:

(,49.14)

1 .(),
,
.
, ()
,
.,(),
,
,() 2 .

;

3 .
4 ,
,1451a38b11:
(
) .

.

.
2oR.Kannicht,(TheAncientQuarrel
betweenPhilosophyandPoetry,1986)(..),
1988,.78:
,
.
,
. ,
,,
,
( ) ()
. ,

.
3,22.4,17:

.
.,,
.

,
( ). ,
,
(1819.),
,.
4,J.d.Romilly,(HistoireetRaisonchezThucydide,Paris1967)
(. . ), 1988, . ,
1

,
: ()
,
5 .,,
6 ;

:
)
,

(,49).
, ,
,
.
),

.:


().

.
:,
414 .., ,
.
,
( ). . , 4649


(. 299): ,
,,,.[]
,
.
,
,

.
5,82.2,13:
84.2, 15:

.,,50.1,23,45.7,13:

..W.Nestle,(VonMy
thos zum Logos, 1940) (. . ), 1999, . , . 7634:
,(
).
. ,
.
6corpus
.

 7 (,)
, 8 .

(.49)
,
:

,
.
,
. ,
,
,
,.
,
,
.

9 .

:
, 10 ,
, ,

.
,
,,,
,.,
,
: ,
,,
11 , ,
. ,
,8.2.
,46.5,45.(
)(,
,

)Gomme,Andrews,Dover(AhistoricalCommentaryofThucydides,Oxford1970,.313
4):Themostlikelysourcewouldbethosetowhomthegeneralstalked,complacentlyor
complainingly,atthetime,fortheGreekshadonlyarudimentaryconceptionofmilitarydiscretion,let
alonesecurity.Itisnoteworthythatonthisoccasion,asanothers,nothingcouldbedonebyacollegiate
commanduntilamajorityagreed.D.Roctor(TheExperienceofThucydides,Warminter1980,.156)
.
9,49,1.14.3.
10
(
).Gomme(..,.314315)
.
11
(J. D. Wollkott, New Words in Thucydides, Transactions and Proceedings of the
AmericanPhilologicalAssociation29(1898),.115).
7
8

,
,()

. ,
,,
,.

().
.,
,():
:)(
,,),)
(:,...) 12 .
,
,
. , ,

.,,

,
,
.

.,o
.
,,
.
1.
:
13 .

, , 14 .
,

.
1.1.,,
.
,

. , ,
,
.T.Gardiner,TermsforpowerinThucydides,Harvard1968.
V.J.Hunter(Thucydides,TheArtfulReporter,Toronto1973,.96100)

(,4246).(.97):Demosthenesreflections(orThucydides
explanation)parallelLamachosgnomeineveryrespect.Bothstressspeedandimmediacy[]Thereis
thenanobviouscorrespondencebetweentheselogoi.Butevenmoresignificant,theinterveningergaalso
correspondpreciselywithLamachospredictions.
14(.,75.)
12
13

 :
/.
1.2.
.
:
.
:.
,,
15 :
,().

()
!
1.3.,
(),
,,
,
.
.
2.

, (
)
( , ).

:
2.1.
.
()
, ( )
( ).

16 .,
, , .

.
2.2.
:
,
17 .

15.J.D.Denniston,TheGreekparticles,xford1975,.495
497.
16 ,
.
(, 49.4, 36):

,.
17.

 18
(fiction)
.
2.3. 19 ,
,
.
3.
()
20 . (),
,
().
,
:
, 21 ,
.
3.1.
,

.
3.2.
()
,,
.
3.3.()
( )
1.3. ,
:
,.
4.
:

.,

.,
(...)
(),
();

F.M.Cornford(ThucydidesMythhistoricus,London1907,.129152)
.OJ.H.Finley(Thucydides,Cambridge1942,.324325)

.
19(L.S..):.
20,100b2123:
.
21,101a37b4:

.
.
18


,:

.
,
:
, . ,
, 22 .
,
.
5.
,
.
5.1.:
:
( : ). ()
, ()
,.
5.2.,
,(
),.
5.3.,,
,()
()
! ,
,
:!(
) !
,
.
5.4.,
;

,
,
() () 23 .
,
.
,
.
6. :
.,,
....,
. , ,
2007,.146170.
23Bekker().

(.,114.5,55.1).
(.9.5556).
22

 24 .
.

,,
. ,
.

.,
():
!
.
:
25 .
7..
,
26 .
:
, 27 :

,.
,,
.
, .
()
.
,

.,
!().,,
,.,,
(),
28 .
(
).
(,20.6.12,14):

.
25:,11.5,14:

.
26 . , :
,18.45:
.
27V.J.Hunter(..,.100):Consider
6.49.3,acontinuationofLamachospredictionsandafurtherargumentforimmediateattack.Itisanar
gument from probability. They might also () count upon surprising many in the fields outside,
incredulousoftheircoming;andatthemomentthattheenemywascarryinginhispropertythearmy
would not want for booty if it sat down in force before the city. One knows at once that Lamachos is
probablyright.
28. H. P. Stahl,SpeechesandCourseofEvents in booksix and sevenof Thucydides,P.A.
Stadter(ed.),TheSpeechesinThucydides,NorthCarolina1973,.72:Theirrationaldesiresmighteven
24

8.

().
:,
,.
,
.,.

.
: 29 .

.

,
.
:,
30 , 31 .,

,
,
, 32 .
,
,
.),).
:
.1).
2).

have been realized successfully: in 6.4750 Thucydides makes it quite clear that an attack on Syracuse
immediatelyupontheAtheniansarrivalinSicilywouldgiveaveryrealchanceforvictory,becausethe
Syracusans were then shocked by surprise and inadequately prepared. Of course it was a chance, no
more.
29,50.1,12.
30()
,,
(,101).
31.,42.3,16:
(

). . V. J. Hunter (.., . 186):
Let us assume first that Thucydides did not just fabricate the opinions but had their general purport
fromsomeinformant,perhapsevenAlkibiadeshimself.HeknewthenthatLamachoswasforimmediate
attack, Alkibiades for negotiations first, and Nikias for a return to Athens as soon as possible. He also
knew the kind of men they were, Nikias, a conservative, Alkibiades, a backroom machinator, and
Lamachos,anenergeticmilitaryman.Theparticularargumentsofeachhecouldreadilyassume,keeping
twothingsinmind,whatactuallydidoccurlaterandthepurposethisdebatewastohaveintheHistory.
I think that we have made it clear that his opinion is based on afterthefact reasoning. , H. P.
Stahl,Thucydides.DieStellungdesMenchenimgeschichtichenProzess,Zetemata40,Mnchen1966,.107,
anm.6a.
32.H.P.Stahl,
SpeechesandCourseofEventsinbooksixandsevenofThucydides,..,.6077.

3)
.
4)
.
5),,.
6) ,
.
.1).
2).
3).

. 1012
.
,(
),,,
,,,
().

,

.
, ,
, .
(
, ).
( ) ,
,
,,.

33 ,
.
.,

.
,
34 .

N.G.L.Hammond(TheParticularandtheUniversalinthespeechesinThu
cydides.WithspecialreferencetothatofHermocratesatGelaP.A.Stadter(ed.),..,.4959)
,
..,22.12:

.
34.A.Parry,Thucydidesuseofabstractlanguage,YaleFrenchStudiesXLV(1970),.320,
(. 19): History is the story of mans attempt to impose his intellect on the
world. The word that expresses intellect is , corresponding in the verb , to come to
33

10


,,
, ;
.
.
(1216b 26 1217a 4)
:
.
,
,
( ):
.
: )
,)
() 35 .
,
,
: [ ] 36 . ,


37 .
:
38 ,
:
,
39 , , :
.,,

:... 40 .
.

.
,

knowanditisevenmore commonin Periclesspeechesthan. Thecentralproblemofhistoryis,

How,andwhen,canmanimposehisonthingsoutsidehimself?.
35..,
,,,,,.,
2008,.122125.
36,1216b39.
37,436a1921.
38,993b1631.
39.,101a3436:
.
40,1394a5.,,
,.

11

,.

,
.,
,
.
,,
( ),
, .
( 41 )
.
,,
,,
,..

, 163b 911:
...

41

12