20 I 030 +FOR s 0.000 .010 020 .030 040 .050 .060 .070 060 .090 .100 120 .140 .160 180 .200 .250 .300 .350 .4@J .450 .500 .550 O.cooo .0120 .0210 .0285 .0345 0405 .0450 .0495 0525 .0560 .0590 .0630 .0660 .0670 0675 .0670 .0615 .0520 .0360 .0210 .0015 0.0+300 .0115 0195 0265 0325 .0375 0420 .0455 .0465 0510 .0535 .0570 0565 .0590 .0580 .0560 .0470 .0330 .0165 I 0.40 I 0.50 I 0,60 I 0.60

PORTION OF PROFILE

ABOVE WEIR CREST

00000 .0110 .0185 .0250 0300 .0345 .0380 .0410 .0435 .0455 .0465 .0460 .0475 .0460 0435 .0395 .0265 .0100

O.cooo .0105 .0170 .0225 .0265 .0300 0330 .0350 .0365 .0370 .0375 0365 0345 .0305 0260 .0200 .0015

0.0000 .0100 .0160 .0200 0230 0250 .0265 .0270 .0270 .0265 .0255 .0220 0175 .0110

O.cooo .0090 .0140 .0165 0170 0170 .0165 0150 .0130 .0100 ,IX)S5

\ \ r\
.0040 0.189 .228 .259 266 .310 .331 .376 .413 .445 .474 .523 .567 .601 .655 .696 .725 .750 .770 .787 .801 .827 .840 0.116 .149 .174 .195 .213 .228 .263 .293 .319 .342 381 .413 43s .473 .493 .517 .531 .544 .553 .660

Y ~

~FOR s 0.454 .43s .540 .579 .615 .650 .726 795 .662 .922 .023 .128 .220 .380 1.525 1.659 1.780 1.697 2.003 2.104 2.340 2.550 2.740 2.904 3.043 3.169 3.286 3.SS6 0.392 .437 .478 .516 .550 .564 ,W .729 .790 .643 .947 1.040 1.129 1.285 1.420 1.537 1.639 1.723 1.809 1 .87s 2.017 2.105 2.153 2.180 2.198 2.207 2.210

PORTION OF PROFILE

BELOW wEIR cREsT

0.0C43 -.020 -.040 -.060 -.lmo -.l W -.160 -.200 -.250 -.300 -.400 -.sm -.600 -.600 -1 .O@J -1.200 -1 .41XJ -1.600 -1 .81X3 -2.000 -2.600 -3.000 -3.500 -4030 -4.500 -5.000 -5.500 -6.003

0.325 .369 .407 443 .476 .606 .577 .639 .692 .741 .B28 .302 .%7 1.030 1.164 1.228 1.276 1.316 1.347 1.372 1.423 1.457 1.475 1 .4B7 1,491

0.253 .232 .328 35E .366 .412 .460 .516 .557 .594 .656 .710 .753 .627 .878 .917 .949 .973 .337 1.013 1.049 1.073 1.066

NOTE:

APPRECIABLE VELOCITY OF APPROACH NAPPE AERATED. TABLE BY WAGNER, TRANSACTIONS,=, 1966,

MORNING
LOWER NAPPE

GLORY

SPILLWAYS

SURFACE COORDINATES P/R= O.15

DESIGN CHART 140-1/5 WES 10-61

HYDRAULIC

-----

PREPARED

eY

u s

ARMY

ENGINEER

WATERWAYS

Experiment

STATION,

VICKSBURG,

httssw.bwa

1.12

1.10

~$22.o

1.08 -

1.06

1.04

5=o./51.02 ~ \\ b

1.00 0 0.4 0.0 Hd F 1.2 1.6 2.0

NOTE:

P R

=DEPTH =RADIUS

OF APPROACH OF SHARP HEAD HEAD

TO SHARP

CREST,

CREST. CREST. CREST. DESIGN OF

Hs= DESIGN Hd= DESIGN

ON SHARP

ON SPILLWAY FROM BASED USBR ON

CURVES ARE TAKEN SMALL DAMS. DASHED LINES OF DATA. ARE

EXTRAPOLATION

MORNING

GLORY

SPILLWAYS

HYDRAULIC
PREPARED BY u s ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBUhG, MISSISSIPPI

DESIGN

CHART

140-1/6
WIIS

=--

10-61

P F R ~
0.4!0

H~ e ~ > Hd x ! 05 -0.190
0 3e7

LIMITING DOWNSTREAM QUADRANT EQUATIONS

UPSTREAM QUADRANT EQUATIONS

LIMITING x Hd

22 te3 -0.166 mmw

I es 122

0.2 x ~ ()
$s.6

-0.237

0.1035

=-0.635 H.-J = Hd O.61O 3 Hd () 3 Hd ()

X Hd () ~ Hd =0.685 Hd
0 424

3.20

03 () -0.145 0035 t
.73 0.419

-0209

0,0893

~=-o.sm Hd

2.25

0.4 () -0.155 ~=o,590 Hd [)

1 73

-0174 x 0m375 fi ()

0.0764

~=-o.53a Hd =0,830 Hd ~ () Hd ~ Hd

~ Hd

x ~ ()

I .45
4.73

0.30
0,451

0.2

-0,219 =-0.622 Hd x Hd () -0,140 0 440 ! -0.120 1=0.725 Hd z Hd () ! ,73 -0.160 0.4?6 ~=o.mo H,j () ~ Hd 1.73 -0.125
0,451 .73

00972

350 a.se x ~ () 2.15

0.3 ()

-0.189 =-0.637 Hd Z Hd

0.0817

=0.6S0 Hd

x Hd ()

Om74

0.4
lid

-0.1s6 0.0655 0 430

=-0,556

x @ () ~ x 000375 () ~ x

6.99

z lid () z H,-J

1.35
4,77

0.15 () ~ () -0.105
lid

0,2

-0.192

0.0724

=-0.625 Hd

3.45
10 0

0.3 -0.164
lid

0.0627

3=-0.665

Z= Hd

O.6430 ~ Hd () 1 ~= H,-J 0,760 ~ Hd ()

73

0w8

()~ x Os () ~
6.67

2.15

0.4 ()

-0.132

0.0504

~=+.slo Hd

~ Hd

1 35

x .a, 1 ()

nl

ORIGIN

OF

COORDINATES

MORNING

GLORY SPILLWAYS CREST SHAPE EQUATIONS

HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHART 140-1/7 WES 10-61

> z 1 s o

-J

\ 1EXPERIMENT 5TAT10N, VICKSBURG, h3sslssippl

pREPARED

BY

ARMV

ENGINEER

WATERWAVS

U. S. ARMY ENGINEER

WATERWAYS

EXPERIMENT

STATION

COMPUTATION JOB CW 804 COMPUTATION COMPUTED BY CWD

GIVEN: Design discharge
Design Conduit REQUIRED: Spillway COMPUTE: 1. Crest radius Assume Hd ~= required to pass design discharge. shape with minimum crest radius head Approach depth

SHEET SUBJECT BY MBB Morning Glory Spillway DATE 6/30/61

PROJECT

John Doe Dam CHECKED

Spillway Design DATE 6/14/61

(Q)= (P) 22

l0,000cfs R for free flow

(Hd) = 10 ft

to be designed

R = 16.4 ft ,0 =0.61 16.4

.( ~
P

-HyTpRo
CONDUIT

For

~=

0.61

and (HDC

:2

C = 3.08 Q= C(2rr

140-1/1)

R) Hd312
X

= 3.08

6.28

16.4

103/2

= 10,030 cfs* 2. Ratio of head on weir to crest radius (H~\R)

For

~=

0.61

and

:22

H, = 1.047 Hd

(HDC

140-1 [6)

H, = 1.047 H. .
R 3. Crest profile HDC 140-1/3.

10 = 10.47 ft

10.47 =
16.4 for H,\R

0.64

(Partial

submergence,

0.45<

H~\R

< 1.00)

= 0.64

by interpolation

from table

on

*lf

computed discharge

does not closely computation.

approximate

design discharge,

as-

sume new radius and repeat

MORNING

GLORY SPILLWAYS

SPILLWAY DESIGN SAMPLE COMPUTATION

HYDRAULIC
PREPARED 8Y U S A~MY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MISSISSIPPI

DESIGN

CHART

140-1/8 wES 10-61