Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ผลกระทบของคลื่น โทรศัพท์
ผลกระทบของคลื่น โทรศัพท์
29 4 ..-.. 2554
Jutiporn Sudsiri
Faculty of Sciences and Industrial Technology, Prince of Songkla University,
Suratthani Campus, Suratthani, 84000, Thailand
E-mail: jutipornc@gmail.com
Songkla Med J 2011;29(4):183-193
(mobile phone)
: , ,
. . 84000
14 2554 11 2554
183
Abstract:
The mobile phone has become a part of human life. Use of mobile phones continues to increase
because development of the technology leads them to be used for new purposes. In Thailand, the
effect of electromagnetic wave (EMW) emissions from mobile phone base stations on human health
has not been discussed extensively. Even so it is reported that EMW can affect human health if
people are exposed to the high field strengths or even low field strengths if they are persistent over
extended periods of time. Especially, people who live close to the base station are being exposed
to EMW irradiation continuously that cannot do anything to avoid. The radiation is different from
an individual uses their mobile phone which can be controlled by personal choice. It is reported
that people living less than 300 meters from a mobile phone base station have an increased risk of
headache, nausea, memory fading and poor-quality sleep. However, the effect of EMW frequencies
used by mobile phones on human health is still unclear but recent research reports can be taken as
evidence of a significant risk. Therefore, more information on EMW, which may affect human health,
is needed to reveal potential risks, which should be acted upon, based upon the precautionary principle.
Key words: human health, mobile phone base station, mobile phone radiation
.. 2518
21
(electromagnetic pollution)
1
European Information Technology
Observatory .. 2553
5,100
.. 2551 20
6,500 .. 25542
electromagnetic wave (EMW) ( 50
(Hz) 300 (GHz))
(KHz)
(short-term exposure)
(long-term
exposure)2
The International Commission on NonIonizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)
184
29 4 ..-.. 2554
(limit) EMW
(.)
4 .. 2550
EMW
(specific absorption
rate; SAR)
(W/kg) . SAR
EMW
0.08
2
4 3
.. 2533
(mobile phone antenna mast
base station)
Sudsiri J.
(Effects of mobile phone radiation
from base stations)
EMW
100 300
(radio frequency; RF)
(World Health Organization;
WHO)3
EMW
Levitt Lai2
( 1)
4-7
Santini 8
350
0-300 (nausea)
(loss appetites) (headaches)
(sleep disruption) (irritability)
(depression) (memory loss)
(visual disruption)
( 2)
185
1 2
GSM* 24-48 .
915-1,947 GSM*
MHz
(gene)
24-72 .
(Deoxyribonucleic
acid; DNA)
Chiang 11 AM*
2 .
24 ./
24
GSM*
2
300 8
()
32.8*
51*
14.5*
20.4*
41.3*
16.9
27.7
14.5
<10
3
23.2*
47.8*
6.9
8.3
57.1*
26.8*
25.4*
24.3*
10-50
2
3
41.7*
40*
8.4
8
41.4*
21.6
29.4
23
25.7*
26.1*
3
5.5
57.5*
19.7*
26.6*
13.5
50-100
2
3
47.2*
40.6*
5.7
5
46.9*
11.6
37.1*
22
44.1*
36.7*
3.8
5
58.5*
24*
29*
7.1
100-200
2
3
25.8
60.7*
2.4
6.9
45.8*
16.2
25
2.5
4.1
31.2*
4.6
0
50*
3.1
15.6
4.9
200-300
2
3
25
9
19.3 0
0
2.3
4.2 0
33.3 35.5
13.6 2.5
17.2 11.1
15
2.8
>300
2
18
3.3
15.6 1.8
2.1 1.1
3.3 3.3
13.8 21.2
10.3 3.7
17.9 5.8
13.6 4.1
2=, 3=
* (p<0.05)
186
29 4 ..-.. 2554
Sudsiri J.
Abel-Rassoul14
Santini Eger 15
1,045
10
400 5
2
112
5:3
( 3)
Anslow16
4
3-7
Ecolog Report17
- (T-Mobile)
220 (evidence)
(initiating) (promoting)
ICNIRP
EMW 1,000
3 400
5 100,000 15
()
()
(:)
5.6
5:3
1.1
0:1
4.6
2:3
3
2
0.6
0.9
2:1
1:1
4
0
3.7
4.0
2:2
0:0
3
0
3.6
1.2
2:1
0:0
1
1
1.2
1.1
0:1
0:1
0
1
0.6
0.7
0:0
1:0
187
(Thermal effect)
RF
(antenna) RF (absorbed)
(kinetic energy)
(cytoplasm)
(ions)
18
SAR
SAR 1.6 12
0.1
EMW 0.1
19
188
ICNIRP
ICNIRP
(Biological effect)
(membrane)
20
(non-thermal
effect)
(tinnitus)
(faint) (fatigue)
(discomfort of scalp) (lose hair)
(faintness of eyesight)
(memory fading)
(audition fading) (worse quality of
sleeping)
(subjective symptom)
21-23
900
60 30 24
29 4 ..-.. 2554
(nerve system)
(immune system) (endocrine
system) (blood
circulation system)
1-6
60 25
(subjective
assume)
26
19
.. 2551 13.30-16.00 . 1
1
1. .
Songkla Med J Vol. 29 No. 4 Jul-Aug 2011
Sudsiri J.
3
300
(hand free)
10
2. .
500-600 (
2 )
189
(field strength)
3. .
second-hand smoker
24
190
ICNIRP
4.
(...)
.. 2550
3
5
10
11
29 4 ..-.. 2554
...
EMF 27
WHO ... ..
2550 5, 10 11
1. (cumulative)
ICNIRP
(extremely low frequency;
ELF) 2 (mG)
0.6 SAR
1 28
2.
(potential health risks)
Songkla Med J Vol. 29 No. 4 Jul-Aug 2011
Sudsiri J.
3.
4.
/
5.
300
6.
300
micro-cells
nano-cells
29
7.
8.
9.
/
10. (
)
191
SAR
0.001
192
Subjective symptom, sleeping problems, and
cognitive performance in subjects living near
mobile phone base stations. Occup Environ Med
2006; 63: 307 - 13.
7. Liakouris AG. Radiofrequency (RF) sickness in
the Lilienfeld study: an effect of modulated
microwave? Arch Environ Health 1998; 53: 236 - 8.
8. Santini R, Santini P, Danze JM, et al. Study of
health of people living in the vicinity of mobile
phone base stations: I influences of distance and
sex. Pathol Biol 2002; 50: 369 - 73.
9. Belyaev IY, Hillert L, Protopopova M, et al.
915 MHz microwaves and 50 Hz magnetic field
affect chromatin conformation and 53BP1 foci in
human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy
persons. Bioelectromagnetics 2005; 26: 173 - 84.
10. Belyaev IY, Markov E, Hillert L, et al. Microwaves
from UMTS/GSM mobile phones induce long lasting inhibition of 53BP1/gamma-H2AX DNA
repair foci in human lymphocytes. Bioelectro magnetics 2009; 30: 129 - 41.
11. Chiang H, Yao GD, Fang QS, et al. Health effects
of environmental electromagnetic fields. J Bioelectr
1989; 8: 127 - 31.
12. Salford LG, Brun AR, Eberhardt JL, et al. Nerve
cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure
to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ
Health Perspect 2003; 111: 881 - 3.
13. Lerchl A, Krger H, Niehaus M, et al. Effects of
mobile phone electromagnetic fields at nonthermal
SAR values on melatonin and body weight of
Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus). J Pineal
Res 2008; 44: 267 - 72.
14. Abel-Rassoul G. Neurobehavioral effects among
inhabitants around mobile phone base stations.
Neurotoxicology 2007; 28: 434 - 40.
15. Eger H, Hagen KU, Lucas B, et al. The influence
of being physically near to a cell phone transmission
mast on the incidence of cancer. Umwelt Medizin
Gesellschaft 2004; 17: 1 - 7.
16. AVAATE [homepage on the Internet]. The
29 4 ..-.. 2554
Sudsiri J.
Proc Biol Sci 2002; 269: 193 - 201.
23. Chou CK, Guy AW, McDougall JA, et al.
Specific absorption rate in rats exposed to 2,450 MHz microwaves under seven exposure conditions.
Bioelectromagnetics 1985; 6: 73 - 88.
24. Dubreuil D, Jay T, Edeline JM. Does head-only
exposure to GSM-900 electromagnetic fields affect
the performance of rats in spatial learning tasks?
Behav Brain Res 2002; 129: 203 - 10.
25. Lorge J, Ezell CS. Observing-responses of rats
exposed to 1.28- and 5.62-GHz microwaves. Bio electromagnetics 1980; 1: 183 - 98.
26. Ya-ning L. Review on the investigation of the
mechanism of the biological effects of the electro magnetic radiation. BMS 2000; 1: 22.
27. WHO. Workshop on guiding public health policy
in areas of scientific uncertainty; 2005 July 11-13;
Ottawa, Canada. Ottawa: WHO; 2005.
28. Wongpanichlearch S. Effects of electromagnetic
fields on human health. Bangkok: TQP Publisher;
2008.
29. NCT. Notification of the national telecommuni cations commission. Bangkok: NCT; 2007.
193