"

:

" "

:
'
4102


7 ...................................................................................................................................
11 ........................................................................................................................

1
1.1

11 ................................................................................................

1.2

11 ......................................................................................

1.1

11...................................................................................................
11.................................................................................................

2
2.1

11 ..........................................................

2.2

11 .........................................................................................

2.2.1

22 ..................................................................................

2.2.2

21 .............................................
22........................................................

2.1
2.1.1

21 .......................................Space Syntax

2.1.2

27 ...............................................................................

2.2

21 .....................................................

2.2

-21 .....................

2.1

12 ...............................................................................................................
12 ...............................................................................................................

1
1.1

12...................................................................................................

1.2

11 ..............................................................................................

1.2.1

11 .....................................................................

1.2.2

11 .............................................................................................

1.1

, 27 ............................................................

1.1.1

27 ..........................................................

1.1.2

22 ..............................................................

1.2

22 ...................................................................................

1.2.1

22 ..........................................................

1.2.2

( )22 ............................................

1.2.1

22 .............................................................

1.2
1.2.1

22..................................................................................
22 ........................................................................................
2

1.2.2

21 .............................................

1.1

21.................................................................................

1.7

27.......................................................................................

1.7.1

27 ...............................................................................................

1.7.2

21 ...............................................................................................

1.7.1

21 ................................................................................

1.1
2

21 .....................................................................................
12 ....................................................................................................................
12 ........................................................................

2.1
2.1.1

12 .....................................................................................

2.1.2

72 ....................................................................................

2.1.1

72 .........................................................................................

2.1.2

71 ...................................................................................
71 .............................................................

2.2
2.2.1
2.1

( )temporal 11 ........................................
12 ........................................

2.1.1

11 ......................................................................

2.1.2

122 ...................................................................

2.1.1

122.........................................................................
121 ...................................................................

2.2
2.2.1

112 ....................................................

2.2.2

112...................................................

2.2.1

112........................................................
111.............................................................

2.2
2.2.1

117 ......................................

2.2.2

111 ......................................................................

122 .............................................................................................................

2
2.1

122 ..............................................................................................

2.2

122 .................................................................................................................

2.2.1

-122 ........

2.2.2

121 ........................................................................
1

2.2.1

127...............................................................

2.2.2

121.........................

2.2.2

112.......................................

2.2.1

- 111 ....................................................

2.1

111 ........................................................................................

2.2

112 ....................................................................................

111........ ....................................................................................................
'

12 122.................

'

12 121..........


1.1 12 ...............................................................................
2.1 22 .............................
1.1 17 ...................................................................................................
1.2 22 ..........................................................................................................
1.1 21 .............................................................................................
1.2 27 ...........................................................................................
1.2 21 .............................................................................................
2.1 12 ................................................
2.2 (11 ..................................................................)Desire Line
2.1 121 ......................................................
2.1 , 111

1.1 -- 21 ..................................................
1.2 ' 1 22 .......................................................................
1.1 ' - 2 22 ........................................................................
1.2 ' - 1 22 .........................................................
1.2 ' - 2 21 ......................................................
1.1 21 .........................................................
1.7 -- 21 .............
1.1 -- 21 .....................
2.1 12 ............................................................
2.2 17 .........................................................
2.1 -- 72 ................................
2.2 71 ......................................................
2.2 72 ...........................................................
2.1 11 ..................
2.7 -- 11 ..............
2.1 17 ................................................
2.1 ( )r=3 --11 ........................ .
2.12 ( )r=3 122 ...............................
2.11 122 .........................................
2.12 127 .......................................


1.1 - 22 .............................................................
12 1.2 11 ...............................
2.1 - 11 ...............
2.2 t - 11 .......
2.1 12 ..............................................................
2.2 17 ................................................................
2.2 11 ......................................................
2.1 ( )R 12 ..................................................
2.7 12 ......................................
2.1 12 111 ........................................
2.1 12 112 .......................................
2.12 117 ....................................................
2.11 111 ............................
2.12 122 ...............
2.11 122 .........................
2.12 122 ................................................
1. 121. ...........................
2. 121 ....................................
1. 122...........................................
2. 121.................................................
2. 122............................................................
1. 122.................................................................
1. 121.....................................................

2.1 72 ............................................................................................
2.2 71 ...............................................................................................
2.1 (+) 77 .............................................................................
2.2 71 ..........................
2.2 11 .................................................................
2.1 - 12 12 ......................................................
2.7 17 ...................................................................
2.1 11 .........................................................
2.1 121 ............
2.12 12 112 .................. .



, ( ;Moudon et al., 1997; Frank et al., 2006
.)Jacobsen, 2003
, ( Hakkert and :
.)Matar, 2007

( -)
. .
,
.
,
, .

- -
. (,)Marshall, 2005, pp. 1-9

. , -
.
,
( .)Hebbert, 2005 :

,
)i( :
; ( )ii
; ( )iii

 ; ( )iv .
.

:
.1 ?
.2 , ,
?
.1
?

- , -
. -
- - .


.

, ,
.

.
-
.

. , 212
, 12- .
12

1

 . ,
- .

-

.
, .
,
. , -
, .

- - - .-
, -
-
- -
.

,
. ,
.
,
.
( .)Raford and Ragland, 2006; Jiang, 2009a ,

( .)Zook et al., 2012; Chu, 2005
,
. -
- ,
. ,
1

 11 12
.
, ,
.

,
.
,

(.)Hillier, 1996a
,
, -
, .

.

, , .

.
( .)Hillier et al., 1993; Hillier, 1996a ,
,
. ( ;Hillier, 1996b; Kashef, 2010
.)Lerman et al., 2014
, ,
.

12

 0

. , ,-
, - " .
22- ,
. ,
, .
,
: , - ,
( .)Cervero and Radisch, 1996; Moudon et al., 1997
.
( .)Frank et al., 2006
( )Jacobsen, 2003; Geyer et al., 2006
.
. ,
( .)Hakkert and Matar, 2007 :

0.0
( )Gehl, 1987
. ,
.
,
. , ,
, . .
, - .

- .
.

11

 .
- .
" .1.1

1.1 - : - , ; :
' - , .

, ( )Gemzoe, 2006
. : (
) , " , .
.
( ) , ,
( , )
.
, , .

( ,)Alfonzo, 2005
.-
,
.
( ,)feasibility (
) . ( ,)accessibility
, .
( ,)safety .
12

 ( ,)comfort
. ( ,)pleasurability
.

( .)Appleyard, 1981 ,
, , .
, ,
,
(Bosselman et al., 1999; Jacobs et :
.)al., 2002 , -
- ,
, ( )enclosure (.)Ewing et al., 2006

0.4

.1
.
( Gehl Architects, 2004,
)p.116 .
, 17%-
( .)Scholefield, 2007
" ' ,' ( )City of Cambridge, 2000 , ( City of
)Portland, 1998
.

Walk 21

/http://www.walk21.com

11

 ( )National Association of City Transportation Officials, 2013

.

(
.)2221 , -
, ,

. , -
- . ( )2212

-
. ,
, .

' ( ,2221' )111-272

: (
) , ;
;
; .
, '
,
, -
(.)Marshall, 2012

,
.

12

( .)Deichmann, 2004
.

( )New York City DOT, 2008 .'
( )Johnston, 2008

- . '
, .

- , "
12- 12- ,
.

( .)Duany et al., 2000 - -

(.)Veras and Amorim, 2005

-
.'
'

(' .)2221 ,
, ' ()LOS Level of Service
. ,
,
. ,
( ,)Lo, 2009
.

12

( .)Litman, 2009
,
, .
(
) .
22-
(.)Forsyth and Southworth, 2008

0.1


- .
, ,
.

( - )
.
.
, ,
,
. ,
. ,
,
. ,
,
.

:
.1 ?
11

 .2 , ,
?
.1
?

: 2
.
1 . 2 2
.

17

 4
.
.

4.0
,
( )Urbanization Science ( )Batty, 2012
- -
, ( .)Marhall, 2012

( Solecki et al., 2013,
:)pp.13-14

"We need a science of urbanization. This science would focus on the fundamental laws
of the urbanization process: its origins, development, organization, emergent properties,
"and connections to other social and biophysical processes.

( )Batty, 2012 22-

( )systems theory ,
( )complexity theory
. ,
( )emergence
.

( )Marshall, 2012
-
. ' ' ,
11

 ' , ,
, ( ,' .)211


.
,
(.)Kashef, 2010; Karimi, 2012

4.4
.
' ( )legibility
( .)Lynch, 1960, pp. 2-6'
( )Golledge and Stimson, 1997
.
- ( ,)Time-geography
, -
. , ,
.

( )walkability .
( - )
(
') ( .)Saelens and Handy, 2008
, ,
.
( .)Kelly et al., 2007

11

 . ,
.

,,
, ( )Saelens et al., 2003-
.
( .)factor analysis
( )Cerin et al., 2006
" . 1,211 ,
" , -
. , ,
, ,
. ( )Ewing et al., 2006
- .
-
( )human scale
.

4.4.0

. ( )Talen, 2003
( )Congress for New Urbanism 122
,- . ()Nelessen, 1994
212 :'
; ( 212')
; 122' ( ) ,
. ( Krizek and
)Johnson, 2006 (
22

 ) , 222- . ,
- ( ,)2222 ,
122
.

4.4.4

( ,
, ") . , ()Cervero and Radisch, 1996
.
, - , ,
, .

, .

.
( )Baran et al., 2008 -
- ( )

.

,
, , ( )self selection
. ,
,
, .

(.)Kashef, 2010

21


. ( )Levine, 2005
. ,
,

. ( )Leinberger, 2009, pp. 86-112

.

4.1

( :)Raford and Ragland, 2006
( )configuration approach ;
; .

- .

( ,
) .
.

,
( .)Hillier et al., 1993

, ,
,
.
.-

22

4.1.0 Space Syntax

" " Space
.Syntax .
12- ()Hillier and Hanson, 1984
.
( Hillier et al.,
.)1993
,
.
, .

-
, ( ;Hillier et al., 1993; Penn et al., 1998
.)Turner, 2007; Jiang, 2009a " "


.

,
.
( )axial map
.
( .)Hillier and Hanson, 1984, pp. 17, 91 & 99( )axial lines

21

 Depthmap2
(
)2.1 (:)Turner et al., 2005, p. 428

"An axial map is the minimal set of axial lines such that the set taken together fully
surveils the system, and that every axial line that may connect two otherwise
"unconnected lines is included.

2.1 ( . : -.)2111 ,

.
,
. ( )Hillier and Iida, 2005
( )road segments
- , ( angular
.)distance
.
, , , .
-
.

Depthmap

https://github.com/SpaceGroupUCL

22

 ,
.
.)Hillier et al., 1993; Jiang, 2009a( 22-72%
,)Read, 1999( 12-72% 27-11%
( )Raford and Ragland, 2006 .
( )R2
.' ( )Jiang, 2009a, p. 8
:

"As we can see, over 60% of human movement can be predicted or explained purely
from a topological point of view. In terms of statistics, the other 40% is not predictable,
"and it may relate to land use, building height and road width, etc.

( , )
( )Hillier and Iida, 2005
121 -
.
( )2.22-2.72 ( )2.21-2.72
( .)2.11-2.21

.

( )Turner, 2007
-
. ,
( , ,
) ,
2,222 . , ( Hillier et
22

 )al., 2007
.
,
.

. ,
( .)Raford, 2003 ()Karimi, 2012
.
( )
- .
-
.
,
.

',
' -
( .)McCahill and Garrick, 2008 ,
(.)Pereira et al., 2012
,
.

. , ,
, .
.
, ( .)Ratti, 2004
( ,)edge effect
21


.
, -
( .)Turner, 2007 ,
.
, ,
( ).

4.1.4

, . ,
( )named streets
.

( .)Jiang and Liu, 2009
- ( )perception " ,
. ,
, (
) ,
.

.
( )Ozbil et al., 2011 ( metric
)reach 222-' 1,122' ,
( )directional reach .
,
. ,

27

 . ( )Ozbil, 2013


.

4.2
, ,
,
.
( ,)Kelly et al., 2007
( Chu, 2005; Ozer and Kubat, 2007; Zook et
.)al., 2012 ( (Desyllas et al., 2003
,
( , , ) .

( Cervero and Duncan,
.)2003

: , .
( )Ozer and Kubat, 2007
,
.
( )Desyllas et al., 2003
. ,
, ,
( .)R=0.82

21

 ( Raford and
.)Ragland, 2006

.

, ( 22 )
(.)Raford and Ragland, 2003

.
( )Desyllas and Duxbury, 2000

.
( )R .2.27
( )Desyllas et al., 2003
.

,
,
.
1
.

4.2 -

. - -
.
, (.)Marshall, 2005, pp. 84-86

21

 . ,
11 22
.

.22- ,
( ,' :)1

"The cataclysm of Modernism was not just about comprehensive redevelopment and the
introduction of a new kind of infrastructure that had happened before, when the
railways entered the Victorian city. What modern road planning did was to alter the
fundamental relationship between routes and buildings. It effectively turned cities inside
"out and back to front.

, -
. ,
.
,
( .)Hebbert, 2005 :,
-
222-' ( Porta et al.,
.)2014

,
( .)Forsyth and Southworth, 2008
-

( .)Porta et al., 2010 ( )Murrain, 2002
12


.
.
,
, -
.

-
- .
()Marshall, 2005
22- ,
( .)Marshall and Garrick, 2010
.
- . -
-
22-
( .)Lerman and Omer, 2013
- - ,
-
(.)Cervero and Radisch, 1996; Baran et al., 2008

, (
X T )
( .)Nes and Zhaohui, 2009 ,
,
X
T- .
11

 X- ,
,
-.

( )Peponis et al., 2007 1122

" .3 111 12- "
, , .
( 1122) 1122
(-) . 1122
, ( )
.

4.2
. ,
, .

. ,
-.

. , -

( , )
( .)Kashef, 2010 , (
-) .

3 "
.

12


,
.

11

, , .

1.0
-
.
, ,
- .
1.1 :

.1 -
, , ?

( ,)Peponis et al., 2007; Marhsall and Garrick, 2010

.

.2
? ( , ")
? ( , ,-)
? ( )
() ?

-?

()Hillier et al., 1993; Raford and Ragland, 2006
. ,
,
12

 , ( ,)Hillier and Iida, 2005

.

.1 ( , ")
? ?
-
?

.
.
(;Lerman and ; Desyllas et al., 2003; Raford and Ragland, 2006
.)Omer, 2013
, . ,
.
,
( ,)Hillier, 1996a; Porta et al., 2009
?
.

.2 ( , )
? ?
-
?

( , ) (
,) .
(.)Raford and Ragland, 2003

12

 .2 ( , )
? ,
? -
?

,
.
( .)Alfonzo, 2005; Gehl, 1987, pp. 129-183 ,
()Desyllas et al., 2003
.

.

.1 - , , -
?
?
- ?
?

, ,
, ,
.

( .)Hillier, 1996a; Hillier, 1999 , ""
.
,
.

, , .
11

 ,
,- , ".
-
( ,)Almeida, 2007 :
.

.1.1

3.1 .
( ) -
, . (
) .

,
.
.
,
, , . ,
- :
17

 ,
,
? ?

1.4

,
)i( : ; ( )ii
; ( )iii
; ( )iv .

.
, ,
.

.
-
. .1.2

1.4.0
-
- -
. , -
,
. , -

. ,

11

 .
, .

-
: 20-
. ,
" . , -
" .
( )
. ,
( : Lerman ;2211 ,
,)et al., 2014 .

1.4.4
, -
. - -
- .


. 1.1 -
-- 1.1 ,
- .

11

, ,

3.2 .

22

 3.1 -- .
)1( : - ; ( )2 ; ( )3 -; ( )4
- .

21

 3.1 - .

()
1619.50

638.73

980.78

674.50

353.11

321.39

1759.63

821.51

938.12

1512.02

635.50

876.52

' 0
, ,1.2 1,122-
,
-.

3.2 ' 1 .

( ) - -
.- ( 22-;2221 ,
22

 )Welter, 2009 122- .- -

( 12- ,2221 ,' )111
112- . - ( ,' :)111

" , ' ' ' ,' ,

, .
,
( )".

1122 -
. 22-12- 12
11 1.2 .

' :1 ; ;
; .

' 4
1.1
. , -
.
---
.

21

 3.3 ' - 2 .

-
- . -
,
, - , .
. .
, .

- , .
22- ,
,
. ,
( ,2221 ,' .)211
172 , 122 ( ) 122-
( ).

' :2 ; ;
; .

22

 ' 1
1.2 (
-) ( ) . -
.
.

3.4 ' - 3 .

- -- . 1112-
- .
. "
.
. 1122-
.
,
. 1,712 ,
( ) 122- ( ) 122-.

' :1 ; "; ;
.
22

 ' 2
1.2
. .
22- ,
, .
.

3.5 ' - 4 .

- ,
' ( 2) . 1122
.
.
22- . -
1,222 , 122- 112-
- .

' :2 ; -;
; .
21

 1.1 ,
--
. " ""
.ArcGIS Ver. 10.0 ,
( .)1.1.1 ,
( ) .
--
.

, :
.1 . " ,
,4 5 .
.2 , .
( : , 62221 .. .
") .
.1 , .
.

1.1.0
- ( ) ,
. .
( )1.1
, . ,
( ) ""
, .

4 http://govmap.gov.il/ :
5 http://moovit.co.il :
6 http://cbs.gov.il/census/census/main_mifkad08.html :2221

27

 1.1 , .
1.1 .
- .
.
1.1 ,
.
.

1.7 --
.

3.6 . ()

().

21

 3.7 -- .

21

 1.1.4
-
, ,
.-
. ,
.

1.2
.
,
- -
. :
,
( )
.

1.2.0

( ,)Space Syntax .
.)UCL , v.10.15( Depthmap
" ).ArcGIS (ver. 10.0

ArcGIS "" 11' -

, 2' 1'
. - .
DepthMap
. -- . 1.1
. 2,111-
-.
22

 , ( .)Hillier, 1996b
.
) (Connectivity ,
. ( ,)Integration
( )
. , ( .)Choice
( ),
" " .
() .
.
( ) ,
( ) .
1 ( (r=3

. ,
, .

,
- ( Intelligibility-) .
, .
'' ''
.
,
( .)Hillier, 2002
(
) .
( Hillier,
.)1996b, pp. 93-94
21

 (
) ( )
() .
,
(
) .
222 :' 222 ,' 722 ,' 1,222 ,' 1,222 ,' 1,222 ,' 1,722 ,' 2222 ,'2,222 ,
' 1,222 ,' 2,222 ,' 2,222 ,' ( ) .
12,112 -.

.1 :
()Axial Connectivity
( )Choice ()r=3
( )Integration ()r=3

.2 ( ):
()Geometric Choice
()Geometric Mean Depth

.1 ( ):
()Metric Choice
()Metric Mean Depth

.2 :
()Intelligibility

22

 3.8 --.

21

 1.2.4 ( )
( )
, ,
, .

, -
.
11
.
. ,
- .22
.

( )2.2
( ,)1.7 .
:

-
. - .
( )1.7 -
" .
, -.

22

 1.2.1
-
( .)1.7 .

. , ( T
) ( X ) .
:

( )
( , X )
X

1.2
.
,
.
.

1.2.0
,
. -
:
2
1 -
2

22

 1.1 .

3.3 )a( . ; ( )b
; ( )c '.

1.2.4

.
:
011'
011'

1.2
- .
.
.
2221
.. .
.. ( )
- .
:

( )
( )
( )

21

 1.3
.
.
,
.

.

1.3.0
- ,

. 2 :1
2
1
2
1

.
.1
.- 1
.7 1.2 .

3.4 )a( . 3 ; ( )b 2 '; ()c

1 .

27

 1.3.4
2 1
2 :
1
2
1 - ,

2 ,
2 ,
1.2 .

3.5 )a( . 5 ; ( )b 4 -; ( )c
3 ; ( )d 2 ; ( )e 1 .

1.3.1

-
:

= +

21

 1 +
- =
1+

1.3

- .

. ,
.

,
,Bluetooth .
( .)Schweizer, 2005

. , .
, , .
, ,
- . ,
, - .7
, " ( gate
)counts . ,
.

( .)Sauter, 2010
-
. - -
-
.

21

 ( )
( , ,
) .
.
2 (
) , 12 (
) . 2.
( ) 12:22-
,22:22 .

212 .
, .
12- :
( 212 ) , -
( 122 ) - -
( 11 ) .
( 21 12 ) -
( 21 21 ) . 1.2 12
-
( .)1.2

12

 15 3.2 .

215

- -

102

99

51

24

24
52

25

23

28

28

25

24

60

52

11

 2
.
- .

. ,
.

2.0

- -
.
, -
. - -
. 2.1
.-
.

12

 4.1 - .

11

 2.0.0
-
( ) , .
-.
.
2.0.0.0

- -
- - ,
(-) () .
- ()
(-) .1.22 t - ( )Indepenent t-test-
-
. t
- - - .

, -
.
, . (
)
. -
12- . ,
, . 2.1
---
.
, . 2.1
.

12

 4.1 .
, .
. .

4.1 - 4.1
.

2.7 2.1.1.1
2.1 .

(
- ) .
- - - . 2.2
. - -
-
12

 . 11 , - -
, -
.

.
.
,
.
( 2 ) .,
( ) .
"" "
, . -

. ,Desire Lines
. ,
. (-
- -) ,
2.2

4.2 ( )Desire Line .

.

2.1.1
.
11

 4.2 .
)a( . ' 1 ,-
() -; ( )b ' 2 ,- - (
) -; ( )c ' 3 - ,- ()
-; ( )d ' 4- ,- ()
-.

17

2.0.0.4

- t
- ( )Independent t-test -
. - -
- . 2.2
, .
,-
. ( ) -
- - ,
( -
) , (
).

4.2 t - - .

, -
.
.
( 1.11 )
( ,)1.27 - ( )1.21
-
( .)2.11

2.1 --
- . ,
--
11

 -- .
,
- .
-
(.)Omer and Goldblatt, 2012

-
- - 11
- - . , t -
- ,
( )P<0.01 . ,
-
- .
-
. (-
- - )
.

-
( )r=3 .
- , - - .
- 22 - .
t - -
, ( )P<0.01
- .
, -
.
- ( ,
) - -.
11

 4.3 -- .
)1( : ; ( )2 ; ( )3 -; ( )4
- .

72

 , ,
( ,)2.72 12-
, - (
.)2.11 2.1 2.1.1.2
2.12 .

, -.
- -
- . - -
- 2 ( ) 22- ( -
) . t -
- ,
-
( .)P<0.05
.
.7.11 12-
-
.2.71
2.0.0.1

-
- - . -
12- - .
- , 22
- - . ,
- (2.1
) 2.27 ( 2.11
).

71

 , ( X
, ,T
) - - - (
X- ) .
X
.T

,
( )
. -
() () .
- , -
1.12-1.22 - - .
-
( ) . - -
.2.11

2.0.4
.2.2 2.1
- . 1
, 2
.
- - -
. - -
.
- - .2.21
, -
. ,1 1
.12
72

 -
- .
. - - -
, . -
( )a2.2
.

4.4 )a( . ' 1 ,-

() -; ( )b ' 2 ,-
- ( ) -; ( )c ' 3 - ,-
() -; ( )d ' 4- ,-
() -.

71


0.70
0.60
0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20
0.10
0.00
-

4.1 - .

2.0.1
2.2 ,
() (
.)1.7.2 Error! Reference source not found. ( )
, .
- - - ,
-
. -
- - .

.2.2 , - -
12- ,
.
,
,
. , 2.1.1.1
-
.
72

 4.5 )a( . ' 1 ,-

() -; ( )b ' 2 ,-
- ( ) -; ( )c ' 3 - ,-
() -; ( )d ' 4- ,-
() -.

72

 ( )
0.35
0.30
0.25

0.20

0.15

0.10
0.05
0.00
-

4.2 - .

- - -
72- - .
- . ( )
- ,
- ( 2.27 ,
) 22- . ,
,
21- -
2- .

2.1 - .
. - ,

- - - . ,
-
12- 12- .

71

 ( +)

50.00
45.00
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
-

4.3 (+) - .

-
. , ,2.2
.-

- . ,
. 1
. , 2
.

, 1- -
, -
. - -
( 1- - -) . -
- 2.2 2.72- ,
- - (
- ,
- ) . , - ,
- ,1
, -
. , (-
) ,1.1 .
77

 2.4
,
( 12 .)1.2 2.2
( )X-
( )Y-
.
.

12 . ,
, . ,
.

. , ,
, .
2 12- (
) ,
.

71

 4.4 ( )
( ) .

71

 2.1
- . 2.2
2.1 .
- - -
. -
-
- . , - ,
22- - - .
,
.
11% :
-- 11% , -
17% - . t -
- - -
- t- .
t-
( )P<0.01 - - -.

4.3 - .

* - -

-
.
-
- - . ,
.
12

 - (-
) -
(- - ) 21 ,
- - (- -
) - - (-
- ) 111.

-
( 171.11 )
- - (-
172.1 ).

4.5 - .

2.1 ( )
. ,

. ( )Jiang, 2009b
, .
-
,
11

 ( .)Jiang, 2013 212

( :)2.1
.1 ( 221 ) 12%-
21 , .
.2 ( 111.7 221- )
22%- 27 , -.
.1 ( 111.7- ) -
11% 122 , -.

2.1
, ,
.2.2 .2.11
, 21 12 ,
- 1 , -
- - 2 - - . ,
- - -.
( 27 2 ,
- ) , ( 12)
- - - ( 12).
, - - ( )b2.1
.

12

 4.6 )a( . ' 1

,- () -; ( )b ' 2 ,-
- ( ) -; ( )c ' 3 -,
- () -; ( )d ' 4- ,-
() -.

. 2.1
-
- - .
- -
11

- .
.

( .)Jiang, 2009b
. ,
.

, ( ' )2 -
- - -
( R=0.9 - R=0.78 - ) .
-
.b2.1

2.1
- .

12

 4.6 - 15 .
( R ,1- ).

12

 ,
. ,
-
-
.

2.2
- . 2.7
2.2 .
. , -
. , -
217.1 , -
. -

.2.1
- - ( 122.2 )
- - ( 121 ) -
- ( 111.2 ) .
- - -.
- -
- - -
. ,2.1
.
- - R=0.72
- - -
R=0.96 R=0.92- . -

.

11


. -
- -
.

. , -
2.2
- .

4.4 - .

* - -

4.7 - .

17

 2.4.0 ( )temporal
2.1
- . 2.2
,
( )
.

4.8 - .

4.5 - (
).

11

.1
- - - .

.2 -
, - -
. ,-
, - - .,
- - - ( )11:22-11:22
111.22 , -
( )12:22-11:22 122.11 .

.1 - .

. - -
27
.

.2 . ,-
11-
( 217.2- 121.2-
) , - 12-
( 211.21- .)171.21-
.-
( -) (
, -) -
( )
.

11

2.1

.
12-
,1.2
.

.SPSS
( ) . ,
2.2
, . , -
(
) .

2.2 ,
, .
, - )i( : ;
( )ii ( )iii( ;)Axial
( )iv( ;)Segment-Angular (.)Segment-Metric

.

2.1 ( )R 12

. ,
(
12

 ) .
.
12 '.

,P<0.01 . ,
' ,
( ) . ,
- ( 22- )
, ,
( 22- ).

11

 4.6 ( )R 15 . ,
. ,P<0.01 . ()
P<0.05 () . .

12

 2.1.0
- )i( :
; ( )ii ( )iii( ;)Axial
( )iv( ;)Segment-Geometric ( .)Segment-Metric-

.
2.1.0.0

- 12
( 2.21
.2.11-2.71 11 12 P<0.01
.)P<0.05 ,
( )
( ,)2.21 ( ,)2.21 -
( ,)2.71 - - ( )2.12
(.)2.12

- . ,
- - -
, - . ,
.2.1.1.1

,
.
R=0.19
- - ( .)P<0.05
11

 ,
.

2.7 2,122 --.

(
.)2.1
(
)
,
( )Jiang, 2013 2.2
.
. 2.7 .

(
.)R=0.36 ,
. 12 ,
,2.7 12 ( , 12-
) , 2%
.

4.7 .4.7

()

()

0-4

1,499

69.56%

273,068

39.94%

182.17

5-8

453

21.02%

188,405

27.55%

415.90

9-15

139

6.45%

105,134

15.38%

756.36

16-24

38

1.76%

48,805

7.14%

1,284.34

25-33

16

0.74%

35,946

5.26%

2,246.63

34+

6
-

10

0.46%

32,408

4.74%

3,240.78

2,155

100.00%

683,766

100.00%

317.29

2.7
.
12

 ( - ) ,
. ,

.

2.1 .
.
( )
.

12- . 1. '
12
.

12

 4.7 ( ) -- .
.4.7

11

 4.8 .
)a( .4.8 ' 1 ,- () -; ()b
' 2 ,- - ( ) -; ( )c
' 3 - ,- () -; ( )d '
4- ,- () -.

17

2.1.0.4

12
.
( )r=3 ( 2.11
.2.22-2.21 11 12 ,P<0.01
P<0.05 ) .
- - - ,
- - . ,
-
.

2.1 -- ( 2,111
-) .
,
. 2.12
. -
- - . ,
- .
-
. , -
- - ,
- .

11

 4.9 ( )r=3 --.

11

 4.11 ( )r=3 )a( . ' 1 ,

- () -; ( )b ' 2 ,-
- ( ) -; ( )c ' 3 - ,-
() -; ( )d ' 4- ,-
() -.

,2.12
.
. ,
-
122

 . -
- ,
- - . ,
- 2.12 .

12- . 2. '
12 .
2.1.0.1

12-
1,222' ( 2.17
.2.12-2.21 12 12 P<0.01
) .
. -
- - -
- - . ,
-
.

12
: 722'
: ( ,)2.21
- , ( .)2.2
-
. , -
- - -
- -.

121

 ( ) -
- ( .)2.2
.
722' -
(.)2.1

12- . 1. '
12 .
2.1.0.2

12-
2,222' ( 2.22
.2.22-2.22 1 12 ,P<0.01
P<0.05 ).

.
2,222'
( .)2.22
.
12- . 2. '
12 .

2.1.4
12-
( 2.12 2.12-
.2.22 11 12 ,P<0.01
P<0.05 ) .
- ( .)2.2
2.1 12 .
122

 - (
2.21- .)2.2 ,
- - ( 2.12- .)2.22
- ,2.21
- - .2.11
-
- ( - - - - -
.P<0.05 -
- - - ) .
- - -
( )2.1
- .

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
-

- -

4.9 15 .

( )2.1 ( .)2.2
2.11 . 21
( 221 21 ,)2.2
, 2
( 2
2 ).

121


12- . 2. ' 12
.

4.11
. 4.6 )a( .4.4 ' 1
,- () -; ( )b ' 2 ,-
- ( ) -; ( )c ' 3 - ,-
() -; ( )d ' 4- ,-
() -.

122

 2.1.1
12-
( 2.11 .2.11-2.17
12 12 P<0.01 .)P<0.05
: 1- 2
( 2-
) ( 1 ) . , 1- ,11
11 .

- - ( ,)2.21
( )2.1 - - ( .)2.17
- -
- 2.21 - -
2.1 - . ,
- ,
- -
.

2.12 .
- ,

. ,
- .
, (- -
-) , (-
) . 7
( )1 ( .)1
( c2.12 ) (
122

 .)2.2 ,
2 , 2
.2 ( c2.12 )
.
- ( 2.1
- ) .
, - 2.11
12
. -
- 2.21 - - .2.27

4.3 . :
;6 : ( )
.2

,
- - - ( .)2.21
( )
- , .

- -
- ( 2.12 ) ,
( )1
( ) ,

121

 ( ) ,
.

4.12 )a( . ' 1 ,-

() -; ( )b ' 2 ,-
- ( ) -; ( )c ' 3 - ,-
() -; ( )d ' 4- ,-
() -.

127

 , 12-.
, ,
- .

( )1 ( )2
.
12 ( 2.21 11 12
P<0.01 ) .
-
, .

-
- .
- - ( -
- - - )
2.2 , -
. - -
. -
, ,
( .)Hebbert, 2005; Buchanan, 1963 ,
( )
, , --
- . ,
- - -
- . (-
- )
, , ( )
(
.)1.2 .
121

 1. ' 12
.

2.2
,
.
Stepwise
12 , . 2.1
.
.P<0.01

2.12 12 .
. 2.22-2.12
( 2.12-2.71 ) .
( )2.12 - ,
( )2.22 - - .
- ,
- - ,
- - - -
. ,
- -
- . -
,
- .

121

1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-

-
-

4.11 15 .

-
, 2.1 ,
. , - :
, ( ,)Axial
( )Segment-Angular ( .)Segment-Metric
2.1 ( 12
) ( 2 2
) .
12- .12
- - (
) , ,2.12 12.

11- 12 .
,- - -
- - .
1- 12 .
- - -
,- - -
- . ,

112

 - - - - -
.

12-
12 . ,
.
,
1- 12 ,
.

4.8 15 .

14

10

11

21 , 12
. ,2.1-
. ,
12.
1. '.

111

 4.9 15.

10

5,111'

751'

1,111'

3,111'

111'

251'

1,751'

511'

751'

3,111'

1,251'

1,751'

4,111'

251'

3,111'

111'

2.2.0
2.1 12 12
.
- - .
- -.

- (
)i( :)2.1.1 ; ( )ii
112

( )iii( ;)Axial ( )iv( ;)Segment-Geometric (Segment-

.)Metric
2.2.0.0

1- 12
.
- .
,
.

-
, : ,
- ,
- - - .

. 2.1.1.1
.

( ) .
(
- -)
.
.
2.2.0.4

1 .12
- .
. , 12-
111

 ,
.

- .
.
2.2.0.1

7- 12
. ,
.

722' . -
-
. ( )
. -
-
- . ( )
, .

, :
222' , 1,722' ,
222' ( - -
) , 722' (
-) 1,222'.

112

2.2.0.2

12- 12 .
,
, .

2,222'.
,
. :
1,222' 2,222' .
, ( ) :
1,222' , 1,722' , 2,222',
( ) , 222'
1,222'.

2.2.4
( ) 11- 12
.
( ) (
- )
. .

( 122')
( 122') .
.

2.2.1
( ) 1- 12
.
- .
.
112


. ,
- - ,
- - - .

- - . 2.11
R=0.87 212
.
,
.

-
.

2.2

,-
.

21 2.2 ,2.1
,
( 2.1 , 1,222
' 2,222') . 2.12 12
. .

111

 4.11 (
).

2.2.0
12 2.12
( 212) .
.

.
.

()R>0.8
.P<0.01
. ,
. 2.11
212 . ,

. ,
.
( ) ,
(
).

117

 4.11 .

0.85

0.53
0.72
0.88

052,1'

0,1'

0.83

052,1'

050,1'

0.89

05111'

0.92

0.88

0,1'

,11'

0.89

0.91

05111'

052,1'

0.80

0.68

25,11'

05111'

0.99

0.99

0.87

0.86

212
,
.
2.12 ,
2.21.

,
. ,
. ,

.

2.2.4
- ,
- .
-
. ,
.
- , .
Bivariate
12
111

 . 2.12 ,
. 2.11 ,
2.12 , .

. (
) -
.
2.2.4.0

,
. 12
( 2.17 .2.21-2.11 11 12
,P<0.01 P<0.05
) . ,
12
. ,
- - - .

, , .
12 ,2.17
- - - .
- 2.21
- - 2.21 . ,
-
-.

111

 4.12 , , .
,P<0.01 . () P<0.05 () .

4.13 , , .

4.14 , , .

122

 - ,
,
. , - -
( - ) ,
- .
2.2.4.4

- 12 .
12
( 2.17 .2.22-2.11
7 12 ,P<0.01 2 P<0.05
2 ) . ,
12
.
12
2.12 .
-
- - . -
2.21
- .2.22 - -
2.21 2.12- .

.

2.12 12 ( .2.12-2.22 11 12
,P<0.01 P<0.05
) . -,
.
121

 , 11-
12 , ,
.
- ,
2.11-
, -
.2.27

-
-
. - -
( 2.1 )2.2
( 2.11 2.21 - ).
2.2.4.1

.
2.17 212
2.11 ( .)2.11 ,
,2.2.1 ( )12
.

12 (
2.11 )2.12
.

2.22-
12 ( .2.22-2.17 11 12
,P<0.01 P<0.05
122

 ) . , ,
. , 1- 12
.
- , - -
( )2.22
- ( .)2.12 , -
, . ,
, .

,
- .

.
, ,
.

121

.

. ,
. ,
.

2.0
,
, -
. -
, -
- -.

.1
.
, .
,
, . , -
, .

- - - .-
,
- - -.

.2 , , ,
,
122

 . ,
, .
( .)Hillier, 1996b; Kashef, 2010; Lerman et al., 2014
,
,
.

2.4
2
- ,
.

2.4.0 -
, ,
- -
- .
22 ( Omer
,)and Zafrir-Reuven, 2010
( ;Peponis et al., 2007
.)Marshall and Garrick, 2010 :

.1
- .

.2 - -
- . , -
( ) , -
-.

122

 .1 -
- - . ,
- .

2.4.4

. ,
. ( (Read, 1999; Jiang, 2009a

. ,
( )
.
( :
,)Hillier et al., 1993; Raford and Ragland, 2006
(
).

- - - ,
- .
-
. -
- (
- )
- - (
).

--
. -

121

 ( ) . , -

- .
-
(.)Nelessen, 1994; Krizek and Johnson, 2006

, -
- - .
-
- - . -

-
. ,- -

.
(.)Jiang, 2009b

2.4.1

,
.
( )Raford and Ragland, 2006; Jiang, 2009a .

.
. ,
- - - .

,
( ) ,
127

 ( )Hillier and Iida, 2005

.
( )Jiang and Liu, 2009
.

. 1,222' , ,

( ,)r=3
( .)Hillier, 1996a; Read, 1999; Raford, 2003; Jiang, 2009a
,
,
.
(
)
. ,
. (.)Hillier and Iida, 2005

- - (
12 ) . -
- 12
.
-
. - -
- ,
,

121

 . -
, .

2.4.2

. (
) - - , -
( .)2.2-
, - -
.
- ,
.- - ,
.

( .)Pagliardini el al, 2010 - -,

- . , - -
.

, (
)2.11 ( )Zook et al., 2012; Chu, 2005 .
,
, -
, (
) .

( .)Hillier, 1996a
,
.
121

 - . ,-
- ,
, .

( ) (
) . - -
- .

- - .
,
( ) . ,-
- - ( )
. -
-
.
.
-
,
(.)Hillier, 1999

( ).

2.4.2

, .
, ,
. ,

.
- - , ,
112

 , ,
.

-
- - ,
.
(
,)Marshall, 2005, pp. 45-70; Hebbert, 2005 .
, . ,
- - , -
- .

.
, ( .)Desyllas et al., 2003
.
,
.
.
.
(
- )

. ,

.

2.4.2 -
2.2
. 12
.
111


.
, .

,
.


.

,
.- (-
) -
(- -).

, , .

.
( ) ,
.
(.)Hillier, 1996a

- ,
2.1 .
, ( Hillier et
.)al., 1993, p. 31, Figure 3 -
,
. ,

112

 (
).

5.1 , .
. ( ) ( ,
) , ( ) , . -
( , ).

2.1
,
.

.1
,- . - 22-
. (
-
111


) . , ,2.2

.

.2 -
- . -- ,
-- . , (-
) (- ) . --
,
, .

.1
" .
,
.
.
, ,
.
. ,

.

.2 -- .
.
-
.

.2
. ,
112

 .

- ( ,2212 ,' .)11-12

( )good continuity ( ;Jiang and Liu, 2009
.)Thomson, 2003

.1
( 12
) ( )
( ) .

. ,
( 21 12 )
.
,
,
.

2.2
.

. :

.1 -
. - -
-
- .
.
( - -
112

 -) ,
( .)fused grid-


.
( )Grammenos and Craig, 2007; Hawkins, 2007
.

.2
, ( )Closeness
( Betweeness Jiang and :
.)Claramunt, 2004

- . ,
, (
.)Jiang and Liu, 2009; Thomson, 2003 :

.1
.
-
( ,)Hebbert, 2005; Buchanan, 1963
. ,
. -
- ( 22- 22- )

.


.
111

 .2 --

.
( , ") -
.
( )Lerman et al., 2014
.

,
.
.

, .

117


.- " ,)2211( . ( )Space Syntax " ,
, ,)1( 1' .211-121

' '" ,)2221( . "( , : ) ,-

: ( .)1111

" ,)2222( . , :

" , , .

" ,)2221( . " ,- : .

(" ,)2221
" , :
http://media.mot.gov.il/PDF/HE_TRAFFIC_PLANNING/PedestrianTrafficPlanning.pdf
( .)21/22/2212

" ,)2212( . " , :

.

" ,)2212( . " ,

2212 .

Alfonzo M. A. (2005), "To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs",
Environment and Behavior, Vol. 37.6, pp. 808-836.

Almeida M. D. (2007), The importance of shade as a strategy to foster walking in

summer, 8th International Walk 21 Conference in Toronto.
111

Appleyard D. (1981), Livable Streets, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Baran P., Rodrigez D. and Khattak A. (2008), "Space syntax and walking in new
urbanist and suburban neighborhoods", Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 13.1, pp. 5-28.

Batty M. (2012), "Building a science of cities", Cities, Vol. 29 (suppl 1), pp.9-16.

Bosselmann P., Macdonald E. and Kronemeyer T. (1999), "Livable streets revisited",

Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 65.2, pp. 168-80.

Buchanan C. (1963), "Traffic in Towns A Study of the Long Term Problems of Traffic
in Urban Areas", London: HMSO.

Cerin E., Saelens B. E., Sallis J. F. and Frank L. D. (2006), "Neighborhood environment
walkability scale: validity and development of a short form", Medicine and Science in
Sports and Exercise, Vol. 38.9, pp. 1682-1691.

Cervero R. and Duncan M. (2003), "Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes" evidence
from the San Francisco Bay Area", American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 93.9,
pp.1478-1483.

Cervero R. and Radisch C. (1996), Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile

oriented neighborhoods, Transport Policy Vol 3.3, pp. 127-141.

111

Chu S. C. H. (2005), When and why do people walk in the city: the influence of urban
elements on time-pattern of pedestrian movement, 6th International Walk 21
Conference in Zurich.

City of Cambridge (2000), "Cambridge Pedestrian Plan", available online at:

http://www.cambridgema.gov/~/media/Files/CDD/Transportation/Pedestrian/ped_plan_
2000.ashx (last accessed on 26/04/2014).

City of Portland (1998), "Portland's Pedestrian Master Plan", available online at:
http://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/90244 (last accessed on
26/04/2014).

Deichmann J. (2004), "Accessible urban spaces a challenge for urban designers", 5th
International Walk 21 Conference in Copenhagen.

Desyllas J. and Duxbury E. (2000), Planning for movement: measuring and modelling
pedestrian flows in cities, RICS Conference, London.

Desyllas J., Duxbury E., Ward J. and Smith A. (2003), Demand modeling of large
cities: an applied example from London, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (UCL):
London, UK.

Duany A., Plater-Zyberk E. and Speck J. (2000), Suburban Nation The Rise of
Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream, New York, NY: North Point Press.

122

Ewing R., Handy S., Brownson R.C., Clemente O. and Winston E. (2006), "Identifying
and measuring urban design qualities related to walkability", Journal of Physical
Activity and Health, Vol.3 (Suppl 1), pp. 223-240.

Forsyth A. and Southworth M. (2008), "Cities afoot pedestrians, walkability and urban
design", Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 13.1, pp. 1-3.

Frank L. D., Sallis J. F., Conway T. L., Chapman J. E., Saelens B. E. and Bachman W.
(2006), "Many pathways from land use to health", Journal of the American Planning
Association, Vol 72.1, pp. 75-87.

Gehl Architects (2004), Toward a fine city for people: public spaces and public life
London, full paper available at:
http://www.gehlarchitects.dk/files/pdf/London_small.pdf (last accessed on 26/04/2014).

Gehl J. (1987) Life Between Buildings, Copenhagen: The Danish Architectural Press.

Gemzoe L. (2006), Quality for people: a set of criteria for the design of pedestrian
places and networks with people in mind, 7th International Walk 21 Conference in
Melbourne.

Geyer G., Raford N. and Ragland D. (2006), "The Continuing debate about safety in
numbers data from Oakland, CA", Transportation Research Board 85th Annual
Meeting.

121

Golledge R. J. and Stimson R. J. (1997), Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective,

New York, NY: Guildford Press.

Grammenos F. and Craig B. (2007), "Whose street is it anyway? Regaining lost ground
for pedestrians", 7th International Walk 21 Conference in Melbourne.

Hakkert A.S. and Matar C. (2007), "Country report for Israel", Part of the Pedestrians
Quality Needs Cost 358 Project.

Hawkins C. (2007), "Assessing the fused grid residential street design: Travel and
walking levels associated with disparate pedestrian and motor vehicle connectivity", 7th
International Walk 21 Conference in Melbourne.

Hebbert M. (2005), "Engineering, urbanism and the struggle for street design", Journal
of Urban Design, Vol 10.1, pp. 39-59.

Hillier, B. (1996a), "Cities as movement economies". Urban Design International, Vol.

1.1, pp. 41-60.

Hillier B. (1996b), Space is the Machine, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University

Press.

Hillier B. (1999), "Centrality as a process: accounting for attraction inequalities in

deformed grids", Urban Design International, Vol. 4.3, pp. 107-127.

122

Hillier B. (2002), "A theory of the city as object: Or, how spatial laws mediate the social
construction of urban space", Urban Design International, Vol. 7.3-4, pp.153-179.

Hillier B. and Hanson J. (1984), The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge, MA:
Cambridge University Press.

Hillier B. and Iida S. (2005), "Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of
urban movement", 5th International Space Syntax Symposium in Delft.

Hillier B., Penn A., Hanson J., Grajewski T. and Xu J. (1993), Natural movement: or,
configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement, Environment and Planning
B: Planning and Design 1993: Vol. 20.1, pp. 29-66.

Hillier B., Turner A., Yang T. and Park H. T. (2007), "Metric and topo-geometric
properties of urban street network: some convergences, divergences and new results", 6th
International Space Syntax Symposium in Istanbul.

Jacobs A. B., MacDonald E. and Rof Y. (2002), "The Boulevard Book", Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.

Jacobsen P.L., (2003). "Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking
and bicycling", Injury Prevention, Vol. 9.3, pp. 205209.

Jiang B. (2009a), "Ranking spaces for predicting human movement in an urban

environment", International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 23.7:
pp. 823837.
121

Jiang B. (2009b), "Street hierarchies: a minority of streets account for a majority of

traffic flow", International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 23.8, pp.
1033-1048.

Jiang B. (2013), "Head/Tail breaks: a new classification scheme for data with a heavytailed distribution", The Professional Geographer, Vol. 65.3, pp. 482-494.

Jiang B. and Claramunt C. (2004), A structural approach to the model generalization of

an urban street network, GeoInformatica Vol. 8 pp. 157-171.

Jiang B. and Liu C. (2009), "Street-based topological representations and analysis for
predicting traffic flow in GIS", International Journal of Geographic Information, Vol.
23.9, 11191137.

Johnston B. D. (2008), "Planning for childe pedestrians: issues of health, safety and
social justice", Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 13.1, pp. 141-145.

Karimi K. (2012), "A configurational approach to analytical urban design: 'Space syntax'
methodology", Urban Design International, Vol. 17.4, pp. 297-318.

Kashef M. (2010), "Neighborhood design and walkability: a synthesis from planning,

design, transportation and environmental health fields", Alhosn University Journal of
Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol 3.1, pp. 87-105.

122

Kelly C. E., Tight M. R., Page M. W. and Hodgson F. C. (2007), Techniques for
assessing the walkability of the pedestrian environment, 8th International Walk 21
Conference in Toronto.

Krizek K. J., Johnson P. J (2006), "Proximity to trails and retail: effects of urban cycling
and walking", Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 72.1, pp.33-42.

Leinberger C. B. (2009), "The Option of Urbanism: Investing in a New American

Dream", Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

Lerman Y. and Omer I. (2013), "The Effects of Configurational and Functional Factors
on the Spatial Distribution of Pedestrians", In: D. Vandenbroucke, B. Bucher and J.
Crompvoets (eds.), "Geographic Information Science at the Heart of Europe", BerlinHeidelberg: Springer, pp. 383-398.

Lerman, Y., Rof, Y. and Omer, I. "Using Space Syntax to Model Pedestrian Movement
in Urban Transportation Planning", Geographical Analysis. Vol. 46.4:392-410.

Levine J. (2005), "A choice-based rationale for land use and transportation alternatives:
evidence from Boston and Atlanta", Journal of Placnning Education and Research, Vol.
24.3 pp. 317-330.

Litman T. (2009), "Economic value of walkability", Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

Lo R. H. (2009), "Walkability: what is it?", Journal of Urbanism: International

Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Vol 2.2, pp. 145-166.
122

Lynch K. (1960), "The Image of the City", Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Marshall S. (2005), "Streets and Patterns", London: Spon Press.

Marshall S. (2012), "Science, psuudo-science and urban design", Urban Design

International, Vol. 17.4, pp. 257-271.

Marshall W. E. and Garrick N. W. (2010), "Street network types and road safety: a study
of 24 California cities", Urban Design International Vol. 15, pp.133-147.

McCahill C. and Garrick N. W. (2008), "The applicability of space syntax to bicycle

facility planning", Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2074, pp. 46-51.

Moudon A. V., Hess M., Snyder M. C. and Stanilov K. (1997), "Effects of site design on
pedestrian travel in mixed-use, medium-density environments", Transportation Research
Record, Vol. 1578, pp.48-55.

Murrain P. (2002), "Understand urbanism and get off its back", Urban Design
International, Vol. 7, pp. 131-142.

National Association of City Transportation Officials (2013), "Urban Street Design

Guide", Washington D.C.: Island Press.

Nes A. V. and Zhaohui S. (2009), "Network typology, junction typology and spatial
configuration and their impacts on street vitality in Singapore", 7th International Space
Syntax Symposium in Stockholm.
121

Nelessen A.C. (1994), "Visions for a New American Dream", Chicago, IL: Planners
Press.

New York City Department of Transportation (2008), "Safe Streets for Seniors",
http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/safestreetsforseniors.pdf (last accessed on
26/04/2014).

Omer I. and Goldblatt R. (2012), "Urban spatial configuration and socio-economic

residential differentiation: The case of Tel Aviv", Computers, Environment and Urban
Systems, Vol 36.2, pp. 177-185.

Omer I. and Zafrir-Reuven O., (2010), "Street patterns and spatial integration of Israeli
cities", The Journal of Space Syntax, Vol. 1, pp. 280-295.

Ozbil A. (2013), "Modeling walking behavior in cities as based on street network and
land-use characteristics: the case of Istanbul", METU Journal of the Faculty of
Architecture, Vol. 30.2, pp. 17-33.

Ozbil A., Peponis J., Stone B, (2011), "Understanding the link between street
connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows", Urban Design International Vol. 16, 2,
125141.

Ozer O. and Kubat A.S. (2007), Walking initiatives: a quantitative movement analysis,
6th International Space Syntax Symposium in Istanbul.

127

Pagliardini N., Porta S. and Salingaros N. (2010), "Geospatial analysis and living urban
geometry", In: Jiang B. and Yao X. (eds), "Geospatial Analysis and Modeling of Urban
Environments", GeoJournal Library (99), Springer, New York, pp.331-355.

Penn A., Hillier B., Banister D. and Xu J. (1998), "Configurational modeling of urban
movement networks", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 25, pp.
59 84.

Peponis J., Allen D., Haynie D., Scoppa M. and Zhang Z. (2007), "Measuring the
configuration of street networks", 6th International Space Syntax Symposium in Istanbul.

Pereira R., Holand F., Medeiros V. and Barros A. (2012), "The use of space syntax in
urban transport analysis: limits and potentials", 8th International Space Syntax
Symposium in Santiago de Chile.

Porta S., Latora V., Wang F., Strano E., Cardillo A, Jacoviello V., Mesorra R. and
Scellato S. (2009), "Street centrality and densities of retail and services in Bologna,
Italy", Environment and Planning B, Vol. 36.3, pp.45-465.

Porta S., Romice O., Alexander M. J., Russel P. and Baird D. (2014), "Alterations in
scale: Patterns of change in main street networks across time and space". Urban Studies,
Vol. 51.16, pp. 3383-3400.

Raford N. (2003), Looking both ways: space syntax for pedestrian exposure forecasting
and collision risk analysis, 4th International Space Syntax Symposium in London.

121

Raford N. and Ragland D. R. (2003), "Space syntax: an innovative pedestrian volume

modeling tool for pedestrian safety", Paper 04-2977, Annual Meeting of the
Transportation Review Board.

Raford N. and Ragland D. R. (2006), "Pedestrian volume modeling for traffic safety and
exposure analysis: case of Boston, Massachusetts" Transportation Research Board 85th
Annual Meeting.

Ratti C. (2004), "Space syntax: some inconsistencies", Environment and Planning B:

Planning and Design, Vol 31.4, pp.487-499.

Read S. (1999), "Space syntax and the Dutch city", Environment and Planning B:
Planning and Design, Vol. 26, pp. 251264.

Saelens B. and Handy S. (2008) "Built environments correlates of walking: a review",

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 40 (suppl 7), pp. 550-566.

Saelens B., J. Sallis and L. Frank. (2003) "Environmental correlates of walking and
cycling: findings from the transportation and urban design and planning literatures",
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 25.2, pp. 85-91.

Sauter D. (2010), "Measuring walking: Towards internationally standardised monitoring

methods", Pedestrians' Quality Needs, Part B4, Documentation measuring walking.

121

Scholefield M. (2007), Exceeding expectations: The growth of walking in Vancouver

and creating a more walkable city in the future through EcoDensity, 8th International
Walk 21 Conference in Toronto.

Schweizer T. (2005), "Methods for counting pedestrians", 6th International Walk 21

Conference in Zurich.

Solecki W., Seto K. C. and Marcottulio J. (2013), "It's time for an urbanization science",
Environment, Vol. 55.1, pp.12-17.

Talen E. (2003), "Neighborhoods as service providers: a methodology for evaluating

pedestrian access", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2003, Vol. 30.2,
pp. 181-200.

Thomson R. C. (2003), "Bending the axial line: smoothly continuous road centre-line
segments as a basis for road network analysis", 4th International Space Syntax
Symposium in London.

Turner A. (2007), "From axial to road-centre lines: a new representation for space
syntax and a new model of route choice for transport network analysis", Environment
and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 34.3, pp. 539-555.

Turner A., Penn A. and Hillier B. (2005), "An algorithmic definition of the axial map",
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 32, pp. 425-444.

122

Veras A. and Amorim L. (2005), New Urbanism: ideals and urban configuration, 5th
International Space Syntax Symposium in Delft.

Welter V. (2009), "The 1925 master plan for Tel-Aviv by Patrick Geddes", Israel Studies,
Vol. 14.3, pp.94-119.

Zook J. B., Lu Y., Glanz K. and Zimring C. (2012), "Design and pedestrianism in a
smart growth development", Environment and Behavior, Vol. 44.2, pp. 216 -234.

121

 ' . 02
( )R , . ,
12 . ,P<0.01 . ()
P<0.05 () .

1. .

2. .

122

 3. .

121

 4. .

122

 5. .

6. .

122

 ' . 02
21- ( 1
) ( .)R .P<0.01
.
1. .

121