02 NOF Dam Section

aarvee associates
Rarhu Reservoir Scheme
July 2013
Revision R1
RARHU RESERVOIR SCHEME

DESIGN OF NON-OVER FLOW DAM MAXIMUM SECTION
HYDRAULIC PARTICULARS
1
T.B.L.
336.650
M.W.L.
335.150
F.R.L
332.150
M.D.D.L
281.000
U/s batter of 1 in
D/s slope of 1 (V) to
10
starts at
0.65
starts at
291.000
=
336.650
Road Level (top of dam)
336.650
Top width
Average Ground / Bed level
305.476
261.143
10 Hard rock level
6.00 m
11 Foundation Level
260.143
12 Bottom level of Foundation gallery
263.143
13 Height of dam
=
=
Earthquake Zone
ao
0.02
336.65 - 260.14
76.5 m
I Load Combination 'A' (Dam construction condition - No water in Reservoir)

6.00
Taking Moments about (A)
TBL
+ 336.650
FRL
+ 332.150
+ 336.650
gallery
W5
76.51 m.
W1
+ 291.000
0.65
1
1
10
2.0
30.857
3.0
+ 265.64
W4gallery
W3
2.5
+ 263.14
W2
Foundation level
3.09
6.00
49.730
+ 260.143
58.815
Detailed Project Report
Stability Analysis
32
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
Sno Load
1
2
3
4
4
W1
W2
W3
W4(-)
W5(-)
Force
Particulars
6.00
0.5
0.5
x 49.73
x 3.09
2.00
2.00
x 76.51
x 76.51
x 30.86
x 2.50
x 2.50
V
1101.70
4565.59
114.26
-12.00
-12.00
x 2.40
x 2.40
x 2.40
x 2.40
x 2.40
H
-
L.A.
Moment
52.730
33.153
56.758
51.730
51.730
58092.187
151363.171
6485.099
-620.755
-620.755
m
5757.55
214698.949
Lever arm
= 214698.9 /
5757.5
=
37.290 m
Maximum Compressive stress occurs at Heel and Minimum stress occurs at Toe
Eccentricity
37.290 -
7.882 m
Allowable 'e'
58.82
6.00
Maximum stress
5757.55
58.82
Minimum stress
9.803 m
=
=
97.89 x
2
176.61 t/m
97.89 x
2
19.176 t/m
II Load Combination 'B' (Water upto FRL)
58.815
2.0
No tension - HENCE OK
+/-
x
58.815
7.882
+
0.804
(Compressive)
-
0.804
(Compressive)
Normal uplift
6.00
TBL
+ 336.650
+ 336.650
FRL
+ 332.150
gallery
0.65
MDDL
+ 281.000
W1
+ 291.000
72.007
W5
2.0
3.0
+ 265.64
W4gallery
Pw
Ps
2.5
20.857
W3
+ 263.14
W2
3.09
20.86
6.00
49.7
+ 260.143
72.01
58.8
Stability Analysis
33
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
24.002
48.005
Sno Load
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
50.730
U1
U2
U3
Force
Particulars
W Weight of body wall as calculated earlier

W5
0.5
x 3.09
x 30.86
U1(-)
8.09
x 24.00
U2(-)
0.5
x 50.73
x 24.00
U3(-)
0.5
x 8.09
x 48.00
Pw(-)
0.5
x 72.01
x 72.01
Ps(-) 0.36
x 0.50
x 20.86
x 20.86
Lever arm
8.1
x
x
x
x
x
V
5757.55
47.61
-194.08
-608.81
-194.08
1
1
1
1
1
V
=
=
H
-2592.50
-78.303
-2670.81
4808.2
L.A.
Moment
25.100
54.772
33.820
56.120
24.002
6.952
214698.949
1194.954
-10629.990
-20589.900
-10891.530
-62226.146
-544.386
111012.0
111012.0 /
4808.19
23.088 m
Maximum Compressive stress occurs at Toe and Minimum stress occurs at Heel
Eccentricity
=
=
23.088 -
58.815
2.0
6.320 m
allowable Eccentricity 'e'
58.82
6.00
Maximum stress
4808.2
58.82
=
=
81.75078 x
2
134.45 t/m
81.75078 x
2
29.047 t/m
Minimum stress
Stability Analysis
9.803
+/-
x
58.815
6.320
+
0.645
(Compressive)
-
0.645
(Compressive)
34
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
III Load Combination 'C' (Water upto MWL) Normal uplift

6.00
TBL
+ 336.650
MWL
+ 335.150
+ 336.650
W6
gallery
0.65
44.15
1
+ 281.000
75.01
+ 291.000
W1
W5
Pw
2.0
3.0
Ps
20.857
30.86
+ 265.64
W4gallery
10
W3
2.5
+ 263.14
W2
3.09
20.86
6.00
+ 260.143
49.7
75.01
58.8
8.086
50.730
U2
25.002
U1
U3
50.005
Sno Load
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

W5
0.5
x 3.09 x 30.857
W6
x 3.09 x 44.150
U1(-)
8.09
x 25.002
U2(-)
0.5
x 50.730 x 25.00
U3(-)
0.5
x 8.09 x 50.005
Pw(-)
0.5
x 75.0
x 75.0
Ps(-) 0.36
x 0.5
x 20.857 x 20.857
Lever arm
Force
Particulars
x
x
x
x
x
x
V
5757.55
47.61
136.23
-202.16
-634.18
-202.16
1
1
1
1
1
1
V
4902.89
=
=
104523.2 /
21.319
Stability Analysis
H
-2813.03
-78.303
-2891.3
L.A.
Moment
25.100
24.750
54.772
33.820
56.120
25.002
6.952
214698.949
1194.954
3371.783
-11072.863
-21447.729
-11345.299
-70332.189
-544.386
104523.219
4902.9
35
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
Eccentricity
21.319 -
8.089
Allowable 'e'
58.815 =
6.000
Maximum stress
9.803
4902.89
58.82
=
=
Minimum stress
58.815
2.0
83.361 x
2
152.15 t/m
83.36086 x
2
14.573 t/m
+/-
x
58.815
8.089
+
0.825
(Compressive)
-
0.825
(Compressive)
IV Load Combination 'D' (Load combination A with earthquake )

+ 336.650
Taking Moments about (A)
6.00
TBL
FRL
+ 336.650
+ 332.150
gallery
0.65
GL
+ 291.000
76.51
W1
2.0
3.0
30.857
+ 265.64
W4gallery
1
2.5
10
+ 263.14
W3
3.09
W2
6.00
+ 260.143
49.73
58.82
C.G.of body wall as calculated in combination 'A'

X
Horizontal sesmic coefficient
=
=
( ah )
b
Zone =
5757.5
ao
= a Coefficient depending upon the soil foundation system

(Table 3 of IS 1893-1984)
=
1 (The value of b for all dams shall be taken as 1.0)
(Table 3 of IS 1893-1984)
= a factor depending upon the importance of the structure
=
3
(Table 4 of IS 1893-1984)
ao
= Basic horizontal sesmic coefficient (depends on Zone)

=
0.02
(Table 2 of IS 1893-1984)
ah
=
=
=
ah at top level
av at top level
214698.9 /
37.290 m
Stability Analysis
1
1.5
0.75
x
x
x
3
0.06
0.06
x
=
=
0.02
=
0.09
0.045
0.06
36
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
Calculations of CG of NOF above its base

Sno Load
1
2
3
4
W1
W2
W3
W4(-)
Force
Particulars
0.5
0.5
1
6.00
x 49.73
x 3.09
x 2.00
Lever arm
x 76.5
x 76.51
x 30.86
x 2.50
x
x
x
x
2.40
2.40
2.40
2.40
1101.70
4565.59
114.26
-12.00
5769.550
ah @ C.G. Level
= 159701.35 /
=
27.680
5769.5
0.090
27.680 x
76.507
0.033
=
av @ C.G. Level
Moment
42143.912
116433.209
1175.225
-51.000
159701.345
0.045
27.680 x
76.507
0.016
Horizontal Inertia Force (HIF)

Moment
=
=
0.033 x
187.867 x
5769.5
27.680
=
=
187.867 t
5200.16 t-m
Vertical Inertia Force (VIF)

Moment
=
=
0.016 x
93.933 x
5769.5
37.290
=
=
93.933 t
3502.77 t-m
Sl.
Description
No.
1 Load combination "A"
2 VIF
3 HIF
L.A.
38.2535
25.50
10.29
4.25
Vertical
Horizontal
Force(t)
5757.550
93.933
Moment (t.m)
Force(t)
187.87
214698.95
3502.774
Moment (t.m)
5200.16
Case I
V
= V Loading A - V V I F
= Loading A -
M VIF
V
M
=
5757.55 93.933
= 214698.95 3502.8 = 205996.02 t-m
Lever Arm
= 205996.02 /
5663.6
Eccentricity 'e'
'e' limit
Maximum stress
=
=
Minimum stress
=
=
Stability Analysis
5663.62 t
5200.16
HIF
36.37 m
36.37 - 58.81525
=
2
58.81525 =
9.803
>
6.00
No tension
6.964 m
5663.616
58.81525
96.295 x
2
164.71 t/m
5663.616
58.81525
96.295 x
2
27.88 t/m
+/-
6.964
x
58.815
6.964
+
0.710
(Compressive)
-
x
58.815
6.964
0.710
(Compressive)
37
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
Case II
V
= V Loading A - V V I F
= Loading A -
V
M
M VIF
= 5757.550 93.93
= 214698.95 3502.77
= 216396.33 t-m
=
+
Lever Arm
= 216396.33 /
5663.62
eccentricity 'e'
'e' limit
Maximum stress (at heel)
=
=
Minimum stress
=
=
5663.616 t
5200.158
38.21 m
38.21 -
58.81525
=
2
58.81525 =
9.803
>
6
No tension
5663.616
1
+/58.81525
96.295 x
2
182.75 t/m
5663.616
58.81525
96.295 x
2
9.84 t/m
HIF
8.801 m
8.801
6
x
58.815
8.801
+
0.898
(Compressive)
-
x
58.815
8.801
0.898
(Compressive)
Case III
V
= V Loading A + V V I F
= Loading A +
M VIF
V
M
= 5757.550 +
= 214698.95 +
= 213001.56 t
93.933
3502.77
=
-
Lever Arm
= 213001.56 /
5851.5
36.40 m
58.82
2
9.803
6.994 m
HIF
5851.483 t
5200.16
eccentricity 'e'
36.40 -
'e' limit
58.81525 =
6
5851.483
58.81525
Maximum stress
=
=
Minimum stress
=
=
99.489 x
2
170.47 t/m
5851.483
58.81525
99.489 x
2
28.51 t/m
>
No tension
6.994
+/-
x
58.815
6.994
+
0.713
(Compressive)
-
x
58.815
6.994
0.713
(Compressive)
Case IV
= V Loading A + V V I F
= Loading A +
Stability Analysis
M VIF
HIF
38
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
V
M
= 5757.550 +
= 214698.95 +
= 223401.88 t
= 223401.88 /
M
Lever Arm
93.933
3502.77
=
+
5851.5
5851.483 t
5200.158
38.18 m
eccentricity 'e'
'e' limit
Maximum stress (at heel)
38.18 -
58.81525
=
2
58.81525 =
9.803
>
6
No tension
8.771 m
5851.483
58.81525
=
=
Minimum stress
99.489 x
2
188.51 t/m
5851.483
58.81525
99.489 x
2
10.47 t/m
+/-
8.771
x
58.815
8.771
+
0.895
(Compressive)
-
x
58.815
0.895
8.771
(Compressive)
V Load Combination 'E' (Load combination B with earthquake )

6.00
+ 336.650
TBL
+ 336.650
FRL
+ 332.150
gallery
0.65
MDDL
+ 281.000
1
W1
+ 291.000
W5
72.007
2.0
Pw
3.0
+ 265.64
W4gallery
Ps
20.857
10
W3
2.5
+ 263.14
W2
3.09
20.86
6.00
72.01
+ 260.143
49.73
58.82
8.09
50.730
U2
24.002
U1
48.005
U3
Stability Analysis
39
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
Hydrodynamic effects due to reservoir
(As per 7.2.1 of IS: 1893 - 1984 )
= Cs ah w h
p
Cs
ah
w
= Hydrodynamic pressure in Kg/m2 at depth 'y'

= Co-eff. Which varies with depth & shape
=
1.5 x
0.06 =
0.09
= 1
Cs
Cm
= Maximum value of Cs obtained from fig.10

for q =
=
0.7
9.9325
= Depth below surface
=
72.0 m
Where
As per cl: 7.2.1.1

Where
for q =
5.7106
(U/s batter)
{ ( ) ( )}
Cm y
y
y
y
2
+
2
2 h
h
h
h
= Depth of reservoir for FRL Condition

=
332.15 260.14
=
72.01 m
Cs
0.7
2
72.0
72.007
72.0
72.01
2
0.35
1.000
Cs
=
=
0.35
0.700
= Cs ah w h
x
x
0.700
4.536
72.0
72.0
72.007
72.007
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.09
72.0
72.007
As per cl : 7.2.1.3
Hydrodynamic Shear force (or) Total Horizontal Shear (Vh) = 0.726 p y

=
=
0.726 x
237.15 t
4.536
Moment about C.G due to Hydrodynamic pressure (Mh) = 0.299 Py2

=
Stability Analysis
0.299 x
4.536
72.0 2
40
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
=
Sl.
No.
1
2
3
4
7032.923 tm
Vertical
Description
Horizontal
Magnitude (t)
4808.192
93.933
Load combination : "B"

VIF
HIF
Hydrodynamic force
Moment (t.m)
111011.95
3502.774
Magnitude (t)
187.87
237.15
Moment (t.m)
5200.16
7032.92
Case I
V
V loading"B"
- V VIF
loading"B"
M VIF
HIF
V = 4808.192 93.933
M = 111011.95 3502.77
= 109341.94 t
Lever Arm
= 109341.94 /
4714.26
eccentricity 'e'
'e' limit
Maximum compressive stress
=
=
Minimum stress
=
=
+
=
-
4714.259 t
5200.16 +
23.19 m
23.19 -
58.81525
=
2
58.81525 =
9.803
>
6
No tension
4714.259
1
+/58.81525
80.154 x
2
130.96 t/m
4714.259
58.81525
7032.92
6.214 m
6.214
6
x
58.815
6.214
+
0.634
(Compressive)
80.154 x
2
29.34 t/m
Hydro-dyna
x
58.815
6.214
0.634
(Compressive)
Case II
V
V loading"B"
- V VIF
loading"B"
M VIF
HIF
V
M
= 4808.192 93.933
= 111011.95 3502.77
= 105676.41 t
Lever Arm
= 105676.41 /
4714.26
eccentricity 'e'
=
'e' limit
Maximum compressive stress (at heel)
=
=
Minimum stress (at heel)
=
=
Stability Analysis
=
+
4714.259 t
5200.16 -
22.42 -
58.81525
=
2
58.81525 =
9.803
>
6
No tension
4714.259
1
+/58.81525
80.154 x
2
137.32 t/m
4714.259
58.81525
80.154 x
2
22.99 t/m
Hydro-dyna
7032.92
22.42 m
6.991 m
6.991
6
x
58.815
6.991
+
0.713
(Compressive)
-
x
58.815
6.991
0.713
(Compressive)
41
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
Case III
V
V loading"B"
loading"B" +
+ V VIF
M VIF
HIF
V
M
= 4808.192 +
93.933
= 111011.95 +
3502.77
= 116347.49 t
Lever Arm
= 116347.49 /
4902.13
eccentricity 'e'
'e' limit
=
=
=
=
+
=
-
4902.126 t
5200.16 +
23.73 m
23.73 -
58.81525
=
2
58.81525 =
9.803
>
6
No tension
4902.126
1
+/58.81525
83.348 x
2
131.59 t/m
4902.126
58.81525
7032.92
5.674 m
5.674
6
x
58.815
5.674
+
0.579
(Compressive)
83.348 x
2
35.11 t/m
Hydro-dyna
x
58.815
5.674
0.579
(Compressive)
Case IV
V
V loading"B"
loading"B" +
+ V VIF
M VIF
HIF
V
M
= 4808.192 +
93.933
= 111011.95 +
3502.77
= 112681.96 t
Lever Arm
= 112681.96 /
4902.13
eccentricity 'e'
'e' limit
=
=
=
=
Stability Analysis
=
+
=
22.99 -
58.81525
=
2
58.81525 =
9.803
>
6
No tension
4902.126
1
+/58.81525
83.348 x
2
137.95 t/m
4902.126
58.81525
83.348 x
2
28.75 t/m
Hydro-dyna
4902.13 t
5200.16 -
7032.92
22.99 m
6.421 m
6.421
6
x
58.815
6.421
+
0.655
(Compressive)
-
x
58.815
0.655
6.421
(Compressive)
42
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
VI LOAD COMBINATION 'F'
(C + Extreme uplift)
6.00
TBL
+ 336.650
MWL
+ 335.150
+ 336.650
gallery
44.15
W6
0.65
75.01
+ 281.000
291.000
W1
2.0
Pw
W5
30.86
3.0
+ 265.64
W4gallery
20.857
2.5
Ps
10
W3
+ 263.14
W2
3.09
20.86
6.00
+ 260.143
49.73
75.01
58.82
58.82
75.01
Sno Load
1
2
3
4
5
6
Force
Particulars

W5
0.5
x 3.09 x 30.857
W6
3.09
x 44.150
U(-)
0.5
x 58.82
x 75.0
Pw(-)
0.5
x 75.0
x 75.0
Ps(-) 0.36
x 0.5
x 20.857 x 20.857
x
x
x
x
V
5757.55
47.61
136.23
-2205.78
1
1
1
1
V
3735.613
H
-2813.03
-78.303
-2891.3
L.A.
Moment
25.100
24.750
39.210
25.002
6.952
214698.949
1194.954
3371.783
-86488.912
-70332.189
-544.386
61900.198
Lever arm
=
61900.2 /
3735.6
=
16.570
Eccentricity
Stability Analysis
16.570 -
58.815
2.0
43
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
12.837
Allowable 'e'
58.815 =
6.000
Maximum stress
3735.61
58.82
=
=
63.51437 x
2
146.69 t/m
63.51437 x
2
-19.664 t/m
Minimum stress
9.803
= 0.02 fc
=
0.02 x
2
=
30 t/m
Maximum allowable tensile stress
Tension devolopes
+/-
x
58.815
12.837
+
1.310
(Compressive)
-
1.310
(Tensile)
1500
2
19.664 t/m
>
Hence ok
VII LOAD COMBINATION 'G' (E + extreme uplift)

6.00
TBL
+ 336.650
FRL
+ 332.150
+ 336.650
W1
0.65
1
+ 281.00
+ 291.000
72.0
W5
30.857
2.0
Pw
3.0
+ 265.64
W4
Ps
20.857
10
W3
2.5
+ 263.14
W2
3.09
20.86
6.00
72.01
+ 260.143
49.73
58.82
58.82
U
72.007
Stability Analysis
44
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
Sno Load
1
2
3
4
5
Sl.
No.
1
2
3
4
Particulars

W5
0.5
x 3.09
x 30.86
U(-)
0.5
x 58.82
x 72.01
Pw(-)
0.5
x 72.0
x 72.0
Ps(-) 0.36
x 0.50
x 20.86
x 20.86
x 1
x 1
x 1
Force
V
H
5757.55
47.61
-2117.55
-2592.50
-78.303
V
3687.6
-2670.8
L.A.
Moment
25.100
39.210
24.002
6.952
214698.949
1194.954
-83029.679
-62226.146
-544.386
70093.7
Vertical
Description
Horizontal
Magnitude (t)
3687.603
93.933
Body wall
VIF
HIF
Hydrodynamic force
Moment (t.m)
70093.69
3502.77
Magnitude (t)
-
Moment (t.m)
-
187.87
237.15
5200.158
7032.923
Case I
V
Vloading B
- V VIF
loading B
Lever Arm
V =
M =
=
=
M VIF
3687.603
70093.69
68423.68
68423.68
93.933
3502.77
=
-
3593.669 t
5200.16 +
3593.67
19.04 m
t
/
HIF
Hydro-dyna
7032.92
eccentricity 'e'
'e' limit
=
=
Minimum stress
=
=
19.04 -
58.81525
=
10.368 m
2
58.81525 =
9.803
<
10.368
6
Tension devolopes
3593.669
1
+/6
x
58.81525
58.815
61.101 x
2
125.72 t/m
3593.669
58.81525
61.101 x
2
-3.52 t/m
= 0.04 fc
=
0.04 x
2
=
60 t/m
Hence ok
10.368
+
1.058
(Compressive)
x
58.815
(Tensile)
1.058
>
2
3.522 t/m
10.368
1500
Case II
V
M
Lever Arm
Vloading B
- V VIF
loading B
M VIF
=
=
=
=
3687.603
70093.69
64758.15
64758.15
t
/
93.933
3502.77
=
+
3593.67
HIF
Hydro-dyna
3593.669 t
5200.16 -
7032.92
18.02 m
Stability Analysis
45
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
eccentricity 'e'
=
'e' limit
=
=
=
=
18.02 -
58.81525
=
11.388 m
2
58.81525 =
9.803
<
11.388
6
Tension devolopes
3593.669
1
+/6
x
58.81525
58.815
61.101 x
2
132.08 t/m
3593.669
58.81525
61.101 x
2
-9.88 t/m
= 0.04 fc
=
0.04 x
2
=
60 t/m
Hence ok
11.388
+
1.162
(Compressive)
x
58.815
(Tensile)
1.162
>
2
9.880 t/m
11.388
1500
Case III
V
Vloading B
+ V VIF
loading B
M VIF
=
=
=
=
3687.603
70093.69
75429.23
75429.23
+
+
t
/
V
M
Lever Arm
HIF
Hydro-dyna
93.933
3502.77
=
-
3781.536 t
5200.16 +
3781.54
19.95 m
7032.92
eccentricity 'e'
'e' limit
=
=
Minimum stress
=
=
19.95 -
58.81525
=
2
58.81525 =
9.803
>
6
No tension
3781.536
1
+/58.81525
64.295 x
2
126.35 t/m
3781.536
58.81525
64.295 x
2
2.24 t/m
= 0.04 fc
=
0.04 x
2
=
60 t/m
Hence ok
Stability Analysis
9.461
6
x
58.815
9.461
+
0.965
(Compressive)
9.461 m
x
58.815
9.461
0.965
(Compressive)
1500
>
2
2.241 t/m
46
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
Case IV
V
Vloading B
+ V VIF
loading B
M VIF
=
=
=
=
3687.603
70093.69
71763.70
71763.70
+
+
t
/
93.933
3502.77
=
+
3781.54
V
M
Lever Arm
HIF
Hydro-dyna
3781.54 t
5200.16 -
7032.92
18.98 m
eccentricity 'e'
'e' limit
=
=
Minimum stress
=
=
18.98 -
58.81525
=
10.430 m
2
58.81525 =
9.803
<
10.430
6
Tension devolopes
3781.536
1
+/6
x
58.81525
58.815
64.295 x
2
132.71 t/m
3781.536
58.81525
64.295 x
2
-4.12 t/m
= 0.04 fc
=
0.04 x
2
=
60 t/m
Hence ok
Stability Analysis
10.430
+
1.064
(Compressive)
x
58.815
(Tensile)
1.064
>
2
4.117 t/m
10.430
1500
47
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
ABSTRACT OF STRESSES ( t/m2)

STRESS (t/m2)
Load
Combination
Permissible tensile stresses
@ Heel
@ Toe
176.61
19.18
OK
fc = 1500 t/Sqm
No-tension @ heel
29.05
134.45
OK
No-tension
14.57
152.15
OK
0.01 fc
D1
D2
D3
D4
164.71
182.75
170.47
188.51
27.88
9.84
28.51
10.47
OK
OK
OK
OK
No-tension @ heel
E1
E2
E3
E4
29.34
22.99
35.11
28.75
130.96
137.32
131.59
137.95
OK
OK
OK
OK
-19.66
146.69
OK
-3.52
-9.88
2.24
-4.12
125.72
132.08
126.35
132.71
OK
OK
OK
OK
15 t/Sqm
F
G
G1
G2
G3
G4
Stresses
0.02 fc
30
30
30
30
30
t/Sqm
t/Sqm
t/Sqm
t/Sqm
t/Sqm
0.02 fc
30 t/Sqm
0.04 fc
60
60
60
60
60
t/Sqm
t/Sqm
t/Sqm
t/Sqm
t/Sqm
38
aarvee associates
July 2013
Revision R1
Factor of Safety against sliding

F = [((w u) tan f ) / Ff) + (C.A./Fc)] / P
F
w
u
tan f
C
A
Ff
Fc
P
C =
f =
A =
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Factor of safety against sliding

Total mass of the dam
Total uplift force
Co-efficient of internal friction
Cohesion of the material at the plane considered
Area under consideration for cohesion
Partial factor of safety inrespect of friction
Partial factor of safety inrespect of cohesion and
Total horizontal force
Fq
Tan f =
100 t/m2
28 O
58.81525 Sqm
Allowable factor of Safety =

Load
Combination
W - U
Ff
5757.550
1.5
4808.192
-2670.807
4902.890
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
(W - U)Tanf/Ff
Table-1 of IS 6512-1984
0.532
1
Factor
of
safety
OK
FC
CA / FC
2040.896
3.6
1.5
1704.374
3.6
1633.757
1.250
OK
-2891.328
1.5
1737.942
3.6
1633.757
1.166
OK
5663.616
5663.616
5851.483
5851.483
-187.867
187.867
-187.867
187.867
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
2509.499
2509.499
2592.741
2592.741
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2450.635
2450.635
2450.635
2450.635
26.402
26.402
26.845
26.845
OK
OK
OK
OK
4714.259
4714.259
4902.126
4902.126
-2621.521
-2720.092
-2621.521
-2720.092
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
2088.847
2088.847
2172.089
2172.089
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2450.635
2450.635
2450.635
2450.635
1.732
1.669
1.763
1.699
OK
OK
OK
OK
3735.613
-2891.328
1.0
1986.261
1.2
4901.271
2.382
OK
3593.669
3593.669
3781.536
3781.536
-2621.521
-2720.092
-2621.521
-2720.092
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1910.788
1910.788
2010.678
2010.678
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
4901.271
4901.271
4901.271
4901.271
2.599
2.504
2.637
2.541
OK
OK
OK
OK
F
G
1
2
3
4
Sliding-Check
39
RARHU RESERVOIR SCHEME

DESIGN OF REINFORCEMENT AROUND FOUNDATION GALLERY
CRITICAL LOAD:
A loading condition which will produce maximum (or) the most significant stress in the structure under consideration.
As per Table 1 of IS 12966 (part 2) - 1990
For Longitudinal Type Opening, The critical loading condition occurs when the reservoir is in Empty condition
for opening located within 1/3 of U/s of dam
Eccentricity
7.882 m
Maximum stress
2
176.609 t/m
Minimum stress
2
19.176 t/m
CALCULATION OF STRESSES BY APPROXIMATE ANALYTICAL METHOD (AS PER IS 12933 (PART 2) -1990
Symbols used are
B
Pu
=
=
=
=
=
Height of Rectangular Opening

2.50 m
Width of Rectangular Opening
2.0 m
Pressure (Water + silt if any) at the U/s face of dam at the level of consideration
Pd
=
=
0.0 t/m
Pressure (Water + silt if any) at the D/s face of dam at the level of consideration
=
=
=
=
=
0.0 t/m
Total base width of the dam at the level of consideration
58.82
Distance of centre of gallery from toe
55.730 m
Total Horizontal force at the level of consideration
T
x
eP
eW
=
=
eM
syu
syd
sx
sy
0.000 t
Total vertical force at the level of consideration
5757.55 t
=
=
=
Total moment about C.G., of the section of the base of dam

I.e., middle of the section assuming the dam base as 1 m wide strip
5757.55 x 7.882
= 45383.08
t-m
Normal stress on horizontal plane at the U/s face of the dam
Normal stress on horizontal plane at the D/s face of the dam

(calculated by stability analysis at the level of consideration)
Normal stress on Vertical plane
2
176.61 t/m
2
19.18 t/m
(calculated by stability analysis at the level of consideration)
Normal stress on Horizontal plane
Tan f u
U/s slope
0.1
Tan f d
D/s Slope
0.65
Shear stress on xy plane at the up stream face of dam
Shear stress on xy plane at the down stream face of dam
txy u
txy d
Principal stress-check
1. NORMAL STRESS :
sy
As per page no: 8 of IS 12966 (part 2 ) - 1990
sy
=
b
2. SHEAR STRESS :
txy
Calculation of
syd
syu
sy
=
=
168.351 t/m2
tyx
txy d
syd
-2
b1
=
=
Tan f d
19.18 -
0.65
3 x
txy u
-2
58.82
eP
2x
txy d
syu
Pu
Tan f u
=
=
176.61
-17.67
0.1
3 x
0
58.82
-17.67
-0.034
-0.247
0 +
-17.67 +
2 x
eP
c1
c1
T2
Pd
12.467
txy u
55.730
b1
b1
Calculation of
2.68 x
a1 + b1 x + c1 x2
Calculation of
19.18
19.18 +
tyx
2
19.18 t/m
syd
176.61 58.82
2.67669
txy ,
a1
a1
a +bx
2x
24.934
txy u
txy d
12.467
3
3459.2
2 x
=
=
0.0009
-0.005
0 +
0
58.82
-17.67
-17.67 +
12.467
12.467
txy
For x = T =
tyx
a1 + b1 x + c1 x2
tyx
a1 + b1 T + c1 T2
txy
12.467 +
-0.247 x
58.82
12.467 +
-14.53 +
-15.61
-17.67
58.82 m
txy
txy u
-0.005 x
3459.23
2
-17.67 t/m
HENCE OK
Hence arrived Constants are correct
Shear stress at the centre of gallery I.e., Instrumentation shaft
txy
For x =
=
a1
55.73 m
txy
+ b1 x + c1 x2
12.467 +
=
=
sx
-14.01
-0.005 x
3105.78
a2 + b2 x + c2 x2+ d2 x3
a1
Tan f d +
12.467
x 0.65 +
8.104
b1
Tan f d
Pd
0
b2
b2
da1
dy
gw
d
dy
da1
dy
dsyd
-13.766 +
a2
a2
Calculation of
55.73
sx
3. NORMAL STRESS :
Calculation of
12.467 +
-15.320 t/m2
-0.247 x
=
Tan f d
da1
dy
Tan f d +
dsyd
dy
gw
d
dy
Tan f d
syd
Pd
0 since , there is no Tail water

=
Tan f d
gc
Since
Tan f d is constant
dsyd
dy
+
K3
Tan f u +
K4
Tan f d
eP
dy
gc
K3
T2
=
=
2.4 for concrete
eM
12
T3
=
K3
=
=
K4
12
203456
x 45383 +
2.677
6.006
eM
12
T3
=
dsyd
dy
=
=
2.677
-3.981
gc
x 45383
b2
2
3459.24
Pu
2
58.82
x0
0.000
eW
Pd
4
3459.24
5757.55
6.658
K3
Tan f u +
K4
2.4
4
58.82
x0
Tan f d
6.006 x 0.1
2.4
0.413
Tan f d
=
=
0.65
0.268
b1
0.108
c1
-2.59
x 0.41
Tan f d +
Tan f d +
da1
dy
0.268
-3.981 x
dsyd
dy
-0.247 x 0.65
6
x
3459.24
0.601
+
5757.55
3.329
2
T
c2
C2
Calculation of
eW
da1
dy
T2
12
203456
dsyd
dy
2
T2
db1
dy
0.000
eP
0.65
db1
dy
dT
dy
12
T
eP
d txy u
dy
2
T
dT
dy
Tan f u
=
=
0.1
0.75
d eP
dy
d txy d
dy
=
=
d txy u
dy
d syu
dy
K1
K2
Pu
d eP
dy
6
T
d txy d
dy
Pd
0 - 0
0.413
gw
d
dy
=
0
- 0.0
syd
Tan f d
Pd
since there is no tail water

+
0.00
0.268
Tan f u
gw
gc
d
dy
K1
syu
d Tan f u
dy
Tan f u +
K2
Tan f d
syu
Pu -
Pu
4
58.82
=
=
0
-9.334
T
x0
eW
2
x 5757.5
3459.24
eW
4
3459.24
6.657589
3.329
0.652
T
5757.55
x Pd
2
58.82
0.000
eM
12
203456
12
T
x0
x 45383
2.6767
12
eP
6
T
=
=
0.65
d syd
dy
K2
4
T
T
K1
txy d
Tan f d
0.65
Tan f d
gw
=
txy u
2.677
eM
12
203456
x 45383
d syu
dy
2.4 +
2.4 +
=
=
=
=
db1
dy
0.750
-0.93
gw
0.1
-0.189
0-
1.89
0.00
-0.012
C2
0.000
x 0.0
-x 0.189
-x 0.189
-0.01
c1
Tan f d +
-0.005 x 0.65
=
=
-0.003
-0.009
-dT
dy
18
T
eP
-0.750
d txy u
dy
18
6
T
T2
1
x
2
-0.006
0.27
0.27
0.000
-0.01
txy d
0.02
0.02
db1
dy
-0.01
x 0.00
dc 1
dy
txy u
6
T
3
T2
6
11966297
x 0.0
3
3459.24
d eP
dy
d txy d
dy
-x 17.670
203455.7
203455.7
58.82
d2
3459.24
0.000 + 0.000
3
=
syu
58.82
d2
dc 1
dy
Pu -
0.000
d Tan f u
dy
Calculation of
3459.24
3459.24
0.750
0.65
+ 0.42
203456
syu
d
dy
x 0.000
db1
dy
0.652 x
1.89
Tan f u
12
6
x
3459.24
d txy u
dy
-9.334 x 0.1
12.47
0.268
203455.7
-x 0.189
3
3459.24
-0.750
0.00012
0.00018
0.0000
0.000000
d2
-0.0005 + 0.000
-0.0002
0.000184
0.000
0.000233
-0.009
0.00
3
=
sx
For x =
sx
0.000061
a2 + b2 x + c2 x2+ d2 x3
55.73 m
=
=
=
8.104
8.104
0.11 x 55.73
0.000 x
6.01275 +
3105.8
3105.8
173083.9
-27.24 +
10.6126
2
-2.515 t/m
The values of constants calculated are correct
tx
=
=
=
tzy u
Tan f u
0.100
x
17.670 x
1.7670
The difference is =
=
sx
-2.515 0.748
1.767
t/m2
at centre of gallery where

For x =
55.73 m
sx
=
=
8.104
8.104
0.11 x
6.1E-05 x
6.01275 +
-2.515 t/m2
55.73 +
-0.009
173083.9
-27.244 +
10.613
(Tensile)
CALCULATION OF TOTAL TENSION:
sy
sx
=
=
=
B
A
D
2
168.351 t/m
2
-2.515 t/m
2.5
=
2.00
1.25
Distance from the boundary of the opening along the Y- axis
0.00
D/A
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
0.20
0.24
0.28
0.32
0.36
0.40
From fig : 3 of IS 12966

(Part2) - 1990
sn1 / sy
sn1
0.91
0.76
0.64
0.53
0.41
0.32
0.27
0.17
0.10
0.06
0.01
153.199
127.946
107.744
89.226
69.024
53.872
45.455
28.620
16.835
10.101
1.684
(tensile)
From fig:4 of IS 12966

(Part2) - 1990
sn2 / sx
1.65
1.64
1.63
1.62
1.60
1.57
1.52
1.50
1.48
1.43
1.38
sn2
-4.149
-4.124
-4.099
-4.074
-4.024
-3.948
-3.823
-3.772
-3.722
-3.596
-3.470
(Comp)
Total Tension
sn1+sn2
157.35
132.07
111.84
93.30
73.05
57.82
49.28
32.39
20.56
13.70
5.15

02 NOF Dam Section

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

02 NOF Dam Section

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

aarvee associates

Rarhu Reservoir Scheme

RARHU RESERVOIR SCHEME

D/s slope of 1 (V) to

Road Level (top of dam)

Average Ground / Bed level

10 Hard rock level

12 Bottom level of Foundation gallery

I Load Combination 'A' (Dam construction condition - No water in Reservoir)

Detailed Project Report

II Load Combination 'B' (Water upto FRL)

Detailed Project Report

W Weight of body wall as calculated earlier

allowable Eccentricity 'e'

Detailed Project Report

III Load Combination 'C' (Water upto MWL) Normal uplift

W Weight of body wall as calculated earlier

Detailed Project Report

IV Load Combination 'D' (Load combination A with earthquake )

C.G.of body wall as calculated in combination 'A'

Horizontal sesmic coefficient

Detailed Project Report

= a Coefficient depending upon the soil foundation system

= Basic horizontal sesmic coefficient (depends on Zone)

Calculations of CG of NOF above its base

Horizontal Inertia Force (HIF)

Vertical Inertia Force (VIF)

Detailed Project Report

Maximum stress (at heel)

Detailed Project Report

Maximum stress (at heel)

V Load Combination 'E' (Load combination B with earthquake )

Detailed Project Report

Hydrodynamic effects due to reservoir

(As per 7.2.1 of IS: 1893 - 1984 )

= Hydrodynamic pressure in Kg/m2 at depth 'y'

= Maximum value of Cs obtained from fig.10

As per cl: 7.2.1.1

= Depth of reservoir for FRL Condition

Hydrodynamic Shear force (or) Total Horizontal Shear (Vh) = 0.726 p y

Moment about C.G due to Hydrodynamic pressure (Mh) = 0.299 Py2

Detailed Project Report

Load combination : "B"

Maximum compressive stress

Maximum compressive stress (at heel)

Detailed Project Report

Maximum compressive stress (at heel)

Maximum compressive stress (at heel)

Detailed Project Report

VI LOAD COMBINATION 'F'

W Weight of body wall as calculated earlier

Detailed Project Report

Maximum allowable tensile stress

VII LOAD COMBINATION 'G' (E + extreme uplift)

Detailed Project Report

W Weight of body wall as calculated earlier

Maximum compressive stress

Detailed Project Report

Maximum compressive stress (at heel)

Maximum compressive stress (at heel)

Detailed Project Report

Maximum compressive stress

Detailed Project Report