You are on page 1of 62

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO

Theories of Failure
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
Theories of Failure
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Summary
Maximum principal stress theory
Maximum principal strain theory
Maximum strain energy theory
Distortion energy theory
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
2
Distortion energy theory
Maximum shear stress theory
Octahedral stress theory
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Introduction
Failure occurs when material starts exhibiting
inelastic behavior
Brittle and ductile materials different modes
of failures mode of failure depends on
loading
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
3
loading
Ductile materials exhibit yielding plastic
deformation before failure
Yield stress material property
Brittle materials no yielding sudden failure
Factor of safety (FS)
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Introduction
Ductile and brittle materials

Y

F

Y
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
4

e

p
Ductile material
Well defined yield point in ductile materials FS on yielding
No yield point in brittle materials sudden failure FS on failure
load
0.2%

Brittle material
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Introduction
Stress developed in the material < yield stress
Simple axial load

x
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
5
If
x
=
Y
=> yielding starts failure
Yielding is governed by single stress
component,
x
Similarly in pure shear only shear
stress.
If
max
=
Y
=> Yielding in shear

x
Multi-axial stress state ??
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Introduction
Various types of loads acting at the same time
N
M
T
Axial, moment and torque
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
6
Axial, moment and torque
p
Internal pressure and external UDL
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Introduction
Multiaxial stress state six stress components one
representative value
Define effective / equivalent stress combination of
components of multiaxial stress state
Equivalents stress reaching a limiting value property
of material yielding occurs Yield criteria
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
7
of material yielding occurs Yield criteria
Yield criteria define conditions under which yielding
occurs
Single yield criteria doesnt cater for all materials
Selection of yield criteria
Material yielding depends on rate of loading static &
dynamic
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Introduction
Yield criteria expressed in terms of quantities
like stress state, strain state, strain energy etc.
Yield function => f(
ij
, Y),
ij
= stress state
If f(
ij
, Y)<0 => No yielding takes place no
failure of the material
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
8
failure of the material
If f(
ij
, Y) = 0 starts yielding onset of yield
If f(
ij
, Y) > 0 - ??
Yield function developed by combining stress
components into a single quantity effective
stress =>
e
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Introduction
Equivalent stress depends on stress state and
yield criteria not a property
Compare
e
with yield stress of material
Yield surface graphical representation of

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
9
yield function, f(
ij
, Y) = 0
Yield surface is plotted in principal stress
space Haiagh Westergaard stress space
Yield surface closed curve
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Parameters in uniaxial tension
Maximum principal stress
Maximum shear stress
Applied stress => Y

1
= Y,
2
= 0,
3
= 0
Y
Y
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
10
Maximum shear stress
Maximum principal strain
2 2
3 1
max
Y
=

( )
E
Y
E E
Y
= + =
3 2
1



1
= Y,
2
= 0,
3
= 0
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Parameters in uniaxial tension
Total strain energy density
Distortional energy
Linear elastic material
E
Y
Y U
Y
2
2
1
2
1
= =
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
11
Distortional energy
[ ]
(
(
(

+
(
(
(

=
(
(
(

=
p
p
p
p
p
p Y Y
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0

First invariant = 0 for deviatoric part => p = Y/3


U = U
D
+ U
V
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Parameters in uniaxial tension
Volumetric strain energy density, U
V
= p
2
/2K
( )
U U U
Y
E K
Y
K
p
U
V D
V
6
2 1
18 2
2
2 2
=

= = =

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
12
( )
( ) ( )
G
Y
U
E
Y
E
Y
E
Y
E
Y
U
U U U
D
D
V D
6
1
3
2 1 3
6 6
2 1
2
2
2 2 2 2
=
+ = + =

=
=

Similarly for pure shear also


R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Failure theories
Failure mode
Mild steel (M. S) subjected to pure tension
M. S subjected to pure torsion
Cast iron subjected to pure tension
Cast iron subjected to pure torsion
Theories of failure
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
13
Theories of failure
Max. principal stress theory Rankine
Max. principal strain theory St. Venants
Max. strain energy Beltrami
Distortional energy von Mises
Max. shear stress theory Tresca
Octahedral shear stress theory
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Max. principal stress theory
Maximum principal stress reaches tensile yield
stress (Y)
For a given stress state, calculate principle
stresses,
1
,
2
and
3
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
14
Yield function
( )
defined not 0
yielding of onset 0
yielding no 0 If,
, , max
3 2 1
>
=
<
=
f
f
f
Y f
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Max. principal stress theory
Yield surface
0 , 0 Y
0 , 0 Y
0 , 0 Y
2 2 2
1 1 1
= = + => =
= = + => =
= = + => =
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y



Represent six surfaces

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
15
0 , 0 Y
3 3 3
= = + => = Y Y

3
Y
Y
Y
Yield surface
Yield strength same in
tension and compression
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Max. principal stress theory
In 2D case,
3
= 0 equations become
0 , 0 Y
0 , 0 Y
2 2 2
1 1 1
= = + => =
= = + => =
Y Y
Y Y

2
Y
Y
-Y
Closed curve
Stress state inside elastic, outside => Yielding
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
16
-Y
Stress state inside elastic, outside => Yielding
Pure shear test =>
1
= +
Y
,
2
= -
Y
For tension =>
1
= +
Y
From the above =>
Y
=
Y
Experimental results Yield stress in shear
is less than yield stress in tension
Predicts well, if all principal stresses are tensile

Y

y

y
Pure shear
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Max. principal strain theory
Failure occurs at a point in a body when the
maximum strain at that point exceeds the value
of the maximum strain in a uniaxial test of the
material at yield point
Y yield stress in uniaxial tension, yield
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
17
Y yield stress in uniaxial tension, yield
strain,
y
= Y/E
The maximum strain developed in the body
due to external loading should be less than this
Principal stresses =>
1
,
2
and
3
strains
corresponding to these stress =>
1
,
2
and
3
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Max. principal strain theory
Strains corresponding to principal stresses -
( )
( )
2
3 2
1
1

+ =
+ =
E E
For onset of yielding
( )
( )
Y
Y
E
Y
= + => =
2 2 1 1

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
18
( )
( )
1 2
3
3
3 1
2
2

+ =
+ =
E E
E E
Maximum of this should be
less than
y
( )
( ) Y
E
Y
Y
E
Y
= + => =
= + => =
2 1 3 3
1 3 2 2


There are six equations
each equation represents a
plane
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Max. principal strain theory
Yield function
e
k j i
k j i
Y f
k j i Y f


=
=
= =

max
3 , 2 , 1 , , , max
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
19
For 2D case
k j i
k j i
e
=

max
Y Y
Y Y
= => =
= => =
1 2 1 2
2 1 2 1


There are four equations, each equation represents a
straight line in 2D stress space
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Max. principal strain theory
Equations
Plotting in stress space
Y Y
Y Y
= =
= =
1 2 1 2
2 1 2 1
,
,


=

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
20
Y
=
1 2
Y
=
2 1

2
Y
=
1 2
Y
=
2 1

y
Failure equivalent
stress falls outside yield
surface
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Max. principal strain theory
Biaxial loading

1
-
2
For onset of yielding
( )
( )

+ =
+ = =
1
1
2 1
Y
Y
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
21

1
= |
2
|=
Maximum principal stress theory
Y =
Max. principal strain theory predicts smaller value of stress
than max. principal stress theory
Conservative design
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Max. principal strain theory
Pure shear

y
Principal stresses corresponding to
shear yield stress

1
= +
y
,
2
= -
y
For onset of yielding max. principal
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
22
For onset of yielding max. principal
strain theory
Y =
y
+
y
=
y
(1 + )
Relation between yield stress in tension and shear

y
= Y/ (1 + ) for = 0.25

y
= 0.8Y Not supported by experiments
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strain energy theory
Failure at any point in a body subjected to a
state of stress begins only when the energy
density absorbed at that point is equal to the
energy density absorbed by the material when
subjected to elastic limit in a uniaxial stress
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
23
subjected to elastic limit in a uniaxial stress
state
In uniaxial stress (yielding)
= E => Hookes law
Strain energy density,
E
Y
U
d U d U
y
ij ij
2
0
2
1
=
= => =



R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strain energy theory
Body subjected to external loads => principal
stresses

2
Strain energy associated with principal
stresses
1
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
24

3
( )
( )
( )
( )
2 1
2
3
1 3
2
2
3 2
1
1
3 3 2 2 1 1
2
1


+ =
+ =
+ =
+ + =
E E
E E
E E
U
( ) [ ]
3 2 1 3 2 1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
+ + + + =
E
U
For onset of yielding,
( ) [ ]
3 2 1 3 2 1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
+ + + + =
E E
Y
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strain energy theory
Yield function
( )
( ) stress Equivalent
1 3 3 2 2 1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
2 2
2
1 3 3 2 2 1
2
3
2
2
2
1
+ + + + = =>
=
+ + + + =
Y f
Y f
e
e


r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
25
For 2D stress state =>
3
= 0 Yield function
becomes
( )
0 safe , 0 Yielding
stress Equivalent
1 3 3 2 2 1 3 2 1
< = =>
+ + + + = =>
f f
e

2
2 1
2
2
2
1
Y f + =
For onset of yielding => f = 0 0
2
2 1
2
2
2
1
= + Y
Plotting this in principal stress space
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strain energy theory
Rearrange the terms
1 2
2 1
3
2
2
1
=
|

\
|

\
|
+
|

\
|
Y Y Y Y


This represents an ellipse
Transform to - csys

2
Y

45
o
1
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
26

1
Y
45
o
( )
( )

+ = + =
= =
2
1
45 cos 45 sin
2
1
45 sin 45 cos
2
1
Equivalent stress
inside no failure
Substitute these in the above
expression
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strain energy theory
Simplifying,
( ) ( )
1 1
1 1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
= + => =
+
+

b a Y Y

Semi major axis OA =>


( )
=
1
Y
a

2
Y

A
B
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
27
Semi major axis OA =>
Semi minor axis OB =>
( ) 1
( ) +
=
1
Y
b

1
Y
45
o
o
B
Higher Poisson ratio bigger major axis, smaller minor axis
If = 0 => circle of radius Y
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strain energy theory
Pure shear

y
Principal stresses corresponding to
shear yield stress

1
= +
y
,
2
= -
y

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
28
( ) ( )

+ = + = 1 , 1
2 1
E E
y y
Strain energy,
( )
( )
y y
Y Y
E E
U

+ = => =
+
= 1 2
2
1
2
2
1
2 2

y
= 0.632 Y
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Distortional energy theory (von-Mises)
Hydrostatic loading
applying uniform stress from all the
directions on a body
Large amount of strain
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
29
energy can be stored
Experimentally verified
Pressures beyond yield
stress no failure of material
Hydrostatic loading change in size volume
Pressure p applied from all sides
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Energy associated with volumetric change
volumetric strain energy
Volumetric strain energy no failure of
material
Strain energy causing material failure
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
30
Strain energy causing material failure
distortion energy associated with shear
First invariant of deviatoric stress = 0
For a given stress state estimate distortion
energy this should be less than distortion
energy due to uniaxial tensile safe
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Given stress state referred to principal co-
ordinate system
[ ]
p
p
p
p
p
p

0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2
1
2
1
(
(
(

+
(
(
(

=
(
(
(

=
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
31
( ) ( ) ( )
ii
p
p p p
J
p p



3
1
0
0 invariant, First
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 2 1
1
3 3
= =>
= + +
=
(

Principal strains =>


1
,
2
,
3
Volumetric strain =>
V
=
1
+
2
+
3
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
This gives
( ) ( ) { }
( )
( )
( )
3 2 1
3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1
2 1 3 2 1
2
1

= + +

=
+ + + + = + + =
p
E E
E
V
V
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
32
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
1 3 3 2 2 1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
3 2 1
2
2
1
strains & stresses principal to due energy strain
6
2 1
2
2 1 3 2 1 3
2
1
2
1
energy, strain Volumetric

+ + + + =
=
+ +

=
=
E E
U
U
E
p
E
p
E
p U
p U
V
V V
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Distortional energy

2
-
m

1
-
m
-
= +
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
33

m

3
-
m
U
D
= U - U
V
( ) ( ) [ ] ( )
2
3 2 1 1 3 3 2 1 2
2
3
2
2
2
1
6
2 1
2
2
1

+ +
|

\
|

+ + + + =
E E
U
D
Simplifying this
( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
12
1
+ + =
G
U
D
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Compare this with distortion in uniaxial tensile
stress
( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]
( ) ( ) ( )
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
12
1
6
+ + = ==
G G
Y
U
D
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
34
( ) ( ) ( )
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
2 + + = => Y
Yield function,
( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
2 2
2
1
stress, Equivalent

+ + =
=
e
e
Y f
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Principal stresses of deviatoric shear stress, S
ii
[ ]
( (
(
(
(

+
(
(
(

=
(
(
(

=
p S
p
p
p
p
p
p
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3
2
1
3
2
1

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
35
(
(
(

+
(
(
(

=
p
p
p
S
S
S
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
] [
3
2
1

S
ii
=
ii
p =>
ii
= S
ii
+ p
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
2
2
p S p S p S p S p S p S Y
Y
+ + + + + + + + =
+ + =
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Simplifying this expression
Hydrostatic pressure does not appear in the expression
( ) ( ) ( )
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
2 S S S S S S Y + + =
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
36
von-Mises criteria has square terms result
independent of signs of individual stress
components
Von-Mises equivalent stress => +ve stress
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
2D stress state =>
3
= 0
Yield function,
2
2 1
2
2
2
1
Y f + =
Onset of yielding,
2
2 1
2
2
2
1
Y = +

2
Re-arrange the terms
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
37

1
Y
Y

45
o
o
A
B
Re-arrange the terms
1
2
2 1
2
2
2
1
=
|

\
|

\
|
+
|

\
|
Y Y Y

This represents an ellipse
Y
Y
3
2
OB axis, minor - Semi
2 OA axis, major - Semi
=
=
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Pure shear

y
Principal stresses corresponding to
shear yield stress

1
= +
y
,
2
= -
y
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
38
Y Y
y y
577 . 0 3
2
2 1
2
2
2
1
2
= => = + =
Suitable for ductile materials
Shear yield = 0.577 * Tensile yield
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Plot yield function in 3D principal stress space

1
=
2
=
3

1
=
2
=
3

2
A
B
= + +
~
n
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
39

3
( ) ( ) ( ) 0 2
2
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
= + + = Y f
Cylinder, with hydrostatic stress as axis
Axis makes equal DCs with all axes

3
o
B
0
3 2 1
= + +
Deviatoric plane
~
3
~
2
~
1
~
~
~
~ ~
3
1
k j i OA
k j i n
+ + =
|

\
|
+ + =
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Projection of OA on hydrostatic axis
|

\
|
+ +
|

\
|
+ +
=
= = => =
~ ~ ~
3 2
~
1
~ ~
~ ~
.
.
cos cos .
k j i k j i
OB
n
n OA
OA n OA n OA


r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
40
( )
( )
( )
|

\
|
+ + =
|

\
|
+ +
+ +
=
|

\
|
+ + + + = = =>
+ + =
|

\
|

\
=
~
~
~ ~
~
~
3 2 1
~
~
~
~
3 2 1
~ ~
3 2 1
~
~
~ ~
3
~
2
~
1
3
3
1
3
1

3
1
3
k j i p k j i OB
k j i n OB OB
OB
OB



~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
OB OA BA
BA OB OA
=
+ =
BA = r = radius
of cylinder
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Radius of cylinder
~
2 1 3
~
1 3 2
~
3 2 1
~
~
~
~ ~
3
~
2
~
1
~ ~ ~ ~
3
2
3
2
3
2
k j i R
k j i p k j i OB OA R BA
|

\
|

+
|

\
|

+
|

\
|

=
|

\
|
+ +
|

\
|
+ + = = =


r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
41
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
2
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
1 3 3 2 2 1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
3 2 1
3 2 1 1
2
3
2
2
2
1
~
3
~
2
~
1
~
~
~
~ ~
2 criteria Yield
2 0
0 0 tensor, stress deviatoris of invariant First
R Radius
3 3 3
Y S S S S S S
S S S S S S S S S S S S
S S S J
S S S
k S j S i S R
= + + =>
+ + = + + = = + +
= + + => =
+ + = =>
+ + =
\ \ \
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Yield criteria,
( )
( ) S S S S S S Y
S S S S S S S S S
S S S S S S S S S Y
2
1
2 Use,
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
1 3 3 2 2 1
2
3
2
2
2
1
1 3 3 2 2 1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
+ + + + + =
+ + = + +
+ + =
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
42
( )
( )
R Y
R S S S Y
S S S S S S Y
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
2 2
3
2
2
2
1
2
3 2 1 3 2 1
=
= + + =
+ + + + + =
Yielding depends on deviatoric stresses
Hydrostatic stress has no role in yielding
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises theory
Second invariant of deviatoric stress
[ ]
1 3 3 2 2 1 2
3
1
3
2
2
1
2
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
S S S S S S J
S
S
S
S
S
S
J
S
S
S
S
+ + =
+ + = =>
(
(
(

=
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
43
( )
( ) ( )
2
2
2
2 2 2
2
2
3
2
2
2
1 2
2
3
2
2
2
1 2
2
3
2
2
2
1 1 3 3 2 2 1
3 function yield Redfining
3
2
3
2 2
1
2
1
2
1
Y J f
J Y R Y
R
S S S J S S S J
S S S S S S S S S
= =>
= => =
= + + = => + + =
+ + = + +
J
2
Materials
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Max. shear stress theory (Tresca)
Yielding begins when the maximum shear
stress at a point equals the maximum shear
stress at yield in a uniaxial tension
T T
K
Y
K = = =>

= =
max
2 1
max

Y
Y
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
44
T T
K K = = => = =
2 2
max
2 1
max

If maximum shear stress < Y/2 => No failure occurs

y
For pure shear,
1
= +
y
,
2
= -
y
Y
Y
T y T
K K = = =>

= =

max
2 1
max
2
Shear yield = 0.5 Tensile yield
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Tresca theory
In 3D stress state principal stresses =>
1
,
2
and
3
Maximum shear stress
`


, , . max
1 3 3 2 2 1

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
45
Yield function
)
`

2
,
2
,
2
. max
1 3 3 2 2 1
yielding of Onset 0
yielding No 0
2 2
,
2
,
2
. max
1 3 3 2 2 1
=> =
=> <
|

\
|
=
)
`


=
f
f
Y
K f
T

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Tresca theory
Following equations are obtained
( ) ( )
T T
T T
K f K f
K K
2 , ; 2 ,
2 2
2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1
2 1 2 1
+ = =
=

=> =



r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
46
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
T T
T T
T T
T T
K f K f
K K
K f K f
K K
2 , ; 2 ,
2 2
2 , ; 2 ,
2 2
1 3 1 3 6 1 3 1 3 5
1 3 1 3
3 2 3 2 4 3 2 3 2 3
3 2 3 2
+ = =
=

=> =

+ = =
=

=> =





R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Tresca theory
Redefining yield function as,
( ) ( )( )
( )( )
T T
K K f 2 2 , ,
2 1 2 1 3 2 1
+ =
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2 1 1 3 2 4 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 1
, . , . , . , . , , , f f f f f f =
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
47
( ) ( )( )
( )( )
( )( )
T T
T T
T T
K K
K K
K K f
2 2
2 2
2 2 , ,
1 3 1 3
3 2 3 2
2 1 2 1 3 2 1
+
+
+ =



Each function represents a plane in 3D principal stress space
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2
2
1 3
2
2
3 2
2
2
2 1 3 2 1
4 4 4 , ,
T T T
K K K f =
No effect of hydrostatic pressure in Tresca criteria
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Tresca theory
Yield function in principal stress space

3
A
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
48

1
O

2
-
1
= 2K
T

1
-
2
= 2K
T

2
Hydrostatic axis
Tresca yield surface
View A along hydrostatic axis
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Tresca theory
Yield surface intersects principal axes at 2K
T
73 . 54
3
1
cos
axis c Hydrostati
0
3 2 1
= => =
= = =>


A
Wall/plane of hexagon

3
-
1
= 2K
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
49
3
2
2 cos
2
26 . 35 90
3
0 0
T
T
K OA OB
K OA
= =
=
= => = +


OB projection of OA on
deviatoric plane
O
Hydrostatic axis
A
B

Deviatoric plane,
1
+
2
+
3
= 0

C
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Tresca theory
Tresca hexagon

3
A, B
D
O C
D
3
2
2
T
K
30
0
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
50

1
O

2
-
1
= 2K
T

1
-
2
= 2K
T
C
D
O C
T
T
K OC
K OC
OD OC
2
2
3
3
2
2
30 cos
= =>
= =>
=
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Tresca theory
2D stress state -
3
= 0
T
T
T
K
K
K
2
2
2
1
2
2 1
=
=
=


Each equation represents two
lines in 2D stress space

2
A
2K
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
51

2
O
2K
T
- 2K
T

1
-
2
= 2K
T
-
1
+
2
= 2K
T

1
= 2K
T

1
= - 2K
T

2
= - 2K
T

2
= 2K
T
A
B
45
0
O
A
B
45
0
2K
T
T
T T
K
OA
OC
K K OA OB
2 2
45 cos
2
2
1
2 45 cos
= =
= = =
Yield curve elongated hexagon
C
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Tresca theory
2D stress state -
3
= 0
T
K 2
2 1
=
Each equation represents two
lines in 2D stress space

2
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
52
T
T
T
K
K
K
2
2
2
1
2
2 1
=
=
=

2
O
2K
T
- 2K
T

1
-
2
= 2K
T
-
1
+
2
= 2K
T

1
= 2K
T

1
= - 2K
T

2
= - 2K
T

2
= 2K
T
A
B
45
0
Yield curve elongated hexagon
C
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises Tresca theories
Pure tension
( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
2
6
1
+ + = =
M
K J von-Mises criteria =>
Trescas criteria =>
)
`


=
2
,
2
,
2
max
1 3 3 2 2 1

T
K

1
= Y,
2
= 0,
3
= 0
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
53
Y K Y K
T M
2
1
,
3
1
= =
)
2 2 2
Pure shear =>
1
= +
y
,
2
= -
y
=>
T y M
K K = =
( ) Tresca 5 . 0 Mises), (von 577 . 0

2
1
,
3
1
y y
Y Y
Y K Y K
y T y M
= =
= = = =


von-Mises criteria predicts 15% higher shear stress than Tresca
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises Tresca theories
2D stress space von-Mises and Tresca

2
Y

45
o
A
B

1
2
y

45
o
A
B
2
y
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
54

1
Y
o
{ }
2 1 2 1
2 1
2
2
2
1
2
, , . max

=
+ =
Y
Y
Yielding in uniaxial tension
Tresca conservative
)
`


=
+ =
2
,
2
,
2
. max
2
3
2 1 2 1
2 1
2
2
2
1
2


y
y

1
o
y
3
Yielding in shear
von-Mises conservative
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises Tresca theories
Experiments by Taylor & Quinney**
Thin walled tube subjected to axial and
torsional loads
T
2
2
1 xy
xx xx


+
|
|

|
+ =
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
55
P P
T
A

xx
A

xx

xy
** Taylor and Quinney Plastic deformation of metals, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc.A230, 323-362, 1931
2
2
2
1
2 2
2 2
xy
xx xx
xy


+
|

\
|
=
+
|

\
+ =
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises Tresca theories
Tresca criteria
1
2 /
if, yielding No
4
2
2
2
2
2 2 2 2
2
2 1
<
|
|

\
|
+
|

\
|
+ = => +
|

\
|
= =
Y Y
Y Y
xy
xx
xy xx xy
xx


r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
56
von-Mises criteria
2 /
|

\
\
Y Y
1
3 /
if, yielding No
3
2
2
2 2 2
2 1
2
2
2
1
2
<
|
|

\
|
+
|

\
|
+ =
+ =
Y
Y
Y
Y
xy
xx
xy xx



R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
von-Mises Tresca theories
Plotting these two criteria

xy
/ Y
0.6
Experimental data shows
good agreement with von-
Mises theory.
Tresca conservative
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
57

xx
/ Y
1
von-Mises
Tresca
Aluminium
Mild steel
Copper
Tresca conservative
von-Mises theory more
accurate generally used
in design
Experiments show that for
ductile materials yield in
shear is 0.5 to 0.6 times of
yield in tensile
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Octahedral shear stress theory
Octahedral plane makes equal angles with all
principal stress axes direction cosines same
Shear stress acting on this plane octahedral
shear
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
58
( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
9
1
+ + =
oct
Body subjected to pure tension,
1
= Y,
2
=
3
= 0
( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
2 2
2
9
2

+ + =
=
Y
Y
oct
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Octahedral shear stress theory
Comparing this with von-Mises theory =>
both are same
Pure shear

1
=
y
,
2
= -
y
,
3
= 0
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
59
( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]
( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
2 2
2
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
6
3
2
9
6
9
1



+ + =
=
= + + =
y
y oct
y oct
Same as von-Mises
theory in pure shear
Octahedral shear stress
theory => von-Mises
theory
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Tensile & shear yield strengths
Each failure theory gives a relation between
yielding in tension and shear ( = 0.25)
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
60
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Failure theories in a nut shell
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
61
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
62

You might also like