Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ENGW1102 14872
Professor Christen Enos
09.17.2014
Peer Reviews for The First Debate between an Electronic Devices Evaluation Agency and a Cell
Phone Manufacturer in Chinese Internet History wrote by Weimin Zhao
After I finish reading the article, with the help of the introduction paragraph, I can easily
understand what is Zhao going to say, it is about a debate first occurs in China between a
telephone assessment website called Zealer and a cell phone manufactory called Smartisan.
However, I have some uncertainties and suggestion for it.
Over all, in the first paragraph, Zhao does the introduction, includes in the background of
these two debaters and the reasons of this debate, which is very clear. And in the following
paragraph, Zhao keeps introducing the details of this debate, which includes three parts, and
below each introduction of these two parts have a paragraph for explaining why. The penultimate
paragraph gives the views of this debate as a customer. Moreover, Zhao shares some personal
thoughts and impressions. This article has clear content and context, but it needs to prove in the
distribution of content.
The article is organized, however, I am confused about the last two paragraphs. Although the
second last paragraph is talks about the views from customers and the last one is about Zhaos
opinion, I cannot tell the difference between these two. By judging from the meaning, these two
all clarify the doubts and unreliable, it seems like it only gives the opinions and explanations
about this debate, but no rhetorical situation. For instance, Zhao gives some quotations of what
the CEO of Smartisan says, and also follows with explanation, but in my opinion, if Zhao can add
Comment [CE4]: Yes! The purpose of the
the purposes of why this CEO says this sentence at that time and what the impacts of these
words, the article can be better. And in this video, these two people change their tones and
moods with the change of time, and this can be a point to show in which part that gain the upper
hand. Moreover, from the wearing, both of them are in black, but the Zealers CEO is wearing a
T-shirt with a white printed word Zealer, which place in the middle of the front of T-shirt.
video, instead of
Maybe Zhao can add the reasons and purposes why he does that. Another example is that the
CEO of Smartisan brings some data boards, and it can also used as another example, like give the
reason of why and how it works.
Zhao also does well on the part of worked cite, although the form seems a little different
from mine, the way how I do the citation is do that without the links follow behind. And even if
people want to use official website, people cannot only list a link. And Zhao does not use any
images or audio, but with the link in the citation, I can find the resource easily and which can help
me to understand directly by watching the video. In addition, grammar is not a big problem for
In summary, this is a not bad essay, only needs more details for rhetorical situation, less
explanation about this specific technology issues and also need to consider about the citation
problem.
Fangyi Yu (Iris)
ENGW1102 14872
Professor Christen Enos
09.17.2014
Peer Reviews for Movie confessions review Wrote by Wenqi Zhou
This analysis essay for Confessions does include an introduction paragraph why Zhou loves
this kind of movie, and followed with two paragraphs movie introduction, and very much
detailed description for the contents of the movie. After reading, I know that this is a movie
about a teacher, who wants to find out the truth of why her daughter died and starts a revenge
plan.
This essay begins with the reasons that why Zhou chooses this movie, which is helpful for
preview and can pre-know the Zhou s attitude of this movie. And the second paragraph starts
with the introduction for the movie and ends with an analysis of rhetorical situation, which is the
gloomy sky. Zhou says that the sky can shows the inner minds of people, which is a really good
personal experience
Comment [CE10]: Not clear how thats a
point and can be a suitable example for rhetorical (word missing: rhetorical what?) and also
shows the purposes why director put this sky in these scenes. Then, Zhou keeps introduce the
movie, and a lengthy quotation appears in the middle of the introduction part, which I think this
seventy-seven words quotation seems a little bit long, Zhou can short it, summarize it or delete
the less important part. I think the most important is the beginning and ending, which is I wont
element is covered
Comment [CE11]: The essay does do an
forgive you and I will revenge, I will make you to remember, the meaning, the value of life.
Moreover, the description of the main character Yuko in paragraph six, which is in a quotation,
Comment [CE12]: I agree: She can put
and this is a very good example of it, especially for rhetorical part, Zhou analysis that the
behavior of the actress shows the inner world, like put down the knees, trying to smile, but
the tears are rolling down shows the pain of the character. After that, it comes with a paragraph
About the content in this essay, I can find half of them are talking about how humans mental
job
controls activities, why a crime can happen and why some of this crime can have reasonable
reasons. But I cannot find the connection between them and cannot tell the difference between
the seventh and eighth paragraphs either. Zhou puts a lot of personal opinions and explanations
in, but I think it may needs more specific examples. Such as the fifth paragraph, probably Zhou
can find an example of minor crime in the movie, and it will become better to present
examples with the ideas and opinions. On the same paragraph, Zhou uses on the other hand
twice in two connected sentences, which confused me, and she may needs to replace it with a
synonym. And I also think Zhou can has more rhetorical situation in it, just like the gloomy sky
and the way of using it.
In the summary, this is an organized essay, with good introduction and analysis for the
content of the movie, and the significance is, the opinions need more specific examples.